An Integrative Developmental Framework for Studying Gender Inequities in Politics

References

• Abendschön, S. (2017). Children and politics. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(2), 163–166. doi:10.1177/0002764216689119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abendschön, S., & Tausendpfund, M. (2017). Political knowledge of children and the role of sociostructural factors. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(2), 204–221. doi:10.1177/0002764216689122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Canada: The University of Manitoba Press.
   Google Scholar
• Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality”. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 47–92). San Diego, California: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, N. C. Z., Martin, C. L., Field, R. D., Cook, R. E., & Lee, J. (2016). Development of expectancies about own- and other-gender group interactions and their school-related consequences. Child Development, 87(5), 1423–1435. doi:10.1111/cdev.12596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anzia, S. F., & Berry, C. R. (2011). The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson effect: Why do congresswomen outperform congressmen? American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 478–493. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00512.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayman, R., & Korabik, K. (2010). Leadership: Why gender and culture matter. American Psychologist, 65(3), 157–170. doi:10.1037/a0018806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, S., Zuo, X., Lou, C., Acharya, R., & Lundgren, R. (2017). Learning to be gendered: Gender socialization in early adolescence among urban poor in Delhi, India, and Shanghai, China. Journal of Adolescent Health, 61(4S), S24–S29. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaman, L., Chattopadhyay, R., Duflo, E., Pande, R., & Topalova, P. (2009). Powerful women: Does exposure reduce bias? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4), 1497–1540. doi:10.1162/qjec.2009.124.4.1497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaman, L., Duflo, E., Pande, R., & Topalova, P. (2012). Female leadership raises aspirations and educational attainment for girls: A policy experiment in India. Science, 335(6068), 582–586. doi:10.1126/science.1212382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhard, R., Holman, M., Shames, S., & Teele, D. L. (2019). Beyond ambition. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 7(4), 815–816. doi:10.1080/21565503.2019.1678883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand, M. (2019). The gender socialization of children growing up in nontraditional families. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 109, 115–121. doi:10.1257/pandp.20191077
   Google Scholar
• Bialik, K. (2019). For the fifth time in a row, the new Congress is the most racially and ethnically diverse ever. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/02/08/for-the-fifth-time-in-a-row-the-new-congress-is-the-most-racially-and-ethnically-diverse-ever/.
   Google Scholar
• Bian, L., Leslie, S.-J., & Cimpian, A. (2017). Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science, 355(6323), 389–391. doi:10.1126/science.aah6524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigler, R. S. (1995). The role of classification skill in moderating environmental influences on children’s gender stereotyping: A study of the functional use of gender in the classroom. Child Development, 66(4), 1072–1087. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00923.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigler, R. S., Arthur, A. E., Hughes, J. M., & Patterson, M. M. (2008). The politics of race and gender: Children’s perceptions of discrimination and the US Presidency. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 8(1), 83–112. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2008.00161.x
   Google Scholar
• Bigler, R. S., Hayes, A. R., & Hamilton, V. (2014). The role of schools in the early socialization of gender differences. In Encyclopedia on early childhood development. https://www.child-encyclopedia.com/
   Google Scholar
• Blažev, M., Karabegović, M., Burušić, J., & Selimbegović, L. (2017). Predicting gender-STEM stereotyped beliefs among boys and girls from prior school achievement and interest in STEM school subjects. Social Psychology of Education, 20(4), 831–847. doi:10.1007/s11218-017-9397-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleeker, M. M., & Jacobs, J. E. (2004). Achievement in math and science: Do mothers’ beliefs matter 12 years later? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 97–109. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, K., Gonzalez, A. M., Schmader, T., & Baron, A. S. (2018). Early gender differences in core values predict anticipated family versus career orientation. Psychological Science, 29(9), 1540–1547. doi:10.1177/0956797618776942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos, A. L., Schneider, M. C., & Utz, B. L. (2018). Navigating the political labyrinth: Gender stereotypes and prejudice in U.S. elections. In C. B. Travis, J. W. White, A. Rutherford, W. S. Williams, S. L. Cook, & K. F. Wyche (Eds.), APA handbook of the psychology of women: Perspectives on women’s private and public lives (Vol. 2, pp. 367–384). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Boston, J. S., & Cimpian, A. (2018). How do we encourage gifted girls to pursue and succeed in science and engineering. Gifted Child Today, 41(4), 138–196. doi:10.1177/1076217518786955
   Google Scholar
• Brechenmacher, S. (2018). Tackling Women's Underrepresentation in US Politics: Comparative Perspectives from Europe. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Brenan, M. (January, 2020). Women still handle main household tasks in U.S. Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/283979/women-handle-main-household-tasks.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 514, 513–531. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513
   Google Scholar
• Burns, N., Verba, S., & Lehman, K. (2001). The private roots of public action: Gender, equality, and political participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. E., & Wolbrecht, C. (2006). See Jane Run: Women politicians as role models for adolescents. The Journal of Politics, 68(2), 233–247. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00402.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, J., & Banaji, M. R. (2017). Social inferences from group size. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 204–211. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnes, N. (2018). The cash ceiling: Why only the rich run for office—And what we can do about it. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, A., & Teten, R. L. (2002). Assessing changing views of the president: Revisiting Greenstein’s Children and Politics. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 32(3), 453–462. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5705.2002.tb00001.x
   Google Scholar
• Cassese, E. C., Bos, A. L., & Schneider, M. C. (2014). Whose American Government? A quantitative analysis of gender and authorship in American Politics Texts. Journal of Political Science Education, 10(3), 253–272. doi:10.1080/15512169.2014.921655
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-a-scientist test. Science Education, 67(2), 255–265. doi:10.1002/sce.3730670213
   Google Scholar
• Chang, A., Sandhofer, C. M., & Brown, C. S. (2011). Gender biases in early number exposure to preschool-aged children. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 30(4), 440–450. doi:10.1177/0261927X11416207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charafeddine, R., Mercier, H., Yamada, T., Matsui, T., Sudo, M., Germain, P., … Van der Henst, J.-B. (2019). Cross-cultural differences in the valuing of dominance by young children. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 19(3–4), 256–272. doi:10.1163/15685373-12340058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charafeddine, R., Zambrana, I. M., Triniol, B., Mercier, H., Clément, F., Kaufmann, L., … Van der Henst, J.-B. (2020). How preschoolers associate power with gender in male-female interactions: A cross-cultural investigation. Sex Roles, 83(7–8), 453–473. doi:10.1007/s11199-019-01116-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, K. K., Guryan, J., & Pan, J. (2018). The effects of sexism on American women: The role of norms vs. discrimination. Chicago, IL: Becker Friedman Institute for Economics, University of Chicago. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3233788.
   Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay, R., & Duflo, E. (2004). Women as policy makers: Evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India. Econometrica, 72(5), 1409–1443. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00539.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S., & Markus, H. R. (2020). Masculine defaults: Identifying and mitigating hidden cultural biases. Psychological Review, 127(6), 1022–1052. doi:10.1037/rev0000209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S., Meltzoff, A. N., & Kim, S. (2011). Classrooms matter: The design of virtual classrooms influences gender disparities in computer science classes. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1825–1835. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1–35. doi:10.1037/bul0000052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chestnut, E. K., & Markman, E. M. (2018). “Girls are as good as boys at math” implies that boys are probably better: A study of expressions of gender equality. Cognitive Science, 42(7), 2229–2249. doi:10.1111/cogs.12637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chhin, C. S., Bleeker, M. M., & Jacobs, J. E. (2009). Gender-typed occupational choices: The long-term impact of parents’ beliefs and expectations. In H. M. G. Watt & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Gender and occupational outcomes: Longitudinal assessments of individual, social, and cultural influences (pp. 215–234). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Childs, S., & Hughes, M. (2018). “Which men?” How an intersectional perspective on men and masculinities helps explain women’s political underrepresentation. Politics & Gender, 14(2), 282–287. doi:10.1017/S1743923X1800017X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimpian, J. R., Kim, T. H., & McDermott, Z. T. (2020). Understanding persistent gender gaps in STEM. Science, 368(6497), 1317–1319. doi:10.1126/science.aba7377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, A. (2018). Do gender quotas really reduce bias? Evidence from a policy experiment in Southern Africa. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 5(3), 182–194. doi:10.1017/XPS.2018.8
   Google Scholar
• Cogsdill, E. J., Todorov, A. T., Spelke, E. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2014). Inferring character from faces: A developmental study. Psychological Science, 25(5), 1132–1139. doi:10.1177/0956797614523297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. The American Psychologist, 64(3), 170–180. doi:10.1037/a0014564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, R. E., Martin, C. L., Nielson, M. G., & Xiao, S. X. (in press). Contemporary cognitive approaches to gender development: New schemas, new directions, and new conceptualizations of gender. In D. Vanderlaan & I. W. Wong (Eds.), Gender and sexuality development. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T. E. (1985). The bear market in political socialization and the costs of misunderstood psychological theories. American Political Science Review, 79(4), 1079–1093. doi:10.2307/1956249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correll, S. J. (2001). Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1691–1730. doi:10.1086/321299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–168. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8/
   Google Scholar
• Croft, A., Schmader, T., Block, K., & Baron, A. S. (2014). The second shift reflected in the second generation: Do parents’ gender roles at home predict children’s aspirations? Psychological Science, 25 (7), 1418–1428. doi:10.1177/0956797614533968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley, K., Callanan, M., Tenenbaum, H. R., & Allen, E. (2001). Parents explain more often to boys than to girls during shared scientific thinking. Psychological Science, 12(3), 258–261. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cvencek, D., Meltzoff, A. N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2011). Math-gender stereotypes in elementary school children. Child Development, 82(3), 766–779. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01529.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlbom, L., Jakobsson, A., Jakobsson, N., & Kotsadam, A. (2011). Gender and overconfidence: Are girls really overconfident? Applied Economics Letters, 18(4), 325–327. doi:10.1080/13504851003670668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• del Río, M. F., & Strasser, K. (2013). Preschool children’s beliefs about gender differences in academic skills. Sex Roles, 68(3–4), 231–238. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0195-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch, F. M., Servis, L. J., & Payne, J. D. (2001). Paternal participation in child care and its effects on children’s self-esteem and attitudes toward gendered roles. Journal of Family Issues, 22(8), 1000–1024. doi:10.1177/019251301022008003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekman, A. B., Brown, E. R., Johnston, A. M., & Clark, E. K. (2010). Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics careers. Psychol Sci, 21(8), 1051–1057. doi:10.1177/0956797610377342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekman, A. B., Clark, E. K., Johnston, A. M., Brown, E. R., & Steinberg, M. (2011). Malleability in communal goals and beliefs influences attraction to STEM careers: Evidence for a goal congruity perspective. J Pers Soc Psychol, 101(5), 902–918. doi:10.1037/a0025199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittmar, K., Sanbonmatsu, K., Carroll, S. J., Walsh, D., & Wineinger, C. (2017). Representation matters: Women in the U.S. Congress. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for American Women and Politics.
   Google Scholar
• Döring, A. K., Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Groenen, P. J. F., Glatzel, V., Harasimczuk, J., … Bilsky, W. (2015). Cross-cultural evidence of value structures and priorities in childhood. British Journal of Psychology, 106(4), 675–699. doi:10.1111/bjop.12116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 33(October), 41–113. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80004-6
   Google Scholar
• Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., Du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 75–93. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunham, Y., Baron, A. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2016). The development of implicit gender attitudes. Developmental Science, 19(5), 781–789. doi:10.1111/desc.12321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Heilman, M. E. (2016). Gender and leadership: Introduction to the special issue. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 349–353. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.109.3.573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., Nater, C., Miller, D. I., Kaufmann, M., & Sczesny, S. (2020). Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. The American Psychologist, 75(3), 301–315. doi:10.1037/amp0000494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children’s self- and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64(3), 830–847. doi:10.2307/1131221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enright, E. A., Gweon, H., & Sommerville, J. A. (2017). ‘To the victor go the spoils’: Infants expect resources to align with dominance structures. Cognition, 164, 8–21. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, S., & Stenner, K. (1997). Perceived threat and authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 18(4), 741–770. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., & Markus, H. R. (2012). Introduction: A wide-angle lens on the psychology of social class. In S. T. Fiske & H. R. Markus (Eds.), Facing social class: How societal rank influences interaction (pp. 1–11). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, C. A., & Sherrod, L. R. (1995). Youth political development: An introduction. Reading Research Quarterly. Retrieved from doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1998.tb01229.x.
   Google Scholar
• Fort, D. C., & Varney, H. L. (1989). How students see scientists: Mostly male, mostly white, and mostly benevolent. Science and Children, 26(8), 8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, R. L., & Lawless, J. L. (2005). To run or not to run for office: Explaining nascent political ambition. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 642–659. doi:10.2307/3647737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, R. L., & Lawless, J. L. (2014). Uncovering the origins of the gender gap in political ambition. American Political Science Review, 108(3), 421–499. doi:10.1017/S0003055414000227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulcher, M., Sutfin, E. L., & Patterson, C. J. (2008). Individual differences in gender development: Associations with parental sexual orientation, attitudes, and division of labor. Sex Roles, 58(5–6), 330–341. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9348-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghavami, N., Katsiaficas, D., & Rogers, L. O. (2016). Toward an intersectional approach in developmental science. The role of race, gender, sexual orientation, and immigrant status. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 50, 31–73. doi:10.1016/bs.acdb.2015.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghavami, N., & Peplau, L. A. (2013). An intersectional analysis of gender and ethnic stereotypes: Testing three hypotheses. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(1), 113–127. doi:10.1177/0361684312464203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girl Scout Research Institute. (2019). Decoding the digital girl. Retrieved from https://www.girlscouts.org/content/dam/girlscouts-gsusa/forms-and-documents/about-girl-scouts/research/GSUSA_GSRI_Decoding-the-Digital-Girl_Full-Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Girl Scouts Research Institute. (2008). Change It Up! What girls say about redefining leadership. Retrieved from https://www.girlscouts.org/content/dam/girlscouts-gsusa/forms-and-documents/about-girl-scouts/research/change_it_up_executive_summary_english.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Girl Scouts Research Institute. (2014). Running for a change: Girls and politics pulse poll. Retrieved from https://www.girlscouts.org/content/dam/girlscouts-gsusa/forms-and-documents/about-girl-scouts/research/girls_and_politics.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Glazier, J. J., Gülgöz, S., & Olson, K. R. (2020). Gender encoding in gender diverse and gender conforming children. Child Development, 91(6), 1877–1885. doi:10.1111/cdev.13399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenstein, F. I. (1965). Children and politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenstein, F. I. (1970). A note on the ambiguity of “political socialization”: Definitions, criticisms, and strategies of inquiry. The Journal of Politics, 32(4), 969–978. doi:10.2307/2128390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidetti, M., Carraro, L., & Castelli, L. (2017). An exploration of the differential effects of parents’ authoritarianism dimensions on pre-school children’s epistemic, existential, and relational needs. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 2079. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gülgöz, S., & Gelman, S. A. (2017). Who’s the boss? Concepts of social power across development. Child Development, 88(3), 946–963. doi:10.1111/cdev.12643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gülgöz, S., Glazier, J. J., Enright, E. A., Alonso, D. J., Durwood, L. J., Fast, A. A., … Olson, K. R. (2019). Similarity in transgender and cisgender children’s gender development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(49), 24480–24485. doi:10.1073/pnas.1909367116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). The role of parents and teachers in the development of gender-related math attitudes. Sex Roles, 66(3–4), 153–166. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9996-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halim, M. L. D., Ruble, D. N., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Shrout, P. E., & Amodio, D. M. (2017). Gender attitudes in early childhood: Behavioral consequences and cognitive antecedents. Child Development, 88(3), 882–899. doi:10.1111/cdev.12642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halim, M. L. D., Walsh, A. S., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Zosuls, K. M., & Ruble, D. N. (2018). The roles of self-socialization and parent socialization in toddlers’ gender-typed appearance. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(8), 2277–2285. doi:10.1007/s10508-018-1263-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halim, M. L., Ruble, D. N., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Zosuls, K. M., Lurye, L. E., & Greulich, F. K. (2014). Pink frilly dresses and the avoidance of all things “girly”: Children’s appearance rigidity and cognitive theories of gender development. Developmental Psychology, 50(4), 1091–1101. doi:10.1037/a0034906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halim, N., Yount, K. M., Cunningham, S. A., & Pande, R. P. (2016). Women’s political empowerment and investments in primary schooling in India. Social Indicators Research, 125(3), 813–851. doi:10.1007/s11205-015-0870-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, M. D., & Cimpian, A. (2021). “Wonderful but weak”: Children’s ambivalent attitudes toward women. Sex Roles, 84(1–2), 76–90. doi:10.1007/s11199-020-01150-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawley, P. H. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19(1), 97–132. doi:10.1006/drev.1998.0470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawley, P. H. (2015). Social dominance in childhood and its evolutionary underpinnings: Why it matters and what we can do. Pediatrics, 135(Supplement), S31–S38. doi:10.1542/peds.2014-3549D
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heck, I.A., Bas, J., & Kinzler, K.D. (2021, April). Small groups lead, big groups control. Perceptions of numerical group size, power, and status across development. Talk presented at the Society for Research in Child Development Bi-annual Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Heck, I. A., Kushnir, T., & Kinzler, K. D. (2021). Social sampling: Children track social choices to reason about status hierarchies. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/xge0001008
   Google Scholar
• Hellmer, K., Stenberg, G., & Fawcett, C. (2018). Preschoolers’ conformity (and its motivation) is linked to own and parents’ personalities. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 36(4), 573–588. doi:10.1111/bjdp.12243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilliard, L. J., & Liben, L. S. (2010). Differing levels of gender salience in preschool classrooms: Effects on children’s gender attitudes and intergroup bias. Child Development, 81(6), 1787–1798. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01510.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, J. M. (2017). Most Americans see value in steering children toward toys, activities associated with opposite gender. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/12/19/most-americans-see-value-in-steering-children-toward-toys-activities-associated-with-opposite-gender/.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, L. C., Rose, J. C., & Barbarin, O. A. (2013). Raising African American boys: An exploration of gender and racial socialization practices. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 83(2-3), 218–230. doi:10.1111/ajop.12031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddy, L., & Capelos, T. (2002). Gender stereotyping and candidate evaluation. In V. C. Ottati, R. S. Tindale, J. Edwards, F. B. Bryant, L. Health, D. C. O’Connell, & E. J. Posavac (Eds.), The social psychology of politics. Social psychological applications to social issues (pp. 29–53). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, D., Rodriguez, J., Smith, E. P., Johnson, D. J., Stevenson, H. C., & Spicer, P. (2006). Parents’ ethnic-racial socialization practices: A review of research and directions for future study. Developmental Psychology, 42(5), 747–770. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.5.747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, M. (2007). The persistent problem of colorism: Skin tone, Status, and Inequality. Sociology Compass, 1(1), 237–254. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00006.x
   Google Scholar
• Hussak, L. J., & Cimpian, A. (2018). Investigating the origins of political views: Biases in explanation predict conservative attitudes in children and adults. Developmental Science, 21(3), e12567–17. doi:10.1111/desc.12567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyman, H. (1959). Political socialization. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jaxon, J., Lei, R. F., Shachnai, R., Chestnut, E. K., & Cimpian, A. (2019). The acquisition of gender stereotypes about intellectual ability: Intersections with race. Journal of Social Issues, 75(4), 1192–1215. doi:10.1111/josi.12352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joel, D. (2021). Beyond the binary: Rethinking sex and the brain. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 122, 165–175. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.11.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joel, D., Persico, A., Salhov, M., Berman, Z., Oligschläger, S., Meilijson, I., & Averbuch, A. (2018). Analysis of human brain structure reveals that the brain “types” typical of males are also typical of females, and vice versa. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12(October), 318–399. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00399
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• John, S., Smith, H., Zack, E., Terrell, C., Whittaker, M., Pae, J., & Richie, R. (2016). The Impact of Ranked Choice Voting on Representation: How Ranked Choice Voting Affects Women and People of Color Candidates in California. Representation 2020: Parity for Women in Politics.
   Google Scholar
• Junn, J., & Brown, N. E. (2008). What revolution? Incorporating intersectionality in women and politics. In C. Wolbrecht, K. Beckwith, & L. Baldez (Eds.), Political women and American democracy (pp. 64–78). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kajanus, A., Afshordi, N., & Warneken, F. (2020). Children’s understanding of dominance and prestige in China and the UK. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(1), 23–34. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminsky, J., & White, T. J. (2007). Electoral Systems and Women's Representation in Australia. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 42(2), 185–201.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 616–642. doi:10.1037/a0023557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, T. J., McCord, R. S., Petersen, G. J., Young, I. P., & Ellerson, N. M. (2016). The American school superintendent: 2010 decennial study. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
   Google Scholar
• Krook, M. L. (2009). Quotas for women in politics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, J. L., & Fox, R. L. (2008). Why are women still not running for public office? Issues in Governance Studies, 16, 1–20. Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu//media/Files/rc/papers/2008/05_women_lawless_fox/05_women_lawless_fox.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, K. M., Crouter, A. C., & McHale, S. M. (2015). Links between family gender socialization experiences in childhood and gendered occupational attainment in young adulthood. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 90, 26–35. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2015.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lay, J. C., Holman, M. R., Bos, A. L., Greenlee, J. S., Oxley, Z. M., Buffett, A., … Al, E. T. (2021). TIME for kids to learn gender stereotypes: Analysis of gender and political leadership in a common social studies resource for children. Politics & Gender, 17(1), 1–22. doi:10.1017/S1743923X19000540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leaper, C. (2014). Parents’ socialization of gender in children. Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development, 2014(December), 1–5. https://www.child-encyclopedia.com/
   Google Scholar
• Leaper, C., & Farkas, T. (2015). The socialization of gender during childhood and adolescence. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization (pp. 541–565). New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lei, R. F., Leshin, R. A., & Rhodes, M. (2020). The development of intersectional social prototypes. Psychological Science, 31(8), 911–926. doi:10.1177/0956797620920360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, R. F., & Rhodes, M. (2021). Why social cognitive development research needs intersectionality. PsyArXiv. doi:10.31234/osf.io/ecdy8
   Google Scholar
• Leshin, R. A., Lei, R. F., Byrne, M., & Rhodes, M. (2021). Who is a typical woman? How race biases representations of gender across development. PsyArXiv. doi:10.31234/osf.io/d6gbw
   Google Scholar
• Liben, L. S., & Bigler, R. S. (2002). The developmental course of gender differentiation: Conceptualizing, measuring, and evaluating constructs and pathways. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67(2), 1–183. doi:10.1111/1540-5834.t01-1-00188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, Z., Woodward, A. L., & Kinzler, K. D. (2017). The origins of social categorization. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(7), 556–568. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukaszewski, A. W., Simmons, Z. L., Anderson, C., & Roney, J. R. (2016). The role of physical formidability in human social status allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(3), 385–406. doi:10.1037/pspi0000042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maccoby, E. E. (1988). Gender as a social category. Developmental Psychology, 24(6), 755–765. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.24.6.755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science Education, 95(5), 877–907. doi:10.1002/sce.20441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandalaywala, T. M., Tai, C., & Rhodes, M. (2020). Children’s use of race and gender as cues to social status. PLoS One, 15(6), e0234398. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0234398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D. (1971). Political socialization: The implicit assumptions questioned. British Journal of Political Science, 1(4), 453–465. doi:10.1017/S0007123400009248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C. L., & Fabes, R. A. (2001). The stability and consequences of young children’s same-sex peer interactions. Developmental Psychology, 37(3), 431–446. doi:10.1037//0012-1649.37.3.431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C. L., & Little, J. K. (1990). The relation of gender understanding to children’s sex-typed preferences and gender stereotypes. Child Development, 61(5), 1427–1439. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb02872.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C. L., & Ruble, D. N. (2010). Patterns of gender development. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 353–381. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C. L., Ruble, D. N., & Szkrybalo, J. (2002). Cognitive theories of early gender development. Psychological Bulletin, 128(6), 903–933. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, M. M., Molina-López, M. M., & Mateos de Cabo, R (2020). Explaining the gender gap in school principalship: A tale of two sides. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1741143220918258. doi:10.1177/1741143220918258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2016). Building bridges between psychological science and education: Cultural stereotypes, STEM, and equity. Prospects, 46(2), 215–234. doi:10.1007/s11125-017-9391-z
   Google Scholar
• Master, A., Cheryan, S., Moscatelli, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2017). Programming experience promotes higher STEM motivation among first-grade girls. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 160, 92–106. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer, E. L., Patrick, J., Britto, L. M., & Millar, H. (2016). Where are the women? A report on the status of women in the United States social studies standards. National Women's History Museum. https://www.womenshistory.org/sites/default/files/museum-assets/document/2018-01/NWHM_Status-of-Women-in-State-Social-Studies-Standards.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, J. D., & Schmidt, H. M. (2004). Gendered political socialization in four contexts: olitical interest and values among junior high school students in China, Japan, Mexico, and the United States. The Social Science Journal, 41(3), 393–407. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2004.04.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHale, S. M., Crouter, A. C., & Whiteman, S. D. (2003). The family contexts of gender development in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 12(1), 125–148. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenney, S., & Voogt, J. (2010). Technology and young children: How 4–7 year olds perceive their own use of computers. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 656–664. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midgette, A. J. (2020). Chinese and South Korean children’s moral reasoning regarding the fairness of a gendered household labor distribution. Developmental Psychology, 56(1), 91–102. doi:10.1037/dev0000854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. I., Nolla, K. M., Eagly, A. H., & Uttal, D. H. (2018). The development of children’s gender-science stereotypes: A meta-analysis of 5 decades of U.S. draw-a-scientist studies. Child Development, 89(6), 1943–1955. doi:10.1111/cdev.13039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. I., & Wai, J. (2015). The bachelor’s to Ph.D. STEM pipeline no longer leaks more women than men: A 30-year analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(37), 10–37. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00037
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murgatroyd, L. (1982). Gender and occupational stratification. The Sociological Review, 30(4), 574–602. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1982.tb00669.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muzzatti, B., & Agnoli, F. (2007). Gender and mathematics: Attitudes and stereotype threat susceptibility in Italian children. Developmental Psychology, 43(3), 747–759. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemi, R. G., & Hepburn, M. A. (1995). The rebirth of political socialization. Perspectives on Political Science, 24(1), 7–16. doi:10.1080/10457097.1995.9941860
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2004). Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Okimoto, T. G., & Brescoll, V. L. (2010). The price of power: Power seeking and backlash against female politicians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(7), 923–936. doi:10.1177/0146167210371949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivo, C. (2012). Bringing women in: Gender and American government and politics textbooks. Journal of Political Science Education, 8(2), 131–146. doi:10.1080/15512169.2012.667676
   Google Scholar
• Oppermann, E., Brunner, M., & Anders, Y. (2019). The interplay between preschool teachers’ science self-efficacy beliefs, their teaching practices, and girls’ and boys’ early science motivation. Learning and Individual Differences, 70, 86–99. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2019.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen Blakemore, J. E. (2003). Children’s beliefs about violating gender norms: Boys shouldn’t look like girls, and girls shouldn’t act like boys. Sex Roles, 48(9/10), 411–419. . doi:10.1023/A:1023574427720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks-Stamm, E. J., Henson, E. N., & Martiny, S. E. (2020). Girls’ perceptions of their mothers at work and home: Warm does not mean weak. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1–6. doi:10.1111/bjdp.12364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pate, J., & Fox, R. (2018). Getting past the gender gap in political ambition. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 156, 166–183. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2018.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, M. M. (2019). Children’s literature as a vehicle for political socialization: An examination of best-selling picture books 2012–2017. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 180(4–5), 231–250. doi:10.1080/00221325.2019.1635077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, M. M., & Bigler, R. S. (2006). Preschool children’s attention to environmental messages about groups: Social categorization and the origins of intergroup bias. Child Development, 77(4), 847–860. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00906.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, M. M., Bigler, R. S., Pahlke, E., Brown, C. S., Hayes, A. R., Ramirez, M. C., & Nelson, A. (2019). Toward a developmental science of politics. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 84(3), 7–185. doi:10.1111/mono.12410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, M. F., Fraile, M., & Rubal, M. (2015). Young and gapped? Political knowledge of girls and boys in Europe. Political Research Quarterly, 68(1), 63–76. doi:10.1177/1065912914554040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, B. L., Link, T., Boelter, C., & Leukefeld, C. (2012). Blinded to science: Gender differences in the effects of race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status on academic and science attitudes among sixth graders. Gender and Education, 24(7), 725–743. doi:10.1080/09540253.2012.685702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perszyk, D. R., Lei, R. F., Bodenhausen, G. V., Richeson, J. A., & Waxman, S. R. (2019). Bias at the intersection of race and gender: Evidence from preschool-aged children. Developmental Science, 22(3), 1–8. doi:10.1111/desc.12788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piscopo, J. M. (2019). The limits of leaning in: Ambition, recruitment, and candidate training in comparative perspective. Politics, Groups, and Identities, (4)7, 817–828. doi:10.1080/21565503.2018.1532917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preece, J. R. (2016). Mind the gender gap: An experiment on the influence of self-efficacy on political interest. Politics & Gender, 12(01), 198–217. doi:10.1017/S1743923X15000628
   Google Scholar
• Pun, A., Birch, S. A. J., & Baron, A. S. (2016). Infants use relative numerical group size to infer social dominance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(9), 2376–2381. doi:10.1073/pnas.1514879113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pun, A., Birch, S. A. J., & Baron, A. S. (2017). Foundations of reasoning about social dominance. Child Development Perspectives, 11(3), 155–160. doi:10.1111/cdep.12235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 377–391. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, P. C., Anzures, G., Izard, C. E., Lee, K., Pascalis, O., Slater, A. M., & Tanaka, J. W. (2011). Looking across domains to understand infant representation of emotion. Emotion Review, 3(2), 197–206. doi:10.1177/1754073910387941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, P. C., Lee, K., & Pascalis, O. (2019). Face processing in infancy and beyond: The case of social categories. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 165–189. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reifen-Tagar, M., Federico, C. M., Lyons, K. E., Ludeke, S., & Koenig, M. A. (2014). Heralding the authoritarian? Orientation toward authority in early childhood. Psychological Science, 25(4), 883–892. doi:10.1177/0956797613516470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reifen-Tagar, M., Hetherington, C., Shulman, D., & Koenig, M. (2017). On the path to social dominance? Individual differences in sensitivity to intergroup fairness violations in early childhood. Personality and Individual Differences, 113, 246–250. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuben, E., Rey-Biel, P., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2012). The emergence of male leadership in competitive environments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(1), 111–117. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M., & Gelman, S. A. (2009). A developmental examination of the conceptual structure of animal, artifact, and human social categories across two cultural contexts. Cognitive Psychology, 59(3), 244–274. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M., Leslie, S.-J., Bianchi, L., & Chalik, L. (2018). The role of generic language in the early development of social categorization. Child Development, 89(1), 148–155. doi:10.1111/cdev.12714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riegle-Crumb, C., Moore, C., & Ramos-Wada, A. (2011). Who wants to have a career in science or math? Exploring adolescents’ future aspirations by gender and race/ethnicity. Science Education, 95(3), 458–476. doi:10.1002/sce.20431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, S. O., Gelman, S. A., & Ho, A. K. (2017). So it is, so it shall be: Group regularities license children’s prescriptive judgments. Cognitive Science, 41, 525–576. doi:10.1111/cogs.12443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, S. O., Ho, A. K., Gülgöz, S., Berka, J., & Gelman, S. A. (2020). The roles of group status and group membership in the practice of hypodescent. Child Development, 91(3), e721–e732. doi:10.1111/cdev.13279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, S. O., & Rizzo, M. T. (2020). The psychology of American racism. American Psychologist. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/amp0000642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, S. O., Weisman, K., Lane, J. D., Williams, A., Camp, N. P., Wang, M., … Griffiths, C. (2020). God as a White man: A psychological barrier to conceptualizing Black people and women as leadership worthy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(6), 1290–1315. doi:10.1037/pspi0000233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosette, A. S., Leonardelli, G. J., & Phillips, K. W. (2008). The White standard: Racial bias in leader categorization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 758–777. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosette, A. S., & Livingston, R. W. (2012). Failure is not an option for Black women: Effects of organizational performance on leaders with single versus dual-subordinate identities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(5), 1162–1167. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruffman, T., Ruffman, C., Hill, S., Turunc, G., Park, N., Du, K., … Hunter, J. A. (2020). RWAc and SDOc: The measurement of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation in childhood. Social Development, 29(4), 1194–1214. doi:10.1111/sode.12438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saguy, T., Reifen-Tagar, M., & Joel, D. (2021). The gender-binary cycle: The perpetual relations between a biological-essentialist view of gender, gender ideology, and gender labeling and sorting. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1822), 20200141. doi:10.1098/rstb.2020.0141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanbonmatsu, K. (2017). Political parity: Research inventory. Retrieved from https://www.politicalparity.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Parity-Research-Full.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, C. E., & Toomey, R. B. (2018). Integrating an intersectionality lens in theory and research in developmental science. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2018(161), 7–15. doi:10.1002/cad.20245
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sapiro, V. (2004). Not your parents’ political socialization: Introduction for a new generation. Annual Review of Political Science, (1)7, 1–23. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saw, G., Chang, C. N., & Chan, H. Y. (2018). Cross-sectional and longitudinal disparities in STEM Career aspirations at the intersection of gender, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Educational Researcher, 47(8), 525–531. doi:10.3102/0013189X18787818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. C., & Bos, A. L. (2019). The application of social role theory to the study of gender in politics. Political Psychology, 40(S1), 173–213. doi:10.1111/pops.12573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. C., Holman, M. R., Diekman, A. B., & Mcandrew, T. (2016). Power, conflict, and community: How gendered views of political power influence women’s political ambition. Political Psychology, 37(4), 515–531. doi:10.1111/pops.12268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schyns, B., Tymon, A., Kiefer, T., & Kerschreiter, R. (2013). New ways to leadership development: A picture paints a thousand words. Management Learning, 44(1), 11–24. doi:10.1177/1350507612456499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sears, D. O., & Brown, C. (2013). Childhood and adult political development. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, & J. S. Levy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shames, S. (2015). Barriers and solutions to increasing women’s political power. Discussion Draft, 13.
   Google Scholar
• Shutts, K. (2015). Young children’s preferences: Gender, race, and social status. Child Development Perspectives, 9(4), 262–266. doi:10.1111/cdep.12154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shutts, K., Kenward, B., Falk, H., Ivegran, A., & Fawcett, C. (2017). Early preschool environments and gender: Effects of gender pedagogy in Sweden. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 162, 1–17. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.04.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shutts, K., Pemberton Roben, C. K., & Spelke, E. S. (2013). Children’s use of social categories in thinking about people and social relationships. Journal of Cognition and Development, 14(1), 35–62. doi:10.1080/15248372.2011.638686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, A. (2017). How can we explain the gender gap in children’s political knowledge? American Behavioral Scientist, 61(2), 222–237. doi:10.1177/0002764216689123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2005). Parents’ socializing behavior and children’s participation in math, science, and computer out-of-school activities. Applied Developmental Science, 9(1), 14–30. doi:10.1207/s1532480xads0901_3
   Google Scholar
• Solbes-Canales, I., Valverde-Montesino, S., & Herranz-Hernández, P. (2020). Socialization of gender stereotypes related to attributes and professions among young Spanish school-aged children. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 609–616. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somit, A., & Peterson, S. A. (1987). Political sociailzation’s primacy principle: A biosocial critique. International Political Science Review, 8(3), 205–213. doi:10.1177/019251218700800302
   Google Scholar
• Steffens, M. C., Jelenec, P., & Noack, P. (2010). On the leaky math pipeline: Comparing implicit math-gender stereotypes and math withdrawal in female and male children and adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 947–963. doi:10.1037/a0019920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromquist, N. P. (2007). The gender socialization process in schools: A cross-national comparison. Background paper prepared for the education for all Global Monitoring Report 2008 education for all by 2015: Will we make it? 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, J., Moss-Racusin, C., Lopez, M., & Williams, K. (2018). Backlash against gender stereotype-violating preschool children. PLoS One, 13(4), e0195503-24. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0195503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teele, D. L., Kalla, J., & Rosenbluth, F. (2018). The ties that double bind: Social roles and women’s underrepresentation in politics. American Political Science Review, 112(3), 525–541. doi:10.1017/S0003055418000217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terrizzi, B. F., Brey, E., Shutts, K., & Beier, J. S. (2019). Children’s developing judgments about the physical manifestations of power. Developmental Psychology, 55(4), 793–808. doi:10.1037/dev0000657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thijs, P., Te Grotenhuis, M., Scheepers, P., & van den Brink, M. (2019). The rise in support for gender egalitarianism in the Netherlands, 1979–2006: The roles of educational expansion, secularization, and female labor force participation. Sex Roles, 81(9–10), 594–609. doi:10.1007/s11199-019-1015-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, A. J., & King, C. T. (2007). Gendered racial socialization of African American mothers and daughters. The Family Journal, 15(2), 137–142. doi:10.1177/1066480706297853
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, A. J., Abramyan, M., Lukowski, A., Thomsen, L., & Sarnecka, B. W. (2016). Preferring the mighty to the meek: Toddlers prefer novel dominant agents. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 241–246.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, A. J., Thomsen, L., Lukowski, A. F., Abramyan, M., & Sarnecka, B. W. (2018). Toddlers prefer those who win but not when they win by force. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(9), 662–669. doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0415-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomsen, L. (2020). The developmental origins of social hierarchy: How infants and young children mentally represent and respond to power and status. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 201–208. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomsen, L., Frankenhuis, W. E., Ingold-Smith, M., & Carey, S. (2011). Big and mighty: Preverbal infants mentally represent social dominance. Science, 331(6016), 477–480. doi:10.1126/science.1199198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobin, D. D., Menon, M., Menon, M., Spatta, B. C., Hodges, E. V. E., & Perry, D. G. (2010). The intrapsychics of gender: A model of self-socialization. Psychological Review, 117(2), 601–622. doi:10.1037/a0018936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toscano, H., Schubert, T. W., & Sell, A. N. (2014). Judgments of dominance from the face track physical strength. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(1), 1–18. doi:10.1177/147470491401200101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tworek, C. M., & Cimpian, A. (2016). Why do people tend to infer “ought” from “is”? The role of biases in explanation. Psychological Science, 27(8), 1109–1122. doi:10.1177/0956797616650875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2020). The World's Women 2020: Trends and Statistics. https://worlds-women-2020-data-undesa.hub.arcgis.com/.
   Google Scholar
• UN Women. (2021). Facts and figures: Women’s leadership and political participation. https://www.unwomen.org/en/what-we-do/leadership-and-political-participation/facts-and-figures.
   Google Scholar
• UN Women. (2013). Women’s leadership and political participation. Retrieved from http://www.unwomen.org/en/what-we-do/leadership-and-political-participation.
   Google Scholar
• Van Deth, J. W., Abendschön, S., & Vollmar, M. (2011). Children and politics: An empirical reassessment of early political socialization. Political Psychology, 32(1), 147–174. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00798.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vial, A. C., Napier, J. L., & Brescoll, V. L. (2016). A bed of thorns: Female leaders and the self-reinforcing cycle of illegitimacy. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 400–414. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waxman, S. R. (2010). Names with never hurt me? Naming and the development of racial and gender categories in preschool-aged children. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 593–610. doi:10.1002/ejsp.732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegemer, C. M., & Vandell, D. L. (2020). Parenting, temperament, and attachment security as antecedents of political orientation: Longitudinal evidence from early childhood to age 26. Developmental Psychology, 56(7), 1360–1371. doi:10.1037/dev0000965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisman, K., Johnson, M. V., & Shutts, K. (2015). Young children’s automatic encoding of social categories. Developmental Science, 18(6), 1036–1043. doi:10.1111/desc.12269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolak, J. (2020). Self-confidence and gender gaps in political interest, attention, and efficacy. The Journal of Politics, 82(4), 1490–1501. doi:10.1086/708644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolbrecht, C., & Campbell, D. E. (2007). Leading by example: Female members of parliament as political role models. American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 921–939. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00289.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128(5), 699–727. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.5.699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2021). Global Gender Gap Report 2021. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2021.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, S. X., Cook, R. E., Martin, C. L., & Nielson, M. G. (2019). Characteristics of preschool gender enforcers and peers who associate with them. Sex Roles, 81(11–12), 671–685. doi:10.1007/s11199-019-01026-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S., Greer, L. L., Halevy, N., & van Bunderen, L. (2019). On ladders and pyramids: Hierarchy’s shape determines relationships and performance in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(12), 1717–1733. doi:10.1177/0146167219842867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zenger, Folkman. (2015). A study in leadership: Women do it better than men. Real Women, Real Leaders, 2015, 165–169. doi:10.1002/9781119207573.oth2
   Google Scholar
• Zitek, E. M., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2012). The fluency of social hierarchy: The ease with which hierarchical relationships are seen, remembered, learned, and liked. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 98–115. doi:10.1037/a0025345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zosuls, K. M., Ruble, D. N., & Tamis-Lemonda, C. S. (2014). Self-socialization of gender in African American, Dominican immigrant, and Mexican immigrant toddlers. Child Development, 85(6), 2202–2217. doi:10.1111/cdev.12261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zosuls, K. M., Ruble, D. N., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Shrout, P. E., Bornstein, M. H., & Greulich, F. K. (2009). The acquisition of gender labels in infancy: Implications for gender-typed play. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 688–701. doi:10.1037/a0014053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar