A Phenomenology of Depth

REFERENCES

• Aron, L. (1995). The internalized primal scene. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 5, 195–237.
   Google Scholar
• Aron, L. (2006). Analytic impasse and the third: Clinical implications of intersubjectivity theory. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 87, 349–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (1998). Shadow of the other. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond doer and done to: An intersubjective view of thirdness. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73, 5–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. (1962). Learning from experience. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. (1965). Transformations. London, UK: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. (1970). Attention and interpretation. London, UK: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Botella, C., & Botella, S. (2005). The work of psychic figurability: Mental states without representation (A. Weller , Trans.). Hove and New York: Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Britton, R. (2004). Subjectivity, objectivity, and triangular space. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73,47–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. M. (1998). Standing in the spaces. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. M. (2006). Awakening the dreamer. Mahwah, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. M. (2011). The shadow of the tsunami. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ferro, A. (2012). Creativity in the consulting room: Factors of fertility and infertility. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 32, 257–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foehl, J. C. (2008). Follow the fox: Edgar A. Levenson’s pursuit of psychoanalytic process. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 77, 1231–1268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foehl, J. C. (2011). A phenomenology of distance: On being hard to reach. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 21, 607–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1893–1895). Studies on hysteria. Standard Edition, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1895). Project for a scientific psychology. Standard Edition, 1, 281–391.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. Standard Edition, 4, 1–627.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1913). An evidentual dream. Standard Edition, 12, 267–277.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1915). The unconscious. Standard Edition, 14, 159–216.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. Standard Edition, 19, 1–66.
   Google Scholar
• Green, A. (1975). The analyst, symbolization and absence in the analytic setting. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 56, 1–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, A. (1999). The work of the negative. London, UK: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Green, A. (2000). Andre Green at the Squiggle Foundation. London, UK: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Green, A. (2004). Thirdness and psychoanalytic concepts. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73, 99–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, A. (2010). Thoughts on the Paris School of Psychosomatics. In M. Aisenstein & E. Rappoport de Aisenberg ( Eds.), Psychosomatics today: A psychoanalytic perspective (pp. 1–46). London, UK: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, I. (1992). Extending Sullivan’s interpersonalism. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 28, 732–747.
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, E. (1983). The ambiguity of change. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Loewald, H. W. (1980). Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardi, R. (2008). The body in the analytic session. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 89, 89–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matte Blanco, I. (1988). Thinking, feeling and being. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). The philosopher and his shadow. In R. C. McCleary (Trans.), Signs (pp. 159–181). Evanston, IL: Northwest Universities Press. (Original work published 1960)
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible (A. Lingis, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern Universities Press. (Original work published 1964)
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1971). Projet de travail sur la nature de la perception. In T. F. Garaets ( Ed.), Vers une Novelle Philosophie Transcendentale. The Hague, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff. (Original work published 1933)
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1973). Dialogue and the perception of the other (J. O’Neill, Trans.). In The prose of the world (pp. 131–146). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1969)
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1993a). Cézanne’s doubt. In G. A. Johnson ( Ed.), The Merleau-Ponty aesthetics reader (pp. 59–75). Evanston, IL: Northwestern Universities Press. (Original work published 1948)
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1993b). Eye and mind. In G. A. Johnson ( Ed.), The Merleau-Ponty aesthetics reader (pp. 121–149). Evanston, IL: Northwestern Universities Press. (Original work published 1961)
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). The phenomenology of perception (D. A. Landis, Trans.). London, UK: Routledge. (Original work published 1945)
   Google Scholar
• Minkowski, E. (1970). Lived time: Phenomenological and psychopathological studies (N. Metzel, Trans.) Evanston, IL: Northwestern Universities Press. (Original work published 1933)
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A. (1993). Hope and dread in psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. H. (1988). On the dialectical structure of experience—Some clinical and theoretical implications. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 24, 17–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. H. (1992). The dialectically constituted/decentred subject of psychoanalysis. I. The Freudian Subject. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 73, 517–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. H. (1994). The analytic third: Working with intersubjective facts. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75, 3–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. H. (2004). The analytic third: Implications for psychoanalytic theory and technique. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73, 167–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orange, D. (1995). Emotional understanding. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1957). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vols.1–8 (C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1904)
   Google Scholar
• Peltz, R. (2012). Ways of hearing: Getting inside psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 22, 279–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, B. E. (2009). Performative and enactive features of psychoanalytic witnessing: The transference as the scene of address. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 90, 1359–1372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, B. (2010). Enactive Fields: An approach to interaction in the Kleinian-Bionian model: Commentary on paper by Lawrence J. Brown. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 20, 695–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. (1970). Freud & philosophy: An essay on interpretation. (D. Savage , Trans.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. (1976). Interpretation theory: Discourse and the surplus of meaning. Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, J. (1983). Reflections on some relations between psychoanalytic concepts and psychoanalytic practice. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 64, 35–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (1992). The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, H. (1957). Notes on symbol formation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 38, 391–397.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steinbock, A. J. (1987). Merleau-Ponty’s concept of depth. Philosophy Today, 31, 336–351.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. B. (1997). Unformulated experience. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. B. (2010). Partners in thought. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wachtel, P. (2003). The surface and the depths: The metaphor of depth in psychoanalysis and the ways in which it can mislead. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 39, 5–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahavi, D. (1999). Self-awareness and alterity: A phenomenological investigation. Evanston, IL: Northwestern Universities Press.
   Google Scholar