The Things We Carry: Finding/Creating the Object and the Analyst’s Self-Reflective Participation

REFERENCES

• Aron, L. (1996). A meeting of minds: Mutual influence in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aron, L. (2006). Analytic impasse and the third: Clinical implications of intersubjectivity. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 87, 349–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balint, M. (1968). The basic fault: Therapeutic aspects of regression. London, UK: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Baranger, M. (1993). The mind of the analyst: From listening to interpretation. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 74, 15–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, A. (2001). It takes one to know one: Or, whose unconscious is it anyway? Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 11, 683–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, A. (2009). An independent theory of clinical technique viewed through a relational lens. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 19, 237–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, A., & Cooper, S. (2012). Relational psychoanalysis. In E. Auschincloss & E. Samberg ( Eds.), Psychoanalytic terms and concepts ( pp. 79–84). New York, NY: American Psychoanalytic Association.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond doer and done to: An intersubjective view of thirdness. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73, 5–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. (1991). On knowing one’s patient inside and out: The aesthetics of unconscious communication. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 1, 399–422.
   Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. (1998). Standing in the spaces: Essays on clinical process, trauma, and dissociation. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press
   Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. (2011). The shadow of the tsunami and the growth of the relational mind. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, S. (2012) The child as traumatic trigger: Commentary on paper by Laurel Moldawsky Silbur. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 22, 123–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L. (1992). Anthem. On the future. New York, NY: Sony.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, S. (2000). Mutual containment in the psychoanalytic process. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 10, 166–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, S. (2008). Privacy, reverie, and the analyst’s ethical imagination. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 77, 1045–1073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, S. (2010). A disturbance in the field: Essays in transference–countertransference. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, S. (2012). Exploring a patient’s shift from relative silence to verbal expressiveness: Observations on an element of the analyst’s participation. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 83, 97–116.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, K. (2001). Faggot = loser. Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 2, 3–28.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, K. (2009). Boyhood femininity, gender identity disorder, masculine presuppositions, and the anxiety of regulation. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 19, 353–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, J. (2004). Whose bad objects are we anyway?: Repetition and our elusive love affair with evil. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 14, 711–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faimberg, H. (1988). The telescoping of generations—Genealogy of certain identifications. Contemp. Psychoanalysis, 24, 99–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, R. (1952). Psychoanalytic studies of the personality. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. (1997). Projective identification: The analyst’s involvement. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 78, 227–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferenczi, S. (1988). The clinical diaries of Sandor Ferenczi (J. Dupont, ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferro, A. (2005). Seeds of illness. Seed of recovery. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foehl, J. C. (2010). The play’s the thing: The primacy of process and the persistence of pluralism. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 46, 48–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foehl, J. C. (2011). A phenomenology of distance: On being hard to reach. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 21, 607–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, L. (2007). The delicate balance of work and illusion in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 76, 817–833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghent, E. (1989). Credo - the dialectics of one-person and two-person psychologies. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 25, 169–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, A. (2005). Key ideas for contemporary psychoanalysis: Misrecognition and recognition of the unconscious. Hove, UK: Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. (1995). Psychoanalytic technique and the interactive matrix. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 64, 1–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2009). “You must remember this. ” Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 19, 2–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2011). The relational tradition: Landscape and canon. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 59, 701–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, I. (2009). Therapeutic passion in the countertransference. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 19, 619–637.
   Google Scholar
• LaFarge, L. (2004). The imaginer and the imagined. Psychoanalysis, 73, 591–625.
   Google Scholar
• Lanzman, C. (2012). The man who stood witness for the world. The Guardian, March 3, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, H. (2013). Comparing field theories. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 23, 667–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. (1991). Needs, wishes and interpersonal negotiation. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 11, 147–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. (1997). Influence and autonomy in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Modell, A. H. (1963). Primitive object relationships and the predisposition to schizophrenia. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 44, 282–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modell, A. H. (1976). The holding environment and the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 24, 285–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Money-Kyrle, R. E. (1968). Cognitive development. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 49, 691–698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. (1994a). The analytic third: Working with intersubjective clinical facts. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75, 3–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. (1994b). Psychoanalysis and interpretive action. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 63, 219–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. (2004). The analytic third: Implications for psychoanalytic theory and technique. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73, 167–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. (2012). Creative readings: Essays on seminal analytic works. London, UK: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, M. (2007). Raiding the inarticulate: The analytic setting and listening beyond contertransference. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 88, 1441–1456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racker, H. (1968). Transference and countertransference. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, J. (1976). Countertransference and role-responsiveness. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 3, 43–50.
   Google Scholar
• Searles, H. (1979). Countertransference and related subjects. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, S. (2013). Paying attention and feeling puzzled: Chaos, creativiity and the anlayst’s effectivenss. Psychoanalytic Dialogues.
   Google Scholar
• Slochower, J. (1996). Holding and the fate of the analyst’s subjectivity. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 6, 323–353.
   Google Scholar
• Spezzano, C. (2007). A home for the mind. Psychoanalysis Quarterly, 76, 1563–1583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, D. (1997). Unformulated experience. In Dissociation to imagination in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. (2009). Partners in thought: Working with unformulated experience, dissociation, and enactment. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tublin, D. (2010). Partners in thought: Working with unformulated experience, dissociation and enactment. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tublin, S. (2011). Discipline and freedom in relational technique. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 47, 519–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, D. F. (2005). Arts and letters. Daily, p.1.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. (1965). Ego distortion in terms of true and false self. In The maturational process and the facilitating environment: Studies in the theory of emotional development ( pp. 140–152). New York, NY: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar