The Analyst’s Private Space: Spontaneity, Ritual, Psychotherapeutic Action, and Self-Care

REFERENCES

• Baranger, M., & Baranger, W., (2008). The analytic situation as a dynamic field. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 89, 796–826.
   Google Scholar
• Bass, A. (1996). Holding, holding back, and holding on: Commentary on paper by Joyce Slochower. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 6, 361–378.
   Google Scholar
• Bass, A. (2007). When the frame doesn’t fit the picture. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 17, 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (1997). The shadow of the other. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond the doer and done to: An intersubjective view of thirdness. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73, 5–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. (1959). Attacks on linking. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 40, 308–315.
   Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. (1962). The psycho-analytic study of thinking. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 43, 306–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. (1998). Standing in the spaces: Essays on clinical process trauma and dissociation. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. (2006). Awakening the dreamer: Clinical journeys. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. (2011). The shadow of the tsunami: and the growth of the relational mind. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, S. (2010). A disturbance in the field: Essays in transference-countertransference engagement. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, K. (2001). More life: Centrality and marginality in human development. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 11, 313–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, D. (1992). The intimate edge: Extending the reach of psychoanalytic interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1943). Reply to Mrs. Isaac’s “The nature and function of phantasy.” In P. Kind & R. Steiner ( Eds.), The Freud-Klein Controversies, 1941–1945 ( pp. 358–360). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1944). Endopsychic structure considered in terms of object-relationships. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 25, 70–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1952). Psychoanalytic studies of the personality. London, UK: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Ferro, A. (1999). The bi-personal field. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ferro, A. (2002). Superego transformations through the analyst’s capacity for reverie. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 71, 477–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferro, A. (2006). Trauma, reverie, and the field. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 75, 1045–1056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferro, A., & Basile, R. (2008). Countertransference and the characters of the psychoanalytic session. The Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 31, 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1914). Remembering, repeating and working-through (further recommendations on the technique of psycho-analysis II). Standard Edition, 12, 145–156.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1930). Civilization and its discontents. Standard Edition, 21, 57–146.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J. (1991). Region of unlikeness. New York, NY: Ecco.
   Google Scholar
• Grossmark, R. (2012). The unobtrusive relational analyst, Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 22, 629–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, I. Z. (1998). Ritual and spontaneity in the psychoanalytic process: A dialectical-constructivist view. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, I. Z. (2006). Forging difference out of similarity: The multiplicity of corrective experience. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 75, 715–751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, I. Z. (2009). Therapeutic passion in the countertransference. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 19, 617–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaacs, S. (1943). The nature and function of phantasy. In P. King & R. Steiner ( Eds.), The Freud-Klein Controversies 1941-1945 ( pp. 264–321). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Issacs, S. (1952). The nature and function of phantasy. In J. Riviere ( Ed.), Developments in Psycho-Analysis ( pp. 62–121). London, UK: Hogarth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis: An integration. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. (1995). Hope and dread in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. (2003). Relationality: From attachment to intersubjectivity. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. H. (2012). Creative readings. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Slochower, J. (2004). Holding and psychoanalysis: A relational approach. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slochower, J. (2006). Psychoanalytic Collisions. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. (1997) Unformulated experience: From dissociation to imagination in psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. (2010). Partners in thought: Working with unformulated experience, dissociation, and enactment. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. (2013a). Relational freedom and therapeutic action. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic, 61, 227–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, D. (2013b). Field theory in psychoanalysis, Part 1: Harry Stack Sullivan and Madeleine and Willy Baranger. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 23, 487–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, D. (2013c). Field theory in psychoanalysis, Part 2: Bionian field theory and contemporary interpersonal/relational psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 23, 630–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, H. S. (1940). Conceptions of modern psychiatry. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1958). The capacity to be alone. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 39, 416–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and reality. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar