Publication Cover
Psychoanalytic Dialogues
The International Journal of Relational Perspectives
Volume 26, 2016 - Issue 2
105
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Discursive Underside of Psychoanalysis: Comments on Cooper’s “Blurring Boundaries”

, Ph.D.

REFERENCES

  • Arlow, J. (1963). The supervisory situation. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 11, 576–594. doi:10.1177/000306516301100306
  • Atlas, G. (2015). Touch me, know me: The enigma of erotic longing. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 32(1), 123–139. doi:10.1037/a0037182
  • Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
  • Bick, E. (1968). The experience of the skin in early object-relations. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 49, 484–486.
  • Bion, W. (1970). Attention and interpretation. London, UK: Tavistock.
  • Bloom, H. (1973). The anxiety of influence: A theory of poetry. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Britton, R. (1989). The missing link: Parental sexuality in the Oedipus complex. In J. Steiner (Ed.), The oedipus complex today: Clinical implications (pp. 83–101). London, UK: Karnac.
  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Cooper, S. (2010). A disturbance in the field: Essays in transference-countertransference engagement. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Cooper, S. (2016). The analyst’s experience of the depressive position: The melancholic errand of psychoanalysis. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Dimen, M. (2003). Sexuality intimacy power. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Dylan, B. (1983). License to kill. New York, NY: Columbia Records.
  • Elise, D. (2015a). Psychic riptides: Swimming sideways: Reply to Dimen, Gabbard, and Harris. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 25, 593–599. doi:10.1080/10481885.2015.1077049
  • Elise, D. (2015b). Reclaiming lost loves: Transcending unrequited desires. Discussion of Davies’ “Oedipal Complexity. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 25, 284–294. doi:10.1080/10481885.2015.1034549
  • Federn, P. (1952). Ego psychology and the psychoses. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. Standard Edition, 19, 3–66.
  • Freud, S. (1930). Civilization and its discontents. Standard Edition, 21, 59–145.
  • Freud, S. (1933). New introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. Standard Edition, 22, 3–182.
  • Gabbard, G., & Lester, E. (1995). Boundaries and boundary violations in psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Galatzer-Levy, R. (2015). Exploring Boundaries: From Psychoanalysis to Fractals and Back. Presented to Massachusetts Institute of Psychoanalysis, May 16, 2015.
  • Giesbrecht, H., & Levin, C. (2012). Art in the offertorium: Narcissism, psychoanalysis and cultural metaphysics. New York, NY: Rodopi.
  • Harris, A. (2009). You must remember this. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 19, 2–21. doi:10.1080/10481880802634537
  • Harris, A. (in press). Boundary violations: The assaults on thinking: Consequences and remedies. In C. Levin (Ed.), Boundary trouble in psychoanalysis: Clinical and social dimensions of the ‘Primal Crime.’ New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Jacobson, E. (1964). The self and the object world. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
  • Levin, C. (2003). Containing the container: Some experiential aspects of narcissism and the problem of “Primary Undifferentiation.”. Israel Psychoanalytic Journal, 1, 167–202.
  • Levin, C. (2012). Psychophantic relations with art: Analytic romanticism and the problem of perversion. In H. Giesbrecht & C. Levin (Eds.), Art in the offertorium: Narcissism, psychoanalysis, and cultural metaphysics (pp. 175–208). New York, NY: Rodopi.
  • Levin, C. (Ed.). (in press). Boundary trouble: Psychoanalytic and social perspectives on the ‘primal crime.’ New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Milner, M. (1952). The role of illusion in symbol formation. In The suppresed madness of sane men (Vol. 1987, pp. 83–113). London, UK: Tavistock.
  • Mitchell, S. (1984). Object relations theories and the developmental tilt. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 20, 473–499. doi:10.1080/00107530.1984.10745749
  • Parsons, M. (2006). The analyst’s countertransference to the psychoanalytic process. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 87, 1183–1198. doi:10.1516/CFMR-JQLL-N40W-4PAW
  • Winnicott, D. W. (1960). The theory of the parent–infant relationship. In The maturational processes and the facilitating environment (pp. 37–55). New York, NY: International Universities Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.