References
- Bick, E. (1968). The experience of the skin in early object-relations. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 49, 484–486.
- Bion, W. R. (1984). Elements of psychoanalysis. London, UK: Karnac Books.
- Bromberg, P. M. (1996). Standing in the spaces: The multiplicity of self and the psychoanalytic relationship. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 32, 509–535. doi:10.1080/00107530.1996.10746334
- Cooper, S. H. (2004). The state of the hope: The new bad object in the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 14, 527–551. doi:10.1080/10481880409353126
- Davies, J. M. (1998). Multiple perspectives on multiplicity. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 8, 195–206. doi:10.1080/10481889809539241
- Director, L. (2002). The value of relational psychoanalysis in the treatment of chronic drug and alcohol use. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 12, 551–579. doi:10.1080/10481881209348689
- Ogden, T. (1989). On the concept of an autistic-contiguous position. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 70, 127–140.
- Racker, H. (1968). Transference and countertransference. London, UK: Hogarth Press.
- Skolnick, N. J. (2006). What’s a good object to do? Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 16, 1–27.
- Stern, D. B. (2003). Unformulated experience: From dissociation to integration in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
- Williams, P. W. (2010). Invasive objects: Minds under siege. East Sussex, England: Taylor and Francis.
- Williams, P. W. (2014). Orientations of psychotic activity in defensive pathological organizations. Interational Journal of Psychoanalysis, 95, 423–440. doi:10.1111/1745-8315.12141
- Winnicott, D. W. (1965a). Ego integration in child development. In The maturational process and the facilitating environment (pp. 56–63). Madison, CT: The International Psycho-Analytical Library; The Hogarth Press and the Institute for Psychoanalysis.
- Winnicott, D. W. (1965b). Fear of breakdown. International Review of Psychoanalysis, 1, 103–107.