Reference-Set Computation in Children: Mandarin-Speaking Children’s Pronoun Interpretation in Avoid Pronoun Contexts

REFERENCES

• Chien, Yuchin & Kenneth Wexler. 1990. Children’s knowledge of locality conditions in binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition 1(3). 225–295.
   Google Scholar
• Chierchia, Gennaro, Stephen Crain, Maria Teresa Guasti, Andrea Gualmini & Luisa Meroni. 2001. The acquisition of disjunction: Evidence for a grammatical view of scalar implicatures. In Anna H.-J. Do, Laura Domínguez & Aimee Johansen ( eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development [BUCLD 25], 157–168. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Carol. 1969. The acquisition of syntax in children from 5 to 10. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conroy, Stacey, Eri Takahashi, Jeff Lidz & Colin Phillips. 2009. Equal treatment for all antecedents: How children succeed with Principle B. Linguistic Inquiry 40(3). 446–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crain, Stephen & Cecile McKee. 1985. Acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. In Steve Berman, Jae Woong Choe & Joyce McDonough ( eds.), Proceedings of the 16th North East Linguistic Society [NELS 16], 94–110. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
   Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Yosef & Tanya Reinhart. 1993. The innateness of binding and coreference. Linguistic Inquiry 24(1). 69–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, Yang & Haihua Pan. 2001. A further investigation into the complement structure of Mandarin V-de resultative construction. In Haihua Pan ( ed.), Studies in Chinese linguistics II, 1–30. Hong Kong: Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Gualmini, Andrea, Stephen Crain, Luisa Meroni, Gennaro Chierchia & Maria T. Guasti. 2001. At the semantics/pragmatics interface in child language. In Rachel Hastings, Brendan Jackson & Zsofia Zvolenszky ( eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 11, 231–247. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Guasti, Maria T., Gennaro Chierchia, Stephen Crain, Francesca Foppolo, Andrea Gualmini & Luisa Meroni (2005). Why children and adults sometimes (but not always) compute implicatures. Language and Cognitive Processes 20(5). 667–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haegeman, Liliane. 1994. An introduction to government and binding theory, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, Glyn. 2009. The derivation of anaphoric relations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, Laurence. 1984. Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In Deborah Schiffrin ( ed.), Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications, 11–42. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C.-T. James. 1988. Wo pao de kuai and Chinese phrase structure. Language 64(2). 274–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C.-T. James. 1989. Pro-drop in Chinese: A generalized control theory. In Osvaldo Jaeggli & Kenneth J. Safir ( eds.), The null subject parameter, 185–214. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C.-T. James. 1992. Complex predicates in control. In Richard K. Larson, Sabine Iatridou, Utpal Lahiri & James Higginbotham ( eds.), Control and grammar, 109–147. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Yan. 1994. The syntax and pragmatics of anaphora: A study with special reference to Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, Stephen C. 1987. Minimization and conversational inference. In Jef Verschueren & Marcella Bertuccelli Papi ( eds.), The pragmatic perspective: Selected papers from the 1985 International Pragmatics Conference, 61–129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Yafei. 1999. Cross-componential causativity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17(3). 445–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Yafei. 2005. X⁰: A theory of the morphology-syntax interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Gereon. 2011. Constraints on displacement: A phase-based approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Papafragou, Anna & Julien Musolino. 2003. Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantics-pragmatics interface. Cognition 86. 253–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart, Tanya. 1983. Anaphora and semantic interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhart, Tanya. 2004. The processing cost of reference set computation: Acquisition of stress shift and focus. Language Acquisition 12(2). 109–155.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhart, Tanya. 2006. Interface strategies: Optimal and costly computations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Song, Hyun-joo & Cynthia Fisher. 2005. Who’s “she”? Discourse structure influences preschoolers’ pronoun interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language 52. 29–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szendrői, Kriszta. 2004. Acquisition evidence for an interface theory of focus. In Jacqueline van Kampen & Sergio Baauw ( eds.), Proceedings of GALA 2003, 457–468. Utrecht, The Netherlands: LOT.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, Rosalind & Kenneth Wexler. 1999. Principle B, VP ellipsis and interpretation in child grammars. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trueswell, John C., Irina Sekerina, Nicole M. Hill & Marian L. Logrip. 1999. The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition 73. 89–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar