Object Clitic Omission in Child Spanish: Evaluating Representational and Processing Accounts

REFERENCES

• Akhtar, Nameera, Jennifer Jipson & Maureen A. Callanan. 2001. Learning words through overhearing. Child Development 72(2). 416–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archibald, Lisa & Susan Gathercole. 2007. Nonword repetition and serial recall: Equivalent measures of verbal short-term memory? Applied Psycholinguistics 28. 587–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au, Terry Kit-fong, Leah M. Knightly, Sun-Ah Jun & Janet S. Oh. 2002. Overhearing a language in childhood. Psychological Science 13. 238–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avram, Larisa. 2000. Clitic omission in child Romanian. Paper presented at the Psycholinguistics Colloquium, January, University of Potsdam, Potsdam.
   Google Scholar
• Babyonyshev, Maria & Stefania Marin. 2004. The acquisition of object clitic constructions in Romanian. In Alejna Brugos, Manuella R. Clark-Cotton & Seungwan Ha (eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development [BUCLD 29], 17–44. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, Jessica A. 2005 Sonority effects in the production of consonant clusters by Spanish-speaking children. In David Eddington (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 6th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages, 1–14. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
   Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, Simon, Alan Leslie & Utal Frith. 1985. Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition 21. 37–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedore, Lisa M. & Laurence B. Leonard. 2001. Grammatical morphology deficits in Spanish-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 44. 905–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belletti, Adriana, Elisa Bennati & Antonella Sorace. 2007. Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 25. 657–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger-Morales, Julia, Manola Salustri & Jill Gilkerson. 2005. Root infinitives in the spontaneous speech of two bilingual children: Evidence for separate grammatical systems. In James Cohen, Kara McAlister, Kellie Rolstad & Jeff MacSwan (eds.), ISB4: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism, 296–305. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, Nan. 1981. Are there constraints on childhood disfluency? Journal of Fluency Disorders 6. 341–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, Valentina & Cristiano Chesi. 2006. Phases, left branch islands, and computational nesting. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 12(1). 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Bloodstein, Oliver. 1974. The rules of early stuttering. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 39. 379–394.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, Paul. 1990. Subjectless sentences in child language. Linguistic Inquiry 21. 491–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, Kathryn. 1986. Meaning, sound, and syntax: Lexical priming in sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 12. 575–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, Kathryn. 1987. Coordinating words and syntax in speech plans. In Andrew W. Ellis (ed.), Progress in the Psychology of Language, Vol. 3, 337–390. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2013. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Version 5.3.03. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Bornkessel, Ina, Brian McElree, Matthias Schlesewsky & Angela D. Friederici. 2004. Multidimensional contribution to garden-path strength: Dissociating phrase structure from case marking. Journal of Memory and Language 51(4). 495–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottari, Piero, Paola Cipriani & Anna Maria Chilosi. 1993/1994. Protosyntactic devices in the acquisition of Italian free morphology. Language Acquisition 3(4). 327–369.
   Google Scholar
• Butterworth, Brian, Tim Shallice & Frances L. Watson. 1990. Short-term retention without short-term memory. In Giuseppe Vallar & Tim Shallice (eds.), Neuropsychological impairments of short-term memory, 187–213. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campos, Héctor. 1999. Transitividad e intransitividad. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, 1519–1574. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
   Google Scholar
• Castilla, Anny P. 2008. Developmental measures of morphosyntatic acquisition in monolingual 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old Spanish-speaking children. Toronto: University of Toronto dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Castilla, Anny P. & Ana T. Pérez-Leroux. 2010. Omissions and substitutions in Spanish object clitics: Developmental optionality as a property of the representational system. Language Acquisition 17. 2–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 2005. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, Eve. 1985. The acquisition of Romance with special reference to French. In Dan I. Slobin (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, 688–782. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, João & Maria Lobo. 2009. Clitic omission in the acquisition of European Portuguese: Data from comprehension. In Acrisio Pires & Jason Rothman (eds.), Minimalist inquiries into child language acquisition: Case studies across Portuguese, 63–84. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, Anne, John A. Hawkins & Gary Gilligan. 1985 The suffixing preference: A processing explanation. Linguistics 23. 723–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, Philip S. & Larry Fenson. 1996. Lexical development norms for young children. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 28. 125–127.
   Google Scholar
• Deese, James & Roger A. Kaufman. 1957. Serial effects in recall of unorganized and sequentially organized verbal material. Journal of Experimental Psychology 54. 180–187.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De la Mora, Juliana. 2004. Direct object clitics in Spanish-speaking children with and without specific language impairment. Edmonton, AB: University of Alberta master’s thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Dell, Gary S. 1986. A spreading activation theory of retrieval in language production. Psychological Review 93. 283–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, Fernanda. 2000. Syntax in language production: An approach using tree-adjoining grammars. In Linda Wheeldon (ed.), Aspects of language production, 291–330. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, Dawn R., Nina Clark & Glyn W. Humphreys. 2003. The treatment of an auditory working memory deficit and the implications for sentence comprehension abilities in mild “receptive” aphasia. Aphasiology 17(8). 723–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, Robert. 1998. Structural complexity and the time course of grammatical development. Cognition 66. 249–301
   Google Scholar
• Frank, Robert. 2002. Phrase structure composition and syntactic dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, Robert. 2006. Phase theory and Tree Adjoining Grammar. Lingua 116. 145–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujino, Hanako & Tetsuya Sano. 2002. Aspects of the null object phenomenon in child Spanish. In Ana T. Pérez-Leroux & Juana M. Liceras (eds.), The acquisition of Spanish morphosyntax, 67–88. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, Merrill F. 1980. Levels of processing in sentence production. In Brian Butterworth (ed.), Language production: Volume I. Speech and talk, 177–220. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gathercole, Susan E. & Anne-Marie Adams. 1993. Phonological working memory in very young children. Developmental Psychology 29(4). 770–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathercole, Susan E., Susan J. Pickering, Benjamin Ambridge & Hannah Wearing. 2004. The structure of working memory from 4 to 15 years of age. Developmental Psychology 40(2). 177–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavarró, Anna, Vicenç Torrens & Ken Wexler. 2010. Object clitic omission: Two language types. Language Acquisition 17(4). 192–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, Edward. 1998. Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68. 1–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, Edward. 2000. The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In Alec Marantz, Yasushi Miyashita & Wayne O’Neil (eds.), Image, language, brain: Papers from the first mind articulation project symposium, 95–126. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grüter, Theres. 2006. Object clitics and null objects in the acquisition of French. Montreal: McGill University dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Grüter, Theres & Martha Crago. 2012. Object clitics and their omission in child L2 French: The contributions of processing limitations and L1 transfer. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15(3). 531–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grüter, Theres, Nereyda Hurtado, Anne Fernald. 2012. The parsing of Spanish object clitics by 4-year-olds. Poster presented at the Conference on Human Sentence Processing, March 14–16, City University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Guasti, Maria T. 1993/1994. Verb syntax in Italian child grammar: Finite and nonfinite verbs. Language Acquisition 3(1). 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, Manuel & Carmen Silva-Corvalán. 1993. Spanish clitics in a contact situation. In Ana Roca and John Lipski (eds.) Spanish in the United States: Linguistic contact and diversity, 75–89. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Gutierrez-Clellen, Vera F. & Richard Hofstetter. 1994. Syntactic complexity in Spanish narratives: A developmental study. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 37. 645–654.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gutierrez-Clellen, Vera F., M. Adelaida Restrepo, Lisa Bedore, Elizabeth Peña & Raquel Anderson. 2000. Language sample analysis: Methodological considerations. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools 31(1). 88–98.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hawkins, John A. & Anne Cutler. 1988. Psycholinguistic factors in morphological asymmetry. In John A. Hawkins (ed.), Explaining language universals, 280–317. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Herschensohn, Julia. 2004. Functional categories and the acquisition of object clitics in L2 French. In Philippe Prévost & Johanne Paradis (eds.), The acquisition of French in different contexts: Focus on functional categories, 207–242. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hopp, Holger. 2010. Ultimate attainment in L2 inflection: Performance similarities between non-native and native speakers. Lingua 120(4). 901–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Yi Ting, Xiaobei Zheng, Xiangzhi Meng, & Jesse Snedeker. 2013. Children’s assignment of grammatical roles in the online processing of Mandarin passive sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 69. 589–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, Kellogg, W. 1965. Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. NCTE Research Report No. 3. Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Hyams, Nina. 1983. The acquisition of parameterized grammars. New York: City University of New York dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Hyams, Nina. 1986. Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Hyams, Nina. 2011. Missing subjects in early child language. In Jill de Villiers & Tom Roeper (eds.), Handbook of generative approaches to language acquisition, 13–52. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hyams, Nina & Jeannette Schaeffer. 2008. Auxiliary and clitic omissions in Italian children’s participle constructions. In João Freitas & Anna Gavarró (eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition 2007 (GALA 2007), 292–302. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Scholars Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. Florian. 2008. Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. Journal of Memory and Language 59. 434–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeggli, Osvaldo. 1982. Topics in Romance syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeggli, Osvaldo. 1986. Three issues in the theory of clitics: Case, doubled NPs, and extraction. In Hagit Borer (ed.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 19, 15–42. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jakubowicz, Celia. 2005. The language faculty: (ab)normal development and interface constraints. Paper presented at GALA, Siena, Italy. [handout]
   Google Scholar
• Jakubowicz, Celia. 2011. Measuring derivational complexity: New evidence from typically-developing and SLI learners of L1-French. Lingua 121. 339–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakubowicz, Celia & Lea Nash. 2001. Functional categories and syntactic operations in (ab)normal language acquisition. Brain and Language 77. 321–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakubowicz, Celia, Lea Nash, Catherine Rigaut & Christophe-Loic Gérard. 1998. Determiners and clitic pronouns in French-speaking children with SLI. Language Acquisition 7. 113–160.
   Google Scholar
• Jakubowicz, Celia & Catherine Rigaut. 2000. L’acquisition des clitiques nominatifs et des clitiques objets en français. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 45. 119–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, Aravind K., Leon Levy & Masako Takahashi. 1975. Tree adjunct grammars. Journal of the Computer and System Sciences 10(1). 136–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kampen, Jacqueline van. 1997. First steps in wh-movement. Utrecht: University of Utrecht dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Kayne, Richard. 1975. French syntax: The transformational cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kayne, Richard. 1993. Toward a modular theory of auxiliary selection. Studia Linguistica 47. 3–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keenan, Edward & Bernard Comrie. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8. 63–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knightly, Leah M., Sun-Ah Jun, Janet S. Oh & Terry Kit-fong Au. 2003. Production benefits of children overhearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 114. 465–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulick, Seth, Robert Frank & K. Vijay-Shanker. 2000. Defective complements in Tree Adjoining Grammar. In Alexander Williams & Elsi Kaiser (eds.), Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 6(3). 35–73. University of Pennsylvania, Department of Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, Laurence B., Carol A. Miller & Amanda J. Owen. 2000. The comprehension of verb agreement morphology by English-speaking children with specific language impairment. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 14. 465–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, Willem J. M. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, Willem J. M., Ardi Roelofs & Antje S. Meyer. 1999. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22. 1–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lope Blanch, Juan M. (ed.). 1971. El habla de la ciudad de México: Materiales para su estudio [The speech of Mexico City: Study materials]. México: UNAM.
   Google Scholar
• Lope Blanch, Juan M. (ed.). 1976. El habla popular de México: Materiales para su estudio [Colloquial speech of Mexico: Study materials]. México: UNAM.
   Google Scholar
• Lyczkowski, David A. 1999. Adquiéretelo: On the acquisition of pronominal object clitics in Spanish. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University thesis.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, Maryellen C. & Morten Christiansen. 2002. Reassessing working memory: A comment on Just & Carpenter (1992) and Waters & Caplan (1996). Psychological Review 109. 35–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Margaza, Panagiota & Aurora Bel. 2006. Null subjects at the syntax-pragmatics interface: Evidence from Spanish interlanguage of Greek. Proceedings of the 8th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2006), 88–97. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, Mercer. 1974. Frog goes to dinner. New York: Dial.
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel, Dana, Cecile McKee & Judy B. Bernstein. 1998. How children’s relatives solve a problem for minimalism. Language 74(2). 308–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, Dana, Cecile McKee & Merrill F. Garrett. 2010. Children’s sentence planning: Syntactic correlates of fluency variations. Journal of Child Language 37. 59–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKee, Cecile & Dana McDaniel. 2001. Resumptive pronouns in English relative clauses. Language Acquisition 9(2). 113–156.
   Google Scholar
• Meisel, Jürgen. 1989. Early differentiation of languages in early bilingual children. In Kenneth Hyltenstam & Loraine Obler (eds.), Bilingualism across the lifespan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Jon F. & Robin S. Chapman. 1996. SALT: A computer program for the systematic analysis of language transcripts [Computer software]. Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Natascha, Berthold Crysmann & Georg A. Kaiser. 1996. Interactions between the acquisition of French object drop and the development of the C-system. Language Acquisition 5. 35–63.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Natascha & Aafke Hulk. 2001. Crosslinguistic influence in bilingual language acquisition: Italian and French as recipient languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4. 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Naigles, Letitia. 2002. Form is easy, meaning is hard: Resolving a paradox in early child acquisition. Cognition 86(2). 157–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norbury, Courtenay F., Dorothy V. M. Bishop & Josie Briscoe. 2001. Production of English finite verb morphology: A comparison of mild-moderate hearing impairment and specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 44. 165–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paradis, Johanne. 2004. The relevance of specific language impairment in understanding the role of transfer in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics 25. 67–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paradis, Johanne & Fred Genesee. 1997. On continuity and the emergence of functional categories in bilingual first-language acquisition. Language Acquisition 6. 91–124.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, Rhea. 2001. Language disorders from infancy through adolescence. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
   Google Scholar
• Peperkamp, Sharon. 1997. Prosodic words. Den Haag: Holland Academic Graphics.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Leroux, Ana T., Anny P. Castilla & Jerry Brunner. 2012. General and specific effects of lexicon in grammar: Determiner and object pronoun omissions in child Spanish. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 55. 313–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Leroux, Ana T., Alejandro Cuza & Danielle Thomas. 2011. Clitic placement in Spanish/English bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14. 221–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Leroux, Ana T., Mihaela Pirvulescu & Yves Roberge. 2008a. Null objects in child language: Syntax and the lexicon. Lingua 118. 370–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Leroux, Ana T., Mihaela Pirvulescu & Yves Roberge. 2008b. Children’s interpretation of null objects under the scope of negation. Retrieved from http://homes.chass.utoronto.ca/˜cla-acl/actes2008/CLA2008_Perez-Leroux_Pirvulescu_Roberge.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Leroux, Ana T., Mihaela Pirvulescu & Yves Roberge. 2009. Bilingualism as a window into the language faculty: The acquisition of objects in French-speaking children in bilingual and monolingual contexts. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12. 97–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Leroux, Ana T., Mihaela Pirvulescu, Yves Roberge, Lyn Tieu & Danielle Thomas. 2006. Variable input and object drop in child language. In Claire Gurski & Milica Radisic (eds.), Proceedings of the 2006 Canadian Linguistics Association Annual Conference. http://westernlinguistics.ca/Publications/CLA2006/Perez-Leroux_etal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, Colin. 1996. Order and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Pirvulescu, Mihaela, Anna Pérez-Leroux & Yves Roberge. 2012. A bidirectional study of object omissions in French-English bilinguals. In Kurt Braunmüller, Christoph Gabriel & Barbara Hänel‐Faulhaber (eds.), Multilingual individuals and multilingual societies, 171–188. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Prévost, Philippe. 2006. The phenomenon of object omission in child L2 French. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 9. 263–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, Charles & Peter Schreiber. 1982. Why short subjects are hard to find than long ones. In Eric Wanner & Lila R. Gleitman (eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art, 78–102. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reig, María Asela. 2008. Cross-dialectal variability in propositional anaphora: A quantitative and pragmatic study of null objects in Mexican and Peninsular Spanish. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Schaeffer, Jeannette. 1997. Object scrambling, object (-clitic) placement and nominal specificity in Dutch child language. In Elizabeth Hughes, Mary Hughes & Annabel Greenhill (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development [BUCLD 21], 527–538. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schaeffer, Jeannette. 2000. The acquisition of direct object scrambling and clitic placement: Syntax and pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Scherag, André, Lisa Demuth, Frank Rösler, Helen J. Neville & Brigitte Röder. 2004. The effects of late acquisition of L2 and the consequences of immigration on L1 for semantic and morpho-syntactic language aspects. Cognition 93. 97–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwenter, Scott A. 2006. Null objects across South America. In Timothy Face & Carol Klee (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 8th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, 23–36. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Serratrice, Ludovica, Antonella Sorace & Sandra Paoli. 2004. Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax-pragmatics interface: Subjects and objects in English-Italian bilingual and monolingual acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7. 183–205.
   Google Scholar
• Soares, Carla. 2003. The C-domain and the acquisition of European Portuguese: The case of wh-questions. Probus 15. 147–176.
   Google Scholar
• Soares, Carla. 2006. La syntaxe de la périphérie gauche en portugais européen et son acquisition [The syntax of the left periphery in European Portuguese and its acquisition]. Doctoral thesis, University of Paris 8.
   Google Scholar
• Song, Jae Y., Megha Sundara & Katherine Demuth. 2009. Effects of phonology on children’s production of English 3rd person singular -s. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 52. 623–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sportiche, Dominique. 1996. Clitic constructions. In Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 213–276. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Stager, Christine L. & Janet F. Werker. 1997. Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasks. Nature 388. 381–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundara, Megha, Katherine Demuth & Patricia Kuhl. 2011. Sentence position effects on children’s perception and production of English third singular -s. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 54. 55–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tedeschi, Roberta. 2009. Acquisition at the interface: A case study on object clitics in early Italian. Utrecht: LOT Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Torres Cacoullos, Rena & Scott A. Schwenter. 2009. Variation in Spanish clitic placement: Constructional and pragmatic effects. Retrieved from http://www.fflch.usp.br/dl/tardes_de_ling/Variation%20in%20Spanish%20Clitic%20Placement_handout.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Trueswell, John C., Irina Sekerina, Nicole Hill & Marian Logrip. 1999. The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition 73. 89–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsakali, Vina & Ken Wexler. 2004. Why children omit in some languages but not in others: New evidence from Greek. In Jacqueline van Kampen & Sergio Baauw (eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition 2003 (GALA 2003), 493–504. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Scholars Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uriagereka, Juan. 1995. Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 26. 79–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, Gabriella, Brian Butterworth & Merrill F. Garrett. 1996. Subject-verb agreement in Spanish and English: Differences in the role of conceptual constraints. Cognition 61. 261–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, Gabriella & Janet Nicol. 1998. Separating hierarchical relations and word order in language production: Is proximity concord syntactic or linear? Cognition 68. B13–B29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagers, Matthew W. & Colin Phillips. 2013. Going the distance: Memory and control processes in active dependency construction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, Meryl J., C. Woodruff Starkweather & Helen S. Cairns. 1981. Syntactic influences on stuttering in young child stutterers. Journal of Fluency Disorders 6(4). 283–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler, Ken. 1998. Very early parameter setting and the Unique Checking Constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua 106. 23–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler, Ken. 2002. Theory of phasal development. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Wexler, Ken, Anna Gavarró & Vicenç Torrens. 2004. Feature checking and clitic omission in child Catalan and Spanish. In Reineke Bok-Bennema, Bart Hollebrandse, Brigitte Kampers-Mahne & Petra Sleeman (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2002, 253–269. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• White, Lydia. 1996. Clitics in L2 French. In Harald Clahsen (ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition, 335–368. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar