Linguistic and Cognitive Abilities in Children with Specific Language Impairment as Compared to Children with High-Functioning Autism

References

• American Psychiatric Association. 2000. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edn. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edn. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, Anthony, S. Palferman, L. Heavey & Ann Le Couteur. 1998. Autism: The phenotype in relatives. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 28. 369–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barner, David & Jesse Snedeker. 2005. Quantity judgments and individuation: Evidence that mass nouns count. Cognition 97. 41–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, Simon. 1988. Social and pragmatic deficits in autism: Cognitive or affective? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 18(3). 379–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, Dorothy. 2010. Overlaps between autism and language impairment: Phenomimicry or shared etiology. Behavior Genetics 40. 618–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom, Elma. 2003. From root infinitive to finite sentence: The acquisition of verbal inflections and auxiliaries. Utrecht: Utrecht University dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Borer, Hagit. 2005. In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colle, Livia, Simon Baron-Cohen & Jacqueline Hill. 2007. Do children with autism have a theory of mind? A nonverbal test of autism vs. specific language impairment. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 37(4). 716–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creemers, Ava. 2014. The DP as testing domain for the modularity of language: grammar and pragmatics in SLI and ASD. MA Thesis, University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, Jan (see de Jong)
   Google Scholar
• Duinmeijer, Iris. 2012. Subject-verb agreement task. Ms. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Eigsti, Inge-Marie & Loisa Bennetto. 2009. Grammaticality judgments in autism: Deviance or delay. Journal of Child Language 36(5). 999–1021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eigsti, Inge-Marie, Ashley de Marchena, Jillian Schuh & Elizabeth Kelley. 2011. Language acquisition in autism spectrum disorders: A developmental review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 5(2). 681–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froud, Karen & Heather van der Lely. 2008. The count-mass distinction in typically developing and grammatically specifically language impaired children: New evidence on the role of syntax and semantics. Journal of Communication Disorders 41(3). 274–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurts, Hilde. 2005. Children’s Communication Checklist-2-NL. Pearson Assessment and Information B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, John. 1991. On (in) definite articles: Implicatures and (un) grammaticality prediction. Journal of Linguistics 27(2). 405–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite NPs. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, Amherst dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, Lucy. 2001. How does the severity of a learning disability affect working memory performance? Memory 9. 233–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, Lucy, David Messer & Gilly Nash. 2012. Executive functioning in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 53(1). 37–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, Laurence. 2006. Toward a Fregean pragmatics: Voraussetzung, Nebengedanke, Andeutung. In Laurence R. Horn & Istvan Kecskes (eds.), Explorations in pragmatics: Linguistic, cognitive, and intercultural aspects, 39–69. Berlin: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• van Hout, Angeliek van, Kate Harrigan & Jill de Villiers. 2010. Asymmetries in the acquisition of definite and indefinite NPs. Lingua 120(8). 1973–1990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, Jan de. 1999. Specific language impairment in Dutch: Inflectional morphology and argument structure. Groningen: Grodil.
   Google Scholar
• Karmiloff-Smith, Annette. 1979. A functional approach to child language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, Jonathan & Marcel Just. 1991. Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language 30. 580–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laws, Glynis & Dorothy Bishop. 2004. Pragmatic language impairment and social deficits in Williams syndrome: A comparison with Down’s syndrome and specific language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 39(1). 45–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, Laurence. 1998. Children with Specific Language Impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maratsos, Michael. 1976. The use of definite and indefinite reference in young children: An experimental study of semantic acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meir, Natalia & Sharon Armon-Lotem. 2014. Verbal working memory in bilingual children with and without SLI. Paper presented at the Experimental Psycholinguistics Conference, October 1–3, Madrid, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Miyake, Akira, Patricia Carpenter & Marcel Just. 1994. A capacity approach to syntactic comprehension disorder: Making normal adults perform like aphasic patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology 11. 671–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perovic, Alexandra, Nadya Modyanova & Kenneth Wexler. 2013. Comparison of grammar in neuro-developmental disorders: The case of binding in Williams syndrome and autism with and without language impairment. Language Acquisition 20(2). 133–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polišenská, Kamila, Shula Chiat & Penny Roy. 2015. Sentence repetition: What does the task measure? International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 50(1). 106–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouscoulous, Nausikaa, Ira Noveck, Guy Politzer & Anne Bastide. 2007. A developmental investigation of processing costs in implicature production. Language Acquisition 14(4). 347–375.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, John. 1976. Standard progressive matrices: Sets A, B, C, D & E. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, Mabel, Steven Warren & Stacy Betz. 2005. Language symptoms of developmental language disorders: An overview of autism, Down syndrome, fragile X, specific language impairment, and Williams syndrome. Applied Psycholinguistics 26(1). 7–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rispens, Judith & Anne Baker, 2012. Nonword repetition: the relative contributions of phonological short-term memory and phonological representations in children with language and hearing impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 55. 683–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rispens, Judith & Pieter Been. 2007. Subject-verb agreement and phonological processing in developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment (SLI): A closer look. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 42(3). 293–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaeffer, Jeannette. 2000. The acquisition of direct object scrambling and clitic placement: Syntax and pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Schaeffer, Jeannette. In press. Unravelling the complexity of Direct Object Scrambling. Language Science.
   Google Scholar
• Schaeffer, Jeannette & Lisa Matthewson. 2005. Grammar and pragmatics in the acquisition of article systems. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23(1). 53–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaeffer, Jeannette, Merel Van Witteloostuijn & Doatske De Haan. 2014. Article choice in children with High Functioning Autism (HFA) and in children with Specific Language Impairment (SLI). Linguistics in the Netherlands 31(1). 107–128.
   Google Scholar
• Semel, Eleanor, Elisabeth Wiig, Wayne Secord & Willem Kort. 2008. CELF® 4 NL: Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals: Nederlandse versie. Amsterdam: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Stalnaker, Robert. 1974. Pragmatic presuppositions. In Milton K. Munitz & Peter Unger (eds.), Semantics and philosophy, 197–214. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Hout, Angeliek (see Hout)
   Google Scholar
• van Witteloostuijn, Merel (see Witteloostuijn)
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, David. 1974. Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wexler, Ken, Jeannette Schaeffer & Gerard Bol. 2004. Verbal syntax and morphology in Dutch normal and SLI children: How developmental data can play an important role in morphological theory. Syntax 7(2). 148–198.
   Google Scholar
• Witteloostuijn, Merel van & Jeannette Schaeffer. 2014. On the acquisition of the mass-count distinction in Dutch. Paper presented at the Taalkunde in Nederlanddag ( Linguistics in the Netherlands conference), February 1.
   Google Scholar