Discourse effects on older children’s interpretations of complement control and temporal adjunct control

References

• Adler, Alison. 2006. Syntax and discourse in the acquisition of adjunct control. Boston: Massachusetts Institute for Technology dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Ariel, Mira. 2001. Accessibility theory: An overview. In Ted Sanders, Joost Schilperoord & Wilbert Spooren (eds.), Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects, 29–87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Broihier, Kevin & Ken Wexler. 1995. Children’s acquisition of control in temporal adjuncts. In Carson Schutze, Jennifer Ganger & Kevin Broihier (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 26, 193–220. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Buchstaller, Isabelle & Karen Corrigan 2011. Making intuitions work: Testing instruments for measuring dialect syntax. In Warren Maguire & April McMahon (eds.), Analysing variation in English, 30–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cairns, Helen, Dana McDaniel, Jennifer Hsu & Michelle Rapp. 1994. A longitudinal study of principles of control and pronominal reference in child English. Language 70. 260–288.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Carol. 1969. The acquisition of syntax in children from 5 to 10. Research Monograph No. 57. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Herbert & William Chase. 1972. On the process of comparing sentences against pictures. Cognitive Psychology 3(3). 472–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, Sarita & Helen Cairns. 1994. The development of infinitives from three to five. Journal of Child Language 21. 713–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1993. The dynamics of focus structure. Ms. Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Israel.
   Google Scholar
• Givón, Talmy (ed.). 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Goodluck, Helen. 1981. Children’s grammar of complement-subject interpretation. In Susan Tavakolian (ed.), Language acquisition and linguistic theory, 139–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodluck. Helen. 1986. Children’s interpretations of pronouns and NPs: An alternative view. In Barbara Lust (ed.), Studies in the acquisition of anaphora. Volume II. Applying the constraints, 247–269. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Goodluck, Helen. 2001. The nominal analysis of children’s interpretations of adjunct PRO clauses. Language 77. 494–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodluck, H and Behne, D. 1992. Development in control and extraction. In Weissenborn, J; Goodluck, H; and Roeper, T. (eds) Theoretical issues in language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Goodluck, Helen, Arhonto Terzi & Gema Chocano Diaz. 2001. The acquisition of control cross-linguistically: Structural and lexical factors in learning to license PRO. Journal of Child Language 28. 153–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guasti, Maria. 2004. Language acquisition: The growth of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, Jennifer, Helen Cairns, Sarita Eisenberg & Gloria Schlisselberg. 1989. Control and co-reference in early child language. Journal of Child Language 16. 599–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janke, Vikki. 2016. Pragmatic leads and null subjects: When children consult leads and when they do not. In Jennifer Scott & Deb Waughtal (eds.), Proceedings of the 40th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development [BUCLD 40], 184–204. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janke, Vikki. 2017. Who is the agent? The influence of pragmatic leads on children’s reference assignment in non-obligatory control. Journal of Child Language, 1–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janke, Vikki & Laura Bailey. 2017. Effects of discourse on control. Journal of Linguistics 54. http://www.academia.edu/26830049/Effects_of_Discourse_on_Control_accepted_in_Journal_of_Linguistics_2016_available_first_view_ 53(3). 533–565.
   Google Scholar
• Janke, Vikki & Ad Neeleman. 2012. Ascending and descending VPs in English. Linguistic Inquiry 43(2). 151–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janke, Vikki & Alexandra Perovic. 2015. Intact grammar in HFA? Evidence from control and binding. Lingua 164. 68–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janke, Vikki & Alexandra Perovic. 2016. Advanced syntax and primary pragmatics in children with ASD. In Letitia R. Naigles (ed.), Innovative investigations of language in autism spectrum disorder, 141–162. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association and de Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Kawasaki, Noriko. 1993. Control and arbitrary interpretation in English. Amherst: University of Massachusetts dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, Susannah, William Davies & Stanley Dubinsky. 2010. Up to d(eb)ate on raising and control. Part 2: The empirical range of the constructions and research on their acquisition. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(6). 401–416.
   Google Scholar
• Landau, Idan. 2000. Elements of control: Structure and meaning in infinitival constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Landau, Idan. 2013. Control in generative grammar: A research companion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, Richard. 1991. Promise and the theory of control. Linguistic Inquiry 22(1). 103–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, Richard. 2004. Sentence-final adverbs and “scope.” In Matthew Wolf & Keir Moulton (eds.), Proceedings of the Northeast Linguistics Society [NELS] 34, 23–43. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.
   Google Scholar
• Lust, Barbara, Larry Solan, Suzanne Flynn, Catherine Cross & Elaine Schuetz. 1986. A comparison of null and pronoun anaphora in first language acquisition. In Barbara Lust (ed.), Studies in the acquisition of anaphora. Volume I. Defining the constraints, 245–277. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, Rita. 1983. On control and control theory. Linguistic Inquiry 14. 421–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, Dana, Helen Cairns & Jennifer Hsu. 1990. Control principles in the grammar of young children. Language Acquisition 1. 297–335.
   Google Scholar
• Neeleman, Ad, Elena Titov, Hans van de Koot & Reiko Vermeulen. 2009. A syntactic typology of topic, focus and contrast. In Jeroen van Craenenbroeck (ed.), Alternatives to cartography, 15–52. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Omaki, Akira & Jeffrey Lidz. 2015. Linking parser development to acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Language Acquisition 22. 158–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perovic, Alexandra, Nadya Modyanova & Kenneth Wexler. 2013. Comparison of reflexive and personal pronouns in children with autism: A syntactic or pragmatic deficit? Applied Psycholinguistics 34(4). 813–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart, Tanya. 1981. Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27. 53–94.
   Google Scholar
• Ring, Melanie & Harald Clahsen. 2005. Distinct patterns of language impairment in Down’s syndrome and Williams syndrome: The case of syntactic chains. Journal of Neurolinguistics 18(6). 479–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samek-Lodovici, Vieri. 1996. Constraints on subjects: An optimality theoretic analysis. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Sanoudaki, Eirini & Spyridoula Varlokosta. 2014. Pronoun comprehension in individuals with Down syndrome: Deviance or delay? Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 57. 1442–1452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, Janet. 1983. The acquisition of control in complement sentences: The role of structural and lexical factors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen Sherman, Janet Cohen & Barbara Lust. 1986. Syntactic and lexical constraints on the acquisition of control in complement sentences. In Barbara Lust (ed.), Studies in the acquisition of anaphora. Volume I. Defining the constraints, 279–310. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, Janet Cohen & Barbara Lust. 1993. Children are in control. Cognition 43. 1–51.
   Google Scholar
• Strawson, Peter. 1964. Identifying reference and truth values. Theoria 30(2). 96–118.
   Google Scholar
• Tavakolian, Susan. 1978. Children’s comprehension of pronominal subjects and missing subjects in complicated sentences. In Helen Goodluck & Larry Solan (eds.), Papers in the structure and development of child language, 145–152. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 4. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Vallduví, Enric. 1992. The informational component. New York/London: Garland.
   Google Scholar
• Wexler, Ken. 1992. Issues in the growth of control. In Richard Larson, Sabina Iatridou, Utpal Lahiri & James Higginbotham (eds.), Control and grammar: Studies in linguistics and philosophy, 253–295. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, E. 1980. Predication. Linguistic Inquiry, 11, 203–238.
   Google Scholar