Intervention effects in the acquisition of raising: Evidence from English and Spanish

References

• Aissen, Judith. 1974. Verb raising. Linguistic Inquiry 5(3). 325–366.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Deborah. 2005. The acquisition of tough-movement in English. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Arosio, Fabrizio, Flavia Adani & Maria Teresa Guasti. 2009. Grammatical features in the comprehension of Italian relative clauses by children. In Brucart José M., Gavarró Anna, Solà Jaume (eds.), Merging features: Computation, interpretation, and acquisition, 138–155. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arosio, Fabrizio, Maria Teresa Guasti & Natale Stucchi. 2011. Disambiguating information and memory resources in children’s processing of Italian relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 40(2). 137–154. doi:10.1007/s10936-010-9160-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausín, Adolfo. 2001. On A-movement. Storrs, CT: UConn dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Ausín, Adolfo & Marcela Depiante. 2000. On the syntax of parecer with and without experiencer. Proceedings of the 3rd Hispanic Linguistic Symposium, 155–170. Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Avrutin, Sergey. 2000. Comprehension of wh-questions by children and Broca’s aphasics. In Grodzinsky Yosef, Shapiro Lewis P., Swinney David (eds.), Language and the brain: Representation and processing, 295–312. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, Mark, Kyle Johnson & Ian Roberts. 1989. Passive arguments raised. Linguistic Inquiry 20. 219–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, Misha. 2005. Learning verbs without arguments: The problem of raising verbs. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34. 165–191. doi:10.1007/s10936-005-3637-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, Misha. 2006. There began to be a learnability puzzle. Linguistic Inquiry 37. 441–456. doi:10.1162/ling.2006.37.3.441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belletti, Andrea & Luigi Rizzi. 2013. Ways of avoiding intervention: Some thoughts on the development of object relatives, passives and control. In Piattelli-Palmarini Massimo, Berwick Robert (eds.), Rich languages from poor inputs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, J. Kathryn. 1986. Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology 18(3). 355–387. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bod, Rens, Jennifer Hay & Stefanie Jannedy. 2003. Probabilistic Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, James R., Brian MacWhinney & Yasuaki Harasaki. 2000. Developmental differences in visual and auditory processing of complex sentences. Child Development 71(4). 981–1003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borer, Hagit & Kenneth Wexler. 1987. The maturation of syntax. In Tom Roaper, Williams Edwin (eds.), Parameter setting, 123–172. Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Borer, Hagit & Kenneth Wexler. 1992. Bi-unique relations and the maturation of grammatical principles. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 10(2). 147–190. doi:10.1007/BF00133811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosque, Ignacio & Esther Torrego. 1995. On Spanish haber and tense. Langues et Grammaire 1. 13–29.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, Joan & Paul Hopper. 2001. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: Benjamin.
   Google Scholar
• Choe, Jinsun. 2012. Children seem to know raising: Raising and intervention in child language. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Choe, Jinsun & Kamil Deen. 2016. Children’s difficulty with raising: A performance account. Language Acquisition 23(2). 112–141. doi:10.1080/10489223.2015.1047097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Carol. 1969. The acquisition of syntax in children from 5 to 10. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program, Vol. 28. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cinque, Guglielmo. 2004. Restructuring and functional structure. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond. The cartography of syntactic structures, New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Vol. 3, 132–191.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Chris. 2005a. A smuggling approach to raising in English. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 289–298. doi:10.1162/0024389053710701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, Chris. 2005b. A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax 8. 81–120. doi:10.1111/synt.2005.8.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Crain, Stephen & Cecile McKee. 1985. The acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. In Stephen Berman, Jac-Woong Choe, Joyce McDonough (eds.), Proceedings of the 16th North East Linguistics Society [NELS 16], 94–111. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Daneman, Meredyth & Patricia Carpenter. 1980. Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19(4). 450–466. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6
   Google Scholar
• de Vincenzi, Marica, Lisa S. Arduino, Laura Ciccarelli & Remo Job. 1999. Parsing strategies in children comprehension of interrogative sentences. Proceedings of European Conference on Cognitive Science. 301–308. Istituto di Psicologia del CNR, Rome, Rome.
   Google Scholar
• Diesing, Molly. 1992. Bare plural subjects and the derivation of logical representations. Linguistic Inquiry 23(3). 353–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, Nick. 2002. Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2). 143–188. doi:10.1017/S0272263102002024
   Google Scholar
• Felser, Claudia, Theodore Marinis & Harald Clahsen. 2003. Children‘s processing of ambiguous sentences: A study of relative clause attachment. Language Acquisition 11(3). 127–163. doi:10.1207/s15327817la1103_1
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Leborans, M. Jesús. 1999. La predicación: Oraciones copulativas. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua Española, 2357–2460. Madrid: Espasa.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, Naama, Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi. 2009. Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua 119(1). 67–88. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, Naama & Hedva Lavi. 2006. On the Order of Acquisition of A-Movement, Wh movement, and V-C movement. In Adriana Belletti, Elisa Bennati, Cristiano Chesi, Elisa Di Domenico, & Ida Ferrari (eds.), Language Acquisition and Development, 211-217. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, Naama & Rama Novogrodsky. 2004. The acquisition of relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: A study of SLI and normal development. Journal of Child Language 31(3). 661–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganger, Jennifer, Sabrina Dunn & Peter Gordon. 2005. Genes take over when the input fails: A twin study of the passive. In Alejna Brugos, Manuella R. Clark-Cotton, Seungwan Ha (eds.), A supplement to the proceedings of the 29th Annual Boston Conference on Language Development [BUCLD 29]. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.
   Google Scholar
• Gaulin, Cynthia A. & Thomas F. Campbell. 1994. Procedure for assessing verbal working memory in normal school-age children: Some preliminary data. Perceptual and Motor Skills 79. 55–64. doi:10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehrke, Berit & Nino Grillo. 2008. How to become passive. In Grohmann Kleanthes K. (ed.), Explorations of phase theory: Features, arguments, and interpretation at the interfaces, 231–268. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, Edward. 1998. Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68(1). 1–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, Edward. 2000. The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In Miyashita Yasushi, Marantz Alec (eds.), Image, language, brain, 95–126. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, Peter & Jill Chafetz. 1990. Verb-based versus class-based accounts of actionality effects in children‘s comprehension of passives. Cognition 36(3). 227–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, Peter C., Randall Hendrick & William H. Levine. 2002. Memory-load interference in syntactic processing. Psychological Science 13(5). 425–430. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodner, Daniel & Edward Gibson. 2005. Consequences of the serial nature of linguistic input for sentenial complexity. Cognitive Science 29(2). 261–290. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haegeman, Liliane. 2006. Clitic climbing and the dual status of sembrare. Linguistic Inquiry 37(3). 484–501. doi:10.1162/ling.2006.37.3.484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, Scott A. 1994. Information processing strategies in riskless preference reversals: The prominence effect. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 59(1). 1–26. doi:10.1006/obhd.1994.1048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, Christopher. 2011. The acquisition of raising. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, Christopher, Nadia Modyanova & Kenneth Wexler. 2006. Predicting passive acquisition: Environmental factors and biological maturation. Paper presented at 22nd Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Workshop in Language Acquisition, Aalborg, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, Christopher, Robyn Orfitelli & Kenneth Wexler. 2007. When seem means think: The role of the experiencer phrase in children’s comprehension of raising. In Belikova Alyona, Meroni Luisa, Umeda Mari (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America [GALANA 2], 135–146. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, Christopher, Robyn Orfitelli & Kenneth Wexler. 2008. The acquisition of raising reconsidered. In Anna Gavarró & M. João Freitas (eds.), Language acquisition and development: proceedings of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition [GALA 2007], 253–262. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, Christopher & Kenneth Wexler. 2006. Children’s passives and their resulting interpretation. In Kamil Ud Deen, Jun Nomura, Barbara Schulz, & Bonnie Schwartz (eds.), Proceedings of the inaugural conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America [GALANA 1], 125–136. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, Christopher & Kenneth Wexler. 2007. The late development of raising: What children seem to think about seem. In In William Davies & Stanley Dubinsky (eds.) New horizons in the analysis of control and raising, 35–70. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, Jennifer R., Helen S. Cairns & Robert W. Fiengo. 1985. The development of grammars underlying children’s interpretation of complex sentences. Cognition 20. 25–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyams, Nina & William. Snyder 2005. Young children never smuggle: Reflexive clitics and the Universal Freezing Hypothesis. Paper presented at the 30th Boston University Conference on Language Development [BUCLD 30]. Boston, MA. Retrieved from http://web.uconn.edu/snyder/papers/HyamsSnyder05.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hyams, Nina & William. Snyder 2006. Young children are frozen: Reflexive clitics and the Universal Freezing Hypothesis. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from http://web.uconn.edu/snyder/papers/Hyams_Snyder_2006.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Landau, Idan. 2010. The syntax of implicit arguments. Linguistic Inquiry 41. 357–399. doi:10.1162/LING_a_00001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landau, Idan & Rosalind Thornton. 2011. Early child control. Lingua 121(5). 920–941. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2010.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, Richard & Shravan Vasishth. 2005. An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cognitive Science 29(3). 375–419. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. The CHILDES project: The database, Vol. 2. Psychology Press. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Maratsos, Michael, Dana E. C. Fox, Judith A. Becker & Mary Anne Chalkley. 1985. Semantic restrictions on children‘s passives. Cognition 19(2). 167–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, Robert. 1977. The grammar of quantification. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• McElree, Brian. 2000. Sentence comprehension is mediated by content-addressable memory. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2(2). 111–123. doi:10.1023/A:1005184709695
   Google Scholar
• McElree, Brian, Stephani Foraker & Lisbeth Dyer. 2003. Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 4(1). 67–91. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00515-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKee, Cecile, Dana McDaniel & Jesse Snedeker. 1998. Relatives children say. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 27(5). 573–596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O‘Grady, William, Miseon Lee & Miho Choo. 2003. A subject-object asymmetry in the acquisition of relative clauses in Korean as a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25(03). 433–448.
   Google Scholar
• O’Grady, William. 1997. Syntactic development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Grady, William, Yoshie Yamashita, Miseon Lee, Miho Choo & Sookeu Cho. 2000. Computational factors in the acquisition of relative clauses. Proceedings of the International Conference on Development of Mind, 40–46. Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Orfitelli, Robyn. 2012. Argument intervention in the acquisition of A-movement. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, Mary C. & Linda Lombardi. 1998. Syntactic priming in immediate recall of sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 38(3). 265–282. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. Locality and left periphery. Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 3. 223–251.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Leah, Theodore Marinis, Claudia Felser & Harald Clahsen. 2007. Antecedent priming at trace positions in children’s sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 36(2). 175–188. doi:10.1007/s10936-006-9038-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, John R. 1973. Slifting. In Gross Maurice, Schützenberger Marcel-Paul (eds.), The formal analysis of natural languages, 133–169. The Hague: Muton.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, Caroline F., Franklin Chang, Ben Ambridge, Julian M. Pine & Elena V.M. Lieven. 2012. The development of abstract syntax: Evidence from structural priming and the lexical boost. Cognition 125(1). 49–63. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, Ana Lúcia, Anabela Gonçalves & Nina Hyams. 2016. Aspects of the acquisition of object control and ECM-type verbs in European Portuguese. Language Acquisition 23(3). 199–233. doi:10.1080/10489223.2015.1067320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, Janet Cohen & Barbara Lust. 1993. Children are in control. Cognition 46(1). 1–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, William & Nina Hyams. 2015. Minimality effects in children’s passives. In Elisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann, Simona Matteini (eds.), Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honor of Adriana Belletti, 343–368. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Stowell, Tim. 2005. Parenthetical main clauses. Unpublished manuscript, UCLA.
   Google Scholar
• Stromswold, Karin. 1996. Does the VP-internal subject stage really exist? Paper presented at the 21st Boston University Conference on Language Development [BUCLD 21], Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Torrego, Esther. 1996. Experiencers and raising verbs. In Freidin Robert (ed.), Current issues in comparative grammar, 101–120. Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Torrego, Esther. 1998. The dependencies of objects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torrego, Esther. 2002. Arguments for a derivational approach to syntactic relations based on clitics. In Epstein Samuel, Daniel Seely T. (eds.), Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program, 249–268. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• van Dyke, Julie A. & Richard L. Lewis. 2003. Distinguishing effects of structure and decay on attachment and repair: A cue-based parsing account of recovery from misanalyzed ambiguities”. Journal of Memory and Language 49(3). 285–316. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00081-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, Tessa & Edward Gibson. 2002. The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity. Cognition 85. 79–112. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00087-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, Tessa & Edward Gibson. 2005. Effects of NP type in reading cleft sentences in English. Language and Cognitive Processes 20(6). 751–767. doi:10.1080/01690960500051055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wurmbrand, Susi. 1999. Modal verbs must be raising verbs. In Sonya Bird, Andrew Carnie, Jason Haugen, & Peter Norquest (eds). Proceedings of the 18th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics [WCCFL 18], 599–612. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wurmbrand, Susi. 2001. Infinitives: Restructuring and clause structure. New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Wurmbrand, Susi & Jonathan Bobaljik. 1999. Modals, raising and a-reconstruction. Paper presented at Leiden University (October 1999), Leiden, Netherlands. Retrieved from http://wurmbrand.uconn.edu/Papers/Leiden-1999.pdf
   Google Scholar