Gradual syntactic triggering: The gradient parameter hypothesis

References

• Bertolo, Stefano. 2001. “A Brief Overview of Learnability.” In Language Acquisition and Learnability, edited by Stefano Bertolo, 1–14. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berwick, Robert C. 1985. The Acquisition of Syntactic Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Boeckx, Cedric. 2011. “Approaching Parameters from Below.” In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty, edited by Anna Maria Di Sciullo and Cedric Boeckx, 205–21. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boeckx, Cedric. 2012. Considerations Pertaining to the Nature of Logodiversity, or How to Construct a Parametric Space without Parameters. Barcelona, Spain: Ms., ICREA & Universitat de Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R., and C. Hanlon. 1970. “Derivational Complexity and Order of Acquisition in Child Speech.” In Cognition and the Development of Language, edited by J Hayes, 11–53. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, Robert R., and Frederick Mosteller. 1955. Stochastic Models for Learning. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1955-1975. The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. New York, NY & Chicago, IL: Plenum Press & University of Chicago Press. Published 1955, republished 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1981a. “A Naturalistic Approach to Language and Cognition.” Cognition and Brain Theory 4 (1):3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1981b. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York, NY: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Christophe, Anne, Marina Nespor, Maria Teresa Guasti, and Van Ooyen. Brit. 2003. “Prosodic Structure and Syntactic Acquisition: The Case of the Head-direction Parameter.” Developmental Science 6 (2):211–20. doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, Robin. 1989. “On the Relationship between the Input Data and Parameter Setting.” In Juli Carter and Rose-Marie Déchaine (eds.), Proceedings of The 19th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 19), 48–62. Amherst, MA: GSLA, University of Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Robin. 1992. “The Selection of Syntactic Knowledge.” Language Acquisition 2 (2):83–149. doi:10.1207/s15327817la0202_1.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Robin, and Ian Roberts. 1993. “A Computational Model of Language Learnability and Language Change.” Linguistic Inquiry 24 (2):299–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culicover, Peter W, and Ray Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler Syntax. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, Janet Dean. 1998a. “Parsing to Learn.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 27 (3):339–74. doi:10.1023/A:1023255705029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor, Janet Dean. 1998b. “Unambiguous Triggers.” Linguistic Inquiry 29 (1):1–36. doi:10.1162/002438998553644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor, Janet Dean, and William Gregory Sakas. 2004. “Evaluating Models of Parameter Setting.” In Alejna Brugos, Linnea Micciulla and Christine E Smith (eds.), Proceedings of The 28th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD 28), 1–27. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, Janet Dean, and William Gregory Sakas. 2005. “The Subset Principle in Syntax: Costs of Compliance.” Journal of Linguistics 41 (3):513–69. doi:10.1017/S0022226705003439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foraker, Stephani, Terry Regier, Naveen Khetarpal, Amy Perfors, and Joshua Tenenbaum. 2009. “Indirect Evidence and the Poverty of the Stimulus: The Case of Anaphoric One.” Cognitive Science 33 (2):287–300. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01014.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazdar, Gerald, Ewan Klein, Geoffrey Keith Pullum, and Ivan Andrew Sag. 1985. Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, Edward, and Kenneth Wexler. 1994. “Triggers.” Linguistic Inquiry 25 (3):407–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold, Edward Mark. 1967. “Language Identification in the Limit.” Information and Control 10 (5):447–74. doi:10.1016/S0019-9958(67)91165-5.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, Isaac. 2017. Choosing a Grammar: Learning Paths and Ambiguous Evidence in the Acquisition of Syntax. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Han, C, J Lidz, and J Musolino. 2007. “V-raising and Grammar Competition in Korean: Evidence from Negation and Quantifier Scope.” Linguistic Inquiry 38 (1):1–47. doi:10.1162/ling.2007.38.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, Betty, and Todd R Risley. 1995. Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hornstein, Norbert. 2016. “Indirect Negative Evidence.” Faculty of Language Blog. Accessed 6 March, 2019. http://facultyoflanguage. blogspot. com/2016/04/indirect - negative-evidence.html.
   Google Scholar
• Howitt, Katherine. 2020. “Doing Away with Defaults: Motivation for a Gradient Parameter Space.” MA Thesis., The City University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Howitt, Katherine, Meredith Lancaster, and William Gregory Sakas. 2017. “Doing Away with Defaults: The Parametric Gradient Hypothesis.” Poster presented at The 42nd Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD), November 3–5. Boston: Boston University.
   Google Scholar
• Hyams, Nina. 1986. Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Hyams, Nina, and Kenneth Wexler. 1993. “On the Grammatical Basis of Null Subjects in Child Language.” Linguistic Inquiry 24 (3):421–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, Sanjay, Daniel Osherson, James S. Royer, and Arun Sharma. 1999. Systems that Learn: An Introduction to Learning Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kapur, Shyam. 1994. “Some Applications of Formal Learning Theory Results to Natural Language Acquisition.” In Syntactic Theory and First Language Acquisition: Cross-linguistic Perspectives. Volume 2: Binding, Dependencies, and Learnability, edited by Barbara Lust and Gabriella Hermon, 491–508. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Vol. 25. Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, Frank. 2000. Gradience in Grammar: Experimental and Computational Aspects of Degrees of Grammaticality. Edinburgh, UK: University of Edinburgh dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, Frank. 2006. “Linear Optimality Theory as a Model of Gradience in Grammar”. In Gradience in Grammar: Generative Perspectives., edited by Gisbert Fanselow, Caroline Fery, Ralph Vogel, and Matthias Schlesewsky, 270–87. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kroch, Anthony S. 1989. “Reflexes of Grammar in Patterns of Language Change.” Language Variation and Change 1 (3):199–244. doi:10.1017/S0954394500000168.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, Jey Han, Alexander Clark, and Shalom Lappin. 2014. “Measuring Gradience in Speakers’ Grammaticality Judgements.” In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 821–26. Quebec City, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, Jey Han, Alexander Clark, and Shalom Lappin. 2015. “Unsupervised Prediction of Acceptability Judgements.” In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), 1618–28. Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, Jey Han, Alexander Clark, and Shalom Lappin. 2017. “Grammaticality, Acceptability, and Probability: A Probabilistic View of Linguistic Knowledge.” Cognitive Science 41 (5):1202–41. doi:10.1111/cogs.12414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. The Childes Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Third Edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, Gary F. 1993. “Negative Evidence in Language Acquisition.” Cognition 46 (1):53–85. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(93)90022-N.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2004. “Typological Evidence and Universal Grammar.” Studies in Language 28 (3):527–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osherson, Daniel N., Michael Stob, and Scott Weinstein. 1986. Systems that Learn: An Introduction to Learning Theory for Cognitive and Computer Scientists. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearl, Lisa Sue. 2007. “Necessary Bias in Natural Language Learning.” dissertation., University of Maryland, College Park.
   Google Scholar
• Pearl, Lisa, and Jeffrey Lidz. 2013. “Parameters in Language Acquisition.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Biolinguistics, edited by Cedric Boeckx and Kleanthes K. Editors Grohmann, 129–59. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511980435.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, Steven. 1979. “Formal Models of Language Learning.” Cognition 7 (3):217–83. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(79)90001-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, Steven. 1989. Learnability and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Regier, Terry, and Susanne Gahl. 2004. “Learning the Unlearnable: The Role of Missing Evidence.” Cognition 93 (2):147–55. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.12.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rita, Manzini, M., and Kenneth Wexler. 1987. “Parameters, Binding Theory, and Learnability.” Linguistic Inquiry 18 (3):413–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery.” In Elements of Grammar, edited by Luigi Rizzi and Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sakas, William Gregory. 2000. “Ambiguity and the Computational Feasibility of Syntax Acquisition.” dissertation. City University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Sakas, William Gregory. 2003. “A Word-order Database for Testing Computational Models of Language Acquisition.” In Proceedings of the 41st annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, 415–22. Sapporo, Japan: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P03-1053.
   Google Scholar
• Sakas, William Gregory. 2016. “Computational Approaches to Parameter Setting in Generative Linguistics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Developmental Linguistics, edited by Jeffrey Lidz, William Snyder and Joe Pater, 696–724. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sakas, William Gregory, and Janet Dean Fodor. 2001. “The Structural Triggers Learner.” In Language Acquisition and Learnability, edited by Stefano Bertolo, 172–233. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sakas, William Gregory, and Janet Dean Fodor. 2007. ““Ideal” Language Learning and the Psychological Resource Problem.” Presentation at the MIT workshop: Where does Syntax from? Have we all been Wrong? Accessed 6 March, 2019. https://techtv. mit. edu/videos/16297 - ideal - language - learning - and - the - psychological- resource- problem. Slides available at http://colag. cs.hunter.cuny.edu/pub/Sakas.Fodor.MIT.workshop.ppt.
   Google Scholar
• Sakas, William Gregory, and Janet Dean Fodor. 2011. “Generating CoLAG Languages Using the “Supergrammar”.” Tech. rep. Accessed 6 March, 2019. http://www. colag. cs. hunter.cuny.edu/pub/COLAG_2011_supergrammar.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sakas, William Gregory, and Janet Dean Fodor. 2012. “Disambiguating Syntactic Triggers.” Language Acquisition 19 (2):83–143. doi:10.1080/10489223.2012.660553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakas, William Gregory, Robert Berwick, and Charles Yang. 2018. “Parameter Setting Is Feasible.” Linguistic Analysis 41 (3–4):391–408.
   Google Scholar
• Sprouse, Jon. 2007. “A Program for Experimental Syntax: Finding the Relationship between Acceptability and Grammatical Knowledge.” dissertation., University of Maryland, College Park.
   Google Scholar
• Sprouse, Jon, Beracah Yankama, Sagar Indurkhya, Sandiway Fong, and Robert C Berwick. 2018. “Colorless Green Ideas Do Sleep Furiously: Gradient Acceptability and the Nature of the Grammar.” The Linguistic Review 35 (3):575–99. doi:10.1515/tlr-2018-0005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprouse, Jon, and Norbert Hornstein. 2013. Experimental Syntax and Island Effects. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Straus, Kenneth Jerold. 2008. “Validations of a Probabilistic Model of Language Learning.” dissertation., Northeastern University.
   Google Scholar
• Sugisaki, Koji. 2007. “A Note on the Default Values of Parameters.” Biolinguistics 1 (4):114–17.
   Google Scholar
• Sugisaki, Koji, and William Snyder. 2003. “Do Parameters Have Default Values?: Evidence from the Acquisition of English and Spanish”. In Proceedings of the Fourth Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics.Tokyo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Sugisaki, Koji, and William Snyder. 2006a. “Evaluating the Variational Model of Language Acquisition.” In The Proceedings of the Inaugural Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition–North America, 345–52. Vol. 4. Honolulu, HI: University of Connecticut Occasional Papers in Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Sugisaki, Koji, and William Snyder. 2006b. “The Parameter of Preposition Stranding: A View from Child English.” Language Acquisition 13 (4):349–61. doi:10.1207/s15327817la1304_4.
   Google Scholar
• Tenenbaum, Joshua Brett, and Thomas Griffiths. 2001. “Generalization, Similarity, and Bayesian Inference.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):629–40. doi:10.1017/S0140525X01000061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkel, William J. 1996. “Acquisition by a Genetic Algorithm-based Model in Spaces with Local Maxima.” Linguistic Inquiry 27 (2):350–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valiant, Leslie Gabriel. 1984. “A Theory of the Learnable.” Communications of the ACM 27 (11):1134–42. doi:10.1145/1968.1972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler, Kenneth, and M. Rita Manzini. 1987. “Parameters and Learnability in Binding Theory.” In Parameter Setting, edited by Thomas Roeper and Edwin Williams, 41–76. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Fei, and Joshua Brett Tenenbaum. 2007. “Sensitivity to Sampling in Bayesian Word Learning.” Developmental Science 10 (3):288–97. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00590.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Charles. 2002. Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Charles. 2017. “Rage against the Machine: Evaluation Metrics in the 21st Century.” Language Acquisition 24 (2):100–25. doi:10.1080/10489223.2016.1274318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar