Morphological generalization in bilingual language production: Age of acquisition determines variability

References

• Attaviriyanupap, Korakoch. 2006. Der Erwerb der Verbflexion durch thailändische Immigrantinnen in der Schweiz. Eine Bestandaufnahme. Linguistik Online 26. 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, Harald, Doug Davidson & Douglas Bates. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59. 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialystok, Ellen & Kenji Hakuta. 1999. Confounded age: Linguistic and cognitive factors in age differences for second language acquisition. In David Birdsong (ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis, 161–181. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Birdsong, David. 1999. Introduction: Whys and why nots of the critical period hypothesis for second language acquisition. In David Birdsong (ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis, 1–22. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bordag, Denisa & Magdalena Sieradz. 2012. Learner corpora in second language research: An example study in German as a foreign language. Studies in Applied Linguistics 1. 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, Joan. 1995. Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10. 425–455. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969508407111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, Joan & Carol Moder. 1983. Morphological classes as natural categories. Language 59. 251–270. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/413574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clahsen, Harald. 1992. Overregularization in the acquisition of inflectional morphology: A comparison of English and German. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 57. 166–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clahsen, Harald. 1997. The representation of participles in the German mental lexicon: Evidence for the dual-mechanism model. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1996, 73–95. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Clahsen, Harald. 1999. Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22. 991–1013. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X9931222X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clahsen, Harald & Anna Jessen. 2019. Do bilingual children lag behind? A study of morphological encoding using ERPs. Journal of Child Language 46. 955–979. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000919000321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clahsen, Harald, Maria Martzoukou & Stavroula Stavrakaki. 2010. The perfective past tense in Greek as a second language. Second Language Research 26. 501–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658310373880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clahsen, Harald, Jürgen Meisel & Manfred Pienemann. 1983. Deutsch als Zweitsprache. Tübingen: Narr.
   Google Scholar
• Clahsen, Harald & Monika Rothweiler. 1993. Inflectional rules in children’s grammars: Evidence from German participles. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1992, 1–34. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3710-4_1.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 2001. Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuskley, Christine, Francesca Colaiori, Claudio Castellano, Vittorio Loreto, Martina Pugliese & Francesca Tria. 2015. The adoption of linguistic rules in native and non-native speakers: Evidence from a Wug task. Journal of Memory and Language 84. 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, Robert. 2012. Interactions between individual differences, treatments, and structures in SLA. Language Learning 62. 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00712.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, Brian, Charles Clifton Jr. & Lyn Frazier. 2014. Pushed aside: Parentheticals, memory and processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 29(4). 483–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman, Jeffrey, Elizabeth Bates, Mark Johnson, Annette Karmiloff-Smith, Domenico Parisi & Kim Plunkett. 1996. Rethinking innateness: Connectionism in a developmental framework. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enochson, Kelly & Jennifer Culbertson. 2015. Collecting psycholinguistic response time data using Amazon Mechanical Turk. PloS one 10(3). e0116946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhy, Yael. 2020. Morphological generalization of Hebrew verb classes: An elicited production study in native and non-native speakers. The Mental Lexicon 15(2). 223–257. https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.19001.far
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Dobao, Ana & Julia Herschensohn. 2021. Acquisition of Spanish verbal morphology by child bilinguals: Overregularization by heritage speakers and second language learners. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 24. 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728920000310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, Lynn & Melanie Wall. 2005. Graphical views of suppression and multicollinearity in multiple linear regression. The American Statistician 59. 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313005X41337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, Edward, Steve Piantadosi & Kristina Fedorenko. 2011. Using Mechanical Turk to obtain and analyze English acceptability judgments. Language and Linguistics Compass 5(8). 509–524.
   Google Scholar
• Gor, Kira & Svetlana Cook. 2010. Nonnative processing of verbal morphology: In search of regularity. Language Learning 60(1). 88–126.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00552.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granena, Gisela & Michael Long. 2013. Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research 29. 311–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312461497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahne, Anja, Jutta Mueller & Harald Clahsen. 2006. Morphological processing in a second language: Behavioral and event-related brain potential evidence for storage and decomposition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18. 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892906775250067.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hartshorne, Joshua, Joshua Tenenbaum & Steven Pinker. 2018. A critical period for second language acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 million English speakers. Cognition 177. 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Becky. 2014. The effects of age on second language grammar and speech production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 43. 397–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-013-9261-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köpcke, Klaus-Michael. 1998. Prototypisch starke und schwache Verben der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Germanistische Linguistik 141. 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Lago, Sol, Anna Stutter Garcia & Claudia Felser. 2019. The role of native and non-native grammars in the comprehension of possessive pronouns. Second Language Research 35. 319–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemhöfer, Kristin & Mirjam Broersma. 2012. Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behavior Research Methods 44. 325–343. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenneberg, Eric. 1967. Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, Yan-kit Ingrid. 2006. Verb morphology in second language versus third language acquisition: The representation of regular and irregular past participles in English-Spanish and Chinese-English-Spanish interlanguages. Eurosla Yearbook 6. 27–56. https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.6.05leu.
   Google Scholar
• Meisel, Jürgen. 2009. Second language acquisition in early childhood. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 28. 5–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meisel, Jürgen. 2011. First and second language acquisition: Parallels and differences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mohsenian, Nazanin. 2020. The production of German participles by L2 speakers: An ERP study. Potsdam: University of Potsdam master’s thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, Victoria. 2004. Dissociable systems in second language inflectional morphology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26. 433–459. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104263033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neubauer, Kathleen & Harald Clahsen. 2009. Decomposition of inflected words in a second language: An experimental study of German participles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 31. 403–435. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109090354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, Steven. 1999. Words and rules. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, Steven & Michael Ullman. 2002. The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6. 456–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01990-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plunkett, Kim & Virginia Marchman. 1996. Learning from a connectionist model of the acquisition of the English past tense. Cognition 61. 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00721-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasada, Sandeeb & Steven Pinker. 1993. Generalisation of regular and irregular morphological patterns. Language and Cognitive Processes 8. 1–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969308406948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rispens, Judith & Elise de Bree. 2015. Bilingual children’s production of regular and irregular past tense morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18(2). 290–303. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruoff, Arno. 1981. Häufigkeitswörterbuch gesprochener Sprache gesondert nach Wortarten. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Sopata, Aldona. 2013. Einblick in das mentale Lexikon–Partizipien II im frühen Erwerb des Deutschen. Zeitschrift des Verbandes Polnischer Germanisten/Czasopismo Stowarzyszenia Germanistów Polskich (ZVPG) 2. 151–159.
   Google Scholar
• Sterner, Franziska. 2017. Sukzessiv-bilinguale Kinder: Der Erwerb von Partizipien in der frühen Zweitsprache Deutsch. Hamburg: University of Hamburg dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• telc gGmbH (ed.). 2015. Kompetenzcheck Deutsch Beruf A1A2B1B2C1. Frankfurt am Main, 1. Auflage 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Enlli, Nia Williams, Llinos Jones, Susi Davies & Hanna Binks. 2014. Acquiring complex structures under minority language conditions: Bilingual acquisition of plural morphology in Welsh. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17(3). 478–494. https://doi.org:10.1017/S1366728913000497
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, Michael. 2020. The declarative/procedural model. A neurobiologically motivated theory of first and second language. In Bill VanPatten, Gregory Keating & Stefanie Wulff (eds.), Theories in second language acquisition, 128–161. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Venables, William & Brian Ripley. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Veríssimo, Joao, Vera Heyer, Gunnar Jacob & Harald Clahsen. 2018. Selective effects of age of acquisition on morphological priming: Evidence for a sensitive period. Language Acquisition 25. 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2017.1346104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagers, Matthew & Colin Phillips. 2014. Going the distance: Memory and control processes in active dependency construction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 67. 1274–1304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werker, Janet & Takao Hensch. 2015. Critical periods in speech perception: New directions. Annual Review of Psychology 66. 173–196. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyerts, Helga & Harald Clahsen. 1994. Netzwerke und symbolische Regeln im Spracherwerb: Experimentelle Ergebnisse zur Entwicklung der Flexionsmorphologie. Linguistische Berichte 154. 430–460.
   Google Scholar
• White, Lydia. 2003. Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wurm, Lee & Sebastiano Fisicaro. 2014. What residualizing predictors in regression analyses does (and what it does not do). Journal of Memory and Language 72. 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar