The link between lexical semantic features and children’s comprehension of English verbal be-passives

References

• Belletti, A., & L. Rizzi. 1988. Psych-verbs and theta-theory. Natural Language Linguistic Theory 6(3). 291–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bever, T. G. 1970. The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. Cognition and the Development of Language. 279(362). 1–61.
   Google Scholar
• Borer, H., & K. Wexler. 1987. The maturation of syntax. In Parameter setting, 123–172. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Borga, J., & W. Snyder. 2018. French experiencer verbs and the universal freezing hypothesis. In On the acquisition of the syntax of romance, 7–29. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, C. 2005. A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax 8(2). 81–120.
   Google Scholar
• Crain, S., & C. McKee. 1985. The acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. In Proceedings of Nels, Vol. 15, 94–110.
   Google Scholar
• Crain, S., & R. Thornton. 1998. Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to research on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crain, S., & R. Thornton. 2000. Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crain, S., R. Thornton, & K. Murasugi. 2009. Capturing the evasive passive. Language Acquisition 16(2). 123–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. L. 2012. Developmental perspectives on the acquisition of the passive. University of Connecticut unpublished doctoral dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Demuth, K., F. Moloi, & M. Machobane. 2010. 3-year-olds’ comprehension, production, and generalization of sesotho passives. Cognition 115(2). 238–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Villiers, J. G., & P. A. de Villiers. 1973. Development of the use of word order in comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2(4). 331–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, D., & Y. Grodzinsky. 1998. Children’s passive: A view from the by-phrase. Linguistic Inquiry 29(2). 311–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehrke, B., & N. Grillo. 2009. How to become passive. Explorations of phase theory: Features, arguments, and interpretation at the interfaces, 231–268.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, P., & J. Chafetz. 1990. Verb-based versus class-based accounts of actionality effects in children’s comprehension of passives. Cognition 36(3). 227–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillo, N. 2008. Generalized minimality. Utrecht Institute of Linguistics, OTS.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, C., & J. Hartman. 2006. Some (wh-) questions concerning passive interactions. In Proceedings of the conference on generative approaches to language acquisition. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, C., & K. Wexler. 2006a. By the way, children don’t know by. In Bucld 30: Proceedings of the 30th annual Boston University conference on language development, Vol. 1, 249–261.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, C., & K. Wexler. 2006b. Children’s passives and their resulting interpretation. In The proceedings of the inaugural conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition–North America, University of Connecticut occasional papers in linguistics, Vol. 4, 125–136.
   Google Scholar
• Horgan, D. 1978. The development of the full passive. Journal of Child Language 5( 01). 65–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liter, A., T. Huelskamp, S. Weerakoon, & A. Munn. 2015. What drives the Maratsos effect, agentivity or eventivity? In Boston university conference on language development (Bucld). Boston, MA: Boston University.
   Google Scholar
• Maratsos, M., & R. Abramovitch. 1975. How children understand full, truncated, and anomalous passives. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14(2). 145–157.
   Google Scholar
• Maratsos, M., D. E. Fox, J. A. Becker, & M. A. Chalkley. 1985. Semantic restrictions on children’s passives. Cognition 19(2). 167–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messenger, K., H. P. Branigan, & J. F. McLean. 2011. Evidence for (shared) abstract structure underlying children’s short and full passives. Cognition 121(2). 268–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messenger, K., H. P. Branigan, J. F. McLean, & A. Sorace. 2012. Is young children’s passive syntax semantically constrained? Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language 66(4). 568–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, E. 2015. Felicity of the by-phrase is not enough: Re-evaluating O’Brien et al. (2006). University of Connecticut, Storrs unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, K., E. Grolla & D. Lillo-Martin. 2006. Long passives are understood by young children. In The proceedings of the Boston University conference on language development (Bucld), Vol. 30, 441–451.
   Google Scholar
• Orfitelli, R. M. 2012. Argument intervention in the acquisition of a-movement. University of California, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S., D. S. Lebeaux & L. A. Frost. 1987. Productivity and constraints in the acquisition of the passive. Cognition 26(3). 195–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, W., & N. Hyams. 2015. Minimality effect in children’92s passives. In Elisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann and Simona Matteini (eds.), Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti, 343–368.
   Google Scholar
• Vendler, Z. 1957. Verbs and times. The philosophical review, 143–160.
   Google Scholar