Experiencer troubles: A reappraisal of the predicate-based asymmetry in child passives

References

• Agostinho, Celina. 2020. The acquisition of the passive in European Portuguese. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Alexiadou, Artemis. 2018. -Able adjectives and the syntax of psych verbs. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1): 74. 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schäfer. 2005. The fine structure of (anti-)causatives. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 36, October 28-30, 2007. Amherst, MA: Umass.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, Cynthia L. 1995. Case marking and reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 2003. Participles and voice. In A. Alexiadou, M. Rathert & A. von Stechow (eds.), Perfect explorations. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Aravind, Athulya. 2022. Nominative in non-finite contexts in child language. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Babyonyshev, Maria & Dina Brun. 2004. The acquisition of perfective and imperfective passive constructions in Russian. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 10(1).
   Google Scholar
• Baker, Mark. 1997. Thematic roles and syntactic structure. In Elements of grammar, 73–137. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, Misha. 2015. Animacy and the acquisition of tough adjectives. Language Acquisition, 22(1), 68–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, Misha & Jeanneatte Schaeffer. 2013. Animacy, argument structure and unaccusatives. In M. Becker, J. Grinstead & J. Rothman (eds.). Generative linguistics and acquisition: Studies in honor of Nina M. Hyams, 13–54. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Belletti, Adriana & Luigi Rizzi. 1998. Psych-verbs and θ-theory. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 6(3). 291–352.
   Google Scholar
• Bever, Thomas. 1970. The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (ed.), Cognition and the development of language, 279–362. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Biały, Adam. 2005. Polish psych predicates at the lexicon-syntax interface in cross-linguistic perspective. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, Kathryn & Helga Loebell. 1990. Framing sentences. Cognition 35. 1–39. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(90)90035-I.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borer, Hagit & Kenneth Wexler. 1987. The maturation of syntax. In T. Roeper & E. Williams (eds.), Parameter setting, 123–172. Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Bouchard, Denis. 1995. The semantics of syntax: A minimalist approach to grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowerman, Melissa. 1990. Mapping thematic roles onto syntactic functions: Are children helped by innate linking rules? Linguistics 28. 1253–1290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruening, Benjamin. 2013. By phrases in passives and nominals. Syntax 16(1). 1–41.
   Google Scholar
• Büring, Daniel. 2016. Intonation and meaning. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chapin, Paul. 1967. On the syntax of word-formation in English. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, Candice Chi Hang & Richard Larson. 2014. Psych verbs in English and Mandarin. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 33(1), 127–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crain, Stephen & Janet Fodor. 1993. Competence and performance in child language. In E. Dromi (ed.), Language and cognition: A development perspective. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Crain, Stephen, Rosalind Thornton & Keiko Murasugi. 2009. Capturing the evasive passive. Language Acquisition 16(2). 123–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deal, Amy Rose. 2009. The origin and content of expletives: Evidence from “selection”. Syntax 12(4). 285–323.
   Google Scholar
• Deen, Kamil Ud. 2011. The acquisition of the passive. In Jill de Villiers & Tom Roeper (eds.). Handbook of generative approaches to language acquisition, 155–187. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Deen, Kamil Ud, Ivan Bondoc, Amber Camp, Sharon Estioca, Haerim Hwang, Gyu-Ho Shin, Maho Takahashi, Fred Zenker & Jing Crystal Zhong. 2018. Repetition brings success: Revealing knowledge of the passive voice. In Anne B. Bertolini & Maxwell J. Kaplan (eds.). Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 200–213. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demuth, Katherine, Francina Moloi & Malillo Machobane. 2010. 3-Year-olds’ comprehension, production, and generalization of Sesotho passives. Cognition 115(2). 238–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Swart, Henriette. 1998. “Aspect Shift and Coercion.” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16 (2): 347–85. doi:10.1023/A:1005916004600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Villiers, Jill. G. & Peter A. de Villiers. 1973. Development of the use of word order in comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2(4). 331–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dik, Simon C. 1978. Functional grammar. North Holland Linguistic Series 37. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Embick, David. 2004. On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 35(3). 355–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabb, Nigel. 1984. Syntactic Affixation. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, Danny & Yosef Grodzinsky. 1998. Children’s passive: A view from the by-phrase. Linguistic Inquiry 29(2). 311–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, Naama, Gina Taranto, Lewis P. Shapiro & David Swinney. 2008. The leaf fell (the leaf): The online processing of unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry 39(3). 355–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavarró, Anna & Xavier Parramon. 2017. ”On the adjectival interpretation of passives in acquisition.” Lingua 185:11–24. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2016.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehrke, Berit. 2012. Passive states. In V. Demonte and L. McNally (eds.), Telicity, change, and state: A cross-categorial view of event structure, 185–211, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gehrke, Berit & Nino Grillo. 2009. How to become passive. Explorations of phase theory: Features and arguments, 231–268. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, Peter & Jill Chafetz. 1990. Verb-based versus class-based accounts of actionality effects in children’s comprehension of passives. Cognition 36(3). 227–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillo, Nino. 2008. Generalized Minimality: Syntactic underspecification in Broca’s aphasia. Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics: Utrecht University dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Yosef. 1995. A restrictive theory of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and Language 50(1). 27–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harley, Heidi. 2013. External arguments and the Mirror Principle: On the distinctness of Voice and v. Lingua 125. 34–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartshorne, Joshua, Amanda Pogue & Jesse Snedeker. 2015. Love is hard to understand: The relationship between transitivity and caused events in the acquisition of emotion verbs. Journal of Child Language 42(3). 467–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, Christopher & Jeremy Hartman. 2006. Some (wh-) questions concerning passive interactions. Proceedings of the Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition, 256–268. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, Christopher & Kenneth Wexler. 2006. Children’s passives and their resulting interpretation. In Kamil Ud Deen, Jun Nomura, Barbara Schulz & Bonnie Schwartz (eds.), Proceedings of the Inaugural Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition–North America, University of Connecticut Occasional Papers in Linguistics 4, 125–136. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2). 251–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horgan, Dianne. 1978. The development of the full passive. Journal of Child Language 5. 65–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, Laurence. 1980. Affixation and the unaccusative hypothesis. In Robert A. Hendrick, Carrie S. Masek & Mary Frances Miller (eds.), Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 17, 134–146.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C. T. James. 1999. Chinese passives in comparative perspective. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 29(4). 423–509.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Yi Ting, Xiaobei Zheng, Xiangzhi Meng & Jesse Snedeker. 2013. Children’s assignment of grammatical roles in the online processing of Mandarin passive sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 69(4). 589–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israel, Michael, Christopher Johnson, and Patricia J. Brooks. 2000. From states to events: The acquisition of English passive participles. Cognitive Linguistics 11(1/2). 103–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayne, Richard S. 1984. Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Keenan, Edward L. & Matthew Dryer. 2007. Passive in the world’s languages. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 325–361. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Young-joo & Richard Larson. 1989. Scope interpretation and the syntax of psych-verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 20(4). 681–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in language. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, Katarina & Silvia Kutscher. 2002. Psych-verbs and lexical economy. Arbeiten des Sonderforschungsbereichs 282 “Theorie des Lexikons” 122. Düsseldorf: SFB 282 Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf. http://www.phil-fak.uni-duesseldorf.de/sfb282/working_papers/sfb122.pdf,12.15.2021.
   Google Scholar
• Koring, Loes, Pim Mak, Iris Mulders & Eric Reuland. 2018. Processing intransitive verbs: How do children differ from adults? Language Learning and Development 14(1). 72–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koring, Loes, Pim Mak & Eric Reuland. 2012. The time course of argument reactivation revealed: Using the visual world paradigm. Cognition 123(3). 361–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory (SNLT, volume 33), 109–137. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kratzer, Angelika. 2000. Building statives. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 26(1). 385–399.
   Google Scholar
• Kuno, Susumu. 1971. The position of locatives in existential sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 2(3). 333–378.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, George. 1970. Irregularity in syntax. New York: Holt, Reinhard and Wilson.
   Google Scholar
• Landau, Idan. 2010. The locative syntax of experiencers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landau, Idan & Rosalind Thornton. 2011. Early child control. Lingua 121(5). 920–941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legate, Julie Ann. 2014. Voice and v: Lessons from Acehnese (Vol. 69). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Legate, Julie Ann, Faruk Akkuş, Milena Šereikaitė & Don Ringe. (2020). On passives of passives. Language 96(4). 771–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann, Christian. 1993. Predicate classes in Yucatec Maya. Función 13(14). 195–272.
   Google Scholar
• Liter, Adam & Jeff Lidz. 2021. Non-actional passives can be comprehended by 4-year-olds. In Danielle Dionne & Lee-Ann Vidal Covas (eds.), Proceedings of the 45th annual Boston University conference on language development, vol. 2, 513–527. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marantz, Alec. 2001. Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Maratsos, Michael, Dana Fox, Judith Becher & Marie Ann Chalkley. (1985). Semantic Restrictions on children’s passives. Cognition 19. 167–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinnis, Martha. 2001. Semantic and morphological restrictions in experiencer predicates. In T. Jensen & G. van Herk (eds.) Proceedings of the 2000 CLA Annual Conference, 245–256. Ottawa: University of Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Messenger, Kate, Holly Branigan, Janet McLean & Antonella Sorace. 2012. Is young children’s passive syntax semantically constrained? Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language 66(4). 568–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, Emma & Lisa Pearl. 2018. Do you really mean it? Linking lexical semantic profiles and the age of acquisition for the English passive. In The Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 35), 288–295.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, Emma & Lisa Pearl. 2021. The link between lexical semantic features and children’s comprehension of English verbal be-passives. Language Acquisition 28(4). 433–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, Emma & William Snyder. 2017. The (non)-effects of pragmatics on children’s passives. In Maria LaMendola & Jennifer Scott (eds.), Proceedings of the 41st annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 522–531. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, Karen, Elaine Grolla & Diane Lillo-Martin. 2006. Long passives are understood by young children. Proceedings of the 30th annual Boston University conference on language development Vol. 2, 441–451. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliva, Jesús. & Kenneth Wexler. 2018. The acquisition of Spanish passives: The comparison between subject experiencer versus actional verbs and direct aspectual semantic evidence for the adjectival interpretation. On the Acquisition of the Syntax of Romance. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Oltra-Massuet, Isabel. 2013. Deverbal adjectives at the interface. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Orfitelli, Robyn. 2012. Argument intervention in the acquisition of A-movement.Los Angeles, CA: UCLA dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Perlmutter, David & Paul Postal. 1984. The 1-advancement exclusiveness law. Studies in Relational Grammar 2. 81–125.
   Google Scholar
• Pesetsky, David. 1987. Binding problems with experiencer verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 18(1). 126–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesetsky, David. 1996. Zero syntax: Experiencers and cascades (No. 27). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pylkkänen, Liina. 1999. Causation and external arguments. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 35. 161–183.
   Google Scholar
• Pylkkänen, Liina. 2000a. What applicative heads apply to. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 7(1), 197–210.
   Google Scholar
• Pylkkänen, Liina. 2000b. On stativity and causation. In Carol L. Tenny & James Pustejovsky (eds.), Events as grammatical objects: The converging perspective of lexical semantics and syntax, 417–444. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Introducing arguments (Vol. 49). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhart, Tanya. 2016. Concepts, syntax, and their interface: The theta system (Vol. 72). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhart, Tanya. 2001. Experiencing derivations. In Rachel Hastings, Brendan Jackson & Zso´fia Zvolenszky (eds.), 11th Conference of Semantics and Linguistic Theory. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rispoli, Matthew. 1998. Patterns of pronoun case error. Journal of Child Language, 25(3), 533–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rispoli, Matthew. 2005. When children reach beyond their grasp: Why some children make pronoun case errors and others don’t. Journal of Child Language 32(1), 93–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roeper, Thomas. 1987. Implicit arguments and the head-complement relation. Linguistic Inquiry 18(2). 267–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roeper, Thomas & Angeliek van Hout. 1999. The impact of nominalization on passive, -able and middle: Burzio’s generalization and feature-movement in the lexicon. In Liina Pylkkänen, Angeliek van Hout & Heidi Harely (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 35, 197–210. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Sano, Tetsuya, Mika Endo & Kyoko Yamakoshi. 2001. Developmental issues in the acquisition of Japanese unaccusatives and passives. In Anna H.-J. Do, Laura Domínguez & Aimee Johansen (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Boston University Conference on Language Development, 668–683. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, Florian. 2008. The syntax of (anti-) causatives: External arguments in change-of-state contexts (Vol. 126). Philadelpha, PA: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schütze, Carson & Kenneth Wexler. 1996. Subject case licensing and English root infinitives. In Andy Stringfellow, Dalia Cahana-Amitay, Elizabeth Hughes & Andrea Zukowski (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th annual Boston University conference on language development, Vol. 2, 670–681. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, William & Nina Hyams. 2015. Minimality effects in children’s passives. In Elisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann & Simona Matteini (eds.), Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honor of Adriana Belletti, 343–368. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.223.16sny
   Google Scholar
• Speas, Margaret. 1990. Phrase structure in natural language. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sprouse, Jon, Carson Schütze & Diogo Almeida. (2013). A comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001–2010. Lingua, 134. 219–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudhalter, Vicki & Martin Braine. 1985. How does comprehension of passives develop? A comparison of actional and experiential verbs. Journal of Child Language 12(2). 455–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talmy, Leonard. 1976. Semantic causative types. In M. Shibatani (ed.), The grammar of causative constructions. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368842.
   Google Scholar
• Tenny, Carol. 1998. Psych verbs and verbal passives in Pittsburghese. Linguistics 36. 591–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, Rosalind. 2021. Judgments of acceptability, truth, and felicity in child language. In G. Goodall (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of experimental syntax (Cambridge handbooks in language and linguistics), 394–420. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108569620.016.
   Google Scholar
• Tinker, Erin, Robert Beckwith & Ray Dougherty. (1989). Markedness and the acquisition of emotion verbs. In Ken DeJong & Yongkyoon No (eds.), Proceedings of ESCOL, 252–263. Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Trips, Carola & Achim Stein. 2008. Was English -able borrowable? In Richard Dury, Maurizio Gotti & Marina Dossena (eds.), English historical linguistics volume II: Lexical and semantic change, 217–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Verrips, Maaike. 1996. Potatoes must peel. The acquisition of the Dutch passive. Amsterdam, Netherlands: University of Amsterdam dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Volpato, Francesco, Laura Verin & Anna Cardinaletti. 2016. The comprehension and production of verbal passives by Italian preschool-age children. Applied Psycholinguistics 37(4). 901–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler, Kenneth. 2004. Theory of phasal development: Perfection in child grammar. In A. Csirnaz, A. Gualmini & A. Nevins (eds.), Plato’s problems: Papers on language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (MITWPL).
   Google Scholar
• Wier, Thomas R. 2011. Georgian morphosyntax and feature hierarchies in natural language. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Edwin. 1981. Argument structure and morphology. The Linguistic Review 1. 81–14.
   Google Scholar