Parser-grammar transparency and the development of syntactic dependencies

References

• Altman, Gerry T.M. 1998. Ambiguity in Sentence Processing. Trends in Cognitive Science 2.146–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, Gerry T. & Yuki Kamide. 1999. Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 73(3). 247–264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidl, Amanda, George Hollich & Peter W. Jusczyk. 2003. Early understanding of subject and object wh-questions. Infancy 4. 423–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borovsky, Ariel, Jeffrey L. Elman & Anne Fernald. 2012. Knowing a lot for one’s age: Vocabulary skill and not age is associated with anticipatory incremental sentence interpretation in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 112. 417–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arunachalam, Sudha & Shaun Dennis. 2018. Semantic detail in the developing verb lexicon: An extension of Naigles and Kako (1993). Developmental Science 22. e12697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arunachalam, Sudha. & Sandra R. Waxman. 2010. Meaning from syntax: Evidence from 2-year-olds. Cognition 114. 442–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arunachalam, Sudha, Kristen Syrett & YongXiang Chen. 2016. Lexical disambiguation in verb learning: Evidence from the conjoined-subject intransitive frame in English and Mandarin Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology 7. 138. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, Mark C. 1996. Thematic roles and syntactic structure. In L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 73–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Berwick, Robert & Amy Weinberg. 1984. The grammatical basis of linguistic performance. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bever, Thomas G. 1970. The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (ed.), Cognition and the development of language, 279–362. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Brandone, Amanda, Dede Addy, Rachel Pulverman, Roberta Golinkoff & Kathy Hirsh-Pasek. 2006. One-for-one and two-for-two: anticipating parallel structure between events and language. In Proceedings of BUCLD 30. Boston: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bresnan, Joan & Ronald Kaplan. 1982. Introduction: Grammars as mental representations of language. In J. Bresnan (ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, Youngon & John C. Trueswell. 2010. Children’s (in)ability to recover from garden paths in a verb-final language: Evidence for developing control in sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 106(1). 41–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1968. Language and mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Clackson, Kaili, Claudia Felser & Harald Clahsen. 2011. Children’s processing of reflexives and pronouns in English: Evidence from eye-movements during listening. Journal of Memory and Language 65. 128–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, Cynthia, Yael Gertner, Rose M. Scott & Sylvia Yuan. 2010. Syntactic bootstrapping. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 1(2). 143–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowty, David. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, Evan, Andrew J. Stewart & Ludovica Serratrice. 2011. Children do not overcome lexical biases where adults do: The role of the referential scene in garden-path recovery. Journal of Child Language, 38. 222–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, Fernanda, Vittoria Ferraro & Karl G.D. Bailey. 2002. Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science 11. 11–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, Cynthia. 1996. Structural limits on verb mapping: The role of analogy in children’s interpretations of sentences. Cognitive Psychology 31. 41–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor, Jerry A., Thomas Bever & Merill Garrett. 1967. Language structure and verbal behavior. unpublished manuscript. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, Stefan L., Rens Bod & Morten H. Christiansen. 2012. How hierarchical is language use? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279. 4522–4531.
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, Lyn & Giovanni B. Flores D’Arcais. 1989. Filler driven parsing: A study of gap filling in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language 28(3). 331–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, Lyn & Janet D. Fodor. 1978. The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition 6, 229–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, Lyn & Keith Rayner. 1982. Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology 14. 178–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagliardi, Annie, Tara Mease & Jeffrey Lidz. 2016. Discontinuous development in the acquisition of filler-gap dependencies: Evidence from 15- and 20-month-olds. Language Acquisition 23(3). 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertner, Yael & Cynthia Fisher. 2012. Predicted errors in children’s early sentence comprehension. Cognition 124(1). 85–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertner, Yael, Cynthia Fisher & Julie Eisengart. 2006. Learning words and rules: Abstract knowledge of word order in early sentence comprehension. Psychological science 17(8). 684–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleitman, Lila R. 1990. The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition 1(1). 3–55.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, Peter & Jill Chafetz. 1990. Verb-based versus class-based accounts of actionality effects in children’s comprehension of passives. Cognition 36(3). 227–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirzel, Mina R., Laurel Perkins & Jeffrey Lidz. 2020. 19-month-olds parse wh-quetsions incrementally. Paper presented at 45th Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Yi Ting, Kathryn Leech & Meredith L. Rowe. 2017. Exploring socioeconomic differences in syntactic development through the lens of real-time processing. Cognition 159. 61–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Yi Ting & Zoe Ovans. 2021. Who “it” is influences what “it” does: Discourse effects on children’s syntactic parsing. Cognitive Science 46. e13076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Novick, Jared, Sharon Thompson-Schill & John C. Trueswell. 2005. Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 5. 263–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidz, Jeffrey, Henry Gleitman & Lila R. Gleitman. 2003. “Understanding how input matters: The footprint of universal grammar on verb learning,” Cognition 87. 151–178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassota, Romy, Akira Omaki & Julie Franck. 2016. Developmental changes in misinterpretation of garden-path wh-questions in French. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 69. 829–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lew-Williams, Casey & Anne Fernald. 2007. Young children learning Spanish make rapid use of grammatical gender in spoken word recognition. Psychological Science 18. 193–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidz, Jeffrey, Aaron Steven White & Rebecca Baier. 2017. The role of incremental parsing in syntactically conditioned word learning. Cognitive Psychology 97. 62–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, Tracy. 2007. The processing of non-canonically ordered constituents in long-distance dependencies by pre-school children: A real-time investigation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 36. 191–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, Maryellen C., Neal J. Pearlmutter & Mark S. Seidenberg. 1994. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 101(4). 676–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani, Nivedita & Falk Huettig. 2012. Prediction during language processing is a piece of cake – but only for skilled producers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance 38. 843–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maye, J., Janet F. Werker & LouAnn Gerken. 2002. Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition 82(3). B101–B111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehler, Jacques. 1963. Some effects of grammatical transformations on the recall of English sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 2. 346–351.
   Google Scholar
• Mehler, Jacques & Peter Carey. 1967. The role of surface and base structure in the perception of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 6. 335–338.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, George A. & Noam Chomsky. 1963. Finitary models of language users. in D. Luce (ed.), Handbook of mathematical psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Naigles, Letitia R. 1990. Children use syntax to learn verb meanings. Journal of Child Language 17(2). 357–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, Claire H., Caroline F. Rowland & Julian M. Pine. 2011. Comprehension of argument structure and semantic roles: Evidence from English-learning children and the forced-choice pointing paradigm. Cognitive Science 35(5). 963–982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omaki, Akira, Imogen Davidson-White, Takuya Goro, Jeffrey Lidz & Colin Phillips. 2014. No fear of commitment: Children’s incremental interpretation in English and Japanese wh-questions. Language Learning and Development 10. 206–233.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, Laurel. 2019. How Grammars Grow: Argument structure and the acquisition of non-basic syntax. PhD Dissertation, University of Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, Laurel & Jeffrey Lidz. 2020. Filler-gap dependency comprehension at 15-months: The role of vocabulary. Language Acquisition 27. 98–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, Laurel & Jeffrey Lidz. 2021. Eighteen-month-old infants represent nonlocal syntactic dependencies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(41). e2026469118 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, Laurel, Tyler Z. Knowlton, Alexander Williams & Jeffrey Lidz. 2022. Structure vs. content in syntactic bootstrapping. Article under review.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, Colin. 1996. Order and structure PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, Steven. 1984. Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pozzan, Lucia, Lila R. Gleitman & John C. Trueswell. 2015. Semantic ambiguity and syntactic bootstrapping: The case of conjoined-subject intransitive sentences. Language Learning and Development 12(1). 14–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabagliati, Hugh, Liina Pylkkanen & Gary Marcus. 2013. Top-down influence in young children’s linguistic ambiguity resolution. Developmental Psychology 49. 1076–1089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushen, Shi, Janet F. Werker, & Anne Cutler. 2006. Recognition and representation of function words in english-learning infants. Infancy 10(2). 187–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, Brynn & Nicholas B. Turk-Browne. 2020. Statitical prediction of the future impairs episodic encoding of the present. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117(37). 22760–22770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slobin, Dan I. 1966. Grammatical transformations and sentence comprehension in childhood and adulthood. Journal of Verbal Memory and Verbal Behavior 5. 219–227.
   Google Scholar
• Steedman, Mark 2000. The syntactic process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Syrett, Kristen & Jeffrey Lidz. 2011. Competence, performance and the locality of quantifier raising: Evidence from 4-year-old children. Linguistic Inquiry 42. 305–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thothathiri, Malathi & Jesse Snedeker. 2008. Syntactic priming during language comprehension in three- and four-year-old children. Journal of Memory and Language 47. 69–90.
   Google Scholar
• Trueswell, John C., Daniel Kaufman, Alon Hafri & Jeffrey Lidz. 2012. Development of parsing abilities interacts with grammar learning: Evidence from Tagalog and Kannada. Proceedings of BUCLD 36. 620–632.
   Google Scholar
• Trueswell, John C., Irina Sekerina, Nicole M. Hill, Marian L. Logrip. 1999. The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition 73(2). 89–134. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00032-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueswell, John C., Michael K. Tanenhaus & Susan M. Garnsey. 1994. Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 33(3). 285–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueswell, John C., Michael K. Tanenhaus, & Christopher Kello. 1993. Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19(3). 528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagers, Matthew W., & Colin Phillips. 2009. Multiple dependencies and the role of the grammar in real-time comprehension. Journal of Linguistics 45(2). 395–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, Edward, Paul Gough & Robert Wall. 1968. Grammatical relations and the search of sentences in immediate memory. Presentation at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• White, Aaron Steven & Jeffrey Lidz. 2021. Lexicalization in the developing parser. Glossa: Psycholinguistics 1(1). doi: 10.5070/G601148
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Alexander. 2015. Arguments in syntax and semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, Sylvia & Cynthia Fisher. 2009. Really? She blocked the baby?: Two-year-olds learn combinatorial facts about verbs by listening. Psychological Science 20(5). 619–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, Sylvia, Cynthia Fisher & Jesse Snedeker. 2012. Counting the nouns: Simple structural cues to verb meaning. Child Development 83(4). 1382–1399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar