Kein subjects are hard: Exploring German-speaking children’s behavior with negative indefinites

References

• Anderson, Catherine. 2004. The structure and real-time comprehension of quantifier scope ambiguity. Northwestern University dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Bar-Lev, Moshe E. & Roni Katzir. 2023. Communicative Stability and the Typology of Logical Operators. Linguistic Inquiry 1–42.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, Dale J., Rogers Levy, Christoph Scheepers & Harry J. Tily. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3). 255–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barss, Andrew. 1986. Chains and anaphoric dependence. MIT dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Barwise, Jon & Robin Cooper. 1981. Generalised quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics & Philosophy 4. 159–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bech, Gunnar. 1955. Studien zum deutschen Verbum infinitum. Vol. 35, no. 2 and Vol. 36, no. 6 of Historisks-filologiske Meddelelser. Det Kongelige Danske Videnskaabernes Selskab.
   Google Scholar
• Behrens, Heike. 2006. The input–output relationship in first language acquisition. Language and Cognitive Processes 21. 2–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bill, Cory, Kazuko Yatsushiro & Uli Sauerland. 2019. Asymmetries in children’s negative determiner production. Poster presentation at Boston University Conference on Language Development, November 7-10, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Bobaljik, Jonathan. 2003. Floating quantifiers: Handle with care. In Lisa Cheng & Rint Sybesma (eds.), The second glot international state-of-the-article book: The latest in linguistics, 107–148. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bobaljik, Jonathan & Susi Wurmbrand. 2005. The domain of agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23. 809–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bošković, Željko. 2009. Licensing negative constituents and negative concord. In A. Schardl, M. Walkow & M. Abdurrahman (eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, 125–138. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Roger. 1973. A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, Sandra & William A Ladusaw. 2004. Restriction and saturation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Crain, Stephen. 2017. Acquisition of quantifiers. Annual Review of Linguistics 3. 219–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crain, Stephen & Rosalind Thornton. 1998. Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics (language, speech, and communication). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crain, Stephen, Weijia Ni & Laura Conway. 1994. Learning, parsing and modularity. In Charles, Clifton Jr, Lyn Frazier, & Keith Rayner (eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing, 443–467. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Deal, Amy Rose. 2022. Negative concord as downward agree. In Özge Bakay, Breanna Pratley, Eva Neu & Peyton Deal (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 52, 235–244. Amherst, MA, GLSA.
   Google Scholar
• de Swart, Henriëtte. 2000. Scope ambiguities with negative quantifiers. In K. von Heusinger and U. Egli (eds.), Reference and anaphoric relations. Studies in linguistics and philosophy, 109–132. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• de Swart, Henriette & Ivan Sag. 2002. Negation and negative concord in romance. Linguistics and Philosophy 25. 373–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Driemel, Imke, Johannes Hein, Cory Bill, Aurore Gonzalez, Ivona Ilić, Paloma Jeretič & Astrid van Alem. 2023. Negative concord without agree: Insights from German, Dutch and English child language. Languages 8(3). 179.
   Google Scholar
• Grewendorf, Günther. 1989. Ergativity in German. Dordrecht: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, Angela. 2007. The development of early prosodic word structure in child German: Simplex Words and compounds. University of Potsdam dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Guasti, Maria Teresa, Artemis Alexiadou & Uli Sauerland. 2023. Undercompression errors as evidence for conceptual primitives. Frontiers in Psychology 14. 1104930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackl, Martin, Jorie Koster-Hale & Jason Varvoutis. 2012. Quantification and ACD: Evidence from real-time sentence processing. Journal of Semantics 29(2). 145–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider, Hubert. 2010. The syntax of German. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haider, Hubert. 2017. The case of German. In Jindrich Toman (ed.), Studies in German grammar, 65–102. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Hein, Johannes, Cory Bill, Imke Driemel, Aurore Gonzalez, Ivona Ilić, Paloma Jeretič & Maria Teresa Guasti. 2023. Negative concord in the acquisition of non-negative concord languages. In Sam Gray, Quain, Lucas Fagen, Stephanie Reyes & Irene Tang (eds.), Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS58), 167–182. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, Aron. 2017. An inflexible semantics for cross-categorical operators. Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Hornstein, Norbert. 1995. The grammar of logical form: From GB to minimalism. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, Joachim. 1980. Lexical decomposition in Montague grammar. Theoretical Linguistics 7. 121–136.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Kyle & Satoshi Tomioka. 1997. Lowering and mid-size clauses. In Graham Katz, Shin-Sook Kim and Winhart Heike (eds.), Proceedings of the Tübingen Workshop on Reconstruction, 177–198. Universität Tübingen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Koopman, Hilda & Dominique Sportiche. 1991. The position of subjects. Lingua 82. 211–258.
   Google Scholar
• Lieven, Elena & Sabine Stoll. 2013. Early communicative development in two cultures. Human Development 56. 178–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lintfert, Britta. 2009. Phonetic and phonological development of stress in German. University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, Brian. 1991. The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, Jason. 1996. Object scrambling and quantifier float in German. In Kiyomi Kusumoto (ed.), Proceedings of NELS 26, 179–193. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Max. 1979. The logic of language development in early childhood. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Gereon. 2001. Order preservation, parallel movement, and the emergence of the unmarked. In Geraldine Legendre, Jane Grimshaw & Sten VIkner (eds.), Optimality-theoretic syntax, 279–313. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Anja, Petra Schulz & Barbara Höhle. 2010. How the understanding of focus particles develops: Evidence from child German. In Mihaela Pirvulescu (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA), 163–171. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolae, Andreea C. & Kazuko Yatsushiro. 2022. Not eating kein veggies: Negative concord in child German. In R. Hörnig, S. von Wietersheim, A. Konietzko & S. Featherston (eds.), Proceedings of Linguistic Evidence 2020: Linguistic Theory Enriched by Experimental Data, 317–332. Tübingen: University of Tübingen.
   Google Scholar
• Notley, Anna, Peng Zhou, Stephen Crain & Rosalind Thornton. 2009. Children’s interpretation of focus expressions in English and Mandarin. Language Acquisition 16(4). 240–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. & A. Wingfield. 1964. The Time it takes to name an object. Nature 202. 1031–1032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penka, Doris. 2007. A cross-linguistic perspective on n-words. International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology 41(2). 267–283.
   Google Scholar
• Penka, Doris. 2011. Negative indefinites. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20. 365–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rullmann, Hotze. 1995. Geen eenheid. Tabu 25. 194–197.
   Google Scholar
• Sauerland, Uli. 2000. No “no”: On the cross-linguistic absence of a determiner “no.” In Uli Sauerland (ed.), Proceedings of the Tsukuba workshop on determiners and quantification, 415–444. Tsukuba: Tsukuba University.
   Google Scholar
• Sauerland, Uli & Artemis Alexiadou. 2020. Generative grammar: A meaning first approach. Frontiers in Psychology 11. 571295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauerland, Uli & Paul Elbourne. 2002. Total reconstruction, PF movement and derivational order. Linguistic Inquiry 33. 283–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauerland, Uli, Marie-Christine Meyer & Kazuko Yatsushiro. 2024. The cum-sine pattern in German child language: An argument for antonym decomposition. Language Acquisition, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchies of features and ergativity. In Robert M. W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages, 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Sugawara, Ayaka. 2016. The role of question–answer congruence (QAC) in child language and adult sentence processing. Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, Rosalind, Anna Notley, Vincenzo Moscati & Stephen Crain. 2016. Two negations for the price of one. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 1(1). 45.
   Google Scholar
• Tubau, Susagna. 2016. Lexical variation and negative concord in traditional dialects of British English. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 19. 143–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Stechow, Arnim. 1993. Die Aufgaben der Syntax. In Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld and Theo Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research, Vol. 1. Halbband, 1–88. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• von Stechow, Arnim. 2012. Syntax and semantics: An overview. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics, Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science, 2173–2223. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, Klaus R. 1985. How much do children say in a day. Journal of Child Language 12. 475–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, Manuela. 2006. First steps to communication: A pragmatic analysis. Tübingen: Narr Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe, Akira. 2004. The genesis of negative concord: syntax and morphology of negative doubling. Linguistic Inquiry 35. 559–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whelan, Robert. 2008. Effective analysis of reaction time data. The Psychological Record 58(3). 475–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wurmbrand, Susi. 2001. AGREE: The other VP-internal subject hypothesis. In K. Megerdoomian & L. A. Bar-el (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 635–648. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wurmbrand, Susi. 2006. Licensing case. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 18. 175–236.
   Google Scholar
• Zanuttini, Rafaella. 1991. Syntactic properties of sentential negation. University of Pennsylvania dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Zehr, Jérémy, & Florian Schwarz. 2018. PennController for internet based experiments (IBEX). https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MD832.
   Google Scholar
• Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2004. Sentential negation and negative concord. Utrecht: LOT Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2011. On the syntactically complex status of negative indefinites. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 14(2). 111–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Peng & Stephen Crain. 2010. Focus identification in child Mandarin. Journal of Child Language 37(5). 965–1005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar