559
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Effects of collaborative activities on group identity in virtual world

&
Pages 516-527 | Received 18 Jun 2010, Accepted 08 Jul 2010, Published online: 14 Sep 2011

References

  • Alavi, M., Wheeler, B. C., & Valacich, J. S. (1995). Using IT to reengineer business education: An exploratory investigation of collaborative tele-learning. MIS Quarterly, 19(3), 293–312. doi: 10.2307/249597
  • Balmer, J., & Wilson, A. (1998). Corporate identity: There is more to it than meets the eye. International Studies of Management & Organization, 28(3), 12–31.
  • Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Barnett, M. G., & Keating, T. (2000). Virtual solar system project: Building understanding through model building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 719–756. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200009)37:7<719::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-V
  • Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Barnett, M. G., & Squire, K. (2001). Constructing virtual worlds: Tracing the historical development of learner practices/understandings. Cognition and Instruction, 19(1), 47–94. doi: 10.1207/S1532690XCI1901_2
  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind experience, and school committee on developments in the science of learning, Washington, DC: Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences, Education of the National Research Council, and National Academy Press.
  • Bricken, M., & Byrne, C. M. (1993). Summer students in virtual reality: A pilot study on educational applications of virtual reality technology. In WexelblatA. (Ed.), Virtual reality: Applications and explorations, (pp. 199–218). Boston, MA: Academic Press.
  • Brown, R. E. (2001). The process of community building in distance learning classes. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 18–35.
  • Byrne, C. (1993). Virtual reality and education (Report No. R-93-2), Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Human Interface Technology Laboratory.
  • Chizhik, A. W. (1998). Collaborative learning through high-level verbal interaction: From theory to practice. The Clearing House, 72, 58–61. doi: 10.1080/00098659809599388
  • Chou, S. W., & Min, H. T. (2009). The impact of media on collaborative learning in virtual settings: The perspective of social construction. Computers & Education, 52(2), 417–431. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.006
  • Dede, C., Salzman, M., & Loftin, R. B. (1996). The development of a virtual world for learning Newtonian mechanics. In Brusilovsky, P., Kommers, P., & Streitz, N. (Ed.), Multimedia, hypermedia, and virtual reality, (pp. 87–106). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
  • Dickey, M. D. (2004). An architectural perspective for the design of educational virtual environments. Journal of Visual Literacy, 24(1), 49–66.
  • Dickey, M. D. (2005). Brave new (interactive) worlds: A review of the design affordances and constraints of two 3D virtual worlds as interactive learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 13(1–2), 121–137. doi: 10.1080/10494820500173714
  • Driscoll, M. (2002). How people learn (and what technology might have to do with it), Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology. Retrieved from http://www.ericdigests.org/2003-3/learn.htm
  • Harasim, L. M. (1996). Online education: The future. In Harrison, T. M., & Stephen, T. (Ed.), Computer networking and scholarly communication in the twenty-first-century university, (pp. 203–214). New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Harasim, L. M., Calvert, T., & Groeneboer, C. (1997). Virtual U: A web-based system to support collaborative learning. In KhanB. H. (Ed.), Web-based instruction, (pp. 149–158). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
  • Haythornthwaite, C. (2002). Building social networks via computer networks: Creating and sustaining distributed learning communities. In Renninger, K. A., & Shumar, W. (Ed.), Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace, (pp. 159–190). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Introduction: Computer-mediated collaborative practices. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4), article 11. Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/haythornthwaite.html
  • Hornbeck, D. W. (1991). Technology and students at risk for school failure. In SheekeyA. D. (Ed.), Educational policy and telecommunications technologies, (pp. 1–7). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom, Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
  • Jonassen, D. H. (1996). Computers in the classroom: Mindtools for critical thinking, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Jonassen, D. H., Carr, C., & Yueh, H. P. (1998). Computers as mindtools for engaging learners in critical thinking. TechTrends, 43(2), 24–32. doi: 10.1007/BF02818172
  • Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective, Rockaway, NJ: Phoenix Color Corp.
  • Jung, J. Y., & Park, H. S. (2008). Learning by doing via game making. In Baek, Y. K., & Gibson, D. (Ed.), Digital simulations for improving education: Learning through artificial teaching environments, (pp. 394–406). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • Kearsley, G. (2000). Online education: Learning and teaching in cyberspace, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • Kim, B. K., Park, H. S., & Baek, Y. K. (2009). Not just fun, but serious strategies: Using meta-cognitive strategies in game-based learning. Computers & Education, 52(4), 800–810. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.004
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lenning, O. T., & Ebbers, L. H. (1999). The powerful potential of learning communities: Improving education for the future (Report No. HE-031-924). ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 428606, Washington, DC: George Washington University Graduate School of Education and Human Development.
  • McKay, S., Van Schie, J., & Headley, S.. Embarking on an educational journey in Second Life. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education international conference 2008, Chesapeake, VA: AACE, 2008. 1762–1766
  • McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J.W.. Social software and participatory learning: Extending pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. Atkinson, R., & McBeath, C.. ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings of the 24th ASCILITE conference, Singapore, Singapore: Centre for Educational Development, Nanyang Technological University, 2007. 664–675
  • Pantelidis, V. S. (1995). Reasons to use virtual reality in education. VR in the schools, 1(1), Retrieved from http://vr.coe.ecu.edu/pub.htm
  • Pantelidis, V. S. (1996). Suggestions on when to use and when not to use virtual reality in education. VR in the schools, 2((1), Retrieved from http://vr.coe.ecu.edu/pub.htm
  • Park, H. S., & Baek, Y. K. (2009a). Empirical evidence and practical cases for using virtual world in educational context. In Yang, H., & Yuen, S. (Ed.), Collective intelligence and e-learning 2.0: Implications of Web-based communities and networking, (pp. 227–246). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • Park, H. S., & Baek, Y. K. (2009b). Exploring meaning of the context into the educational game. Journal of Korea Game Society, 9(4), 11–20.
  • Paul, D. L. (2006). Collaborative activities in virtual settings: A knowledge management perspective of telemedicine. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(4), 143–176. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222220406
  • Romiszowski, A. J. (1997). Web-based distance learning and teaching: Revolutionary invention or reaction to necessity?. In KahnB. H. (Ed.), Web-based instruction, (pp. 25–37). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
  • Romiszowski, A. J., & Mason, R. (1996). Computer-mediated communication. In JonassenD. H. (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology: A project of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, (pp. 397–432). New York: Simon & Shuster Macmillan.
  • Rudestam, K. E. (2004). Distributed education and the role of on-line learning in training professional psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35(4), 427–432. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.35.4.427
  • Sanders, R. L., & McKeown, L. (2007). Promoting reflection through action learning in a 3D virtual world. International Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 50–55.
  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Science, 3(3), 265–283. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0303_3
  • Sherry, L., & Myers, K. M. (1996). Developmental research on collaborative design. Proceedings of the 43rd annual conference of the Society for Technical Communication, Charlottesville, VA: Society for Technical Communication.
  • Smart, K. L., & Cappel, J. J. (2006). Students' perceptions of online learning: A comparative study. Journal of Information Technology Education, 5, 201–219.
  • Smith, B. L., & MacGregor, J. T. (1992). What is collaborative learning?. Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education, (pp. 10–29). University Park, PA: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment.
  • Solimeno, A., Mebane, M. E., & Tomai, M. (2008). The influence of students and teachers characteristics on the efficacy of face-to-face and computer supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 51(1), 109–128. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.04.003
  • Wilson, S. (2006). The personal learning environment blog, Retrieved from http://www.cetis.ac.uk/members/ple
  • Winn, W. (1997). The impact of three-dimensional immersive virtual environments on modern pedagogy (HITL Technical Report No. R-97-15), Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Human Interface Technology Laboratory.
  • Youngblut, C. (1998). Educational uses of virtual reality technology (Technical Report No. IDA Document D-2128), Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses.
  • Yu, C. P., & Young, M. L. (2008). The virtual group identification process: A virtual educational community case. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(1), 87–90. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.9929

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.