Discourse measures for Basque summary grading

References

• Aduriz, I., Alegria, I., Artola, X., Ezeiza, N., Sarasola, K., & Urkia, M. (1997). A spelling corrector for Basque based on morphology. Literary and Linguistic Computation, 12(1),
   Google Scholar
• Aduriz, I., Aranzabe, M., Arriola, J., Diaz de Ilarraza, A., Gojenola, K., & Oronoz, M. A cascaded syntactic analyser for Basque. Proceedings of computational linguistics and intelligent text processing. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 2004. 124–135
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bengoetxea, K., & Gojenola, K. (2009). Exploring treebank transformations in dependency parsing. Recent advances in natural language processing, RANLP 2009 (pp. 33–38). Borovets, Bulgaria: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing text: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(83)80002-4
   Google Scholar
• Carenini, G., Ng, R. T., & Zhou, X. (2008). Summarizing emails with conversational cohesion and subjectivity. Proceedings of ACL 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Cassany, D. (1993). Did´actica de la correcci´on de lo escrito. Vol. 108, Spain: Editorial Grao´, deIRIF SL. (In Spanish).
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.)., Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• DeGroot, M. H., & Schervish, M. J. (2002). Probability and statistics (3rd ed.), Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Garner, R. (1982). Efficient text summarization. Costs and benefits. Journal of Educational Research, 75(5), 275–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Lowerse, M. M., & Zhiqiang, C. (2004). Coh-metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion of language. Behavior Research Methods, 36, 193–202. doi: 10.3758/BF03195564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A.K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English, Harlow, UK: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Hualde, J. A., & Ortiz, de Urbina, J. (2003). A grammar of Basque, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, E., Steinhart, D., Stahl, G., & The LSA Research Group (2000). Developing summarization skills through the use of LSA-based feedback. Interactive Learning Environments, 8, 87–109. doi: 10.1076/1049-4820(200008)8:2;1-B;FT087
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., Patel, V., & Ericsson, K. (1999). The role of long-term working memory in text comprehension. Psychologia, 42, 186–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 263–393.
   Google Scholar
• Kozminsky, E., & Graetz, N. (1986). First vs second language comprehension: Some evidence from text summarizing. Journal of Research in Reading, 9(1), 3–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.1986.tb00107.x
   Google Scholar
• Leacock, C., & Chodrow, M. (2003). Automated grammatical error detection. In Shermis, M. D., & Burstein, J. C. (Ed.), Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. 195–207), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Long, J., & Harding-Esch, E. (1978). Summary and recall of text in first and second languages. In Gerver, D. (Ed.), Language interpretation and communication, (pp. 273–287). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Lowerse, M. M., McCarthy, P. M., & Graesser, A. C. (2010). Co-metrix: Computing linguistic features of cohesion. Discourse Processes, 47, 292–330. doi: 10.1080/01638530902959943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newfields, T. (2001). Teaching summarizing skills: Some practical hints. ELJ Journal, 2, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H. E. (2001). The handbook of discourse analysis, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Siddharthan, A. (2006). Syntactic simplification and text cohesion. Research on Language and Computation, 4(1), 77–109. doi: 10.1007/s11168-006-9011-1
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. M. (1982). Text structured and children's comprehension and memory for expository material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 323–340. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.74.3.323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd, R. W., Khongput, S., & Darasawang, P. (2007). Coherence, cohesion and comments on students' academic essays. Assessing Writing, 12, 10–25. doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2007.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Vechtomova, O., & Karamuftuoglu, M. (2008). Lexical cohesion and term proximity in document ranking. Information Processing and Management, 44, 1485–1502. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2008.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zipitria, I., Arruarte, A., & Elorriaga, J. A. Observing lemmatization effect in LSA coherence and comprehension grading of learner summaries. Proceedings of intelligent tutoring systemsAshley, K., & Ikeda, M. Jhonghli, Taiwan: Springer. 2006a
   Google Scholar
• Zipitria, I., Arruarte, A., & Elorriaga, J. A. LEA: Summarization Web environment based on human instructors’ behaviour. Proceedings of 8th international conference of advanced learning technologies, 2008a. 564–568
   Google Scholar
• Zipitria, I., Elorriaga, J. A., & Arruarte, A. LSA learner sentence comprehension inagglutinative and non-agglutinative languages. Workshop proceedings of intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 51–58). Jhonghli, Taiwan: Springer. 2006b
   Google Scholar
• Zipitria, I., Larrañaga, P., Armañanzas, R., Arruarte, A., & Elorriaga, J. A. (2008b). What is behind a summary-evaluation decision?. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 597–612. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.2.597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar