Community indicators: a framework for observing and supporting community activity on Cloudworks

References

• Alevizou, P., Conole, G.C., Culver, J., & Galley, R. (2010). Ritual performances and collective intelligence: Theoretical frameworks for analysing emerging activity patterns in Cloudworks. Proceedings of the 7th international conference in Networked Learning, 3–5 May 2010a. Retrieved from http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fss/organisations/netlc/past/nlc2010/abstracts/PDFs/alevizou.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Alevizou, P., Conole, G.C., & Galley, R. (2010b). Case study: Using Cloudworks to support OER Activities, Milton Keynes: Open University. Case Study for the HEA-funded ‘Perls in the Clouds' Project.
   Google Scholar
• Alevizou, P., Galley, R., & Conole, G.C. (forthcoming). Collectivity, performance and self-representation: Analysing Cloudworks as a public space for networked learning and reflection. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson & D. McConnell (Eds.), Exploring the theory, pedagogy and practice of networked learning, 75–97.London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, B. (2008). Social networking in higher education. In R. Katz (Ed.), The tower and the cloud, : EduCause. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/thetowerandthecloud
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, P. (2007). What is web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education JISC Technology & Standards Watch. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.org.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Androutsopoulos, J. (2008). Potentials and limitations of discourse-centred online ethnography. Language@Internet, 5, 9. Retrieved from http://www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2008/1610/androutsopoulos.pdf/
   Google Scholar
• Baym, N.K. (1995). The performance of humor in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1, (2). Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1995.tb00327.x/full
   Google Scholar
• Baym, N.K. (1998). The emergence of on-line community. In S. Jones (Ed.), CyberSociety 2.0. revisiting computer-mediated communication and community, 35–68.London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baym, N.K. (2003). Communication in online communities. In K. Christiansen & D. Levinson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of community, 1015–1017.London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bouman, W., Hoogenboom, T., Jansen, R., Schoondorp, M., de Bruin, B., & Huizing, A. (2007). The realm of sociality: Notes on the design of social software. PrimaVera Working Paper Series. Amsterdam: Universiteit Van Amsterdam. Retrieved from http://choo.fis.utoronto.ca/fis/courses/lis2176/Readings/bouman.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R.E. (2001). The process of community-building in distance learning classes. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5, 218–35.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12, 2198–213. doi: 10.1287/orsc.12.2.198.10116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From production to Produsage, Peter Lang: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Cann, A.J. (2010). The Trouble with Cloudworks' Science of the Invisible Blog, weblog post January 13th 2010, Retrieved from http://scienceoftheinvisible.blogspot.com/2010/01/trouble-with-cloudworks.html
   Google Scholar
• Clay, J. (2009). ‘Effecting Change’ eLearning Stuff Blog, weblog posting 8th December 2009, Retrieved from http://elearningstuff.net/2009/12/08/
   Google Scholar
• Clifton, R.A. (1999). The education of university students: A social capital perspective. College Teaching, 47, 3114–118. doi: 10.1080/87567559909595798
   Google Scholar
• Conole, G.C., Culver, J. (2009). Cloudworks: Applying social networking practice for the exchange of learning and teaching ideas and designs, special issue of CAL09. Computers and Education, 54, 679–692. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conole, G.C., Galley, R., & Culver, J. (2011). Frameworks for understanding the nature of interaction, networking and community in a social networking site for academic practice. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning (IRRODL), 12, 119–138.
   Google Scholar
• Downes, S. (2005). E-learning 2.0. eLearn Magazine, New York: Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from http://www.elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm?section=articles&article=29-1
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work. Toward an activity-theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 1133–156. doi: 10.1080/13639080020028747
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, J. (2005). Why some social network services work and others don't – Or: The case for object-centered sociality, : Zengestrom Blog, weblog posting, 13th April 2005. Retrieved from http://www.zengestrom.com/blog/2005/04/why_some_social.html
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, T. (1997). Social interaction on the Net: Virtual community as participatory genre. (pp. 13–21). 30th Hawaii International Conference proceedingsHawaii.
   Google Scholar
• Fayard, A-L., & DeSanctis, G. (2005). Evolution of an online forum for knowledge management professionals: A language game analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10, 4 article 2. Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/fayard.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, G. (2002). Communities of interest: Learning through the interaction of multiple knowledge systems, Retrieved from http://l3d.cs.colorado.edu/~gerhard/papers/iris24.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Galley, R. (2009a). A framework for evaluating Cloudworks, Cloudworks Blog, weblog posting 19th April 2009. Retrieved from http://cloudworks.ac.uk/cloud/view/3391
   Google Scholar
• Galley, R. (2009b). Indicators of community, Cloudworks Blog, weblog posting 13th August 2009. Retrieved from http://cloudworks.ac.uk/news/view/1474
   Google Scholar
• Galley, R., Conole, G.C., & Alevizou, C.P. (2010). Case study: Using cloudworks for an open literature review, Case study for the HEA-funded `Perls in the Clouds' Project, Milton Keynes: Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 2–387–105. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1955). On Face-work: An analysis of the ritual elements in social interactions. Psychiatry, 18, 3213–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratton, L. (2007). Hot Spots: Why some companies buzz with energy and innovation – And others don't, London: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, T., & Guile, D. (2003). A connective model of learning: The implications for work process knowledge. European Educational Research Journal, 2, 156–73. doi: 10.2304/eerj.2003.2.1.10
   Google Scholar
• Gunawardena, C.N., Lowe, C.A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17, 4397–431. doi: 10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAG
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A.R. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers, 115–136.New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, S.C. (1994). Politeness in computer culture: Why women thank and men flame. Cultural performances: Proceedings of the third Berkeley women and language conference, 278–294.Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, S.C., & Nix, C.G. (1997). Is “serious chat” an oxymoron? Pedagogical vs. social uses of Internet Relay Chat, Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics Annual Conference, Orlando, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, S. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behaviour. Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning, 356–357.New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iiyoshi, T., & Kumar, M.S.V. (2008). Introduction. In T. Iiyoshi and & M.S.V. Kumar (Eds.), Opening up education: The collective advancement of education through open technology, open content, and open knowledge, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A.J., & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century, Chicago: The MacArthur Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.newmedialiteracies.org/files/working/NMLWhitePaper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T. (1998). Online social interchange, discord, and knowledge construction. Journal of Distance Education, 13, 157–74.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matel, S., & Ball-Rokeach, S.J. (2001). Real and virtual social ties: Connections in the everyday lives of seven ethnic neighborhoods. The American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 3550–564. doi: 10.1177/00027640121957213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, D.W. (1996). Sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 4315–325. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199610)24:4<315::AID-JCOP2>3.0.CO;2-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, D.W., & Chavis, D.M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6–23. doi: 10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1<6::AID-JCOP2290140103>3.0.CO;2-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulkay, M. (1988). On humour: Its nature and its place in modern society, Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Nichani, M. (2001). ‘Communities of practice at the core’ in Elearningpost, Retrieved from http://www.elearningpost.com/articles/archives/communities_of_practice_at_the_core/
   Google Scholar
• Preece, J., Nonneke, B., & Andrews, D. (2004). The top five reasons for lurking: Improving community experiences for everyone. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 201–223. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redecker, C. (2009). Review of learning 2.0 practices: Study on the impact of web 2.0 innovations on education and training in Europe, Seville: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, G. (2008). Emerging criteria for community success weblog posting 17th March 2008, Retrieved from http://elgg.jiscemerge.org.uk/george/weblog/1308.html
   Google Scholar
• Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier, New York: Harper Perennial. Retrieved from http://www.rheingold.com/vc/book/
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online, London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Siemens, G. (2009). Connectivism and connective knowledge, Retrieved from http://ltc.umanitoba.ca/connectivism/
   Google Scholar
• Tuckman, B. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 6384–399. doi: 10.1037/h0022100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, F., & Hannafin, M.J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 45–23. doi: 10.1007/BF02504682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (1999). Virtual communities as communities: Net Surfers don't ride alone. Communities in cyberspace, 163–190. Berkeley, CA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wittel, A. (2001). Toward a network sociality. Theory, Culture & Society, 18, 651–76. doi: 10.1177/02632760122052048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar