2,372
Views
62
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Why some teachers easily learn to use a new virtual learning environment: a technology acceptance perspective

, , , &
Pages 539-552 | Received 01 Aug 2013, Accepted 06 Jan 2014, Published online: 11 Feb 2014

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  • Alvarez, I., Guasch, T., & Espasa, A. (2009). University teacher roles and competencies in online learning environments: A theoretical analysis of teaching and learning practices. European Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 321–336. doi:10.1080/02619760802624104 doi: 10.1080/02619760802624104
  • Arbaugh, Z. (2014). System, scholar, or students? Which most influences online MBA course effectiveness? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning doi: 10.1111/jcal.12048
  • Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 244–254.
  • Brown, S. (2008). From VLEs to learning webs: The implications of Web 2.0 for learning and teaching. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(1), 1–10. doi:10.1080/10494820802158983 doi: 10.1080/10494820802158983
  • Browne, T., Jenkins, M., & Walker, R. (2006). A longitudinal perspective regarding the use of VLEs by higher education institutions in the United Kingdom. Interactive Learning Environments, 14(2), 177–192. doi:10.1080/10494820600852795 doi: 10.1080/10494820600852795
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. doi: 10.2307/249008
  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1002. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  • Ebert-May, D., Derting, T. L., Hodder, J., Momsen, J. L., Long, T. M., & Jardeleza, S. E. (2011). What we say is not what we do: Effective evaluation of faculty professional development programs. BioScience, 61(7), 550–558. doi:10.1525/bio.2011.61.7.9 doi: 10.1525/bio.2011.61.7.9
  • Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D. T., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2013). Investigating the relations between motivation, tool use, participation, and performance in an e-learning course using web-videoconferencing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 285–292. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.09.005 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.09.005
  • Goldman, R., Pea, R., Barron, B., & Derry, S. J. (2007). Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Gong, M., Xu, Y., & Yu, Y. (2004). An enhanced technology acceptance model for web-based learning. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(4), 365–374.
  • Holmes, V., Clark, W., Burt, P., & Rienties, B. (2013). Engaging teachers (and students) with media streaming technology, the case of box of broadcasts. In L. Wankel & P. Blessinger (Eds.), Increasing student engagement and retention using mobile applications: Smartphones, Skype and texting technologies (Vol. 6D, pp. 211–240). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Group.
  • Hu, P., Clark, T., & Ma, W. (2003). Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: A longitudinal study. Information Management, 41(2), 227–241. doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(03)00050-8 doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00050-8
  • Jenkins, M., Browne, T., Walker, R., & Hewitt, R. (2010). The development of technology enhanced learning: Findings from a 2008 survey of UK higher education institutions. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(5), 447–465. doi:10.1080/10494820903484429 doi: 10.1080/10494820903484429
  • Jimoyiannis, A., & Komis, V. (2007). Examining teachers’ beliefs about ICT in education: Implications of a teacher preparation programme. Teacher Development, 11(2), 149–173. doi:10.1080/13664530701414779 doi: 10.1080/13664530701414779
  • Kinchin, I. M. (2012). Avoiding technology-enhanced non-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), E43–E48. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01264.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01264.x
  • Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575–614. doi:10.3102/0034654307309921 doi: 10.3102/0034654307309921
  • Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 125–139. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00016-6 doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00016-6
  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  • Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309–326. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2 doi: 10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2
  • Pynoo, B., Devolder, P., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Duyck, W., & Duyck, P. (2011). Predicting secondary school teachers’ acceptance and use of a digital learning environment: A cross-sectional study. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 568–575. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.005 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.005
  • Rienties, B., Brouwer, N., & Lygo-Baker, S. (2013). The effects of online professional development on higher education teachers’ beliefs and intentions towards learning facilitation and technology. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 122–131. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.09.002 doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2012.09.002
  • Rienties, B., Kaper, W., Struyven, K., Tempelaar, D. T., Van Gastel, L., Vrancken, S., … Virgailaite-Meckauskaite, E. (2012). A review of the role of information communication technology and course design in transitional education practices. Interactive Learning Environments, 20(6), 563–581. doi:10.1080/10494820.2010.542757 doi: 10.1080/10494820.2010.542757
  • Rienties, B., & Townsend, D. (2012). Integrating ICT in business education: Using TPACK to reflect on two course redesigns. In P. Van den Bossche, W. H. Gijselaers, & R. G. Milter (Eds.), Learning at the crossroads of theory and practice (Vol. 4, pp. 141–156). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Sanchez-Franco, M. J. (2010). WebCT – the quasimoderating effect of perceived affective quality on an extending technology acceptance model. Computers & Education, 54(1), 37–46. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.005 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.005
  • Seidel, T., Blomberg, G., & Renkl, A. (2013). Instructional strategies for using video in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34(0), 56–65. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.03.004 doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2013.03.004
  • Sørebø, Ø., Halvari, H., Gulli, V. F., & Kristiansen, R. (2009). The role of self-determination theory in explaining teachers’ motivation to continue to use e-learning technology. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1177–1187. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.001 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.001
  • Stes, A., De Maeyer, S., Gijbels, D., & Van Petegem, P. (2012). Instructional development for teachers in higher education: effects on students' learning outcomes. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(3), 295-308. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2011.611872
  • Šumak, B., Heričko, M., & Pušnik, M. (2011). A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2067–2077. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.005 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.005
  • Teo, T. (2010). A path analysis of pre-service teachers’ attitudes to computer use: Applying and extending the technology acceptance model in an educational context. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(1), 65–79. doi:10.1080/10494820802231327 doi: 10.1080/10494820802231327
  • Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
  • Watson, W. R., Watson, S. L., & Reigeluth, C. M. (2013). Education 3.0: Breaking the mold with technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–12. doi:10.1080/10494820.2013.764322 doi: 10.1080/10494820.2013.764322

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.