A single-display groupware collaborative language laboratory

References

• AbuSeileek, A. F. (2012). The effect of computer-assisted cooperative learning methods and group size on the EFL learners’ achievement in communication skills. Computers & Education, 58(1), 231–239. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abuseileek, A. F., & AbuAlshar, A. M. (2012). The effect of computer–mediated communication cooperative learning structures and techniques on improving EFL learners’ speaking skill. International Journal of Learning Technology, 7(4), 334–352. doi: 10.1504/IJLT.2012.052210
   Google Scholar
• Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.atc21s.org
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211(4489), 1391–1396. doi: 10.1126/science.7466396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D., Leakey, J., & Ranchoux, A. (2005). TOLD like it is! An evaluation of an integrated oral development pilot project. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 55–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bax, S. (2003). CALL – past, present and future. System, 31, 13–28. doi: 10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00071-4
   Google Scholar
• Berns, A., Palomo-Duarte, M., Dodero, J. M., & Valero-Franco, C. (2013). Using a 3D online game to assess students’ foreign language acquisition and communicative competence. In Scaling up learning for sustained impact (pp. 19–31). Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Blake, R. J. (2011). Current trends in online language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31(1), 19–35. doi: 10.1017/S026719051100002X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodnar, S., de Vries, B. P., Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & van Hout, R. (2011). Feedback in an ASR-based CALL system for L2 syntax: A feasibility study. Proceedings of the SLaTE-2011 workshop, Venice, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. M., & Li, Y. L. (2010). Personalised context-aware ubiquitous learning system for supporting effective English vocabulary learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(4), 341–364. doi: 10.1080/10494820802602329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H. N. (2011). Developing and evaluating an oral skills training site supported by automatic speech recognition technology. ReCALL, 23(1), 59–78. doi: 10.1017/S0958344010000285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, C. W., Lee, C. C., & Liu, C. C. (2012). Investigating face to face peer interaction patterns in a collaborative Web discovery task: the benefits of a shared display. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 29(2), 188–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang, T. T., & Robertson, M. (2010). Impacts of learning management system on learner autonomy in EFL learning. International Education Studies, 3(3), 2–11. doi: 10.5539/ies.v3n3p3
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, M. (2012). OECD international assessment of problem solving skills. OECD conference educating for innovative societies, Paris, April, 26.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, J. H. (2012). Framework for PISA 2015: What 15-years-old should be able to do. 4th annual conference of Educational Research Center, Broumana, Lebanon.
   Google Scholar
• Deutschmann, M., Panichi, L., & Molka-Danielsen, J. (2009). Designing oral participation in second life – a comparative study of two language proficiency courses. ReCALL, 21(2), 206–226. doi: 10.1017/S0958344009000196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, I., Miller, A., & Jiang, S. (2012). A taxonomy of virtual worlds usage in education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 949–964. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01263.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrido-Iñigo, P., & Rodriguez-Moreno, F. (2013). The reality of virtual worlds: Pros and cons of their application to foreign language teaching. Interactive Learning Environments, 21(3), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Gutwin, C., & Greenberg, S. (2004). The importance of awareness for team cognition in distributed collaboration. In E. Salas & S. M. Fiore (Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive processes and performance (pp. 177–201). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hampel, R. (2009). Training teacher for the multimedia age: Developing teacher xpertise to enhance online learner interaction and collaboration. Innovation in language learning and teaching, 3(1), 35–50. doi: 10.1080/17501220802655425
   Google Scholar
• Handley, Z. (2009). Is text-to-speech ready for use in computer-assisted language learning? Speech Communication, 51, 906–919. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2008.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, T. E. (1978). The matter with listening comprehension isn't the ear: Hardware & software. NALLD Journal, 13(1), 8–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hemard, D. (1997). Design principles and guidelines for authoring hypermedia language applications. System, 25(1), s9–27. doi: 10.1016/S0346-251X(96)00057-7
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, C. K., Hsu, C. Y., He, Y. Y., & Chang, C. K. (2009). Verification of the perception and optimal number of learners in a group for computer-assisted language learning. In G. Siemens & C. Fulford (Eds.), Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications 2009 (pp. 1720–1735). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, S. Y. (2005). Building language-learning environments to help technological university students develop English independent learning. The JALT CALL Journal, 1(2), 51–66.
   Google Scholar
• Infante, C., Hidalgo, P., Nussbaum, M., Alarcón, R., & Gottlieb, A. (2009). Multiple mouse based collaborative One-to-One learning. Computers and Education, 53(2), 393–401. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G., & Jaspers, J. (2007). Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? Computers & Education, 49(4), 1037–1065. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory Into Practice, 38(2), 67–73. doi: 10.1080/00405849909543834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, F., DoLenh, S., Bachour, K., Yi-ing Kao, G., Gault, C., & Dillenbourg, P. (2009). Interpersonal computers for higher education. In P. Dillenbourg, J. Huang, & M. Cherubini (Eds.), Interactive artifacts and furniture supporting collaborative work and learning (Vol. 10, pp. 1–17). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler, G., & Bikowski, D. (2010). Developing collaborative autonomous learning abilities in computer mediated language learning: Attention to meaning among students in wiki space. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1), 41–58. doi: 10.1080/09588220903467335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahy, C. (2008). Learner activities in a collaborative CALL task. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(3), 253–268. doi: 10.1080/09588220802090295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahy, C. (2012, August). Learner behavior in a collaborative task-based CALL activity. Call: Using, learning, knowing, EUROCALL conference (pp. 22–25), Gothenburg, Sweden. Proceedings. Research-publishing. net, p. 167.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. W. (2000). English teachers’ barriers to the use of Computer assisted language learning. The Internet TESL Journal, 6(12). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Lee-CALLbarriers.html
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L. (2011). Blogging: Promoting learner autonomy and intercultural competence through study abroad. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 87–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, M. (2009). Technologies in use for second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 769–782. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00972.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., & Wong, D. (2010). What can avatars do? Virtual realities in collaborative language learning. Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications 2010. Chesapeake, VA: AACE, pp. 466–474.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M. (1990). Task, group, and task-group interactions. In S. Anivan (Ed.), Language teaching methodology for the nineties (pp. 31–50). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Mackey, A. (2006). Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 405–430. doi: 10.1093/applin/ami051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merisuo-Storm, T. (2007). Pupil's attitude toward foreign-language learning and the development of literacy skills in bilingual education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(2), 226–235. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mineduc. (2010). Curricular basis, English 6th grade. Retrieved from http://www.curriculumenlineamineduc.cl/605/w3-propertyvalue-52067.htm
   Google Scholar
• Morton, F. (1960). The language laboratory as a teaching machine. Annual bulletin 19 of the connecticut audio-visual education association, “Modern techniques in teaching foreign languages: Language laboratories”, Connecticut, USA, pp. 162–165.
   Google Scholar
• Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik, W. (2003). Automatic speech recognition for second language learning: How and why is actually works. Proceedings of the 15th international conference on phonetic sciences, Barcelona:[s.n], pp. 1157–1160.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, L. V. (2010). Computer mediated collaborative learning within a communicative language teaching approach: A sociocultural perspective. Asian EFL Journal, 12(1), 202–233.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M., Dillenbourg, P., Dimitriadis, Y., & Roschelle, J. (2013). Guest editors: Classroom orchestration. Computers & Education, 69, 485–523. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M., Rosas, R., Peirano, I., & Cardenas, F. (2001). Development of intelligent tutoring systems using knowledge structures. Computers & Education, 36, 15–32. doi: 10.1016/S0360-1315(00)00048-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogata, H. (2008). Computer supported ubiquitous learning: Augmenting learning experiences in the real world. Fifth IEEE international conference on wireless, mobile, and ubiquitous technology in education, 2008. WMUTE 2008, Beijing. IEEE, pp. 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Ogata, H., & Yano, Y. (2003). How ubiquitous computing can support language learning. Proceedings of KEST 2003, Honjo City, Japan, pp. 1–60.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. (2012). EFL learner collaborative interaction in second life. ReCALL, 24(1), 20–39. doi: 10.1017/S0958344011000279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pranita, G. (2010). Digital language laboratory and the teaching of English in India. Educational Quest - An International Journal of Education and Applied Social Sciences, 1(1), 39–45.
   Google Scholar
• Rama, P. (2012). Review of “Language learning in the digital age”. Language Learning and Technology, 16(1), 30–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roby, W. B. (2004). Technology in the service of foreign language learning: The case of the language laboratory. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook on research on educational communications and technology (pp. 523–542). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Saggara, N., & Zapata, G. C. (2008). Blending classroom instruction with online homework: A study of student perceptions of computer- assisted L2 learning. ReCALL, 20(2), 208–224.
   Google Scholar
• Shih, Y. C., & Yang, M. T. (2008). A collaborative virtual environment for situated language learning using VEC3D. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 56–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singhal, M. (1997). The internet and foreign language education: Benefits and challenges. The Internet TESL Journal, 3(6). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Singhal-Internet.html
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 43–69. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1996.0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J., Bederson, B., & Druin, A. (1999). Single display groupware: A model for Co-present collaboration. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 286–293).
   Google Scholar
• Sykes, J. (2005). Synchronous CMC and pragmatic development: Effects of oral and written chat. CALICO Journal, 22, 399–431.
   Google Scholar
• Szewkis, E., Nussbaum, M., Rosen, T., Abalos, J., Denardin, F., Caballero, D., … Alcoholado, C. (2011). Collaboration between large groups in the classroom. International Journal of Collaborative-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(4), 561–575.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderplank, R. (2009). Déjà vu? A decade of research on language laboratories, television and video in language learning. Language Teaching, 43(1), 1–37. doi: 10.1017/S0261444809990267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagener, D. (2006). Promoting independent learning skills using video on digital language laboratories. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(4 & 5), 279–286. doi: 10.1080/09588220601043180
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., & Chen, N.-S. (2010). The collaborative language learning attributes of cyber face-to-face interaction: the perspectives of the learner. Interactive Learning Environments, 20(4), 311–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 470–481. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05514.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31, 57–71. doi: 10.1017/S0261444800012970
   Google Scholar
• Wen, Y., Looi, C. K., & Chen, W. (2011). Towards a model for rapid collaborative knowledge improvement in classroom language learning. Connecting research to policy and practice: Proceedings of CSCL, 836–851.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design. Rasch Measurement.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., & Seneff, S. (2009). Speech-based interactive games for language learning: Reading, translation, and question-answering. Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing, 14(2), 133–160.
   Google Scholar
• Yamada, M. (2009). The role of social presence in learner-centered communicative language learning using synchronous computer-mediated communication: Experimental study. Computers & Education, 52(4), 820–833. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y.-T. C., Gamble, J., & Tang, S.-Y. S. (2011). Voice over instant messaging as a tool for enhancing the oral proficiency and motivation of English-as-a-foreign-language learners. British Journal of Educational Technology. doi: 10.1111/j.1467–8535.2011.01204.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, D., Young, M. F., Wagner, M., & Brewer, R. A. (2009). Negotiation for action: English language learning in Game-based virtual worlds. The Modern Language Journal, 93(4), 489–511. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00927.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2004a). A constructivist mobile learning environment supported by a wireless handheld network. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 235–243. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00089.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2004b). MCSCL: Mobile computer supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 42(3), 289–314. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2003.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar