Cognitive support for learning computer-based tasks using animated demonstration

References

• Arguel, A., & Jamet, E. (2009). Using video and static pictures to improve learning of procedural contents. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 354–359. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atlas, R., Cornett, L., Lane, D. M., & Napier, H. A. (1997). The use of animation in software training: Pitfalls and benefits. In M. A. Quinones & A. Ehrenstein (Eds.), Training for a rapidly changing workplace: Applications of psychological research (pp. 281–302). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2007). Can the cognitive load approach make instructional animations more effective? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 811–820. doi: 10.1002/acp.1351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1976). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, P. (2009). Dynamic visualizations and hypermedia: Beyond the “Wow” factor. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 389–392. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 7–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2008). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Despotakis, T. C., Palaigeorgiou, G. E., & Tsoukalas, I. A. (2007). Students’ attitudes towards animated demonstrations as computer learning tools. Educational Technology & Society, 10(1), 196–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyck, J. L. (1995). Problem solving by novice Macintosh users: The effects of animated, self-paced written, and no instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 29–49. doi: 10.2190/XU45-HAMB-7L4P-KF4X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertelt, A., Renkl, A., & Spada, H. (2005). Learning a new computer application using on-screen videos. In A. Méndez Vilas, B. G. Pereira, J. M. Gonzáles, & J. A. M. Gonzáles (Eds.), Recent research developments in learning technologies (Vol. 2, pp. 757–762). Badajoz: Formatex.
   Google Scholar
• Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., Opfermann, M., Hesse, F. W., & Eysink, T. H. S. (2009). Learning with hypermedia: The influence of representational formats and different levels of learner control on performance and learning behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 360–370. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginns, P. (2005). Meta-analysis of the modality effect. Learning and Instruction, 15, 313–331. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, S. M. (1995). A comparison of still, animated, or nonillustrated on-line help with written or spoken instructions in a graphical user interface. In I. R. Katz, R. Mack, L. Marks, M. B. Rosson, & J. Nielsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 82–89). Denver, CO: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Hasler, B. S., Kersten, B., & Sweller, J. (2007). Learner control, cognitive load and instructional animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 713–729. doi: 10.1002/acp.1345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S. (2012). Instructional benefits of spoken words: A review of cognitive load factors. Educational Research Review, 7, 145–159. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2011.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R., & Paas, F. (2007). Attention cueing as a means to enhance learning from an animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 731–746. doi: 10.1002/acp.1346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory, modality of presentation and the transient information effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 943–951. doi: 10.1002/acp.1787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, R. K. (1999). Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 225–244. doi: 10.1007/BF03172967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 390–397. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., Dow, G. T., & Mayer, S. (2003). Multimedia learning in an interactive self-explaining environment: What works in the design of agent-based microworlds. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 806–813. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, R. (2007). Optimizing learning from animations by minimizing cognitive load: Cognitive and affective consequences of signaling and segmentation methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 765–781. doi: 10.1002/acp.1348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1993). The efficiency of instructional conditions: An approach to combine mental-effort and performance measures. Human Factors, 35, 737–743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmiter, S. (1993). The effectiveness of animated demonstrations for computer-based tasks: A summary, model and future research. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 4, 71–89. doi: 10.1006/jvlc.1993.1005
   Google Scholar
• Palmiter, S., & Elkerton, J. (1993). Animated demonstrations for learning procedural computer-based tasks. Human–Computer Interaction, 8, 193–216. doi: 10.1207/s15327051hci0803_1
   Google Scholar
• Payne, S. J., Chesworth, L., & Hill, E. (1992). Animated demonstrations for exploratory learners. Interacting with Computers, 4, 3–22. doi: 10.1016/0953-5438(92)90010-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebetez, C., Betrancourt, M., Sangin, M., & Dillenbourg, P. (2010). Learning from animation enabled by collaboration. Instructional Science, 38, 471–485. doi: 10.1007/s11251-009-9117-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwan, S., & Riempp, R. (2004). The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: Learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and Instruction, 14, 293–305. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shneiderman, B., & Plaisant, C. (2005). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• de Souza, J. M. B., & Dyson, M. (2008). Are animated demonstrations the clearest and most comfortable way to communicate on-screen instructions? Information Design Journal, 16(2), 107–124. doi: 10.1075/idj.16.2.03bez
   Google Scholar
• Spannagel, C., Girwidz, R., Löthe, H., Zendler, A., & Schroeder, U. (2008). Animated demonstrations and training wheels interfaces in a complex learning environment. Interacting with Computers, 20, 97–111. doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2007.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tabbers, H., & de Koeijer, B. (2010). Learner control in animated multimedia instructions. Instructional Science, 38, 441–453. doi: 10.1007/s11251-009-9119-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabbers, H. K., Martens, R. L., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2004). Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: Effects of modality and cueing. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 71–81. doi: 10.1348/000709904322848824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trimble, S. K., Nathan, B. R., & Decker, P. J. (1991). The effect of positive and negative models on learning in behavior modeling training: Testing for proactive and retroactive interference. Journal of Human Behavior & Learning, 7, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 57, 247–262. doi: 10.1006/ijhc.2002.1017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterson, P., & O'Malley, C. (1992). Using animated demonstrations to teach graphics skills. In A. Monk, D. Diaper, & M. D. Harrison (Eds.), People and computers VII. Proceedings of HCI 92 (pp. 463–474). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, A., Leahy, W., Marcus, N., & Sweller, J. (2012). Cognitive load theory, the transient information effect and e-learning. Learning and Instruction, 22, 449–457. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wouters, P., Tabbers, H. K., & Paas, F. (2007). Interactivity in video-based models. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 327–342. doi: 10.1007/s10648-007-9045-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar