Exploring the effects of employing Google Docs in collaborative concept mapping on achievement, concept representation, and attitudes

References

• Adesope, O. O., & Nesbit, J. C. (2013). Animated and static concept maps enhance learning from spoken narration. Learning and Instruction, 27, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åhlberg, M. (2004). Varieties of concept mapping. In A. J. Cañas, J. D. Novak & F. M. González (Eds.), Concept maps: Theory, methodology, technology. Proceedings of the first international conference on concept mapping (Vol. 2, pp. 25–28). Navarra: Dirección de Publicaciones de la Universidad Pública de Navarra. doi: 10.1.1.132.6645
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. (1976). Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson-Inman, L., & Ditson, L. (1999). Computer-based concept mapping: A tool for negotiating meaning. Learning and Leading with Technology, 26(8), 6–13.
   Google Scholar
• Anohina-Naumeca, A. (2012). Determining the set of concept map based tasks for computerized knowledge self-assessment. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 143–152. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.393
   Google Scholar
• Aydin, S. (2011). Effect of cooperative learning and traditional methods on students' achievements and identifications of laboratory equipments in science-technology laboratory course. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(9), 636–644.
   Google Scholar
• Azmitia, M. (1998). Peer interaction and problem solving: When are two heads better than one? Child Development, 59(1), 87–96. doi: 10.2307/1130391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Begole, J., Rosson, M. B., & Shaffer, C. A. (1999). Flexible collaboration transparency: Supporting worker independence in replicated application-sharing systems. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 6(2), 95–132. doi:10.1145/319091.319096
   Google Scholar
• van Boxtel, C., & Veerman, A. (2001, March). Diagram-mediated collaborative learning: Diagrams as tools to provoke and support elaboration and argumentation. Proceedings of the first European conference on computer-supported collaborative learning (EuroCSCL2001), Maastricht, The Netherlands (pp. 22–24).
   Google Scholar
• Cañas, A. J., Hill, G., Carff, R., Suri, N., Lott, J., & Gómez, G. (2004). Cmaptools: A knowledge modeling and sharing environment. In A. J. Cañas, J. D. Novak, & F. M. González (Eds.), Concept maps: Theory, methodology, technology. Proceedings of the first international conference on concept mapping (Vol. 1, pp. 125–133). Navarra: Dirección de Publicaciones de la Universidad Pública de Navarra. doi: 10.1.1.132.6645
   Google Scholar
• Castañeda, L., & Adell, J. (2012, November). Future teachers looking for their PLEs: The personalized learning process behind it all. PLE conference proceedings (Vol. 1, No. 1), Aveiro, Portugal. Retrieved from http://revistas.ua.pt/index.php/ple/article/view/1440
   Google Scholar
• Cauley, K. (1986). Studying knowledge acquisition: Distinctions among procedural, conceptual and logical knowledge. Proceedings of the 67th annual meeting of the American educational research association (pp. 1–35), CA.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1996). Cognitive load while learning to use a computer program. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10(2), 151–170. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199604)10:2<151::AID-ACP380>3.0.CO;2-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, R., & Vogel, D. (2013). Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Computers & Education, 63, 160–175. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiou, C. C., Lee, L. T., & Liu, Y. Q. (2012). Effect of Novak colorful concept map with digital teaching materials on student academic achievement. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 192–201. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.023
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, C. H. (2004). Evaluating system-based strategies for managing conflict in collaborative concept mapping. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(2), 124–132. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00072.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, C. H., Huang, C. C., & Chang, W. T. (2000). The evaluation and influence of interaction in network supported collaborative concept mapping. Computers & Education, 34, 17–25. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00025-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, S. K. W., & Kennedy, D. M. (2011). Using online collaborative tools for groups to co-construct knowledge. Online Information Review, 35(4), 581–597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14684521111161945 doi: 10.1108/14684521111161945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicognani, A. (2000). Concept mapping as a collaborative tool for enhanced online learning. Educational. Technology & Society, 3(3), 150–158.
   Google Scholar
• De Simone, C., Schmid, R. F., & McEwen, L. A. (2001). Supporting the learning process with collaborative concept mapping using computer-based communication tools and processes. Educational Research and Evaluation, 7(2–3), 263–283. doi:10.1076/edre.7.2.263.3870
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Gräsel, C., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12(2), 213–232. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00005-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaines, B. R., & Shaw, M. L. (1995). Collaboration through concept maps. In The first international conference on computer support for collaborative learning (pp. 135–138). L. Erlbaum Associates Inc. doi:10.3115/222020.222120
   Google Scholar
• Geban, Ö., Askar, P., & Özkan, I. (1992). Effects of computer simulations and problem solving approaches on high school students. Journal of Educational Research, 86, 5–10. doi:10.1080/00220671.1992.9941821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagemans, M. G., van der Meij, H., & de Jong, T. (2013). The effects of a concept map-based support tool on simulation-based inquiry learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 1–24. doi: 10.1037/a0029433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, S., & Wang, P. (2008). Web 2.0 and social learning in a digital economy. IEEE International symposium on knowledge acquisition and modeling, 1121–1124. doi:10.1109/KAMW.2008.4810691
   Google Scholar
• Hemmi, A., Bayne, S., & Land, R. (2009). The appropriation and repurposing of social technologies in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(1), 19–30. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00306.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, G., Atwater, M., & Wiggins, J. (1995). Attitudes toward science of urban seventh grade life science students over time, and the relationship to future plans, family, teacher, curriculum, and school. Urban Education, 30, 71–92. doi:10.1177/0042085995030001006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, H. T., & Wu, S. Y. (2011). Analyzing the social knowledge construction behavioural patterns of an online synchronous collaborative discussion instructional activity using an instant messaging tool: A case study. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1459–1468. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrastinski, S., & Dennen, V. (2012). Social media in higher education: Introduction to the special issue. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, H. S., Chiou, C. C., Chiang, H. K., Lai, S. H., Huang, C. Y., & Chou, Y. Y. (2012). Effects of multidimensional concept maps on fourth graders' learning in web-based computer course. Computers & Education, 58(3), 863–873. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, P. H., Hwang, G. J., Su, I., & Lin, I. H. (2012). A concept-map integrated dynamic assessment system for improving ecology observation competences in mobile learning activities. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(1), 10–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, G., Yang, L., & Wang, S. (2013). A concept map-embedded educational computer game for improving students' learning performance in natural science courses. Computers & Education, 69, 121–130. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandiko, C., & Hay, D. (2010). Exploring the limits of concept mapping: When language takes over. Proceedings of fourth int. conference on concept mapping, 248–256.
   Google Scholar
• Kao, G. Y. M., Lin, S. S. J., & Sun, C. T. (2008). Breaking concept boundaries to enhance creative potential: Using integrated concept maps for conceptual self-awareness. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1718–1728. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao, Y.-T., Lin, Y.-S., & Chu, C.-P. (2012). A multi-factor fuzzy inference and concept map approach for developing diagnostic and adaptive remedial learning systems. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 65–74. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.009
   Google Scholar
• Khamesan, A., & Hammond, N. (2004). Synchronous collaborative concept mapping via ICT: Learning effectiveness and personal and interpersonal awareness. In A. J. Cañas, J. D. Novak, & F. M. González (Eds.), Concept maps: Theory, methodology, technology. Proceedings of the first international conference on concept mapping (Vol. 1, pp. 385–392). Navarra: Dirección de Publicaciones de la Universidad Pública de Navarra. doi: 10.1.1.132.6645
   Google Scholar
• Kim, B. (2001). Social constructivism. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved from http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/
   Google Scholar
• Komis, V., Ergazaki, M., & Zogza, V. (2007). Comparing computer-supported dynamic modeling and “paper & pencil” concept mapping technique in students' collaborative activity. Computers & Education, 49(4), 991–1017. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, S. Y., & Cifuentes, L. (2009). The comparative effect of individually-constructed vs. collaboratively-constructed computer-based concept maps. Computers & Education, 52(2), 365–375. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledger, A. F. (2003). The effects of collaborative concept mapping on the achievement, science self-efficacy and attitude toward science of female eighth grade students (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and theses database (UMI No. 305323932).
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C. P., Wong, L. H., & Shao, Y. J. (2012). Comparison of 1:1 and 1:m CSCL environment for collaborative concept mapping. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(2), 99–113. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00421.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). An analysis of peer interaction patterns as discoursed by on-line small group problem-solving activity. Computers & Education, 50, 627–639. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P., Chen, C., & Chang, Y. (2010). Effects of a computer-assisted concept mapping learning strategy on EFL college students' English reading comprehension. Computers & Education, 54, 436–445. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X. (2004). Using concept mapping for assessing and promoting relational conceptual change in science. Science Education, 88(3), 373–396. doi:10.1002/sce.10127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, C. J., Stodel, E. J., Farres, L. G., Breithaupt, K., & Gabriel, M. A. (2001). The demand-driven learning model: A framework for web-based learning. Internet and Higher Education, 4(1), 9–30. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00045-8
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, K. A. (2010). Web 2.0 research: Introduction to the special issue. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 177–178. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskaliuk, J., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2009). Wiki-supported learning and knowledge building: Effects of incongruity between knowledge and information. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(6), 549–561. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00331.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskaliuk, J., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2012). Collaborative knowledge building with wikis: The impact of redundancy and polarity. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1049–1057. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naismith, L., Lee, B. H., & Pilkington, R. M. (2011). Collaborative learning with a wiki: Differences in perceived usefulness in two contexts of use. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 228–242. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neo, M. (2003). Developing a collaborative learning environment using a web-based design. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(4), 462–473. doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00050.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 937–949. doi:10.1002/tea.3660271003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D. (1991). Clarify with concept maps: A tool for students and teachers alike. The Science Teacher, 58, 45–49.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D., Gowin, D. B., & Kahle, J. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noyes, J. M., & Garland, K. J. (2008). Computer- vs. paper-based tasks: Are they equivalent? Ergonomics, 51(9), 1352–1375. doi:10.1080/00140130802170387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2006). PISA assessment of attitudes towards science. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa
   Google Scholar
• Oishi, L. (2007). Working together: Google Apps goes to school. Technology & Learning, 27(9), 46–47.
   Google Scholar
• Okebukola, P. A. (1992). Concept mapping with a cooperative learning flavor. The American Biology Teacher, 54(4), 218–221. doi: 10.2307/4449458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okebukola, P. A., & Jegede, O. J. (1988). Cognitive preference and learning mode as determinants of meaningful learning through concept mapping. Science Education, 72(4), 489–500. doi:10.1002/sce.3730720408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perron, B. E., & Sellers, J. (2011). A review of the collaborative and sharing aspects of Google Docs. Research on Social Work Practice, 21(4), 489–490. doi:10.1177/1049731510391676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Journal of Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puntambekar, S. (2006). Analyzing collaborative interactions: Divergence, shared understanding and construction of knowledge. Computers and Education, 47(3), 332–351. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhard, P., Hesse, F. W., Hron, A., & Picard, E. (1997). Manipulable graphics for computer-supported problem solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13(3), 148–162. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2729.1997.00017.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, W. (2009). Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful web tools for classrooms (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rienzo, T., & Han, B. (2009). Microsoft or Google Web 2.0 tools for course management. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 123–127.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W., & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). The concept map as a tool for the collaborative construction of knowledge: A microanalysis of high school physics students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(5), 503–534. doi:10.1002/tea.3660300508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W., & Roychoudhury, A. (1994). Science discourse through collaborative concept mapping: New perspectives for the teacher. International Journal of Science Education, 16(4), 437–455. doi:10.1080/0950069940160405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royer, R., & Royer, J. (2004). Comparing hand drawn and computer generated concept mapping. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 23(1), 67–81.
   Google Scholar
• Rye, J., Landenberger, R., & Warner, T. A. (2012). Incorporating concept mapping in project-based learning: Lessons from watershed investigations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(3), 379–392. doi:10.1007/s10956-012-9400-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siavin, R. E. (1991). Synthesis of research on cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 48(5), 71–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sizmur, S., & Osborne, J. (1997). Learning processes and collaborative concept mapping. International Journal of Science Education, 19(10), 1117–1135. doi:10.1080/0950069970191002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slotte, V., & Lonka, K. (1999). Spontaneous concept maps aiding the understanding of scientific concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 515–531. doi:10.1080/095006999290552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. U., Siegel, H., & McInerney, J. D. (1995). Foundational issues in evolution education. Science and Education, 4(1), 23–46. doi:10.1007/BF00486589
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, J. (1987). Social influences on the construction of pupils' understanding of science. Studies in Science Education, 14(1), 63–82. doi:10.1080/03057268708559939
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677–688. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.7.677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suthers, D. D., Hundhausen, C. D., & Girardeau, L. E. (2003). Comparing the roles of representations in face-to-face and online computer supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 41(4), 335–351. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2003.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suwantarathip, O., & Wichadee, S. (2014). The effects of collaborative writing activity using Google Docs on students' writing abilities. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(2), 148–157.
   Google Scholar
• Tobin, K., & Gallagher, J. (1987). What happens in high school science classrooms? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 549–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Translated by Knoxo and Carol. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. (2010). Using Google Docs as a collaboration tool. Athletic Training Education Journal, 5(2), 94–96.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S. L., & Lin, S. S. J. (2007). The effect of group composition of self-efficacy and collective efficacy on computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2256–2268. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wästlund, E., Reinikka, H., Norlander, T., & Archer, T. (2005). Effects of VDT and paper presentation on consumption and production of information: Psychological and physiological factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(2), 377–394. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, S., Yeomans, P., & Wheeler, D. (2008). The good, the bad and the wiki: Evaluating student-generated content for collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 987–995. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00799.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C. G. (1998). Using concept maps to assess conceptual knowledge of function. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(4), 414–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, P. H., Hwang, G. J., Milrad, M., Ke, H. R., & Huang, Y. M. (2012). An innovative concept map approach for improving students' learning performance with an instant feedback mechanism. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 217–232. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01167.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yager, R. E. (1984). Defining the discipline of science education. Science Education, 68(1), 35–37. doi:10.1002/sce.3730680107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, Y., Huang, L., & Yeh, Y. (2011). Knowledge management in blended learning: Effects on professional development in creativity instruction. Computers & Education, 56(1), 146–156. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakaria, E., & Iksan, Z. (2007). Promoting cooperative learning in science and mathematics education: A Malaysian perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(1), 35–39.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7–44. doi:10.1080/10508400802581676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, W., Simpson, E., & Domizi, D. P. (2012). Google Docs in an out-of-class collaborative writing activity. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 24(3), 359–375.
   Google Scholar