The programmers’ collective: fostering participatory culture by making music videos in a high school Scratch coding workshop

References

• Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1–35. doi: 10.3102/00346543064001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of the Learning sciences, 13(1), 15–42. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1301_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denner, J., & Werner, L. (2007). Computer programming in middle school: How pairs respond to challenges. Journal of Education Computing Research, 37(2), 131–150. doi: 10.2190/12T6-41L2-6765-G3T2
   Google Scholar
• DuMont, M., & Fields, D. A. (2013). Hybrid shmybrid: Using collaborative structure to understand the relationship between virtual and tangible elements of a computational craft. In N. Rummel, M. Kapur, M. Nathan, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), To see the world and a grain of sand: Learning across levels of space, time, and scale: CSCL 2013 Conference Proceedings, volume 2, short papers, panels, posters, demos & community events (pp. 233–234). Madison, WI: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Enyedy, N., Danish, J., & Fields, D. A. (2011). Negotiating the “relevant” in culturally relevant mathematics. Canadian Journal of Mathematics, 11(3), 273–291.
   Google Scholar
• Enyedy, N., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2007). “They don't show anything I didn't know”: Emergent tensions between culturally relevant pedagogy and mathematics pedagogy. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 139–174. doi: 10.1080/10508400701193671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fadjo, C. L. (2012). Developing computational thinking through grounded embodied cognition (Unpublished dissertation). New York, NY: Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Fields, D. A., Giang, M. T., Kafai, Y. B. (2014). Programming in the wild: Patterns of computational participation in the Scratch online social networking forum. In Proceedings of the 9th workshop in primary and secondary computing education (pp. 2–11). New York, NY: ACM. Retrieved from http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2670757.2670768
   Google Scholar
• Fields, D. A., Giang, M., & Kafai, Y. B. (2013). Understanding collaborative practices in the Scratch online community: Patterns of participation among youth designers. In N. Rummel, M. Kapur, M. Nathan, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), To see the world and a grain of sand: Learning across levels of space, time, and scale: CSCL 2013 conference proceedings, volume 1, full papers & Symposia (pp. 200–207). Madison, WI: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Fields, D. A., Kafai, Y. B., Strommer, A., Wolf, E., & Seiner, B. (2014). Interactive storytelling for promoting creative expression in media and coding in youth online collaboratives in Scratch. In Proceedings of constructionism. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://constructionism2014.ifs.tuwien.ac.at/papers/3.2_2-8540.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fields, D. A., Pantic, K., & Kafai, Y. B. (2015). “I have a tutorial for this”: The language of online peer support in the Scratch programming community. In Proceedings of interaction design and children, (IDC '15) (pp. 229–238). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Grimes, S. M., & Fields, D. (2012). Kids online: A new research agenda for understanding social networking forums. New York, NY: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop. Retrieved from http://www.joanganzcooneycenter.org/reports-38.html
   Google Scholar
• Grimes, S. M., & Fields, D. A. (2015). Children's media making, but not sharing: The potential and limitations of child-specific DIY media websites for a more inclusive media landscape. Special Issue of Media International Australia, 154, 112–122.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., boyd, D., Cody, R., Herr, B., … Tripp, L. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, geeking out: Living and learning with new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. B., & Burke, W. Q. (2014). Connected code: Children as the programmers, designers and makers for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. B., Desai, S., Peppler, K., Chiu, G., & Moya, J. (2008). Mentoring partnerships in a community technology center: A constructionist approach for fostering equitable service learning. Mentoring & Tutoring. 16(2), 194–201. doi: 10.1080/13611260801916614
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. B., Fields, D. A., & Burke, W. Q. (2010). Entering the clubhouse: Case studies of young programmers joining the online Scratch communities. Journal of Organizational and End-User Computing, 22(2), 21–35. doi: 10.4018/joeuc.2010101906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. B., Fields, D. A., Roque, R., Burke, W. Q., & Monroy-Hernández, A. (2012). Collaborative agency in youth online and offline creative production in Scratch. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 7(2), 63–87.
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. B., Griffin, J., Burke, W. Q. Slattery, M., Fields, D. A., Powell, R., … Sun, J. S. (2013). Broadening participation in and perceptions of computing through cascading mentoring: Implementing a CS community service learning course. In Proceedings of the 44th ACM technical symposium on computer science education (SIGCSE '13) (pp. 101–106). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Luther, K., Caine, K., Ziegler, K., & Bruckman, A. (2010). Why it works (when it works): Success factors in online creative collaboration. In GROUP ’10: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 1–10). New York, NY: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magnifico, A. M. (2010). Writing for whom? Cognition, motivation, and a writer's audience. Educational Psychologist, 45(3), 167–184. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2010.493470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloney, J., Peppler, K., Kafai, Y., Resnick, M., & Rusk, N. (2008). Programming by choice. Urban youth learning programming with Scratch. Portland, OR: Paper presented at the SIGCSE 2008 Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Monroy-Hernandez, A. (2012). Designing for remixing: Supporting an online community of amateur creators (Unpublished dissertation). MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Ogata, A. F. (2013). Designing the creative child. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, L. Guzdial, M., McDowell, C., & Simon, B. (2013). Success in introductory programming: What works? Communications of ACM, 56(8), 34–36. doi: 10.1145/2492007.2492020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Hernández, A. M., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., … Kafai, Y. B. (2009). Scratch: Programming for everyone. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60–67. doi: 10.1145/1592761.1592779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roque, R., Kafai, Y. B., & Fields, D. A. (2012). From tools to communities: Designs to support online creative collaboration in Scratch. Proceedings of IDC 2012. Bremen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Learning how to create: Toward a learning sciences of art and design. In J. van Aalst, K. Thompson, M. J. Jacobson, & P. Reimann. (Eds.), The future of learning: Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS 2012), volume 1, full papers (pp. 33–39). Sydney, NSW, Australia: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago, IL: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. W., & Resnick, M. (1999). “Thick” authenticity: New media and authentic learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 10(2), 195–215.
   Google Scholar