Pedagogical and technological augmentation of mobile learning for young children interactive learning environments

References

• August, D., Carlo, M., Dressler, C., & Snow, C. (2005). The critical role of vocabulary development for English language learners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20(1), 50–57.
   Google Scholar
• Blumenfeld, P. C., Kempler, T. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2006). Motivation and cognitive engagement in learning environments. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 475–488). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buckieituer, W. (2010). A taxonomy of touch. Children's Technology Review, 18(11), 10–11.
   Google Scholar
• Carnine, D. W., Silbert, J., & Kame'enui, E. J. (1997). Direct instruction reading (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Carpendale, J. I. M., & Muller, U. (Eds.). (2004). Social interaction and the development of knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C. W., Lee, J. H., Chao, P. Y., Wang, C. Y., & Chen, G. D. (2010). Exploring the possibility of using humanoid robots as instructional tools for teaching a second language in primary school. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(2), 13–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). Effects of educational technology applications on reading outcomes for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(3), 277–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Common Sense Media. (2013). Zero to eight: Children's media use in America. Retrieved March 21, 2015 from https://www.commonsensemedia.org/research/zero-to-eight-childrens-media-use-in-america-2013
   Google Scholar
• Erstad, O. (2012). The learning lives of digital youth—beyond the formal and informal. Oxford Review Of Education, 38(1), 25–43. doi:10.1080/03054985.2011.577940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, S., & McCalla, G. (2013, July 9–13). Exploring through simulation the effects of peer impact on learning. Paper presented at the Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED), Workshop on Simulated Learners, Memphis, TN.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Mathes, P. G., & Simmons, D. C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 174–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, C. (2008). Teaching English language learners: What the research does—and does not–say. American Educator, 32(2), 8–23.
   Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, C., Rueda, R. S., & August, D. (2006). Synthesis: Sociocultural contexts and literacy development. In D. August & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the national literacy panel on language minority children and youth (pp. 249–265). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Gopnik, A. (2012). Scientific thinking in young children: Theoretical advances, empirical research, and policy implications. Science, 337(6102), 1623–1627. doi:10.1126/science.1223416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, G. H., & Chapman, C. (2013). Differentiated instructional strategies: One size doesn’t fit all. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., & Alao, S. (1997). Designing contexts to increase motivations for reading. Educational Psychologist, 32(2), 95–105. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3202_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Humenick, N. M., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., & Barbosa, P. (2006). Influences of stimulating tasks on reading motivation and comprehension. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 232–246245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamre, B., Hatfield, B., Pianta, R., & Jamil, F. (2014). Evidence for general and domain-specific elements of teacher-child interactions: Associations with preschool children's development. Child Development, 85(3), 1257–1274. doi:10.1111/cdev.12184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, J., Ren, J., Zhu, G., Cai, S., & Chen, G. (2014, July 7–10). Mobile-based AR application helps to promote EFL children’s vocabulary study. Paper presented at the 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Athens, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, S., Floyd, K., & Jeffs, T. (2015). Using mobile media devices and apps to promote young children's learning. In K. L. Heider & M. R. Jalongo (Eds.), Young children and families in the information age, educating the young child (Vol. 10, pp. 117–131). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, P. H. E. H., Shen, G. S., & Gary H. E. (2013). Social and moral relationships with robots: Genetic epistemology in an exponentially increasing technological world. Human Development, 56(1), 1–4. doi:10.1159/000345544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Lim, J. (2013). Gendered socialization with an embodied agent: Creating a social and affable mathematics learning environment for middle-grade females. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1164–1174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, M., Scordino, R., Geurtz, R., Navarrete, C., Ko, Y., & Lim, M. (2014). A look at research on mobile learning in K-12 education from 2007 to the present. Journal of research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 325–372.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuda, N., Cohen, W., Sewall, J., Lacerda, G., & Koedinger, K. (2007, July). Evaluating a simulated student using real students data for training and testing. Paper presented at the user modeling.  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Radesky, J. S., Schumacher, J., & Zuckerman, B. (2015). Mobile and interactive media use by young children: The good, the bad, and the unknown. Pediatrics, 135(1), 1–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, B., Ferrari, E., Dautenhaha, K., Kronreif, G., Prazak-Aram, B., Gelderblom, G.-j., … Marti, P. (2010). Human-centered design methods: Developing scenarios for robot assisted play informed by user panels and field trials. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 68(12), 873–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roseberry, S., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2014). Skype me! Socially contingent interactions help toddlers learn language. Child Development, 85(3), 956–970. doi:10.1111/cdev.12166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryokai, K., Vaucelle, C., & Cassell, J. (2003). Virtual peers as partners in storytelling and literacy learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(2), 195–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saenz, L. M., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Peer-assisted learning strategies for English language learners with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 71(3), 231–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, W., Goldenberg, C., & Marcelletti, D. (2013). English language development: Guidelines for instruction. American Educator, 37(2), 13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (1987). Peer models and children's behavioral change. Review of Educational Research, 57(2), 149–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (1991). Learning theories: An educational perspective. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. L., Chase, C. C., Chin, D. B., Oppezo, M. A., Kwong, H., & Wagster, J. (2009). Interactive metacognition: Monitoring and regulating a teachable agent. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 340–358). New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Sharples, M., Arnedillo-Sanchez, I., Milrad, M., & Vavoula, G. (2009). Mobile learning: Small devices, big issues. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. D. Jong, A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning (pp. 233–249). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sharples, M., & Pea, R. (2014). Mobile learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 501–521). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shuler, C. (2009). Pockets of potential: Using mobile technologies to promote children's learning at sesame workshop. New York, NY: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, R. D. (2007). Vocabulary development of English language and English only learners in kindergarten. The Elementary School Journal, 107(4), 365–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trumbull, E., & Pacheco, M. (2005). The teacher’s guide to diversity: Building a knowledge base (Vol. 1). Providence, RI: The Education Alliance.
   Google Scholar
• Uekawa, K., Borman, K., & Lee, G. (2007). Student engagement in U.S. Urban high school mathematics and science classroom: Findings on social organization, race, and ethnicity. Urban Review, 39(1), 1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, J. (2015). Mobile opportunities: Exploring positive mobile media opportunities for European children: The London School of Economics and Political Science. Polis: Journalism and Society. Retrieved from http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/documents/Mobile-Opportunities.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S., Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S., & Souberman, E. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westlund, J. K., & Breazeal, C. (2015, March 3–5). The interplay of robot language level with children’s language learning during storytelling. Paper presented at the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, Portland, OR.
   Google Scholar
• Wittmer, D. (2012). The wonder and complexity of infant and toddler peer relationships. Young Children, 67(4), 16–25.
   Google Scholar
• Woolf, B. P., Arroyo, I., Muldner, K., Burleson, W., Cooper, D. G., & Christopherson, R. M. (2010). The effect of motivational learning companions on low achieving students and students with disabilities. In V. Aleven, J. Kay, & J. Mostow (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 327–337). Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Zaffke, A., Jain, N., Johnson, N., Alam, M. A. U., Magiera, M., & Ahamed, S. I. (2014, June 25–27). iCanLearn: A mobile application for creating flashcards and social stories for children with autism. Paper presented at the 12th international conference on smart homes and health telematics, ICOST 2014, Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar