Type and degree of co-occurrence of the educational communication in a community of inquiryFootnote^*

* This research was conducted in University of Granada, Spain.

References

• Akayoğlu, S., Altun, A., & Stevens, V. (2009). Social presence in synchronous text-based computer-mediated communication. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 34, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Assessing metacognition in an online community of inquiry. Internet and Higher Education, 14, 183–190. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akyol, Z., Garrison, R., & Ozden, M. Y. (2009). Online and blended communities of inquiry: Exploring the developmental and perceptional differences. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 10(6), 65–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. Internet and Higher Education, 11(3–4), 133–136. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caudle, L. A. (2013). Using a sociocultural perspective to establish teaching and social presence within a hybrid community of mentor teachers. Adult Learning, 24(3), 112–120. doi:10.1177/1045159513489112
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, S. C. (2009). Social presence and online learning: A current view from a research perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(3), 241–254.
   Google Scholar
• Darabi, A., Arrastia, M. C., Nelson, D. W., Cornille, T., & Liang, X. (2011). Cognitive presence in asynchronous online learning: A comparison of four discussion strategies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 216–227. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00392.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Varre, C., Keane, J., & Irvin, M. J. (2011). Dual perspectives on the contribution of on-site facilitators to teaching presence in a blended learning environment. The Journal of Distance Education, 25(3), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework of research and practice. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 1–14. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking and computer conferencing: A model and tool to assess cognitive presence. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. (2004). Students’ role adjustment in online communities of inquiry: Model and instrument validation. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(2), 61–74.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., Koole, M., & Kappelman, J. (2006). Revisiting methodological issues in transcript analysis: Negotiated coding and reliability. The Internet and Higher Education, 9, 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Aguilar, D. A., Suárez-Guerrero, C., Therón-Sánchez, R., García-Peñalva, F. J. (2010). Visual analytics to support e-learning. In M. B. Rosson (Ed.), Advances in learning processes (pp. 207–228). Croatia: In-Tech. doi:10.5772/7932
   Google Scholar
• Halvorsen, A. (2012). Patterns of emoticon usage in ESL students’ discussion forum writing. CALICO Journal, 29(4), 694–717.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkes, M. (2006). Linguistic discourse variables as indicators of reflective online interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 20(4), 231–244.
   Google Scholar
• Hosler, K. A., & Arend, B. D. (2012). The importance of course design, feedback, and facilitation: Student perceptions of the relationship between teaching presence and cognitive presence. Educational Media International, 49(3), 217–229. doi:10.1080/09523987.2012.738014
   Google Scholar
• Kupczynski, L., Ice, P., Wiesenmayer, R., & McCluskey, F. (2010). Student perceptions of the relationship between indicators of teaching presence and success in online courses. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(1), 23–43.
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, M. D., & Ervin-Tripp, S. M. (2014). Structured coding for the study of language and social interaction. In J. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data. Transcription and coding in discourse research (3rd ed., pp. 169–206). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipponen, L., & Rahikainen, M. (2003). Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students’ computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 13, 487–509. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00042-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luor, T., Wu, L., Lu, H.-P., & Tao, Y.-H. (2010). The effect of emoticons in simple and complex task-oriented communication: An empirical study of instant messaging. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 889–895. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (2000). Words & minds. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, T. (2011). Online classroom or community-in-the-making? Instructor conceptualizations and teaching presence in international online contexts. The Journal of Distance Education, 25(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Naidu, S., & Järvelä, S. (2006). Analyzing CMC content for what? Computer & Education, 46, 96–103. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, C. L. (2009). Replicating the use of a cognitive presence measurement tool. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2), 140–155.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Mateo, M., & Guitert, M. (2012). Which social elements are visible in virtual groups? Addressing the categorization of social expressions. Computer & Education, 58, 1234–1246. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto-Llorente, A. M., Sánchez-Gómez, M. C., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2015). To be or not to be successful? That does not only depend on technology, but also on human factors. Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 17(1), 51–71.
   Google Scholar
• Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2004). Validity in quantitative content analysis. Education Technology Research and Development, 52(1), 5–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2000). Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 8–22.
   Google Scholar
• Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. The Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 50–71.
   Google Scholar
• Schrire, S. (2006). Knowledge building in asynchronous discussion groups: Going beyond quantitative analysis. Computers & Education, 46, 49–70. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seoane, A. M., & García-Peñalva, F. J. (2014). Pedagogical patterns and online teaching. In F. J. García-Peñalvo & A. M. Seoane (Eds.), Online tutor 2.0: Methodologies and case studies for successful learning (pp. 298–316). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. S. (2009). Writing web-based distance education courses for adult learners. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 53–65. doi:10.1080/08923640109527084
   Google Scholar
• Spector, J. M. (2008). Theoretical foundations. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Van Merriënboer, & M. P. Driscoll, (Eds.), Research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 21–28). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Stodel, E. J., Thompson, T. L., & McDonald, C. J. (2006). Learners’ perspectives on what is missing from online learning interpretations through the Community of Inquiry framework. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 7(3), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strijbos, J.-W., Martens, R. L., Prins, F., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2006). Content analysis: What are they talking about? Computers & Education, 46, 29–48. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research. Analysis types & software tools. Bedford, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R. P. (1990). Content analysis. In Basic content analysis (2nd ed., pp. 117–124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Weerasinghe, T. A., Ramberg, R., & Hewagamage, K. P. (2012). Inquiry-based learning with or without facilitator interactions. The Journal of Distance Education, 26(2), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. In B. M. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 308–319). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar