Examining civil servants’ decisions to use Web 2.0 tools for learning, based on the decomposed theory of planned behavior

References

• Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 71–80. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajjan, H., Hartshorne, R., & Buechler, S. (2012). Investigating Web 2.0 application impacts on knowledge workers’ decisions and performance. Information Resources Management Journal, 25(4), 65–83. doi: 10.4018/irmj.2012100104
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alton, Y. K. C., Goh, D. H., & Ang, R. P. (2012). Web 2.0 applications in government Web sites. Online Information Review, 36(2), 175–195. doi:10.1108/14684521211229020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, G. J., & Connolly, T. M. (2013). The “state of art” of organisational blogging. Learning Organization, 20(2), 104–117. doi: 10.1108/09696471311303755
   Google Scholar
• Bonsón, E., Torres, L., Royo, S., & Floresc, F. (2012). Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 123–132. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1054–1064. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. doi:10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, K., & Shami, N. S. (2010, May). Microblogging inside and outside the workplace. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 42–49). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gujarati, D. (2003). Basic econometrics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hartshorne, R., & Ajjan, H. (2009). Examining student decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21(3), 183–198. doi: 10.1007/s12528-009-9023-6
   Google Scholar
• Huang, K.-Y., & Güney, S. (2012). Toward a framework of Web 2.0-driven organizational learning. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 31, 128–152.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, W.-C., & Jeng, I. (2013). Factors influencing future educational technologists’ intentions to participate in online teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 255–272. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01294.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, H.-J. (2011). The influence of adult learners’ self-directed learning readiness and network literacy on online learning effectiveness: A study of civil servants in Taiwan. Educational Technology & Society, 14(2), 98–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C.-C., & Chou, C. (2014). Strategies of establishing E-learning system for public sector. Retrieved from http://www.rad.gov.tw/wSite/ct?xItem=51263&ctNode=444&mp=en
   Google Scholar
• Martin, G., Reddington, M., & Kneafsey, M. B. (2009). Web 2.0 and human resource management: ‘Groundswell’ or Hype? London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173–191. doi: 10.1287/isre.2.3.173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nath, J. (2011). Reimagining government in the digital age. National Civic Review, 100(3), 19–23. doi:10.1002/ncr.20070
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Osimo, D. (2008). Web 2.0 in government: Why and how. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS), JRC, European Commission, EUR, 23358.
   Google Scholar
• Sadaf, A., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2012). Exploring factors that predict preservice teachers’ intentions to use Web 2.0 technologies using decomposed theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(2), 171–196. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2012.10782602
   Google Scholar
• Sandars, J., & Schroter, S. (2007). Web 2.0 technologies for undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: An online survey. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 83(986), 759–762. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2007.063123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiue, Y.-M. (2007). Investigating the sources of teachers’ instructional technology use through the decomposed theory of planned behavior. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(4), 425–453. doi: 10.2190/A407-22RR-50X6-2830
   Google Scholar
• Sigala, M., & Chalkiti, K. (2014). Investigating the exploitation of Web 2.0 for knowledge management in the Greek Tourism industry: An utilisation–importance analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 30(0), 800–812. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeels, M. M., & Grudin, J. (2009, May). When social networks cross boundaries: A case study of workplace use of Facebook and Linkedin. Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 95–104). New York: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176. doi: 10.1287/isre.6.2.144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T. (2012). Examining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: An integration of the technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior. Interactive Learning Environments, 20(1), 3–18. doi: 10.1080/10494821003714632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, F., & Kemp, L. J. (2012). Integrating Web 2.0-based informal learning with workplace training. Educational Media International, 49(3), 231–245. doi:10.1080/09523987.2012.738015
   Google Scholar