1,086
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Development and validation of Mobile Learning Acceptance Measure

, &
Pages 847-858 | Received 25 Jan 2016, Accepted 13 Jun 2016, Published online: 13 Sep 2016

References

  • Agudo-Peregrina, Á. F., Hernández-García, Á., & Pascual-Miguel, F. J. (2014). Behavioral intention, use behavior and the acceptance of electronic learning systems: Differences between higher education and lifelong learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 301–314. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.035
  • Akkoyunlu, B., & Yılmaz-Soylu, M. (2008). Development of a scale on learners’ views on blended learning and its implementation process. Internet and Higher Education, 11, 26–32. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.12.006
  • Ally, M., Samaka, M., Loay, I., & John, I. (2013). Use of mobile learning apps in workplace learning. Bulletin of the IEEE Technical Committee on Learning Technology, 15(4), 6–9.
  • Andreea, M., & Cristina, H. (2012). Mobile learning: An economic approach. In Intelligent and adaptive learning systems: Technology enhanced support for learners and teachers (pp. 311–326). IGI Global.
  • Andrew, K. (2011). Models for interdisciplinary mobile learning: Delivering Information to Students. IGI Global.
  • Artino, A. R., & McCoach, D. B. (2008). Development and initial validation of the online learning value and self-efficacy scale. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38, 379–403. doi: 10.2190/EC.38.3.c
  • Bernard, R., Brauer, A., Abrami, P., & Noar, S. (2003). The role of structural equation modeling in scale development. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 622–647. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM1004_8
  • Bernard, R. M., Brauer, A., Abrami, P. C., & Surkes, M. (2004). The development of a questionnaire for predicting online learning achievement. Distance Education, 25(1), 31–47. doi: 10.1080/0158791042000212440
  • Cedric, C., Hannelore, M., Frederik, D., Annelies, R., Lieven, D., & Tammy, S. (2014). Student acceptance of tablet devices in secondary education: A three-wave longitudinal cross-lagged case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 278–286. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.017
  • Chang, K. E., Wu, L. J., Lai, S. C., & Sung, Y. T. (2014). Using mobile devices to enhance the interactive learning for spatial geometry. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(4), 916–934. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2014.948458
  • Chiu, T. K., & Churchill, D. (2015). Adoption of mobile devices in teaching: Changes in teacher beliefs, attitudes and anxiety. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(2), 317–327. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2015.1113709
  • Claudia, D. (2013). New forms of learning for vocational education: Mobile learning–social learning–game-based learning. BWP Special Edition, 27–30.
  • Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340. doi: 10.2307/249008
  • Duggan, A., Hess, B., Morgan, D., Kim, S., & Wilson, K. (1999). Measuring students’ attitude toward educational use of the Internet. ERIC Reproduction Service No. ED. 429 117.
  • Economides, A. A., & Nikolaou, N. (2008). Evaluation of handheld devices for mobile learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 24(1), 3–13.
  • Eunil, P., & Jay, O. (2014). Factors influencing users’ employment of mobile map services. Telematics and Informatics, 31(2), 253–265. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2013.07.002
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Hossein, M. (2015). Social and individual antecedents of m-learning adoption in Iran. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 191–207. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.006
  • Huang, R., Hsiao, C., Tang, T., & Lien, T. (2014). Exploring the moderating role of perceived flexibility advantages in mobile learning continuance intention (MLCI). The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(3), 140–157.
  • Jen-Hung, H., Yu-Ru, L., & Shu-Ting, C. (2007). Elucidating user behavior of mobile learning: A perspective of the extended Technology Acceptance Model. The Electronic Library, 25, 585–598. doi: 10.1108/02640470710829569
  • Kaiser, H. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151. doi: 10.1177/001316446002000116
  • Kay, R. H., & Knaack, L. (2008). A multi-component model for assessing learning objects: The learning object evaluation metric (LOEM). Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24, 574–591. doi: 10.14742/ajet.1192
  • Keengwe, J., & Bhargava, M. (2013). Mobile learning and integration of mobile technologies in education. Education and Information Technologies, 19(4), 737–746. doi: 10.1007/s10639-013-9250-3
  • Lee, H. J. (2015). A theoretical discussion for e-text communication in learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(3), 317–331. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2012.745438
  • Nikou, S., & Bouwman, H. (2014). Ubiquitous use of mobile social network services. Telematics and Informatics, 31(3), 422–433. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2013.11.002
  • Nunnally, J. (1978). Citation classic-psychometric theory. Current Contents/Social & Behavioral Sciences, 22, 12–12.
  • Ozdamli, F., & Uzunboylu, H. (2014). M-learning and perceptions of students and teachers in secondary schools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1), 159–172. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12136
  • Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Retta, G. (2009). The evolution of mobile teaching and learning. California: Informing Science Press.
  • Rovai, A. P., Wighting, M. J., Baker, J. D., & Grooms, L. D. (2009). Development of an instrument to measure perceived cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning in traditional and virtual classroom higher education settings. Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.002
  • Sang, Y. L. (2014). Examining the factors that influence early adopters’ smartphone adoption: The case of college students. Telematics and Informatics, 31(2), 308–318. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2013.06.001
  • Sarrab, M. (2015). Mobile learning (M-learning) concepts, characteristics, methods, components: Platforms and frameworks. New York, NY: Nova Science. ISBN 978-1-63463-342-0
  • Sarrab, M., Elbasir, M., & Alnaeli, S. (2016). Towards a quality model of technical aspects for mobile learning services: An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 100–112. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.003
  • Sharma, S. K., & Govindaluri, S. M. (2014). Internet banking adoption in India: Structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Indian Business Research, 6(2), 155–169. doi: 10.1108/JIBR-02-2013-0013
  • Sharma, S. K., Joshi, A., & Sharma, H. (2016). A multi-analytical approach to predict the Facebook usage in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 340–353. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.020
  • Shittu, T., Madarsha, K., Fakomogbon, O., & Alhaji, L. (2013). Determinant of mobile devices acceptance for learning among students in developing country. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 1(3), 17–29.
  • Statista. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.statista.com/statistics/203734/global-smartphone-penetration-per-capita-since-2005/
  • Sung, H. Y., Hwang, G. J., & Chang, Y. C. (2013). Development of a mobile learning system based on a collaborative problem-posing strategy. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 456–471. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2013.867889
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Pearson Education.
  • Tan, G. W. H., Ooi, K. B., Leong, L. Y., & Lin, B. (2014). Predicting the drivers of behavioral intention to use mobile learning: A hybrid SEM-neural networks approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 198–213. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.052
  • Tarhini, A., Hone, K., Liu, X., & Tarhini, T. (2016). Examining the moderating effect of individual-level cultural values on users’ acceptance of E-learning in developing countries: A structural equation modeling of an extended Technology Acceptance Model. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–23. doi:10.1080/10494820.2015.1122635.
  • Tarhini, A., Teo, T., & Tarhini, T. (2015). A cross-cultural validity of the E-Learning Acceptance Measure (ElAM) in Lebanon and England: A confirmatory factor analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 21(5), 1269–1282. doi: 10.1007/s10639-015-9381-9
  • Teo, T. (2010). Development and validation of the E-Learning Acceptance Measure (ElAM). The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 148–152. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.02.001
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–478.
  • Zhang, Y. (2005). Development and validation of an internet use attitude scale. Computers & Education, 49, 243–253. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.05.005

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.