1,051
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The impact of transactive memory system and interaction platform in collaborative knowledge construction on social presence and self-regulation

, &
Pages 949-969 | Received 16 Dec 2015, Accepted 11 Aug 2016, Published online: 09 Sep 2016

References

  • Akgün, A. E., Byrne, J., Keskin, H., Lynn, G. S., & Imamoglu, S. Z. (2005). Knowledge networks in new product development projects: A transactive memory perspective. Information & Management, 42(8), 1105–1120. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2005.01.001
  • Alsancak, D. (2010). The investigation of the relationship between transactive memory with group cohesion, group atmosphere and performance in computer supported collaboration learning environments (master thesis). Hacettepe University, Ankara.
  • Alsancak, D., & Altun, A. (2011). The relationship between transactive memory and group cohesion, group atmosphere and performance in computer supported collaboration learning environments. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 1(2), 1–16.
  • Aragon, S. R. (2003). Creating social presence in online environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2003(100), 57–68. doi: 10.1002/ace.119
  • Ariff, M. I. M., Milton, S. K., Bosua, R., & Sharma, R. (2011). Exploring the role of ICT in the formation of transactive memory systems in virtual teams. In 15th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems: Quality research in pacific (PACIS 2011) (pp. 1–12). Queensland: Queensland University of Technology.
  • Aydın, S. (2012). The effects of project-based learning environment on preservice biology teachers’ self-regulation levels and self-efficacy beliefs (Unpublished PhD thesis). Gazi University, Ankara.
  • Beldarrain, Y. (2006). Distance education trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education, 27, 139–153. doi: 10.1080/01587910600789498
  • Bluemink, J., Hämäläinen, R., Manninen, T., & Järvelä, S. (2010). Group-level analysis on multiplayer game collaboration: How do the individuals shape the group interaction? Interactive Learning Environments, 18(4), 365–383. doi: 10.1080/10494820802602444
  • Bodemer, D., & Dehler, J. (2011). Group awareness in CSCL environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1043–1045. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.014
  • Brown, E. C., & Hartley, J. R. (1999). Effective pedagogies for managing collaborative learning in on-line learning environments. Educational Technology & Society, 2(2), 39–57.
  • Brown, J. M., Miller, W. R., & Lawendowski, L. A. (1999). The self-regulation questionnaire. In L. VandeCreek & T. L. Jackson (Eds.), Innovations in clinical practice: A source book (pp. 281–289). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
  • Buder, J., & Bodemer, D. (2008). Supporting controversial CSCL discussions with augmented group awareness tools. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(2), 123–139. doi: 10.1007/s11412-008-9037-5
  • Cheung, C. M., Chiu, P. Y., & Lee, M. K. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use Facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1337–1343. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.028
  • Choi, S. Y., Lee, H., & Yoo, Y. (2010). The impact of information technology and transactive memory systems on knowledge sharing, application, and team performance: A field study. MIS Quarterly, 34(4), 855–870.
  • Chou, S. W., & Min, H. T. (2009). The impact of media on collaborative learning in virtual settings: The perspective of social construction. Computers & Education, 52(2), 417–431. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.006
  • Chung, N., Lee, S., & Han, H. (2015). Understanding communication types on travel information sharing in social media: A transactive memory systems perspective. Telematics and Informatics, 32(4), 564–575. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2015.02.002
  • Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2008). A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(2), 105–122. doi: 10.1007/s11412-007-9035-z
  • Duncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 117–128. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4002_6
  • Fransen, J., Weinberger, A., & Kirschner, P. A. (2013). Team effectiveness and team development in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 9–24. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2012.747947
  • Hollingshead, A. B. (1998a). Communication, learning, and retrieval in transactive memory systems. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34(5), 423–442. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1998.1358
  • Hollingshead, A. B. (1998b). Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 659–671. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.659
  • Hollingshead, A. B. (2001). Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1080–1089. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1080
  • Huang, C. C. (2009). Knowledge sharing and group cohesiveness on performance: An empirical study of technology R&D teams in Taiwan. Technovation, 29, 786–797. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.04.003
  • Jackson, M., & Moreland, R. L. (2009). Transactive memory in the classroom. Small Group Research, 40(5), 508–534. doi: 10.1177/1046496409340703
  • Jackson, P. D., & Klobas, J. E. (2010). Exploring the potential of Web 2.0 to improve knowledge directories and “group mind”. Milan: Bocconi University, Carlo F. Dondena Centre for Research on Social Dynamics.
  • Jacobson, M. J., & Wilensky, U. (2006). Complex systems in education: Scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 11–34. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1501_4
  • Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kanselaar, G. (2012). Task-related and social regulation during online collaborative learning. Metacognition and Learning, 7(1), 25–43. doi: 10.1007/s11409-010-9061-5
  • Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., Panadero, E., Malmberg, J., Phielix, C., Jaspers, J., … Järvenoja, H. (2014). Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: Designing for CSCL regulation tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(1), 125–142. doi: 10.1007/s11423-014-9358-1
  • Kahn, A. S. (2013). We’re all in this (game) together: Transactive memory systems, social presence, and social information processing in video game teams. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California.
  • Kang, M., Choi, H., & Park, S. (2007). Construction and validation of a social presence scale for measuring online learners’ involvement. In C. Montgomerie & J. Seale (Eds.), Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications (pp. 1829–1833). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  • Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G. (2014). The effect of reflective thinking activities in e-learning environments on academic success, social presence and motivation (Unpublished PhD thesis). Ankara University, Ankara.
  • Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G., & Keser, H. (2016). The impact of reflective thinking activities in e-learning: A critical review of the empirical research. Computers & Education, 95, 163–173. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.006
  • Kay, R. H. (2012). Exploring the use of video podcasts in education: A comprehensive review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 820–831. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.011
  • Kim, B. (2001). Social constructivism. Emerging Perspectives on Learning, Teaching, and Technology, 1(1), 1–6.
  • Kim, I., Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., & Archodidou, A. (2007). Discourse patterns during children’s collaborative online discussions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 333–370. doi: 10.1080/10508400701413419
  • Kirschner, P. A. (2015). Facebook as learning platform: Argumentation superhighway or dead-end street? Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 621–625. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.011
  • Kirschner, P. A., Martens, R. L., & Strijbos, J. W. (2004). CSCL in higher education? A framework for designing multiple collaborative environments. In J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner, & R. L. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL, and implementing it in higher education (pp. 3–30). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Komis, V., Avouris, N., & Fidas, C. (2002). Computer-supported collaborative concept mapping: Study of synchronous peer interaction. Education and Information Technologies, 7(2), 169–188. doi: 10.1023/A:1020309927987
  • Kreijns, K. (2004). Sociable CSCL environments: Social affordances, sociability, and social presence (Unpublished PhD thesis). Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen.
  • Kreijns, K., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). Determining sociability, social space and social presence in (a)synchronous collaborating teams. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7(2), 155–172. doi: 10.1089/109493104323024429
  • Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Vermeulen, M. (2013). Social aspects of CSCL environments: A research framework. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 229–242. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2012.750225
  • Lewis, K. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 587–604. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.587
  • Lewis, K. (2004). Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Science, 50, 1519–1533. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0257
  • Li, D. D., & Lim, P. C. (2008). Scaffolding online historical inquiry tasks: A case study of two secondary school classrooms. Computers and Education, 50(4), 1394–1410. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.12.013
  • Liang, D. W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group versus individual training and group performance: The Mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(4), 384–393. doi: 10.1177/0146167295214009
  • Lin, S. J., & Crawford, Y. (2007). Innovations in teaching: An online debate series for first-year pharmacy students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 71(1), 1–8. doi: 10.5688/aj710112
  • Liu, X. (2006). Effects of different explanation prompts on computer supported collaborative learning ın a case-based environment (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
  • Marttunen, M., & Laurinen, L. (2001). Learning of argumentation skills in networked and face-to-face environments. Instructional Science, 29, 127–153. doi: 10.1023/A:1003931514884
  • Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
  • Moreland, R. L., & Myaskovsky, L. (2000). Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 117–133. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2891
  • Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J., Busstra, M. C., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2011). Differences in learning processes between successful and less successful students in computer-supported collaborative learning in the field of human nutrition and health. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 309–318. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.009
  • Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J., Weinberger, A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2013). Scripting for construction of a transactive memory system in multidisciplinary CSCL environments. Learning and Instruction, 25, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.10.002
  • Noroozi, O., Teasley, S. D., Biemans, H. J., Weinberger, A., & Mulder, M. (2013). Facilitating learning in multidisciplinary groups with transactive CSCL scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(2), 189–223. doi: 10.1007/s11412-012-9162-z
  • Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2012). Argumentation-based computer supported collaborative learning (ABCSCL): A synthesis of 15 years of research. Educational Research Review, 7(2), 79–106. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.006
  • Olpak, Y. Z. (2010). Effects of different interaction tools used in online learning environments to the achievements and social presence perceptions of students (Master thesis). Gazi University, Ankara.
  • Olpak, Y. Z., & Cakmak, E. K. (2009). Assessing social presence in e-learning environments: Validity and reliability analysis. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), 142–160.
  • Park, H., & Seo, S. (2013). Effects of collaborative activities on group identity in virtual world. Interactive Learning Environments, 21(6), 516–527. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2011.604037
  • Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459–470. doi: 10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4
  • Prichard, J. S., Stratford, R. J., & Bizo, L. A. (2006). Team-skills training enhances collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 256–265. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.005
  • Prinsen, F. R., Volman, M. L. L., & Terwel, J. (2006). The influence of learner characteristics on degree and type of participation in a CSCL environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6), 1037–1055. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00692.x
  • Puhl, T., Tsovaltzi, D., & Weinberger, A. (2015). Blending Facebook discussions into seminars for practicing argumentation. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 605–616. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.006
  • Remesal, A., & Colomina, R. (2013). Social presence and online collaborative small group work: A socioconstructivist account. Computers & Education, 60(1), 357–367. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.009
  • Schellens, T., Van Keer, H., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2007). Scripting by assigning roles: Does it improve knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2–3), 225–246. doi: 10.1007/s11412-007-9016-2
  • Schreiber, M., & Engelmann, T. (2010). Knowledge and information awareness for initiating transactive memory system processes of computer-supported collaborating ad hoc groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1701–1709. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.019
  • Şimşek, A. (2000). Sınıfta demokrasi [Democracy in the classroom]. Ankara: Eğitim-Sen Publications.
  • Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333(6043), 776–778. doi: 10.1126/science.1207745
  • Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Stegmann, K., Wecker, C., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2012). Collaborative argumentation and cognitive elaboration in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Instructional Science, 40(2), 297–323. doi: 10.1007/s11251-011-9174-5
  • Stoddart, A., Chan, J. Y. Y., & Liu, G. Z. (2016). Enhancing successful outcomes of wiki-based collaborative writing: A state-of-the-art review of facilitation frameworks. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 142–157. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2013.825810
  • Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2004). Designing for interaction: Six steps to designing computer-supported group-based learning. Computers and Education, 42(4), 403–424. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2003.10.004
  • Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Jochems, W. M. G., & Broers, N. J. (2004). The effect of functional roles on group efficiency: Using multilevel modeling and content analysis to investigate computer-supported collaboration in small groups. Small Group Research, 35(2), 195–229. doi: 10.1177/1046496403260843
  • Teasley, S. (1997). Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaboration? In L. B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 361–384). Berlin: Springer.
  • Tsovaltzi, D., Judele, R., Puhl, T., & Weinberger, A. (2015). Scripts, individual preparation and group awareness support in the service of learning in Facebook: How does CSCL compare to social networking sites? Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 577–592. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.067
  • Tu, C. H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131–150. doi: 10.1207/S15389286AJDE1603_2
  • Van Bruggen, J. M. (2003). Explorations in graphical argumentation: The use of external representations in collaborative problem solving (PhD dissertation). Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1988). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185–208). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
  • Weinberger, A. (2011). Principles of transactive computer-supported collaboration scripts. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 6(3), 189–202.
  • Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33(1), 1–30. doi: 10.1007/s11251-004-2322-4
  • Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46(1), 71–95. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.003
  • Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2007). Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 416–426. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.03.007
  • Wheeler, S. (2005). Creating social presence in digital learning environments: A presence of mind? Featured paper for the TAFE conference, Queensland, Australia.
  • Yilmaz, R. (2016). Knowledge sharing behaviors in e-learning community: Exploring the role of academic self-efficacy and sense of community. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 373–382. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.055
  • Yilmaz, R., & Keser, H. (2016). The impact of interactive environment and metacognitive support on academic achievement and transactional distance in online learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research. doi:10.1177/0735633116656453
  • Yoo, P., & Kanawattanachai, Y. (2001). Development of transactive memory and collective mind in virtual teams. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9(2), 187–208. doi: 10.1108/eb028933
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.