How to augment the learning impact of computer simulations? The designs and effects of interactivity and scaffolding

References

• Adams, W. K., Paulson, A., & Wieman, C. E. (2009). What levels of guidance promote engaged exploration with interactive simulations? In H. Charles, S. Mel, & H. Leon (Eds.), 2008 Physics education research conference. AIP conference proceedings (Vol. 1064, pp. 59–62). Edmonton: AIP Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bulu, S. T., & Pedersen, S. (2010). Scaffolding middle school students’ content knowledge and ill-structured problem solving in a problem-based hypermedia learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(5), 507–529. doi:10.1007/s11423-010-9150-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, P. (2004). Commentary: The crucial role of cognitive processes in the design of dynamic visualizations. Learning and Instruction, 14, 353–357. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53, 445–459. doi: 10.3102/00346543053004445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29. doi: 10.1007/BF02299088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A. (2003). Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: Generic and directed prompts. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 91–142. doi: 10.1207/S15327809JLS1201_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fund, Z. (2007). The effects of scaffolded computerized science problem-solving on achievement outcomes: A comparative study of support programs. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 410–424. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00226.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2003). Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 21–38. doi: 10.1007/BF02504515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Cruz, J., Rodríguez-Sotres, R., & Rodríguez-Penagos, M. (2003). On the convenience of using a computer simulation to teach enzyme kinetics to undergraduate students with biological chemistry-related curricula. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 31, 93–101. doi: 10.1002/bmb.2003.494031020193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (1996). Secondary students’ mental models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching chemistry. Science Education, 80, 509–534. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199609)80:5<509::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaakkola, T., Nurmi, S., & Veermans, K. (2011). A comparison of students’ conceptual understanding of electric circuits in simulation only and simulation-laboratory contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(1), 71–93. doi: 10.1002/tea.20386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61, 179–211. doi: 10.3102/00346543061002179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7–19. doi: 10.1007/BF02299087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukkonen, J. E., Kärkkäinen, S., Dillon, P., & Keinonen, T. (2014). The effects of scaffolded simulation-based inquiry learning on fifth-graders’ representations of the greenhouse effect. International Journal of Science Education, 36(3), 406–424. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2013.782452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. M., Nicoll, G., & Brooks, D. W. (2004). A comparison of inquiry and worked example web-based instruction using Physlets. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13, 81–88. doi: 10.1023/B:JOST.0000019640.07432.2b
   Google Scholar
• Lin, X., & Lehman, J. D. (1999). Supporting learning of variable control in a computer-based biology environment: Effects of prompting college students to reflect on their own thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(7), 837–858. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199909)36:7<837::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587–604. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McElhaney, K. W., Chang, H.-Y., Chiu, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2015). Evidence for effective uses of dynamic visualizations in science curriculum materials. Studies in Science Education, 51, 49–85. doi: 10.1080/03057267.2014.984506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., & Valdez, A. (2005). Cognitive load and learning effects of having students organize pictures and words in multimedia environments: The role of student interactivity and feedback. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 35–45. doi: 10.1007/BF02504796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder, Y. G., Lazonder, A. W., & de Jong, T. (2011). Comparing two types of model progression in an inquiry learning environment with modelling facilities. Learning and Instruction, 21, 614–624. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parnafes, O. (2007). What does “fast” mean? Understanding the physical world through computational representations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 415–450. doi: 10.1080/10508400701413443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1977). Introduction and the growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. In H. Gruber, & J. J. Voneche (Eds.), The essential Piaget (pp. xvii–xL, 405–444). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (2000/1972). The psychology of the child. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R. G., … Soloway, E. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 337–386. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1303_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136–153. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryoo, K. L., & Linn, M. C. (2012). Can dynamic visualizations improve middle school students’ understanding of energy in photosynthesis? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 218–243. doi: 10.1002/tea.21003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scalise, K., Timms, M., Moorjani, A., Clark, L., Holtermann, K., & Irvin, P. S. (2011). Student learning in science simulations: Design features that promote learning gains. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 1050–1078. doi: 10.1002/tea.20437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 1337–1370. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.605182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 19–30). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Timpe, S., & Wichmann, A. (2012, August). How can we prepare learners to benefit from experimentation during an inquiry cycle? Paper presented at the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction SIG 20 conference, Bochum, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Treagust, D. F., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. L. (2002). Students’ understanding of the role of scientific models in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 357–368. doi: 10.1080/09500690110066485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 271–296. doi: 10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar