Utilisation of formative peer-assessment in distance online education: a case study of a multi-model sport management unit

References

• Angelino, M. L., Williams, K. F., & Nutwig, D. (2007). Strategies to engage online students and reduce attrition rates. The Journal of Educators Online, 4(2), 1–14. doi: 10.9743/JEO.2007.2.1
   Google Scholar
• Bensoussan, B. E., & Fleisher, C. S. (2012). Analysis without paralysis: 12 tools to make better strategic decisions (2nd ed.). USA: FT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (1999). Peer learning and assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), 413–426. doi: 10.1080/0260293990240405
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S., Rust, C., & Gibbs, G. (1994). Strategies for diversifying assessments in higher education. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Development.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D., & Winnie, P. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281. doi: 10.3102/00346543065003245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craddock, D., & Mathias, H. (2009). Assessment options in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 127–140. doi: 10.1080/02602930801956026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Training. (2015a). 2014 - All students. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/node/38127
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Training. (2015b). 2014 University experience survey national report. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/node/36863
   Google Scholar
• Duranton, H., & Mason, A. (2012). The loneliness of the long-distance learner: Social networking and student support. A case study of the distance-learning MA in translation at Bristol University. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 27(1), 81–87. doi: 10.1080/02680513.2012.640790
   Google Scholar
• Falchicov, N. (2001). Learning together: Peer tutoring in higher education. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287–322. doi: 10.3102/00346543070003287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galusha, J. M. (1997). Barriers to learning in distance education. Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century, 5(3-4), 6–14.
   Google Scholar
• Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 304–315. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenland, S. J., & Moore, C. (2014). Patterns of online student enrolment and attrition in Australian open access online education: A preliminary case study. Open Praxis, 6(1), 45–54. doi: 10.5944/openpraxis.6.1.95
   Google Scholar
• Hare, J. (2014, July 18). “Regional unis pay price of high attrition rates.” Higher Education. The Australian. Retrieved from http://www.theaustralian.com.au/higher-education/regional-unis-pay-price-of-high-attrition-rates/news-story/6dab73f6f9f9b44022bcb99c959128be
   Google Scholar
• Hoye, R., Smith, A.C.T., Nicholson, M., Stewart, B., & Westerbeek, H. (2013). Sport management: Principles and applications (3rd ed.). Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. H., & Schunn, C. D. (2011). Students’ perception about peer assessment for writing: Their origin and impact on revision work. Instructional Science, 39(3), 387–406. doi: 10.1007/s11251-010-9133-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2010). Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective. Learning and Instruction, 20, 344–348. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry, A., Jacobs, S., & Newton, G. (2014). Effective use of peer assessment in a graduate level writing assignment: A case study. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(1), 38–50. doi: 10.5430/ijhe.v4n1p38
   Google Scholar
• Liu, N.-F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279–290. doi: 10.1080/13562510600680582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moodle. (2016). Moodle. Retrieved from http://www.moodle.com
   Google Scholar
• Nakazawa, K. (2009). Student engagement in online language learning: A case study examining the online delivery of tertiary language courses. The International Journal of Learning, 16(7), 405–414.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, C. (2004). Strategy and environmental analysis in sport. In J. Beech & S. Chadwick (Eds.), The business of sport management (pp. 213–239). Essex: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Race, Phil. (2001). A briefing on self, peer & group assessment. In B. Smith, R. Blackwell, & M. Yorke (Eds.), LTSN Generic Centre, Assessment series no. 9 (pp. 1–29). York: York Science Park.
   Google Scholar
• Roblyer, M. D., & Doering, A. H. (2013). Integrating educational technology into teaching (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. (1997). Distance education drop-out: What can we do? In R. Pospisil & L. Willcoxson (Eds.), Learning through teaching (pp. 324–332). Proceedings of the 6th annual teaching learning forum, Murdoch University, February 1997. Perth: Murdoch University.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 20–27. doi: 10.1080/00405840802577569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R., & Tilemma, H. H. (2010). Peer assessment as a collaborative learning activity: The role of interpersonal variables and conceptions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 280–290. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venables, A., & Summit, R. (2003). Enhancing scientific essay writing using peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40, 281–290. doi: 10.1080/1470329032000103816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickerman, P. (2009). Student perspectives on formative peer assessment: An attempt to deepen learning? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 221–230. doi: 10.1080/02602930801955986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willging, P. A., & Johnson, S. D. (2004). Factors that influence students' decision to drop-out of online courses. Online Learning (Formerly the Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks), 8(4), 105–118.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. J., Otrel-Cass, K., Khoo, E., Cowie, B., Saunders, K., & Van Der Merve, S. (2015). The implementation of e-networks to support inquiry learning in science. In C. Koh (Ed), Motivation, leadership and curriculum design: Engaging the net generation and 21st century learners (pp. 201–213). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., Lei, J., Yan, B., Lai, C., & Tan, H. S. (2005). What makes the difference? A practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1836–1884. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00544.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar