5,150
Views
40
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Enhancing the facilitation of online groups in higher education: a review of the literature on face-to-face and online group-facilitation

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 62-71 | Received 13 Oct 2016, Accepted 02 Mar 2018, Published online: 27 Mar 2018

References

  • Abawajy, J., & Kim, T. (2011). Engaging and effective asynchronous online discussion forums. In T. Kim (Ed.), Software engineering, business continuity, and education. ASEA 2011. Communications in computer and information science (Vol. 257, pp. 695–705). Berlin: Springer.
  • Allen, D., & Blythe, T. (2015). Facilitating for learning: Tools for teacher groups of all kinds. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Baran, E., & Correia, A. P. (2009). Student-led facilitation strategies in online discussions. Distance Education, 30(3), 339–361. doi: 10.1080/01587910903236510
  • Baran, E., Correia, A. P., & Thompson, A. D. (2013). Tracing successful online teaching in higher education: Voices of exemplary online teachers. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–41.
  • Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). New York, NY:McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
  • Chang, B., & Kang, H. (2016). Challenges facing group work online. Distance Education, 37(1), 73–88. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2016.1154781
  • Crawford, C. M. (2016). Instructor immediacy and authenticity: Engaging in cognitive vulnerability within the online instructional environment. In S. D’Agustino (Ed.), Creating teacher immediacy in online learning environments (pp. 15–36). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
  • D’Agustino, S. (Ed.). (2016). Creating teacher immediacy in online learning environments. Hershey, PA:Information Science Reference.
  • Dreon, O. (2016). Building teaching presence in online classes. In S. D’Agustino (Ed.), Creating teacher immediacy in online learning environments (pp. 1–14). Hershey, PA:Information Science Reference.
  • Elander, K. R. (2016). “I’m here for you”: instructor presence online. In S. D’Agustino (Ed.), Creating teacher immediacy in online learning environments (pp. 55–75). Hershey, PA:Information Science Reference.
  • Garner, R., & Rouse, E. (2016). Social presence – connecting pre-service teachers as learners using a blended learning model. Student Success, 7(1), 25–36. doi: 10.5204/ssj.v7i1.299
  • Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Journal of Interactive Learning Online, 11(1), 19–42.
  • Harasim, L. M. (2017). Learning theory and online technologies. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Hew, K. F. (2015). Student perceptions of peer versus instructor facilitation of asynchronous online discussions: Further findings from three cases. Instructional Science, 43, 19–38. doi: 10.1007/s11251-014-9329-2
  • Hunter, D. (2012). The art of facilitation: The essentials for leading great meetings and creating group synergy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Wiley.
  • Jaggers, S. S., & Xu, D. (2016). How do online course design features influence student performance? Computers & Education, 95, 270–284. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.014
  • Jaques, D., & Salmon, G. (2007). Learning in groups: A handbook for face-to-face and online environments (4th ed.). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
  • Jenkins, J. C., & Jenkins, M. R. (2006). The 9 disciplines of a facilitator: Leading groups by transforming yourself. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2016). Higher education and the digital revolution: About MOOCs, SPOCs, social media, and the cookie monster. Business Horizons, 59(4), 441–450. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2016.03.008
  • Kennedy, G. (2013, December 1–4). Understanding our present. Paper presented at the 30th ASCILITE conference, Macquarie University, Sydney.
  • Ko, S. S., & Rossen, S. (2010). Teaching online a practical guide (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2013). Organizational behavior (10th ed.). New York, NY:McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  • Löfström, E., & Nevgi, A. (2008). University teaching staff’s pedagogical awareness displayed through ICT-facilitated teaching. Interactive Learning Environments, 16(2), 101–116. doi: 10.1080/10494820701282447
  • Mazzolini, M., & Maddison, S. (2003). Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 40(3), 237–253. doi: 10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00129-X
  • Mykota, D., & Remoundos, D. (2017). Study protocol for scoping review on social presence. International Journal of E-Learning and Distance Education, 32(1), 1–10.
  • Olubukola Afolabi, R. (2016). Emphasizing instructor presence in digital learning environments. In S. D’Agustino (Ed.), Creating teacher immediacy in online learning environments (pp. 37–54). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
  • Orcutt, J. M., & Dringus, L. P. (2017). Beyond being there: Practices that establish presence, engage students and influence intellectual curiosity in a structured online learning environment. Online Learning, 21(3), 15–35. doi: 10.24059/olj.v21i3.1231
  • Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Palmer, N., & Schueths, A. M. (2013). Online teaching communities within sociology: A counter trend to the marketization of higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(7), 809–820. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2013.836097
  • Park, J. H., Schallert, D. L., Sanders, A., J. Z., Williams, K. M., Seo, E., Yu, L.-T.,  … Knox, M. C. (2015). Does it matter if the teacher is there?: A teacher’s contribution to emerging patterns of interactions in online classroom discussions. Computers & Education, 82, 315–328. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.019
  • Parks-Stamm, E. J., Zafonte, M., & Palenque, S. M. (2016). The effects of instructor participation and class size on student participation in an online class discussion forum. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1250–1259. doi:10.1111/bjet.12512.
  • Phirangee, K., Demmans Epp, C., & Hewitt, J. (2016). Exploring the relationships between facilitation methods, students’ sense of community, and their online behaviours. Online Learning, 20(2), 134–154. doi: 10.24059/olj.v20i2.775
  • Putman, S. M., Ford, K., & Tancock, S. (2012). Redefining online discussions: Using participant stances to promote collaboration and cognitive engagement. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 24(2), 151–167.
  • Reidsema, C., Kavanagh, L., Hadgcraft, R., & Smith, N. (Eds.). (2017). The flipped classroom practice and practices in higher education. Singapore: Springer Singapore.
  • Richardson, J. C., Besser, E., Koehler, A., Lim, J., & Strait, M. (2016). Instructors’ perceptions of instructor presence in online learning environments. International Journal of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(4), 82–103.
  • Richardson, J. C., Koehler, A., Besser, E., Caskurlu, S., Lim, S., & Mueller, C. (2015). Conceptualizing and investigating instructor presence in online learning environments. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 256–297. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2123
  • Ringer, M. (1999). Two vital aspects in the facilitation of groups: Connections and containment. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 4(1), 5–11. doi: 10.1007/BF03400704
  • Ringer, M. (2002). Group action: The dynamics of groups in therapeutic, educational and corporate settings. London: Jessica Kingsley.
  • R-M, Conrad., & Donaldson, J. A. (2011). Engaging the online learner: Activities and resources for creative instruction (pp. Jossey–Bass). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Salmon, G. (2011). E-Moderating the key to online teaching and learning (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  • Schwarz, R. M. (2017). The skilled facilitator: A comprehensive resource for consultants, facilitators, coaches, and trainers (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Senge, P., Scharmer, C. O., Jaworski, J., & Flowers, B. S. (2004). Presence: Human purpose and the field of the purpose. Cambridge, MA: The Society for Organizational Learning.
  • Szabo, Z. (2015). Better together: Teams and discourse in asynchronous online discussion forums. Journal of Psychological and Educational Research, 23(1), 73–88.
  • Teräs, H. (2016). Collaborative online professional development for teachers in higher education. Professional Development in Education, 42(2), 258–275. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2014.961094
  • Thomas, G. J. (2008a). Facilitate first thyself: The person-centered dimension of facilitator education. Journal of Experiential Education, 31(2), 168–188. doi: 10.1177/105382590803100205
  • Thomas, G. J. (2008b). The theories and practices of facilitator educators: Conclusions from a naturalistic inquiry. Group Facilitation: A Research and Applications Journal, 9, 4–13.
  • Thorpe, S. J. (2009). Enhancing the effectiveness of online groups: An investigation of storytelling in the facilitation of online groups (Doctoral thesis). Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://aut.researchgateway.ac.nz/handle/10292/778
  • Thorpe, S. J. (2016). Online facilitator competencies for group facilitators. Group Facilitation: A Research and Applications Journal, 13, 77–90.
  • Tsai, C.-W. (2016). Exploring the effects of online team-based learning and co-regulated learning on students’ development of computing skills. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(4), 665–680. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2014.917106
  • Weimer, M. (2013). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Woods, K., & Bliss, K. (2016). Facilitating successful online discussions. Journal of Effective Teaching, 16(2), 76–92.
  • Xu, D., & Jaggers, S. S. (2013). The impact of online learning on students’ course outcomes: Evidence from a large community and technical college system. Economics of Education Review, 37, 46–57. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.08.001
  • Zhao, H., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2017). Teaching presence in computer conferencing learning environments: Effects on interaction, cognition and learning uptake. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 538–551. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12383

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.