Revisiting “power in the classroom”: exploring online learning and motivation to study course content

References

• Allen, E. I., & Seaman, J. (2010). Learning on demand: Online education in the United States, 2009. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/pdf/learningondemand.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2015). Grade level: Tracking online education in the United States. Newburyport, MA: Sloan Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Bağrıacık Yılmaz, A., & Karataş, S. (2018). Development and validation of perceptions of online interaction scale. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(3), 337–354. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2017.1333009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, M. J., Forst, E. C., & Stewart, R. A. (1986). Communication apprehension and motivation as predictors of public speaking duration. Communication Education, 35, 143–146. doi: 10.1080/03634528609388332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beth, A. D., Jordan, M. E., Schallert, D. L., Reed, J. H., & Kim, M. (2015). Responsibility and generativity in online learning communities. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(4), 471–484. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2013.788035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S., & Goodboy, A. K. (2011). Behavioral indicators of transformational leadership in the college classroom. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 12, 10–18. doi: 10.1080/17459435.2011.601520
   Google Scholar
• Czerkawski, B. C. (2016). Networked learning: Design considerations for online instructors. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8), 1850–1863. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2015.1057744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, V. C., Javidi, M., & Nussbaum, J. F. (1988). An analysis of teachers’ verbal communication within the college classroom: Use of humor, self-disclosure, and narratives. Communication Education, 37, 127–141. doi: 10.1080/03634528809378710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, A. N. (2012). Teacher use of prosocial and antisocial power bases and students’ perceived instructor understanding and misunderstanding in the college classroom. Communication Education, 61, 67–79. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2011.636450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, A. N., & Ledbetter, A. M. (2013). Teacher power mediates the effects of technology policies on teacher credibility. Communication Education, 62, 26–47. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2012.725132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, J. R., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N., & Martin, M. M. (2010). Instructor–student and student–student rapport in the classroom. Communication Education, 59, 146–164. doi: 10.1080/03634520903564362
   Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., & Bolkan, S. (2011). Brief report: Student motives for communicating with instructors as a function of perceived instructor power use. Communication Research Reports, 28, 109–114. doi: 10.1080/08824096.2011.541368
   Google Scholar
• Hislop, G. (2009). The inevitability of teaching online. Computer, 42(12), 94–96. doi: 10.1109/MC.2009.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, W. H. D., & Nakazawa, K. (2010). An empirical analysis on how learners interact in wiki in a graduate level online course. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(3), 233–244. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2010.500520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, R., & Frisby, B. N. (2017). Dimensions of instructor disclosure: Implications for rhetorical and relational goals of instruction. Communication Research Reports, 34(3), 221–229. doi: 10.1080/08824096.2017.1286469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, R., Sellnow, D. D., & Frisby, B. N. (2016). The development and validation of the online learning climate scale (OLCS). Communication Education, 65, 307–321. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2015.1101778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, R., & Tatum, N. T. (2017). Do we know what we think we know? On the importance of replication in instructional communication research. Communication Education, 66, 479–481. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2017.1342849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (1984). Power in the classroom IV: Alternatives to discipline. In R. N. Bostrom & B. H. Westley (Eds.), Communication yearbook 8 (pp. 724–746). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (1985). Power in the classroom III: Teacher communication techniques and messages. Communication Education, 34, 19–28. doi: 10.1080/03634528509378579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lannutti, P. J., & Strauman, E. C. (2006). Classroom communication: The influence of instructor self-disclosure on student evaluations. Communication Quarterly, 54, 89–99. doi: 10.1080/01463370500270496
   Google Scholar
• Limperos, A. M., Buckner, M. M., Kaufmann, R., & Frisby, B. N. (2015). Online teaching and technological affordances: An experimental investigation into the impact of modality and clarity on perceived and actual learning. Computers & Education, 83, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1983). Power in the classroom I: Teacher and student perceptions. Communication Education, 32, 175–184. doi: 10.1080/03634528309378527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naidu, S. (2017). Openness and flexibility are the norm, but what are the challenges. Distance Education, 38(1), 1–4. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2017.1297185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, V. P. (1990). Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39, 181–195. doi: 10.1080/03634529009378801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (1984). Power in the classroom II: Power and learning. Communication Education, 33, 125–136. doi: 10.1080/03634528409384729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roach, K. D. (1995). Teaching assistant argumentativeness: Effects on affective learning and student perceptions of power use. Communication Education, 44(1), 15–29. doi: 10.1080/03634529509378994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrodt, P., Witt, P. L., & Turman, P. D. (2007). Reconsidering the measurement of teacher power use in the college classroom. Communication Education, 56, 308–332. doi: 10.1080/03634520701256062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellnow, D. D., & Kaufmann, R. (2017). Instructional communication and the online learning environment: Then, now, and next. In M. L. Houser, & A. M. Hosek (Eds.), The handbook of instructional communication: Rhetorical and relational perspectives (2nd ed, pp. 195–206). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Teven, J. J., & Herring, J. E. (2005). Teacher influence in the classroom: A preliminary investigation of perceived instructor power, credibility, and student satisfaction. Communication Research Reports, 22, 235–246. doi: 10.1080/00036810500230685
   Google Scholar
• Vonderwell, S. (2003). An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: A case study. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 77–90. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00164-1
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y, Chen, N. S, & Levy, M. (2010). Teacher training in a synchronous cyber face-to-face classroom: Characterizing and supporting the online teachers' learning process. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(4), 277–293. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2010.493523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar