The effect of augmented reality activities on improving preschool children’s spatial skills

References

• Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battista, M. T., Wheatley, G. H., & Talsma, G. (1982). The importance of spatial visualization and cognitive development for geometry learning in preservice elementary teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 13(5), 332–340.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bujak, K. R., Radu, I., Catrambone, R., MacIntyre, B., Zheng, R., & Golubski, G. (2013). A psychological perspective on augmented reality in the mathematics classroom. Computers & Education, 68, 536–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, F. A., Pungello, E. P., Miller-Johnson, S., Burchinal, M., & Ramey, C. T. (2001). The development of cognitive and academic abilities: Growth curves from an early childhood educational experiment. Developmental Psychology, 37(2), 231–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbonell Carrera, C., Avarvarei, B. V., Chelariu, E. L., Draghia, L., &  Avarvarei, S. C. (2017). Map-reading skill development with 3D technologies. Journal of Geography, 116(5), 197–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbonell Carrera, C., & Bermejo Asensio, L. A. (2017). Landscape interpretation with augmented reality and maps to improve spatial orientation skill. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 41(1), 119–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey, B. M., Andrews, N., Schindler, H., Kersh, J. E., Samper, A., & Copley, J. (2008). The development of spatial skills through interventions involving block building activities. Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 269–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey, B., Erkut, S., Ceder, I., & Young, J. M. (2008). Use of a storytelling context to improve girls’ and boys’ geometry skills in kindergarten. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(1), 29–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, M. E., & Sugden, D. A. (2002). The identification and assessment of young children with movement difficulties. International Journal of Early Years Education, 10(3), 157–176.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H. (1998). Geometric and spatial thinking in young children. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2003). Young children and technology: What does the research say? Young Children, 58(6), 34–40.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2011). Early childhood mathematics intervention. Science, 333(6045), 968–970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (2010). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for Education of Young Children.
   Google Scholar
• Couse, L. J., & Chen, D. W. (2010). A tablet computer for young children? Exploring its viability for early childhood education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(1), 75–98.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., …  Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1–2), 103–131.
   Google Scholar
• Freitas, R., & Campos, P. (2008). SMART: A system of augmented reality for teaching 2nd grade students. In Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Culture, Creativity, Interaction – Volume 2 (pp. 27–30). Swinton, UK: British Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Beilock, S. L., & Levine, S. C. (2012). The relation between spatial skill and early number knowledge: The role of the linear number line. Developmental Psychology, 48(5), 1229–1241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, L. G., Lubinski, D., & Yao, G. (1993). Utility of predicting group membership and the role of spatial visualization in becoming an engineer, physical scientist, or artist. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 250–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, H., & Schmalstieg, D. (2003). Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality. Computers & Graphics, 27(3), 339–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren, R., & Johnson-Glenberg, M. (2013). Emboldened by embodiment: Six precepts for research on embodied learning and mixed reality. Educational Researcher, 42(8), 445–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56(6), 1479–1498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohman, D. F. (1996). Spatial ability and G. In I. Dennis & P. Tapsfield (Eds.), Human abilities: Their nature and assessment (pp. 97–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Martín-Gutierrez, J., Trujillo, R. E. N., & Acosta-Gonzalez, M. M. (2013). Augmented reality application assistant for spatial ability training. HMD vs Computer Screen use Study. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 49–53.
   Google Scholar
• McGee, M. G. (1979). Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin, 86(5), 889–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, L., & Fitton, D. (2010). Touch-screen technology for children: Giving the right instructions and getting the right responses. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on interaction design and children (pp. 238–241). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, N., & Jarvin, L. (2007). When theories don’t add up: Disentangling the manipulatives debate. Theory Into Practice, 46(4), 309–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchelmore, M. C. (1997). Children’s informal knowledge of physical angle situations. Learning and Instruction, 7(1), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montessori, M. (1964). The Montessori method. (A. E. George, trans.). New York, NY: Schocken Books.
   Google Scholar
• Moyer, P. S. (2001). Are we having fun yet? How teachers use manipulatives to teach mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2(47), 175–197.
   Google Scholar
• Moyer-Packenham, P. S., & Bolyard, J. J. (2016). Revisiting the definition of a virtual manipulative. In P. S. Moyer-Packenham (Ed.), International perspectives on teaching and learning mathematics with virtual manipulatives (pp. 3–25). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Moyer-Packenham, P. S., Niezgoda, D., & Stanley, J. (2005). Young children’s use of virtual manipulatives and other forms of mathematical representations. In W. J. Masalski, & P. C. Elliott (Eds.), Technology-supported mathematics learning environments: Sixty-seventh yearbook (pp. 17–37). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Mulligan, J. (2011). Towards understanding the origins of children’s difficulties in mathematics learning. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 16(1), 19–39.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: Paths toward excellence and equity (committee on early childhood mathematics, C. T. Cross, T. A. Woods, & H. Schweingruber, Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (2001). The psychology of intelligence. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Prescott, A., Mitchelmore, M., & White, P. (2002). Student difficulties in abstracting angle concepts from physical activities with concrete materials. In B. Barton, K. C. Irwin, M. Pfannkuch, & M. O. J. Thomas (Eds.) Mathematics education in the South Pacific, proceedings of the 25th annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia, Auckland (pp. 583–591). Sydney: MERGA.
   Google Scholar
• Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2003). The mental cutting test “schnitte” and the picture rotation test-two new measures to assess spatial ability. International Journal of Testing, 3(3), 219–231.
   Google Scholar
• Quaiser-Pohl, C., Neuburger, S., Heil, M., Jansen, P., & Schmelter, A. (2014). Is the male advantage in mental-rotation performance task independent? On the usability of chronometric tests and paper-and-pencil tests in children. International Journal of Testing, 14(2), 122–142.
   Google Scholar
• Radu, I., & Antle, A. (2017). Embodied learning mechanics and their relationship to usability of handheld augmented reality. In 2017 IEEE virtual reality workshop on K-12 embodied learning through virtual augmented reality (KELVAR) (pp. 1–5).
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, K., & Moyer, P. S. (2005). Third graders learn about fractions using virtual manipulatives: A classroom study. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 24(1), 5–25.
   Google Scholar
• Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2004). Building blocks for early childhood mathematics. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(1), 181–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P. (1992). Spatial ability and its role in United Kingdom education. The Vocational Aspect of Education, 44(1), 103–106.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, J. M., Moyer-Packenham, P., & Heo, H. (2005). Examining technology uses in the classroom: Developing fraction sense using virtual manipulative concept tutorials. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 3(4), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Tığcı, F. (2003). 6 yaş çocukları için mekânsal algı ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi ve mekânsal algı eğitim programı’nın mekânsal algı gelişimine etkisi [development of spatial perception scale for children aged six and effect of spatial perception education program on the development of spatial perception]. Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
   Google Scholar
• van Hiele, P. M. (1999). Developing geometric thinking through activities that begin with play. Teaching Children Mathematics, 5(6), 310–316.
   Google Scholar
• Verdine, B. N., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Newcombe, N. S., Filipowicz, A. T., & Chang, A. (2013). Deconstructing building blocks: Preschoolers’ spatial assembly performance relates to early mathematical skills. Child Development, 85(3), 1062–1076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdine, B. N., Lucca, K. R., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Newcombe, N. S. (2016). The shape of things: The origin of young children’s knowledge of the names and properties of geometric forms. Journal of Cognition and Development: Official Journal of the Cognitive Development Society, 17(1), 142–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaman, H., & Şahin, T. (2015). Concrete and virtual manipulative-assisted teaching of geometry’s impact on the success of building and drawing geometric structures of 5th grade students. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1), 202–220.
   Google Scholar
• Yildiz, B., & Tuzun, H. (2011). Effects of using three-dimensional virtual environments and concrete manipulatives on spatial ability. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 41, 498–508.
   Google Scholar