Effects of a collective problem-solving promotion-based flipped classroom on students’ learning performances and interactive patterns

References

• Al-Zahrani, A. M. (2015). From passive to active: The impact of the flipped classroom through social learning platforms on higher education students’ creative thinking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1133–1148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artino, A. R., & Stephens, J. M. (2009). Academic motivation and self-regulation: A comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students learning online. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3), 146–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. New York, NY,: US: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY,: US: W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S. L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J., Overmyer, J., & Wilie, B. (2013). The flipped class: What it is and what it is not. The Daily Riff.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Blatchford, P., Kutnick, P., Baines, E., & Galton, M. (2003). Toward a social pedagogy of classroom group work. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1-2), 153–172.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, B., & Kang, H. (2016). Challenges facing group work online. Distance Education, 37(1), 73–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., Chen, T. L., & Chen, N. S. (2015). Students’ perspectives of using cooperative learning in a flipped statistics classroom. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(6), 621–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. H., & Chiu, C. H. (2016). Employing intergroup competition in multitouch design-based learning to foster student engagement, learning achievement, and creativity. Computers & Education, 103, 99–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. H., & Hwang, G. J. (2017). Effects of the team competition-based ubiquitous Gaming approach on students’ interactive patterns. Collective Efficacy and Awareness of Collaboration and Communication. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 87.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, P. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). An IRS-facilitated collective issue-quest approach to enhancing students’ learning achievement, self-regulation and collective efficacy in flipped classrooms. British Journal of Educational Technology. doi:10.1111/bjet.12690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, T. H. C. (2017). Analysis of learning behavior in a flipped programing classroom adopting problem-solving strategies. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(2), 189–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chis, A. E., Moldovan, A. N., Murphy, L., Pathak, P., & Muntean, C. H. (2018). Investigating flipped classroom and problem-based learning in a Programming Module for Computing Conversion course. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(4), 232–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 563–580. doi:10.1007/s11423-013-9305-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. Advances in learning and instruction series. New York, NY: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Eichler, J. F., & Peeples, J. (2016). Flipped classroom modules for large enrollment general chemistry courses: A low barrier approach to increase active learning and improve student grades. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(1), 197–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J., Jury, M., & Murayama, K. (2017). Trait and Perceived Environmental Competitiveness in achievement Situations. Journal of Personality, 86, 353–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findlay-Thompson, S., & Mombourquette, P. (2014). Evaluation of a flipped classroom in an undergraduate business course. Business Education & Accreditation, 6(1), 63–71.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, K. (2012). Upside Down and Inside Out: Flip your classroom to improve student learning. Learning & Leading with Technology, 39(8), 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Gikas, J., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 18–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47(1), 109–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., & Valtonen, T. (2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): a framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 25–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, H. T., Chang, K. E., & Yao-Ting, S. (2008). Analysis of problem-solving-based online asynchronous discussion pattern. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 17–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, H. T. (2015). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 81–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, G. J., Lai, C. L., & Wang, S. Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: A mobile technology-enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(4), 449–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Icard, S. B. (2014). Educational technology best practices. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 11(3), 37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, A. C. (2003). The sequential analysis of group interaction and critical thinking in online. The American Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 25–43.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. T., & Johnson, D. W. (1986). Cooperative learning in the science classroom. Science and Children, 24, 31–32.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, D. I., & Sosik, J. J. (2002). Transformational leadership in work groups the role of empowerment, cohesiveness, and collective-efficacy on perceived group performance. Small Group Research, 33(3), 313–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaendler, C., Wiedmann, M., Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2015). Teacher competencies for the implementation of collaborative learning in the classroom: A framework and research review. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 505–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karabulut-Ilgu, A., Yao, S., Savolainen, P., & Jahren, C. (2018). Student perspectives on the flipped-classroom approach and collaborative problem-solving process. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopcha, T. J., Orey, M., & Dustman, W. (2015). Exploring college students’ online help-seeking behavior in a flipped classroom with a web-based help-seeking tool. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(5), 537–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486–490.
   Google Scholar
• Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan, Y. F., Tsai, P. W., Yang, S. H., & Hung, C. L. (2012). Comparing the social knowledge construction behavioral patterns of problem-based online asynchronous discussion in e/m-learning environments. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1122–1135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S. H. J., Lan, Y. J., & Ho, C. Y. Y. (2014). Exploring the Relationship between self-regulated Vocabulary learning and Web-based collaboration. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 404–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, G. S., Shuman, T. R., & Cook, K. E. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(4), 430–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed, H., & Lamia, M. (2018). Implementing flipped classroom that used an intelligent tutoring system into learning process. Computers & Education, 124, 62–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interactions. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, C. M. (2014). Changing Paradigms: A Mixed methods study of Flipping the English language Arts classroom. Raleigh: North Carolina State University.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, C. M., & Young, C. A. (2015). Questions to consider before flipping. Phi Delta Kappan, 97(2), 42–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moraros, J., Islam, A., Yu, S., Banow, R., & Schindelka, B. (2015). Flipping for success: Evaluating the effectiveness of a novel teaching approach in a graduate level setting. BMC Medical Education, 15(1), 1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Narciss, S., Proske, A., & Koerndle, H. (2007). Promoting self-regulated learning in web-based learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1126–1144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, D. J. (2016). The flipped classroom Improves student achievement and course satisfaction in a statistics course A quasi-experimental study. Teaching of Psychology, 43(1), 10–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, R., & Fox, J. (2012). Vodcasts and active-learning exercises in a “flipped classroom” model of a renal pharmacotherapy module. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76(10), 196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, A. A., Aris, B., Rosli, M. S., Mohamed, H., Abdullah, Z., & Mohd Zaid, N. (2015). Significance of Preparedness in flipped classroom. Advanced Science Letters, 21(10), 3388–3390.
   Google Scholar
• Roach, T. (2014). Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics. International Review of Economics Education, 17, 74–84.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. D., & Reid, S. A. (2016). Impact of the flipped classroom on student performance and retention: A parallel controlled study in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(1), 13–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin, A., Cavlazoglu, B., & Zeytuncu, Y. E. (2015). Flipping a college calculus course: A case study. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 142–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• See, S., & Conry, J. M. (2014). Flip My class! A faculty development demonstration of a flipped-classroom. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 6(4), 585–588.
   Google Scholar
• Stajkovic, A. D., Lee, D., & Nyberg, A. J. (2009). Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: Meta-analyses of their relationships, and test of a mediation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 814–828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171–193.
   Google Scholar
• Su, Y., Zheng, C., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2018). Examining the relationship between English language learners’ online self-regulation and their self-efficacy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 105–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, J. C. Y., Wu, Y. T., & Lee, W. I. (2017). The effect of the flipped classroom approach to OpenCourseWare instruction on students’ self-regulation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(3), 713-729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Z., Xie, K., & Anderman, L. H. (2018). The role of self-regulated learning in students’ success in flipped undergraduate math courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 36, 41–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, H. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2013). A collaborative game-based learning approach to improving students’ learning performance in science courses. Computers & Education, 63, 43–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomory, A., & Watson, S. L. (2015). Flipped classrooms for advanced Science courses. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 875–887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, F. H. (2017). An exploration of online behaviour engagement and achievement in flipped classroom supported by learning management system. Computers & Education, 114, 79–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2012). The role of collective efficacy, cognitive quality, and task cohesion in computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL). Computers & Education, 58(2), 679–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, G. C., & Sturtevant, H. G. (2015). Design, implementation, and evaluation of a flipped format general chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(9), 1437–1448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, S. Y., & Hou, H. T. (2015). How cognitive styles affect the learning behaviors of online problem-solving based discussion activity a lag sequential analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(2), 277–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar