Education 3.0 system to enhance twenty-first century skills for higher education learners in Thailand

References

• 15 elearning trends and statistics to know for 2017. (2017). Retrieved from https://elogiclearning.com/15-elearning-trends-and-statistics-to-know-for-2017/
   Google Scholar
• Ali, S. M., Harun, H., Massari, N., Puteh-Behak, F., Darmi, R., Mahir, N. A., … Hamid, Y. E. A. (2017). The 21st century skills in online multiliteracies project approach (eMULPA): Learners’ reflections on their knowledge processes. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 252–258. doi: 10.5901/mjss.2017.v8n1p252
   Google Scholar
• Allison, M., & Kendrick, L. M. (2015). Toward education 3.0: Pedagogical affordances and implications of social software and the semantic web. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2015(144), 109–119. doi: 10.1002/tl.20167
   Google Scholar
• Alsultanny, Y. A. (2006). E-Learning system overview based on semantic web. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 4(2), 111–118.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T., & Whitelock, D. M. (2004). The educational semantic web: Visioning and practicing the future of education. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2004(1), 1. doi: 10.5334/2004-1
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, K. (2009). From IA Richards to web 3.0: Preparing our students for tomorrow’s world. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 58, 954–961.
   Google Scholar
• Banciu, D., & Florea, M. (2011). Information quality–a challenge for e-learning 3.0. Revista Română de Informatică şi Automatică, 21(3), 75.
   Google Scholar
• Beyrouti, N. (2017). Digital technology management and educational innovation: The marketability and employability of the higher education degrees. The Journal of Developing Areas, 51(1), 391–400. doi: 10.1353/jda.2017.0022
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. Paper presented at the ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Borup, J. (2016). Teacher perceptions of learner-learner engagement at a cyber high school. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brons, M. (2017). The open education movement: Is this the future of education? Knowledge Cultures, 5(1).
   Google Scholar
• Burden, K., & Kearney, M. (2016). Future scenarios for mobile science learning. Research in Science Education, 46(2), 287–308. doi: 10.1007/s11165-016-9514-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkle, M. (2009). Learning in virtual worlds: The challenges and opportunities. Paper presented at the CyberWorlds, 2009. CW'09. International Conference on.
   Google Scholar
• Chisega-Negrila, A. M. (2016). Impact of web 3.0 on the evolution of learning. Paper presented at the The International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ciravegna, F., Chapman, S., Dingli, A., & Wilks, Y. (2004). Learning to harvest information for the semantic web. In The semantic web: Research and applications (pp. 312–326). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Claman, F. L. (2015). The impact of multiuser virtual environments on student engagement. Nurse Education in Practice, 15(1), 13–16. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2014.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lima, M., & Zorrilla, M. E. (2017). Social networks and the building of learning communities: An experimental study of a social MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(1). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devedzic, V. (2004). Education and the semantic web. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14(2), 165–191.
   Google Scholar
• Devedžić, V. (2006). The setting for semantic web-based education. In Semantic web and education (pp. 71–99).
   Google Scholar
• Devedžić, V. (2006). Semantic web and education. Integrated series in information systems. Vol. 12. Springer, US.
   Google Scholar
• Dixson, M. D., Greenwell, M. R., Rogers-Stacy, C., Weister, T., & Lauer, S. (2017). Nonverbal immediacy behaviors and online student engagement: Bringing past instructional research into the present virtual classroom. Communication Education, 66(1), 37–53. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2016.1209222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, J. (2014). The evolution of classroom technology. Edudemic: Connecting Education and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Ellman, M. S., & Schwartz, M. L. (2016). Online learning tools as supplements for basic and clinical science education. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 2016(3), 109–114.
   Google Scholar
• Filippo, D., Barreto, C., Fuks, H., Lucena, C. d. (2006). Collaboration in learning with mobile devices: Tools for fórum coordination. Paper presented at the 22nd ICDE-World Conference on Distance Education: Promoting Quality in On-line, Flexible and Distance Education (CD-ROM).
   Google Scholar
• García-Pérez, R., Santos-Delgado, J.-M., & Buzón-García, O. (2016). Virtual empathy as digital competence in education 3.0. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 30. doi: 10.1186/s41239-016-0029-7
   Google Scholar
• Gerstein, J. (2014). Moving from education 1.0 through education 2.0 towards education 3.0.
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington, R., Bonar-Law, J., Fleet, T., & Parkinson, L. (2008). Learning in a multi-user virtual environment. Paper presented at the Visualisation, 2008 International Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, M. R., Tracy, E. M., Painter, L. L., Oestreich, T., & Park, H. (2015). Moving from flipcharts to the flipped classroom: Using technology driven teaching methods to promote active learning in foundation and advanced masters social work courses. Clinical Social Work Journal, 43(2), 215–224. doi: 10.1007/s10615-015-0521-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, I.-C. (2012). Intelligent discovery for learning objects using semantic web technologies. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ifenthaler, D., & Pirnay-Dummer, P. (2011). States and processes of learning communities. Engaging students in meaningful reflection and learning. In Social media tools and platforms in learning environments (pp. 81–94). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Keats, D., & Schmidt, J. P. (2007). The genesis and emergence of education 3.0 in higher education and its potential for Africa. First Monday, 12(3).
   Google Scholar
• Koper, R. (2003). Use of the semantic web to solve some basic problems in education: Increase flexible, distributed lifelong learning, decrease teacher's workload.
   Google Scholar
• Kurilovas, E., Serikoviene, S., & Vuorikari, R. (2014). Expert centred vs learner centred approach for evaluating quality and reusability of learning objects. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 526–534. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43. doi: 10.1080/00220480009596759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lal, M. (2011). Web 3.0 in education & research. BVICAM's International Journal of Information Technology, 3(2).
   Google Scholar
• Leung, C.-H., & Chan, Y.-Y. (2003). Mobile learning: A new paradigm in electronic learning. Paper presented at the Advanced Learning Technologies, 2003. Proceedings. The 3rd IEEE international conference on.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, M. (2008). Trends-21st century learning. CISCO.
   Google Scholar
• Miranda, P., Isaias, P., & Costa, C. J. (2014). From information systems to e-learning 3.0 systems’s critical success factors: A framework proposal. Paper presented at the International Conference on Learning and Collaboration Technologies, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Miranda, P., Isaias, P., Costa, C. J., & Pifano, S. (2016). E-Learning 3.0 framework adoption: Experts’ views. Paper presented at the International Conference on Learning and Collaboration Technologies, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Kereluik, K. (2009). Looking back to the future of educational technology. TechTrends, 53(5), 49.
   Google Scholar
• Naeve, A., Lytras, M., Nejdl, W., Balacheff, N., & Hardin, J. (2006). Advances of the semantic web for e-learning: Expanding learning frontiers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(3), 321–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00608.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemi, H. (2014). The Finnish educational ecosystem. In Finnish innovations and technologies in schools (pp. 3–19). Rotterdam: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nophakhun, L. (2018, May 19). Cisco survey outlines six dominant trends in workforce of the future, BUSINESS. THE NATION. Retrieved from http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/Economy/30345735
   Google Scholar
• Padma, S., & Seshasaayee, A. (2012). Maximum spanning tree model on personalized web based collaborative learning in web 3.0. arXiv preprint arXiv:1205.2263.
   Google Scholar
• Pappas, C. (2015). The top eLearning statistics and facts for 2015 you need to know. Récupéré de http://elearningindustry.com
   Google Scholar
• Pheeraphan, N. (2013). Enhancement of the 21st century skills for Thai higher education by integration of ICT in classroom. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 365–373. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.346
   Google Scholar
• Pimentel, M., Fuks, H., & de Lucena, C. J. P. (2005). Mediated chat development process: Avoiding chat confusion on educational debates. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years!
   Google Scholar
• Pocatilu, P., Alecu, F., & Vetrici, M. (2009). Using cloud computing for E-learning systems. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 8th WSEAS International Conference on Data Networks, Communications, Computers.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, M., Davies, T., & Taylor, K. (2012). ICT For or Against Development_an intro to Web 3.0.
   Google Scholar
• Putnik, G., Alves, C., Carvalho, C., Sousa, S., Varela, L., Shah, V., & Castro, H. (2015). Social network-based education and learning factory as emergent forms of education and training: An application for quality management.
   Google Scholar
• Rego, H., Moreira, T., Morales Morgado, E. M., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2010). Metadata and knowledge management driven Web-based learning information system towards Web/e-Learning 3.0.
   Google Scholar
• Reigeluth, C. M., Aslan, S., Chen, Z., Dutta, P., Huh, Y., Lee, D., … Tan, V. (2015). Personalized integrated educational system: Technology functions for the learner-centered paradigm of education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(3), 459–496. doi: 10.1177/0735633115603998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinsmith-Jones, K., Kibbe, S., Crayton, T., & Campbell, E. (2015). Use of second life in social work education: Virtual world experiences and their effect on students. Journal of Social Work Education, 51(1), 90–108. doi: 10.1080/10437797.2015.977167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiser, R. A. (2001). A history of instructional design and technology: Part I: A history of instructional media. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 53–64. doi: 10.1007/BF02504506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubens, N., Kaplan, D., & Okamoto, T. (2012). E-Learning 3.0: Anyone, anywhere, anytime, and AI. Paper presented at the International Conference on Web-Based Learning, Berlin, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. P., Geith, C., Håklev, S., & Thierstein, J. (2009). Peer-to-peer recognition of learning in open education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(5). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v10i5.641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheeba, T., Begum, S. H., & Bernard, M. J. (2012). Semantic web to e-Learning content. International Journal, 2(10), 58–66.
   Google Scholar
• Stojanovic, L., Staab, S., & Studer, R. (2001). Elearning based on the Semantic Web. Paper presented at the WebNet2001-World Conference on the WWW and Internet.
   Google Scholar
• Ting, R. Y.-L. (2005). Mobile learning: Current trend and future challenges. Paper presented at the Advanced Learning Technologies, 2005. ICALT 2005. Fifth IEEE International Conference on.
   Google Scholar
• Tiropanis, T., Davis, H., Millard, D., & Weal, M. (2009). Semantic technologies for learning and teaching in the web 2.0 era: A survey of uk higher education. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Web Science 2009 Conference, WebSci.
   Google Scholar
• Tresp, V., Bundschus, M., Rettinger, A., & Huang, Y. (2008). Towards machine learning on the semantic web. Paper presented at the Ursw (lncs vol.).
   Google Scholar
• Tsiotakis, P., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2016). Critical factors towards analysing teachers’ presence in on-line learning communities. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 45–58. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utomo, H., Bon, A., & Hendayun, M. (2017). Academic information system support in the era of education 3.0.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J. (2013). Education 3.0: Effect learning style and method of instruction on user satisfaction. European Academic Research I, 1(5), 755–769.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, T. I., Tsai, K. H., Lee, M. C., & Chiu, T. K. (2007). Personalized learning objects recommendation based on the semantic-aware discovery and the learner preference pattern. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 84–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar