References
- Alexander, P. A., & Judy, J. E. (1988). The interaction of domain-specific and strategic knowledge in academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 58, 375–404. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543058004375
- Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/A0021017
- Almarshoud, A. F. (2011). The advancement in using remote laboratories in electrical engineering education: A review. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36, 425–433. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2011.604125
- Arnold, J. C., Kremer, K., & Mayer, J. (2014). Understanding students’ experiments: What kind of support do they need in inquiry tasks? International Journal of Science Education, 36, 2719–2749. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.930209
- Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
- Bumbacher, E., Salehi, S., Wieman, C., & Blikstein, P. (2018). Tools for science inquiry learning: Tool affordances, experimentation strategies, and conceptual understanding. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27, 215–235. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9719-8
- Carnesi, S., & DiGiorgio, K. (2009). Teaching the inquiry process to 21st century learners. Library Media Connection, 27, 32–36.
- Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G., & Bennett, S. (2014). The impact of students’ exploration strategies on discovery learning using computer-based simulations. Educational Media International, 51, 310–329. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2014.977009
- de Jong, T. (2006). Computer simulations: Technological advances in inquiry learning. Science, 312, 532–533. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127750
- de Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340, 305–308. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230579
- de Jong, T., & Njoo, M. (1992). Learning and instruction with computer simulations: Learning processes involved. In E. de Corte, M. Linn, H. Mandl, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Computer-based learning environments and problem solving (pp. 411–429). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
- de Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68, 179–201. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1170753
- Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 391–450. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0803&4_3
- Glaser, R., Schauble, L., Raghavan, K., & Zeitz, C. (1992). Scientific reasoning across different domains. In E. de Corte, M. Linn, H. Mandl, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Computer-based learning environments and problem solving (pp. 345–373). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
- Groβmann, N., & Wilde, M. (2018). Experimentatioin in biology lessons: Guided discovery through incremental scaffolds. International Journal of Science Education, 41, 759–781. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1579392
- Hagemans, M. G., van der Meij, H., & de Jong, T. (2013). The effects of a concept map-based support tool on simulation-based inquiry learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 1–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029433
- Hailikari, T., Katajavuori, N., & Lindblom-Ylanne, S. (2008). The relevance of prior knowledge in learning and instructional design. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72, 113. doi:https://doi.org/10.5688/aj7205113
- Hardy, I., Jonen, A., Möller, K., & Stern, E. (2006). Effects of instructional support within constructivist learning environments for elementary school students’ understanding of “floating and sinking”. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 307–326. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.307
- Hmelo, C. E., Nagarajan, A., & Day, R. S. (2000). Effects of high and low prior knowledge on construction of a joint problem space. The Journal of Experimental Education, 69, 36–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970009600648
- Hughes, S. W. (2005). Archimedes revisited: A faster, better, cheaper method of accurately measuring the volume of small objects. Physics Education, 40, 468–474. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/40/5/008
- Kalyuga, S. (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 509–539. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9054-3
- Klahr, D., & Nigam, M. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: Effect of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science, 15, 661–667. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00737.x
- Klahr, D., & Simon, H. A. (1999). Studies of scientific discovery: Complementary approaches and convergent findings. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 524–543. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.5.524
- Lambiotte, J. G., & Dansereau, D. F. (1992). Effects of knowledge maps and prior knowledge on recall of science lecture content. The Journal of Experimental Education, 60, 189–201. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1992.9943875
- Lazonder, A. W. (2014). Inquiry learning. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 453–464). New York: Springer Science + Business Media.
- Lim, B. (2004). Challenges and issues in designing inquiry on the web. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5), 627–643. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0007-1013.2004.00419.x
- Loverude, M. E. (2009). A research-based interactive lecture demonstration on sinking and floating. American Journal of Physics, 77, 897–901. doi:https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3191688
- Loverude, M. E., Kautz, C. H., & Heron, P. R. L. (2003). Helping students develop an understanding of Archimedes’ principle. I. Research on student understanding. American Journal of Physics, 71, 1178–1187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1607335
- Manlove, S., Lazonder, A. W., & de Jong, T. (2006). Regulative support for collaborative scientific inquiry learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 87–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00162.x
- Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 692–720. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/Tea.10105
- Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., … Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
- Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R. G., … Soloway, E. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 337–386. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_4
- Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 273–304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_2
- Roll, I., Briseno, A., Yee, N., & Welsh, A. (2014). Not a magic bullet: The effect of scaffolding on knowledge and attitudes in online simulations. Paper presented at the international conference of the learning sciences, Boulder, CO.
- Roll, I., de Baker, R. S. J., Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2014). On the benefits of seeking (and avoiding) help in online problem-solving environments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23, 537–560. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.883977
- Ruppert, J., Golan Duncan, R., & Chinn, C. A. (2017). Disentangling the role of domain-specific knolwedge in student modeling. Research in Science Education. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9656-9
- Sancristobal, E., Martín, S., Gil, R., Orduña, P., Tawfik, M., Pesquera, A., … Castro, M. (2012). State of art, initiatives and new challenges for virtual and remote labs. Paper presented at the 12th IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies, Rome.
- Schauble, L., Glaser, R., Raghavan, K., & Reiner, M. (1992). The integration of knowledge and experimentation strategies in understanding a physical system. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 321–343. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350060405
- Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
- Schunk, D. H. (1996). Learning theories: An educational perspective (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
- Simons, K. D., & Klein, J. D. (2007). The impact of scaffolding and student achievement levels in a problem-based learning environment. Instructional Science, 35, 41–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-9002-5
- SLO Nationaal Expertisecentrum Leerplanontwikkeling. (2016). Karakteristieken en kerndoelen: Onderbouw voortgezet onderwijs [Characteristics and headline targets: Lower secundary education]. (Report number: OBVO/16-023). Retrieved from Enschede http://downloads.slo.nl/Documenten/karakteristieken-en-kerndoelen-onderbouw-vo.pdf
- Toth, E. E., Ludvico, L. R., & Morrow, B. L. (2014). Blended inquiry with hands-on and virtual laboratories: The role of perceptual features during knowledge construction. Interactive Learning Environments, 22, 614–630. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.693102
- Tuovinen, J. E., & Sweller, J. (1999). A comparison of cognitive load associated with discovery learning and worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 334–341. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.334
- van Joolingen, W. R., & de Jong, T. (1991). Supporting hypothesis generation by learners exploring an interactive computer simulation. Instructional Science, 20, 389–404. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116355
- van Riesen, S. A. N., Gijlers, H., Anjewierden, A. A., & de Jong, T. (2018a). The influence of prior knowledge on experiment design guidance in a science inquiry context. International Journal of Science Education. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1477263
- van Riesen, S. A. N., Gijlers, H., Anjewierden, A. A., & de Jong, T. (2018b). Supporting learners’ experiment design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66, 475–491. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9568-4
- Veenman, M. V. J., Elshout, J. J., & Meijer, J. (1997). The generality vs domain-specificity of metacognitive skills in novice learning across domains. Learning and Instruction, 7, 187–209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00025-4
- Veermans, K., de Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2000). Promoting self-directed learning in simulation-based discovery learning environments through intelligent support. Interactive Learning Environments, 8, 229–255. doi:https://doi.org/10.1076/1049-4820(200012)8:3;1-D;FT229
- Veermans, K., van Joolingen, W. R., & de Jong, T. (2006). Use of heuristics to facilitate scientific discovery learning in a simulation learning environment in a physics domain. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 341–361. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500277615
- Zacharia, Z. C., Manoli, C., Xenofontos, N., de Jong, T., Pedaste, M., van Riesen, S. A. N., … Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Identifying potential types of guidance for supporting student inquiry when using virtual and remote labs in science: A literature review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63, 257–302. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9370-0
- Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41, 64–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2