References
- Baldwin, J. A., Ebert-May, D., & Burns, D. J. (1999). The development of a college biology self-efficacy instrument for nonmajors. Science Education, 83(4), 397–408. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199907)83:4<397::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-#
- Bandura, A. (1989). Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy. Developmental Psychology, 25, 729–735. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.25.5.729
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.
- Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, 5(1), 307–337. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
- Beghetto, R. A. (2007). Factors associated with middle and secondary students’ perceived science competence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 800–814. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20166
- Bergey, B. W., Ketelhut, D. J., Liang, S., Natarajan, U., & Karakus, M. (2015). Scientific inquiry self-efficacy and computer game self-efficacy as predictors and outcomes of middle school boys’ and girls’ performance in a science assessment in a virtual environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(5), 696–708. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9558-4
- Borst, C. W., Ritter, K. A., & Chambers, T. L. (2016). Virtual energy center for teaching alternative energy technologies. In IEEE virtual reality (pp. 157–158). doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2016.7504701
- Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485–499. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20131
- Cai, Y., Tay, C. T., & Ngo, B. K. (2013). Introduction to 3D immersive & interactive learning. In Y. Cai (Ed.), 3D immersive and interactive learning (pp. 1–16). Singapore: Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4021-90-6
- Canney, N. E., & Bielefeldt, A. R. (2016). Validity and reliability evidence of the engineering professional responsibility assessment tool. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(3), 452–477. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20124
- Chen, J. A., Metcalf, S. J., & Tutwiler, M. S. (2014). Motivation and beliefs about the nature of scientific knowledge within an immersive virtual ecosystems environment. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(2), 112–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.02.004
- Chen, J. A., & Usher, E. L. (2013). Profiles of the sources of science self-efficacy. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 11–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.11.002
- Dalgety, J., & Coll, R. K. (2006). Exploring first-year science students’ chemistry self-efficacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(1), 97–116. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-005-1080-3
- Douglas, K. A., & Purzer, Ş. (2015). Validity: Meaning and relevancy in assessment for engineering education research. Journal of Engineering Education, 104(2), 108–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20070
- Gwee, H. N. (2013). Effects of virtual-reality elements on spatial visualization skills of secondary three students in Singapore. In Y. Cai (Ed.), 3D immersive and interactive learning (pp. 45–57). Singapore: Springer.
- Hushman, C. J., & Marley, S. C. (2015). Guided instruction improves elementary student learning and self-efficacy in science. The Journal of Educational Research, 108(5), 371–381. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.899958
- Ismail, M., Aziz, F. H., Fajil, M., Ismail, M. F., & Shah, A. (2017). The relationship between self-efficacy and GPA grade scores of students. International Journal of Applied Psychology, 7(2), 44–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijap.20170702.03
- Johnson-Glenberg, M. C. (2018). Immersive VR and education: Embodied design principles that include gesture and hand controls. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5(81), 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00081
- Johnson-Glenberg, M. C., & Megowan-Romanowicz, C. (2017). Embodied science and mixed reality: How gesture and motion capture affect physics education. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 1–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0060-9
- Jung, A.-K., & Heppner, M. J. (2017). Development and validation of a work mattering scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 25(3), 467–483. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072715599412
- Kiran, D., & Sungur, S. (2012). Middle school students’ science self-efficacy and its sources: Examination of gender difference. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(5), 619–630. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9351-y
- Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 311. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.311
- Kupermintz, H. (2002). Affective and conative factors as aptitude resources in high school science achievement. Educational Assessment, 8(2), 123–137. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326977EA0802_03
- Lau, S., & Roeser, R. W. (2002). Cognitive abilities and motivational processes in high school students’ situational engagement and achievement in science. Educational Assessment, 8(2), 139–162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326977EA0802_04
- Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Larkin, K. C. (1984). Relation of self-efficacy expectations to academic achievement and persistence. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31(3), 356–362. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.31.3.356
- Lofgran, B. B., Smith, L. K., & Whiting, E. F. (2015). Science self-efficacy and school transitions: Elementary school to middle school, middle school to high school. School Science and Mathematics, 115(7), 366–376. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12139
- Luzzo, D. A., Hasper, P., Albert, K. A., Bibby, M. A., & Martinelli, E. A. J. (1999). Effects of self-efficacy-enhancing interventions on the math/science self-efficacy and career interests, goals, and actions of career undecided college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46(2), 233–243. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.46.2.233
- Mamaril, N. A., Usher, E. L., Li, C. R., Economy, D. R., & Kennedy, M. S. (2016). Measuring undergraduate students’ engineering self-efficacy: A validation study. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), 366–395. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20121
- McCoach, D. B., Gable, R. K., & Madura, J. P. (2013a). Affective characteristics in school and corporate environments: Their conceptual definitions. In B. McCoach, R. K. Gable, & J. P. Madura (Eds.), Instrument development in the affective domain (3rd ed., pp. 1–32). New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7135-6
- McCoach, D. B., Gable, R. K., & Madura, J. P. (2013b). Evidence based on the internal structure of the instrument: Factor analysis. In B. McCoach, R. K. Gable, & J. P. Madura (Eds.), Instrument development in the affective domain (3rd ed., pp. 87–120). New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7135-6
- McCoach, D. B., Gable, R. K., & Madura, J. P. (2013c). Review of the steps for designing an instrument. In B. McCoach, R. K. Gable, & J. P. Madura (Eds.), Instrument development in the affective domain (3rd ed., pp. 197–202). New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7135-6
- Miller, M. D. (2006). Science self-efficacy in tenth grade hispanic female high school students (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (ID 304949419).
- Mineev, G. (2017). The impact of immersive virtual reality on effectiveness of educational games (Unpublished master’s thesis). Utrecht University.
- Montebon, D. R. T. (2016). Shadow education: Effects on students ‘ self-efficacy in science. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 5(1), 31–40.
- National Science Board. (2018). Science & engineering indicators 2018. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/assets/nsb20181.pdf
- Pajares, F., Britner, S. L., & Valiante, G. (2000). Relation between achievement goals and self-beliefs of middle school students in writing and science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(4), 406–422. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1027
- Papachristos, N. M., Vrellis, I., & Mikropoulos, T. A. (2017). A comparison between Oculus Rift and a low-cost smartphone VR headset: Immersive user experience and learning. In IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 477–481). doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2017.145
- Parmar, D. (2017). Evaluating the effects of immersive embodied interaction on cognition in virtual reality (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (ID 1986801781).
- Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 156–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n1p156
- Stranger-Johannessen, E. (2018). Exploring math achievement through gamified virtual reality. In European Conference on technology enhanced learning (pp. 613–616). Springer International Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98572-5
- Sun, Y. (2014). An investigation of Chinese K-12 students’ interest in science. Retrieved from http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_475b16640102ekgf.html
- Technavio. (2017). VR in education market - Trends and forecasts. Retrieved from https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20170515006621/en/VR-Education-Market—Trends-Forecasts-Technavio
- Toh, C., Miller, S., & Simpson, T. (2015). The impact of virtual product dissection environments on student design learning and self-efficacy. Journal of Engineering Design, 26, 48–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2015.1018149
- U.S. Department of Education. (2015). Science, technology, engineering and math: Education for global leadership. Retrieved from https://www.ed.gov/stem
- Velayutham, S., & Aldridge, J. M. (2013). Influence of psychosocial classroom environment on students’ motivation and self-regulation in science learning: A structural equation modeling approach. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 507–527. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9273-y