Prioritizing the components of e-learning systems by using fuzzy DEMATEL and ANP

References

• Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., & Sinclair, J. (2018). A comprehensive model for evaluating e-learning systems success. Distance Learning, 15(3), 57–88.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Qahtani, A. A., & Higgins, S. E. (2013). Effects of traditional, blended and e-learning on students’ achievement in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 220–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Samarraie, H., Teng, B. K., Alzahrani, A. I., & Alalwan, N. (2017). E-learning continuance satisfaction in higher education: A unified perspective from instructors and students. Studies in Higher Education, 1–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1298088.
   Google Scholar
• Al–Rahmi, W., Alias, N., Othman, M. S., Alzahrani, A. I., Alfarraj, O., Saged, A. A., & Abdul Rahman, N. S. (2018). Use of e-learning by university students in Malaysian higher educational institutions: A case in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2802325
   Google Scholar
• Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., & Oliveira, T. (2016). Cultural impacts on e-learning systems’ success. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 58–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2013). A grey-based DEMATEL model for evaluating business process management critical success factors. International Journal of Production Economics, 146(1), 281–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajpai, S., Sachdeva, A., & Gupta, J. P. (2010). Security risk assessment: Applying the concepts of fuzzy logic. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 173(1-3), 258–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaban, I., Bubas, G., & Pipan, M. (2011, September). Key elements of an e-learning course evaluation survey: An empirical validation. 2011–14th international conference on interactive collaborative learning (ICL) (pp. 336–343).
   Google Scholar
• Bhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Rho, J. J., & Ciganek, A. P. (2012). Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers & Education, 58(2), 843–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bongo, M. F., & Ocampo, L. A. (2017a). Exploring critical attributes during air traffic congestion with a fuzzy DEMATEL–ANP technique: A case study in Ninoy Aquino International Airport. Journal of Modern Transportation, 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-017-0150-x.
   Google Scholar
• Bongo, M. F., & Ocampo, L. A. (2017b). A hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach for mitigating airport congestion: A case in Ninoy Aquino international airport. Journal of Air Transport Management, 63, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, S., & Davis, T. (2018, March). Engaging digital natives in an educational Setting. Society for information technology & teacher education international conference, association for the advancement of computing in education (AACE) (pp. 3761–3764).
   Google Scholar
• Büyüközkan, G., Arsenyan, J., & Ertek, G. (2010). Evaluation of e-learning web sites using fuzzy axiomatic design based approach. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 3(1), 28–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2012). A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 3000–3011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo-Merino, D., & Serradell-López, E. (2014). An analysis of the determinants of students’ performance in e-learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 476–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çelikbilek, Y., & Tüysüz, F. (2016). An integrated grey based multi-criteria decision making approach for the evaluation of renewable energy sources. Energy, 115, 1246–1258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuang, H. M., & Lin, C. K. (2014). Exploring learners’ value co-creation behavior in e-learning environments. The Development of Distance Learning in Taiwan Higher Education, 1, 195–215.
   Google Scholar
• Colace, F., & De Santo, M. (2011). Evaluation models for e-learning platforms and the AHP approach: A case study. The IPSI BGD Transactions on Internet Research, 7(1), 31–43.
   Google Scholar
• Dargi, A., Anjomshoae, A., Galankashi, M. R., Memari, A., & Tap, M. B. M. (2014). Supplier selection: A fuzzy-ANP approach. Procedia Computer Science, 31, 691–700.
   Google Scholar
• Dimić, S., Pamučar, D., Ljubojević, S., & Đorović, B. (2016). Strategic transport management models—the case study of an oil industry. Sustainability, 8(9), 954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dytczak, M., & Ginda, G. (2013). Is explicit processing of fuzzy direct influence evaluations in DEMATEL indispensable? Expert Systems with Applications, 40(12), 5027–5032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fichten, C. S., Ferraro, V., Asuncion, J. V., Chwojka, C., Barile, M., Nguyen, M. N., … Wolforth, J. (2009). Disabilities and e-learning problems and solutions: An exploratory study. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 241–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabus, A., & Fontela, E. (1972). World problems, an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL. Geneva, Switzerland: Battelle Geneva Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Garg, R. (2017a). E-learning website evaluation and selection using multi-attribute decision making matrix methodology. Computer Applications in Engineering Education. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21846.
   Google Scholar
• Garg, R. (2017b). Optimal selection of e-learning websites using multiattribute decision-making approaches. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 24(3-4), 187–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg, R., & Jain, D. (2017a). Fuzzy multi-attribute decision making evaluation of e-learning websites using FAHP, COPRAS, VIKOR, WDBA. doi:https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2017.2.003.
   Google Scholar
• Garg, R., & Jain, D. (2017b). Prioritizing e-learning websites evaluation and selection criteria using fuzzy set theory. Management Science Letters, 7(4), 177–184.
   Google Scholar
• Gebel, M., Kupriyanova, V., Morais, R., & Colucci, E. (2014). E-learning in European higher education institutions. European University Association. Retrieved from http://www.eua.be/Libraries/publication/e-learning_survey
   Google Scholar
• Gigović, L., Pamučar, D., Bajić, Z., & Milićević, M. (2016b). The combination of expert judgment and GIS-MAIRCA analysis for the selection of sites for ammunition depots. Sustainability, 8(4), 372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigović, L., Pamučar, D., Božanić, D., & Ljubojević, S. (2017). Application of the GIS-DANP-MABAC multi-criteria model for selecting the location of wind farms: A case study of Vojvodina, Serbia. Renewable Energy, 103, 501–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigović, L., Pamučar, D., Lukić, D., & Marković, S. (2016a). GIS-Fuzzy DEMATEL MCDA model for the evaluation of the sites for ecotourism development: A case study of “Dunavski ključ” region, Serbia. Land Use Policy, 58, 348–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadley, J., Kulier, R., Zamora, J., Coppus, S. F., Weinbrenner, S., Meyerrose, B., … Khan, K. S. (2010). Effectiveness of an e-learning course in evidence-based medicine for foundation (internship) training. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 103(7), 288–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, C. L., & Dzeng, R. J. (2010). Construction safety training via e-learning: Learning effectiveness and user satisfaction. Computers & Education, 55(2), 858–867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, A. N. (2016). E-learning system use and its outcomes: Moderating role of perceived compatibility. Telematics and Informatics, 33(1), 48–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islas-Pérez, E., Pérez, Y. H., Pérez-Ramírez, M., García-Hernández, C. F., & Pérez, B. Z. (2015). Multicriteria decision making for evaluation of e-learning tools. Research in Computing Science, 106, 27–37.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, D., Garg, R., & Bansal, A. (2015). A parameterized selection and evaluation of e-learning websites using TOPSIS method. International Journal of Research & Development in Technology and Management Science, 22(3), 12–26.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, D., Garg, R., Bansal, A., & Saini, K. K. (2016). Selection and ranking of e-learning websites using weighted distance-based approximation. Journal of Computers in Education, 3(2), 193–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jara Gutiérrez, N. P., & Prieto Soler, C. (2018). Impact of the differences between digital natives and immigrants on health science teaching: A systematic review. Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud (ACIMED), 29(1), 92–105.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. D., Hornik, S., & Salas, E. (2008). An empirical examination of factors contributing to the creation of successful e-learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(5), 356–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, H. Y., Lee, A. H., & Yang, C. Y. (2012). A fuzzy ANP model for supplier selection as applied to IC packaging. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(5), 1477–1488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesharwani, A. (2019). Do (How) digital natives adopt a new technology differently than digital immigrants?-A longitudinal study. Information & Management. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103170.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, N. Z., Ansari, T. S. A., Siddiquee, A. N., & Khan, Z. A. (2019). Selection of e-learning websites using a novel proximity indexed value (PIV) MCDM method. Journal of Computers in Education, 6(2), 241–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. C. (2010). Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation–confirmation model. Computers & Education, 54(2), 506–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leidner, DE, & Jarvenpaa, SL. (1993). The information age confronts education: Case studies on electronic classrooms. Information Systems Research, 4(1), 24–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liaw, S. S., Huang, H. M., & Chen, G. D. (2007). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1066–1080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S. H., Liao, H. L., & Peng, C. J. (2005). Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online e-learning users’ acceptance behavior. Issues in Information Systems, 4(2), 175–181.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S. H., Liao, H. L., & Pratt, J. A. (2009). Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance. Computers & Education, 52(3), 599–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Torres, M. D. R., Toral, S. L., & Barrero, F. (2011). Identification of the design variables of eLearning tools. Interacting with Computers, 23(3), 279–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masud, M. A. H., & Huang, X. (2012). An e-learning system architecture based on cloud computing. System, 10(11), 736–740.
   Google Scholar
• Mehregan, M. R., Jamporazmey, M., Hosseinzadeh, M., & Mehrafrouz, M. (2011, September). Proposing an approach for evaluating e-learning by integrating critical success factor and fuzzy AHP. International conference on innovation, management and service (pp. 125–130). Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammed, H. J., Kasim, M. M., AL-Dahneem, E. A., & Hamadi, A. K. (2016). An analytical survey on implementing best practices for introducing e-learning programs to students. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 5(2), 191–196.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammed, H. J., Kasim, M. M., & Shaharanee, I. N. (2018). Evaluation of E-learning approaches using AHP-TOPSIS technique. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC), 10(1-10), 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, R. P., Agarwal, R., Choudhury, A. K., & Tiwari, M. K. (2005). A fuzzy ANP-based approach to R&D project selection: A case study. International Journal of Production Research, 43(24), 5199–5216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosakhani, M., & Jamporazmey, M. (2010, September). Introduce critical success factors (CSFs) of e-learning for evaluating e-learning implementation success. IEEE 2010 international conference on educational and information technology (ICEIT) 1, V1-224-V1-228.
   Google Scholar
• Mustafa, Y. E. A., & Sharif, S. M. (2011). An approach to adaptive e-learning hypermedia system based on learning styles (AEHS-LS): Implementation and evaluation. International Journal of Library and Information Science, 3(1), 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Nilashi, M., & Janahmadi, N. (2012). Assessing and prioritizing affecting factors in e-learning websites using AHP method and fuzzy approach. Information and Knowledge Management, 2(1), 46–61.
   Google Scholar
• Okantey, M., & Addo, H. (2016). Effect of theoretical and institutional factors on the adoption of e-learning. European Scientific Journal, 12(16), 462–473.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, C. S., & Lai, J. Y. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(5), 816–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozkan, S., & Koseler, R. (2009). Multi-dimensional students’ evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1285–1296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papp, R. (2000). Critical success factors for distance learning. Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) 2000 Proceedings, 104, 1858-1861.
   Google Scholar
• Pocatilu, P., Alecu, F., & Vetrici, M. (2010). Measuring the efficiency of cloud computing for e-learning systems. WSEAS Transactions on Computers, 9(1), 42–51.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1996). The analytic network process: Decision making with dependence and feedback; the organization and prioritization of complexity. Pittsburgh: Rws publications.
   Google Scholar
• Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers & Education, 49(2), 396–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevkli, M., Oztekin, A., Uysal, O., Torlak, G., Turkyilmaz, A., & Delen, D. (2012). Development of a fuzzy ANP based SWOT analysis for the airline industry in Turkey. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 14–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shee, D. Y., & Wang, Y. S. (2008). Multi-criteria evaluation of the web-based e-learning system: A methodology based on learner satisfaction and its applications. Computers & Education, 50(3), 894–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soong, M. B., Chan, H. C., Chua, B. C., & Loh, K. F. (2001). Critical success factors for on-line course resources. Computers & Education, 36(2), 101–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sridharan, B., Deng, H., Kirk, J., & Corbitt, B. (2010, January). Structural equation modeling for evaluating the user perceptions of e-learning effectiveness in higher education. ECIS 2010: Proceedings of the 18th European conference on information systems (pp. 1–13).
   Google Scholar
• Su, C. H., Tzeng, G. H., & Hu, S. K. (2016). Cloud e-learning service strategies for improving e-learning innovation performance in a fuzzy environment by using a new hybrid fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making model. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8), 1812–1835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šumak, B., HeričKo, M., & PušNik, M. (2011). A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2067–2077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183–1202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Yu, W. C. (2011). Evaluating the reliability and impact of a quality assurance system for E-learning courseware. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1615–1627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syamsuddin, I. (2012). Fuzzy multi criteria evaluation framework for e-learning software quality. Academic Research International, 2(1), 139–147.
   Google Scholar
• Tadić, S., Zečević, S., & Krstić, M. (2014). A novel hybrid MCDM model based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy VIKOR for city logistics concept selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(18), 8112–8128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, M. L., Lin, R. J., & Chen, H. P. (2011). Evaluating the effectiveness of e-learning system in uncertainty. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111(6), 869–889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzeng, G. H., Chiang, C. H., & Li, C. W. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028–1044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volery, T., & Lord, D. (2000). Critical success factors in online education. International Journal of Educational Management, 14(5), 216–223.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C. S., & Lin, S. L. (2012, August). Combining fuzzy AHP and association rule to evaluate the activity processes of e-learning system. Sixth international conference on genetic and evolutionary computing (ICGEC) (pp. 566–570).
   Google Scholar
• Wu, W. W., & Lee, Y. T. (2007). Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(2), 499–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M., Su, C., & Wang, W. (2017). The use of a DANP with VIKOR approach for establishing the model of e-learning service quality. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 5927–5937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuen, K. K. F. (2012, January). A multiple criteria decision making approach for E-learning platform selection: The primitive cognitive network process. IEEE computing, communications and applications conference (ComComAp) (pp. 294–298).
   Google Scholar
• Zadgari, A. (2016). Assessment of e-learning service quality using the fuzzy analytic network process (Case study: E-learning Department of Shahid Beheshti University). International conference on management & dynamic economics.
   Google Scholar