References
- Agnoli, S., Franchin, L., Rubaltelli, E., & Corazza, G. E. (2015). An eye-tracking analysis of irrelevance processing as moderator of openness and creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 27(2), 125–132. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2015.1030304
- Al-Samarraie, H., & Hurmuzan, S. (2018). A review of brainstorming techniques in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 78–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.12.002
- Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123–167.
- Baer, M., Oldham, G. R., Jacobsohn, G. C., & Hollingshead, A. B. (2008). The personality composition of teams and creativity: The moderating role of team creative confidence. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 255–282. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01299.x
- Baruah, J., & Paulus, P. B. (2016). The role of time and category relatedness in electronic brainstorming. Small Group Research, 47(3), 333–342. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496416642296
- Coskun, H. (2011). The effects of group size, memory instruction, and session length on the creative performance in electronic brainstorming groups. Educational Sciences Theory & Practice, 11, 91–95.
- Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality Inventory and NEO Five-factor Inventory professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
- Dugosh, K. L., Paulus, P. B., Roland, E. J., & Yang, H. C. (2000). Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 79, 722–735. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.722
- Gajda, A., Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Creativity and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(2), 269–299. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000133
- Kaufman, S. B., Quilty, L. C., Grazioplene, R. G., Hirsh, J. B., Gray, J. R., Peterson, J. B., et al. (2015). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality, 84(2), 248–258. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12156
- Li, W., Li, X., Huang, L., Kong, X., Yang, W., Wei, D., et al. (2015). Brain structure links trait creativity to openness to experience. Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, 10, 191–198. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsu041
- Lin, P. Y., Chang, Y. H., Lin, H. T., & Hong, H. Y. (2016). Fostering college students’ creative capacity through computer-supported knowledge building. Journal of Computers in Education, 4, 1–14.
- Luse, A., McElroy, J. C., Townsend, A. M., & DeMarie, S. (2013). Personality and cognitive style as predictors of preference for working in virtual teams. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1825–1832. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.007
- McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1258–1265. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1258
- Michinov, N., Jamet, E., Métayer, N., & Hénaff, B. L. (2015). The eyes of creativity: Impact of social comparison and individual creativity on performance and attention to others’ ideas during electronic brainstorming. Computers in Human Behavior, 42, 57–67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.037
- Minas, R. K. (2018). Triggering insight: Using neuroscience to understand how priming changes individual cognition during electronic brainstorming. Decision Sciences, 49(5), 788–826. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12295
- Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2006). How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 10, 186–213. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_1
- Paulus, P. B., & Brown, V. R. (2010). Toward more creative and innovative group idea generation: A cognitive-social-motivational perspective of brainstorming. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 248–265. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00006.x
- Paulus, P. B., & Yang, H. (2000). Idea generation in groups: A basis for creativity in organizations. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 76–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2888
- Pi, Z. (2017). The role of sharing ideas in creative ideas generation of virtual teams. Wuhan:Central China Normal University, Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
- Pi, Z., Hong, J., & Hu, W. (2019). Interaction of the originality of peers' ideas and students' openness to experience in predicting creativity in online collaborative groups. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1801–1814. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12671
- Pi, Z., Hong, J., & Yang, J. (2017). Effects of the instructor’s pointing gestures on learning performance in video lectures. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(4), 1020–1029. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12471
- Potter, R. E., & Balthazard, P. A. (2004). The role of individual memory and attention processes during electronic brainstorming. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 521–643. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/25148657
- Schilpzand, M. C., Herold, D. M., & Shalley, C. E. (2010). Members’ openness to experience and teams’ creative performance. Small Group Research, 41, 55–76.
- Schwaba, T., Robins, R. W., Grijalva, E., & Bleidorn, W. (2019). Does openness to experience matter in love and work? Domain, facet, and developmental evidence from a 24-year longitudinal study. Journal of Personality, Advance online publication. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12458
- Sharp, L. A., & Whaley, B. (2018). Wikis as online collaborative learning experiences: “A different kind of brainstorming”. Adult Learning, 29(3), 83–93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1045159518761095
- Tidikis, V., & Dunbar, N. D. (2017). Openness to experience and creativity: When does global citizenship matter? International Journal of Psychology, 54(2), 264–268. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12463
- Yagolkovskiy, S. R. (2016). Stimulation of individual creativity in electronic brainstorming: Cognitive and social aspects. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal, 44(5), 761–766. doi: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2016.44.5.761
- Yagolkovskiy, S. R., & Kharkhurin, A. V. (2016). The roles of rarity and organization of stimulus material in divergent thinking. Thinking Skills & Creativity, 22, 14–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.08.001
- Yao, R., & Liang, L. (2010). Analysis of the application of simplified NEO-FFI to undergraduates. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 18(4), 457–459.