References
- Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51(2), 269–290. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00092
- Cheng, G., & Chau, J. (2016). Exploring the relationships between learning styles, online participation, learning achievement and course satisfaction: An empirical study of a blended learning course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 257–278. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12243
- Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962–1023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
- Ergün, E., & Usluel, Y. K. (2016). An analysis of density and degree-centrality according to the social networking structure formed in an online learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 19(4), 34–46.
- Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001
- Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
- Gu, X. Q., Shao, Y. J., Guo, X. F., & Lim, C. P. (2015). Designing a role structure to engage students in computer-supported collaborative learning. Internet and Higher Education, 24, 13–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.09.002
- Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431. doi: https://doi.org/10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAG
- Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Social network analysis: An approach and technique for the study of information exchange. Library & Information Science Research, 18(4), 323–342. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-8188(96)90003-1
- Hernández-Nanclares, N., García-Muñiz, A. S., & Rienties, B. (2017). Making the most of “external” group members in blended and online environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(4), 467–481. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1140656
- Hökkä, P., Vähäsantanen, K., & Mahlakaarto, S. (2017). Teacher educators’ collective professional agency and identity – Transforming marginality to strength. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 36–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.001
- Hou, H.-T. (2012). Exploring the behavioral patterns of learners in an educational massively multiple online role-playing game (MMORPG). Computers & Education, 58, 1225–1233. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.015
- Hou, H.-T., & Wu, S.-Y. (2011). Analyzing the social knowledge construction behavioral patterns of an online synchronous collaborative discussion instructional activity using an instant messaging tool: A case study. Computers & Education, 57, 1459–1468. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.012
- Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2016). Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: How to support collaborative learning? How can technologies help? Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 247–265. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1158654
- Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousands Oak, CA: SAGE Publication Inc.
- Kurucay, M., & Inan, F. A. (2017). Examining the effects of learner-learner interactions on satisfaction and learning in an online undergraduate course. Computers & Education, 115, 20–37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.010
- Lee, J., & Bonk, C. J. (2016). Social network analysis of peer relationships and online interactions in a blended class using blogs. Internet and Higher Education, 28, 35–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.09.001
- Lee, S. W.-Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2011). Students’ perceptions of collaboration, self-regulated learning, and information seeking in the context of Internet-based learning and traditional learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011, 905–914. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.016
- Marbouti, F., & Wise, A. F. (2016). Starburst: A new graphical interface to support purposeful attention to others’ posts in online discussions. Educational Technology Research & Development, 64, 87–113. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9400-y
- Molinillo, S., Aguilar-Illescas, R., Anaya-Sánchez, R., & Vallespín-Arán, M. (2018). Exploring the impacts of interactions, social presence and emotional engagement on active collaborative learning in a social web-based environment. Computers & Education, 123, 41–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.012
- Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Pavo, MÁH, & Rodrigo, J. C. (2015). Interaction analysis of a blog/journal of teaching practice. Internet and Higher Education, 27, 32–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.05.003
- Pi, Z. L., Hong, J. Z., & Yang, J. M. (2017). Effects of the instructor’s pointing gestures on learning performance in video lectures. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(4), 1020–1029. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12471
- Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0303_3
- Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–118). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Stahl, G. (2005). Group cognition in computer-assisted collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 79–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00115.x
- Stepanyan, K., Mather, R., & Dalrymple, R. (2014). Culture, role and group work: A social network analysis perspective on an online collaborative course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(4), 676–693. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12076
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Tawfik, A. A., Giabbanelli, P. J., Hogan, M., Msilu, F., Gill, A., & York, C. S. (2018). Effects of success v failure cases on learner-learner interaction. Computers & Education, 118, 120–132. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.013
- Van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Brekelmans, M. (2014). Supporting teachers in guiding collaborating students: Effects of learning analytics in CSCL. Computers & Education, 79, 28–39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.007
- Wallen, M., & Tormey, R. (2019). Developing teacher agency through dialogue. Teaching and Teacher Education, 82, 129–139. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.014
- Yang, X. M., Li, J. H., Guo, X. S., & Li, X. J. (2015). Group interactive network and behavioral patterns in online English-to-Chinese cooperative translation activity. Internet and Higher Education, 25, 28–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.12.003