References
- Anderson, C. G., Dalsen, J., Kumar, V., Berland, M., & Steinkuehler, C. (2018). Failing up: How failure in a game environment promotes learning through discourse. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 30, 135–144. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.03.002
- Bonde, M. T., Makransky, G., Wandall, J., Larsen, M. V., Morsing, M., Jarmer, H., & Sommer, M. O. (2014). Improving biotech education through gamified laboratory simulations. Nature Biotechnology, 32(7), 694. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2955
- Bower, M., Lee, M. J. W., & Dalgarno, B. (2017). Collaborative learning across physical and virtual worlds: Factors supporting and constraining learners in a blended reality environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 407–430. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12435
- Castaneda, L., Cechony, A., & Swanson, T. (2016). Implications of Virtual Reality in Applied Educational Settings. Retrieved from http://foundry10.org/research/the-implications-of-vr-in-applied-educational-settings/
- Cellscape: A Virtual Reality Journey Inside a Cell. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.cellscape.net/about
- Cheng, M. T., Rosenheck, L., Lin, C. Y., & Klopfer, E. (2017). Analyzing gameplay data to inform feedback loops in The Radix Endeavor. Computers & Education, 111, 60–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.015
- Clarke-Midura, J., Rosenheck, L., Haas, J., & Klopfer, E. (2013). The radix endeavor: Designing a massively multiplayer online game around collaborative problem solving in STEM.
- Coleman, T. E., & Money, A. G. (2019). Student-centered digital game–based learning: A conceptual framework and survey of the state of the art. Higher Education, 1–43.
- Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_2
- Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001005
- Fiore, S. M., Graesser, A., Greiff, S., Griffin, P., Gong, B., Kyllonen, P., … Soulé, H. (2017). Collaborative problem solving: considerations for the National Assessment of Educational Progress.
- Gauthier, A., & Jenkinson, J. (2017). Serious game leverages productive negativity to facilitate conceptual change in undergraduate molecular biology: A mixed-methods randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Game-Based Learning (IJGBL), 7(2), 20–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.2017040102
- Gauthier, A., & Jenkinson, J. (2018). Designing productively negative experiences with serious game mechanics: Qualitative analysis of game-play and game design in a randomized trial. Computers & Education, 127, 66–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.017
- Gee, J. P. (2014). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. London: Macmillan.
- Glenberg, A. M., Gutierrez, T., Levin, J. R., Japuntich, S., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Activity and Imagined activity Can enhance Young Children’s Reading Comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 424–436. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.424
- Gugenheimer, J., Stemasov, E., Sareen, H., & Rukzio, E. (2017, May). Facedisplay: Enabling Multi-user interaction for Mobile virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 369–372). Denver, CO: ACM.
- InCell VR. (2017). Retrieved from https://luden.io/incell/
- Jang, S., Vitale, J. M., Jyung, R. W., & Black, J. B. (2017). Direct manipulation is better than passive viewing for learning anatomy in a three-dimensional virtual reality environment. Computers and Education, 106, 150–165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.009
- Jensen, C. G. (2017). Collaboration and Dialogue in virtual reality. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 5(1), 85–110.
- Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (2005). New developments in social interdependence theory. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131(4), 285–358. doi: https://doi.org/10.3200/MONO.131.4.285-358
- Kapur, M. (2015). Learning from productive failure. Learning: Research and Practice, 1(1), 51–65.
- Kiefer, M. T., & Trumpp, M. N. (2012). Embodiment theory and education: The foundations of cognition in perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 1(1), 15–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TINE.2012.07.002
- Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18, 513–549. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1804_1
- Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Koutsabasis, P., Vosinakis, S., Malisova, K., & Paparounas, N. (2012). On the value of virtual worlds for collaborative design. Design Studies, 33(4), 357–390. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.11.004
- Kurilovas, E. (2016). Evaluation of quality and personalisation of VR/AR/MR learning systems. Behaviour & Information Technology, 35(11), 998–1007. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1212929
- Kurilovas, E., Serikoviene, S., & Vuorikari, R. (2014). Expert centred vs learner centred approach for evaluating quality and reusability of learning objects. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 526–534. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.047
- Laal, M. (2013). Positive interdependence in collaborative learning. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1433–1437. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.058
- Li, L., & Zhou, J. (2016, December). Virtual reality technology based developmental designs of multiplayer-interaction-supporting exhibits of science museums: Taking the exhibit of virtual experience on an aircraft carrier in China science and technology museum as an example. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on virtual-reality Continuum and Its applications in Industry-Volume 1 (pp. 409–412). Alexandria, VA: ACM.
- Lindgren, R., Tscholl, M., Wang, S., & Johnson, E. (2016). Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaction within a mixed reality simulation. Computers & Education, 95, 174–187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.001
- Lui, M., & Slotta, J. D. (2014). Immersive simulations for smart classrooms: Exploring evolutionary concepts in secondary science. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(1), 57–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2013.838452
- Martin, T., & Schwartz, D. L. (2005). Physically distributed learning: Adapting and reinterpreting physical environments in the development of fraction concepts. Cognitive Science, 29(4), 587–625. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_15
- Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., Kwok, O. M., Cifuentes, L., & Davis, T. J. (2012). The learner characteristics, features of desktop 3D virtual reality environments, and college chemistry instruction: A structural equation modeling analysis. Computers & Education, 59(2), 551–568. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.004
- Minogue, J., Jones, M. G., Broadwell, B., & Oppewall, T. (2006). The impact of haptic augmentation on middle school students’ conceptions of the animal cell. Virtual Reality, 10(3-4), 293–305. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-006-0052-4
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. HS-LS1 From Molecules to Organisms: Structures and Processes. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/default/files/dci-arrangement/HS-LS-1062117withfooter.pdf
- OECD. (2017). PISA for development Assessment and Analytical framework: Reading, mathematics and science, Preliminary version. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrović, V. M., & Jovanović, K. (2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. Computers & Education, 95, 309–327. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002
- Pouw, W. T., Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2014). An embedded and embodied cognition review of instructional manipulatives. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 51–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9255-5
- Roschelle, J., Martin, W., Ahn, J., & Schank, P. (2017). Cyberlearning community report: The state of cyberlearning and the future of learning with technology.
- Sandoval, W. (2014). Conjecture mapping: An approach to systematic educational design research. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(1), 18–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.778204
- Schönborn, K. J., Bivall, P., & Tibell, L. A. (2011). Exploring relationships between students’ interaction and learning with a haptic virtual biomolecular model. Computers & Education, 57(3), 2095–2105. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.013
- Schwartz, D. L., & Martin, T. (2006). Distributed learning and mutual adaptation. Pragmatics & Cognition, 14(2), 313–332. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.14.2.11sch
- Stieff, M., & Uttal, D. (2015). How much can spatial training improve STEM achievement? Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 607–615. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9304-8
- Szpak, A., Michalski, S., Saredakis, D., Chen, C., & Loetscher, T. (in press). Beyond Feeling Sick: The Visual and Cognitive Aftereffects of Virtual Reality. PsyArxiv. July 9, 2019 p 1–8.
- Tan, S., & Waugh, R. (2014). Use of virtual-reality in teaching and learning molecular biology. In 3D immersive and interactive learning (pp. 17–43). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4021-90-6_2.
- Thomas, D. R. (2017). Feedback from research participants: Are member checks useful in qualitative research? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 14(1), 23–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2016.1219435
- Thompson, M., Kaser, D., & Grijvala, K. (2019). Envisioning Virtual Reality: A toolkit for implementing virtual reality in the classroom. Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press.
- Thompson, M., Olivas-Holguin, H., Wang, A., Fan, J., Pan, K., Vargas, D., & Gerr, J. (2018, April). Rules, roles, and resources: Strategies to promote collaboration in virtual reality contexts. Novel Interaction Techniques for Collaboration in VR Workshop. CHI2018 Montreal, Canada.
- University of Stavanger Website. (2017). Teaching Molecular Biology in Virtual Reality. https://www.uis.no/news/teaching-molecular-biology-in-virtual-reality-article120293-8865.html
- Webster, R. (2016). Declarative knowledge acquisition in immersive virtual learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1319–1333. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.994533
- Weisberg, S. M., & Newcombe, N. S. (2017). Embodied cognition and STEM learning: Overview of a topical collection in CR:PI. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0071-6
- You, S., Tu, H., Chaney, E. J., Sun, Y., Zhao, Y., Bower, A. J., & Boppart, S. A. (2018). Intravital imaging by simultaneous label-free autofluorescence-multiharmonic microscopy. Nature Communications, 9(1), 2125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04470-8