Findings and implications of flipped science learning research: A review of journal publications

References

• Aşıksoy, G., & Özdamlı, F. (2016). Flipped classroom adapted to the ARCS model of motivation and applied to a physics course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(6), 1589–1603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bano, M., Zowghi, D., Kearney, M., Schuck, S., & Aubusson, P. (2018). Mobile learning for science and mathematics school education: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Computers & Education, 121, 30–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beichner, R. J., & Saul, J. M. (2003). Introduction to the SCALE-UP ((student-centered activities for large enrolment undergraduate programs) project. In Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi”, Varenna, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2016). Flipped learning for elementary instruction (Vol. 5). International Society for Technology in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Canelas, D. A., Hill, J. L., & Novicki, A. (2017). Cooperative learning in organic chemistry increases student assessment of learning gains in key transferable skills. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(3), 441–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2018a). Trends of mobile technology-enhanced medical education: A review of journal publications from 1998 to 2016. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 12(4), 373–393.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, S. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2018b). Impacts of an augmented reality-based flipped learning guiding approach on students’ scientific project performance and perceptions. Computers & Education, 125, 226–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, C. Y., Chen, Y. T., & Chuang, K. Y. (2015). Exploring students’ learning attitude and achievement in flipped learning supported computer aided design curriculum: A study in high school engineering education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 23(4), 514–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, M. A. (2014). Inverted teaching: Applying a new pedagogy to a university organic chemistry class. Journal of Chemical Education, 91, 1845–1850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crompton, H., Burke, D., Gregory, K. H., & Gräbe, C. (2016). The use of mobile learning in science: A systematic review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 149–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, J., & Graff, M. (2005). Performance in e-learning: Online participation and student grades. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 657–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, F., Chen, D. T., Tsai, C. C., & Chai, C. S. (2011). Students’ views of the nature of science: A critical review of research. Science Education, 95(6), 961–999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Archer, L., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2013). Young children’s aspirations in science: The unequivocal, the uncertain and the unthinkable. International Jour- nal of Science Education, 35(6), 1037–1063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duman, G., Orhon, G., & Gedik, N. (2015). Research trends in mobile assisted language learning from 2000 to 2012. ReCALL, 27(2), 197–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichler, J. F., & Peeples, J. (2016). Flipped classroom modules for large enrollment general chemistry courses: A low barrier approach to increase active learning and improve student grades. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(1), 197–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fautch, J. M. (2015). The flipped classroom for teaching organic chemistry in small classes: Is it effective? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 179–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo, M. A. (2014). Blend the lab course, flip the responsibility. In J. Keengwe, G. Onchwari, & J. Oigara (Eds.), Promoting active learning through the flipped classroom model (pp. 185–207). Hershey, PA: Information Science.
   Google Scholar
• González-Gómez, D., Jeong, J. S., & Rodríguez, D. A. (2016). Performance and perception in the flipped learning model: An initial approach to evaluate the effectiveness of a new teaching methodology in a general science classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 450–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, D., Pietri, E. S., Anderson, G., Moyano-Camihort, K., & Graham, M. J. (2015). Increased preclass preparation underlies student outcome improvement in the flipped classroom. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(4), ar36, 1-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., … Wood, W. B. (2004). EDUCATION: Scientific teaching. Science, 304, 521–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2010). The high cost of low educational performance: The long-run economic impact of improving PISA outcomes. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hasni, A., Bousadra, F., Belletête, V., Benabdallah, A., Nicole, M. C., & Dumais, N. (2016). Trends in research on project-based science and technology teaching and learning at K–12 levels: A systematic review. StudieS in Science Education, 52(2), 199–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitt, A. M., & Townsend, J. S. (2007). Getting to the core issues of science teaching: A model-basedapproach to science instruction. Science Educator, 16(2), 20–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, Y. C., Ho, S. N., Tsai, C. C., Hwang, G. J., Chu, H. C., & Wang, C. Y. (2012). Research trends in technology-based learning from 2000 to 2009: A content analysis of publications in selected journals. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 354–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein, M. H., Ow, S. H., Cheong, L. S., Thong, M. K., & Ebrahim, N. A. (2019). Effects of digital game-based learning on elementary science learning: A systematic review. IEEE Access, 7, 62465–62478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, G. J., Lai, C. L., & Wang, S. Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: A mobile technology-enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(4), 449–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: A review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), E65–E70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. L., Kummer, T. A., & Godoy, P. D. D. M. (2015). Improvements from a flipped classroom may simply be the fruits of active learning. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 14, ar5–a12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, J. K., & Wood, W. B. (2005). Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biology Education, 4(4), 298–310.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics courses. Computers & Education, 100, 126–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudonia, I., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Abels, S., & Eilks, I. (2018). Action research in science education–an analytical review of the literature. Educational Action Research, 26(3), 480–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lead States, N. G. S. S. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lenczewski, M. S. (2016). Scaffolded semi-flipped general chemistry designed to support rural students’ learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(12), 1999–2003.
   Google Scholar
• Li, M. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Game-based learning in science education: A review of relevant research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(6), 877–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. L., Hou, H. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2016). Analyzing the social knowledge construction and online searching behavior of high school learners during a collaborative problem solving learning activity: A multi-dimensional behavioral pattern analysis. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(5-6), 893–906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2019). Research trends of flipped classroom studies for medical courses: A review of journal publications from 2008 to 2017 based on the technology-enhanced learning model. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1011–1027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, T. J., Lin, T. C., Potvin, P., & Tsai, C. C. (2019). Research trends in science education from 2013 to 2017: A systematic content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 41(3), 367–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, T., Logan, J., & Waugh, M. (2016). Students’ perceptions of the value of using videos as a pre-class learning experience in the flipped classroom. TechTrends, 60(3), 245–252.
   Google Scholar
• Lundin, M., Rensfeldt, A. B., Hillman, T., Lantz-Andersson, A., & Peterson, L. (2018). Higher education dominance and siloed knowledge: A systematic review of flipped classroom research. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(20), 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in education (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Mylott, E., Kutschera, E., Dunlap, J. C., Christensen, W., & Widenhorn, R. (2016). Using biomedically relevant multimedia content in an introductory physics course for life science and pre-health students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 222–231.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olakanmi, E. E. (2017). The effects of a flipped classroom model of instruction on students’ performance and attitudes towards chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(1), 127–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormanci, U., Cepni, S., Deveci, I., & Aydin, O. (2015). A thematic review of interactive whiteboard use in science education: Rationales, purposes, methods and general knowledge. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(5), 532–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pena-Shaff, J. B., & Nicholls, C. (2004). Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions. Computers & Education, 42(3), 243–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, S. A. (2016). A flipped classroom redesign in general chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(4), 914–922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sezer, B. (2017). The effectiveness of a technology-enhanced flipped science classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(4), 471–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjaastad, J. (2012). Sources of Inspiration: The role of significant persons in young people’s choice of science in higher education. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1615–1636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slemmons, K., Anyanwu, K., Hames, J., Grabski, D., Mlsna, J., Simkins, E., & Cook, P. (2018). The impact of video length on learning in a middle-level flipped science setting: Implications for diversity inclusion. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(5), 469–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomory, A., & Watson, S. L. (2015). Flipped classrooms for advanced science courses. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 875–887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, P. S., Tsai, C. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2012). Developing a survey for assessing preferences in constructivist context-aware ubiquitous learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(3), 250–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu, Y. F., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Trends of library-associated mobile learning based on a review of academic studies published from 2007 to 2016. The Electronic Library, 36(5), 875–891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, A. K., Galloway, R. K., Sinclair, C., & Hardy, J. (2018). Teacher-student discourse in active learning lectures: Case studies from undergraduate physics. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(7), 818–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yager, R. E. (1983). The importance of technology in teaching K-12 science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(6), 577–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zupanec, V. S., Radulovic, B. N., Pribicevic, T. Z., Miljanovic, T. G., & Zdravkovic, V. G. (2018). Determination of educational efficiency and students’ involvement in the flipped biology classroom in primary school. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(1), 162–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar