References
- Barcomb, M., Grimshaw, J., & Cardoso, W. (2017). I can’t program! Customizable mobile language-learning resources for researchers and practitioners. Languages, 2(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages203008
- Cao, K. (2014). A socio-cognitive perspective on second language classroom willingness to communicate. TESOL Quarterly, 48(4), 789–814. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.155
- Carrell, L. J., & Menzel, K. E. (1999). The impact of gender and immediacy on willingness to talk and perceived learning. Communication Education, 48(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529909379150
- Dizon, G. (2017). Using intelligent personal assistants for second language learning: A case study of Alex. TESOL Journal, 8(4), 811–830. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.353
- Dizon, G. (2020). Evaluating intelligent personal assistants for L2 listening and speaking development. Language Learning & Technology, 24(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.125/44705
- Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P. D., & Henry, A. (2015). Motivational dynamics in language learning. Multilingual Matters.
- Eddy-U, M. (2015). Motivation for participation or non-participation in group tasks: A dynamic systems model of task-situated willingness to communicate. Science Direct, 50, 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.03.005
- Kang, S. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.10.004
- Kessler, G. (2018). Technology and the future of language teaching. British Educational Research Journal, 51(1), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12318
- Lai, C., Shum, M., & Tian, Y. (2016). Enhancing learners’ self-directed use of technology for language learning: The effectiveness of an online training platform. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(1), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.889714
- Lee, J. S., & Drajati, N. A. (2019). Willingness to communicate in digital and non-digital EFL contexts: Scale development and psychometric testing. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1588330
- Lee, J. S., & Hsieh, J. C. (2019). Affective variables and willingness to communicate of EFL learners in in-class, out-of-class, and digital contexts. System, 82, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j-system.2019.03.002
- Liu, M. (2018). Bilingual/Multilingual learners’ willingness to communicate in and anxiety on speaking Chinese and their associations with self-rated proficiency in Chinese. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1127889
- MacIntyre, P. D. (2017). An overview of language anxiety research and trends in its development. In C. Gkonou, M. Daubney, & J. M. Dewaele (Eds.), New insights into language anxiety: Theory, research and educational implications (pp. 11–30). Multilingual Matters.
- MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Conrod, S. (2001). Willingness to communicate, social support, and language-learning orientations of immersion students. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(3), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101003035
- MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dornyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x
- Moussalli, S., & Cardoso, W. (2016, August 24-27). Are commercial ‘personal robots’ ready for language learning? Focus on second language speech. In S. Papadima-Sophocleous, L. Bradley, & S. Thouësny (Eds.), CALL communities and culture – short papers from EUROCALL 2016 (pp. 325–329). Cyprus University.
- Moussalli, S., & Cardoso, W. (2019). Intelligent personal assistants: Can they understand and be understood by accented L2 learners? Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1595664
- Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A., & Pawlak, M. (2016). Willingness to communicate in instructed second language acquisition. Multilingual Matters.
- Peng, J. (2019). The roles of multimodal pedagogic effects and classroom environment in willingness to communicate in English. System, 82, 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.04.006
- Reinders, H., & Wattana, S. (2014). Can I say something? The effects of digital game play on willingness to communicate. Language Learning & Technology, 18(2), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000226
- Sampson, R. J., & Yoshida, R. (2020). L2 feelings through interaction in a Japanese-English online chat exchange. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1710514
- Sandeep, S. S. (2019). Learning English language through Amazon Alexa for Indian students. Journal of The Gujarat Research Society, 21(10), 619–622.
- Sauro, S., & Zourou, K. (2019). What are the digital wilds? Language Learning & Technology, 23(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.125/44666
- Underwood, J. (2017, August 23-26). Exploring AI language assistants with primary EFL students. In K. Borthwick, L. Bradley, & S. Thouësny (Eds.), CALL in a climate of change: Adapting to turbulent global conditions - short papers from EUROCALL 2017 (pp. 317–321). Research-publishing.net.
- Yan, J. X., Pan, J., & Wang, H. (2018). The interplay between foreign language anxiety, willingness to communicate and other learner factors in tertiary interpreting classrooms. In J. X., Yan., J. Pan., & H. Wang (Eds.), Research on Translator and Interpreter Training. New Frontiers in Translation Studies (pp. 147–167). Springer, Singapore.
- Zhang, J., Beckmann, N., & Beckmann, J. F. (2018). To talk of not to talk: A review of situational antecedents of willingness to communicate in the second language classroom. System, 72, 226–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.01.003