Time-driven modeling of student self-regulated learning in network-based tutors

References

• Aleven, V., Roll, I., McLaren, B. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2010). Automated, unobtrusive, action-by-action assessment of self-regulation during learning with an intelligent tutoring system. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 224–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.517740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4004_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R. (2008). The role of self-regulation in learning about science with hypermedia. In D. Robinson, & G. Schraw (Eds.), Recent innovations in educational technology that facilitate student learning (pp. 127–156). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 523–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R., & Feyzi-Behnagh, R. (2010). Dysregulated learning with advanced learning technologies. In AAAI Fall Symposium: Cognitive and metacognitive educational systems. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org)
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R., Johnson, A., Chauncey, A., & Graesser, A. (2011). Use of hypermedia to assess and convey self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook series. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 102–121). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Bembenutty, H., & Kitsantas, A. (2013). The triumph of homework completion through a learning academy of self-regulation. In H. Bembenutty, & T. J. Cleary (Eds.), Applications of self-regulated learning across diverse disciplines: A tribute to barry J. Zimmerman (pp. 153–196). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas, G., Jeong, H., Kinnebrew, J. S., Sulcer, B., & Roscoe, R. (2010). Measuring self-regulated learning skills through social interactions in a teachable agent environment. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 05((02|2)), 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793206810000839
   Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (2000). Self-regulation: An introductory overview. In M. Boekarts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 1–9). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, J. (2017). Comparing online and blended learner’s self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzza, D., & Allinotte, T. (2013). Pre-service teachers’ self-regulated learning and their developing concepts of SRL. Brock Education Journal, 23(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.26522/brocked.v23i1.353
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271–315. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0603_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delfino, M., Dettori, G., & Persico, D. (2010). An online course fostering self-regulation of trainee teachers. Psicothema, 22(2), 299–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dettori, G., Giannetti, T., & Persico, D. (2006). SRL in online cooperative learning: Implications for pre-service teacher training. European Journal of Education, 41(3-4), 397–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2006.00273.x
   Google Scholar
• Dignath, C., Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, H. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? Educational Research Review, 3(2), 101–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J., & Azevedo, R. (2007). A theoretical review of Winne and Hadwin’s model of self-regulated learning: New perspectives and directions. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 334–372. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430303953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A., Bolick, C. M., & Robertson, J. (2010). Fostering historical knowledge and thinking skills using hypermedia learning environments: The role of self-regulated learning. Computers & Education, 54(1), 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A., Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2011). Self-regulation of learning with computer-based learning environments. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 126(126), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.449
   Google Scholar
• Hannafin, M. J. (1995). Open-ended learning environments: Foundations, assumptions, and implications for automated design. In R. D. Tennyson, & A. E. Barron (Eds.), Automating instructional design: Computer-based development and delivery tools (pp. 101–129). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hannafin, M. J., Hall, C., Land, S., & Hill, J. (1994). Learning in open-ended environments: Assumptions, methods, and implications. Educational Technology, 34(8), 48–55.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, J., Day, E., & Steele, L. (2019). Interrelationships Among self-regulated learning processes: Toward a dynamic process-based Model of Self-Regulated learning. Journal Of Management, 45(8), 3146–3177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318780440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, J. R., & Land, S. M. (1998). Open-ended learning environments: A theoretical framework and model for design. In N. Maushak, & C. Scholosser (Eds.), Proceedings of the International conference of the association of educational communications and technology (pp. 167–178). ISU.
   Google Scholar
• Käser, T., & Schwartz, D. (2020). Modeling and analyzing inquiry strategies in open-ended learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence In Education, 30(3), 504–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00199-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman, D. F., Ge, X., Xie, K., & Chen, C. H. (2008). Prompting in web-based environments: Supporting self-monitoring and problem solving skills in college students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(2), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.38.2.a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodinariya, T. M., & Makwana, P. R. (2013). Review on determining number of cluster in K-means clustering. International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, 1(6), 90–95.
   Google Scholar
• Kohen, Z., & Kramarski, B. (2012a). Developing a TPCK-SRL assessment scheme for conceptually advancing technology in education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Kohen, Z., & Kramarski, B. (2012b). Developing self-regulation by using reflective support in a video-digital microteaching environment. Education Research International, 2012, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/105246
   Google Scholar
• Kramarski, B. (2018). Teachers as agents in promoting students’ SRL and performance: Applications for teachers’ dual-role training program. In D. H. Schunk, & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook series. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 223–239). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Kramarski, B., & Kohen, Z. (2017). Promoting preservice teachers’ dual self-regulation roles as learners and as teachers: Effects of generic vs. Specific prompts. Metacognition and Learning, 12(2), 157–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-016-9164-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2009a). Investigating preservice teachers’ professional growth in self-regulated learning environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2009b). Three metacognitive approaches to training pre-service teachers in different learning phases of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(5), 465–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610903444550
   Google Scholar
• Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2010). Preparing preservice teachers for self-regulated learning in the context of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 20(5), 434–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauskopf, K., Zahn, C., & Hesse, F. W. (2012). Leveraging the affordances of Youtube: The role of pedagogical knowledge and mental models of technology functions for lesson planning with technology. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1194–1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lajoie, S P, & Azevedo, R. (2006). Teaching and learning in technology-rich learning environments. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 803–821). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Land, S. M. (2000). Cognitive requirements for learning with open-ended learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land, S. M., & Hannafin, M. J. (1996). A conceptual framework for the development of theories-in-action with open-ended learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(3), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, X., Schwartz, D. L., & Hatano, G. (2005). Toward teachers’ adaptive metacognition. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4004_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., & Roscoe, R. (2013). Natural language processing in an intelligent writing strategy tutoring system. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 499–515. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0258-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalsky, T., & Schechter, C. (2013). Preservice teachers’ capacity to teach self-regulated learning: Integrating learning from problems and learning from successes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 30, 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moos, D. C., & Bonde, C. (2016). Flipping the classroom: Embedding self-regulated learning prompts in videos. Technology Knowledge and Learning, 21(2), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-015-9269-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moos, D. C., & Pitton, D. (2014). Student teacher challenges: Using the cognitive load theory as an explanatory lens. Teaching Education, 25(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2012.754869
   Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3602_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlik, P. I., Brawner, K., Olney, A., & Mitrovic, A. (2013). A review of student models used in intelligent tutoring systems. In R. Sottilare, A. C. Graesser, X. Hu, & H. Holden (Eds.), Design recommendations for adaptive intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 39–68). Army Research Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Peeters, J., De Backer, F., Reina, V. R., Kindekens, A., Buffel, T., & Lombaerts, K. (2014). The role of teachers’ self-regulatory capacities in the implementation of self-regulated learning practices. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1963–1970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.504
   Google Scholar
• Perry, N. E., Hutchinson, L., & Thauberger, C. (2007). Mentoring student teachers to design and implement literacy tasks that support self-regulated reading and writing. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560600837636
   Google Scholar
• Perry, N., Phillips, L., & Dowler, J. (2004). Examining features of tasks and their potential to promote self-regulated learning. Teachers College Record, 106(9), 1854–1878. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00408.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, N. E., Phillips, L., & Hutchinson, L. (2006). Mentoring student teachers to support self-regulated learning. The Elementary School Journal, 106(3), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1086/501485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poitras, E., Doleck, T., Huang, L., Li, S, & Lajoie, S. (2017). Advancing teacher technology education using open-ended learning environments as research and training platforms. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poitras, E., Doleck, T., Huang, L., Li, S., & Lajoie, S. (2018). nBrowser: An intelligent web browser for studying self-regulated learning in teachers’ use of technology. In R. Zheng (Ed.), Strategies for deep learning with digital technology: Theories and practices in education. Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Poitras, E., & Fazeli, N. (2016). Using an intelligent web browser for teacher professional development: Preliminary findings from simulated learners. In G. Chamblee & L. Langub (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology and teacher education international conference (pp. 3037–3041). AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Poitras, E. G., & Fazeli, N. (2016a). Mining the edublogosphere to enhance teacher professional development. In S. Hei-Jew (Ed.), Social media data extraction and content analysis. IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Poitras, E., Fazeli, N., & Mayne, Z. (2018). Modeling student teachers’ information-seeking behaviors while learning with network-based tutors. Journal Of Educational Technology Systems, 47(2), 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239518797086
   Google Scholar
• Randi, J. (2004). Teachers as self-regulated learners. Teachers College Record, 106(9), 1825–1853. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00407.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randi, J., & Corno, L. (2000). Teacher innovations in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 651–685). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roll, I., & Winne, P. H. (2015). Understanding, evaluating, and supporting self-regulated learning using learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2015.21.2
   Google Scholar
• Rovers, S., Clarebout, G., Savelberg, H., de Bruin, A., & van Merriënboer, J. (2019). Granularity matters: Comparing different ways of measuring self-regulated learning. Metacognition And Learning, 14(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-019-09188-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Shin, T. (2009). Survey of preservice teachers’ knowledge of teaching and technology. Récupéré le, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Segedy, J. R., Kinnebrew, J. S., & Biswas, G. (2015). Using coherence analysis to characterize self-regulated learning behaviours in open-ended learning environments. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2(1), 13–48. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2015.21.3
   Google Scholar
• Smeets, E. (2005). Does ICT contribute to powerful learning environments in primary education? Computers & Education, 44(3), 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnenberg, C., & Bannert, M. (2019). Using process mining to examine the sustainability of instructional support: How stable are the effects of metacognitive prompting on self-regulatory behavior? Computers In Human Behavior, 96, 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winne, P. (2019). Paradigmatic dimensions of instrumentation and analytic methods in research on self-regulated learning. Computers In Human Behavior, 96, 285–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. Zimmerman, & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 153–189). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (2008). The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk, & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research and applications (pp. 298–314). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (2010). Self-regulated learning and sociocognitive theory. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (pp. 503–508). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Winters, F. I., Greene, J. A., & Costich, C. M. (2008). Self-regulation of learning within computer-based learning environments: A critical analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9080-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirth, J., Stebner, F., Trypke, M., Schuster, C., & Leutner, D. (2020). An interactive layers model of self-regulated learning and cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 32(4), 1127–1149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09568-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolters, C. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (1998). Contextual differences in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, English, and social studies classrooms. Instructional Science, 26(1-2), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003035929216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yurdakul, I. K., Odabasi, H. F., Kilicer, K., Coklar, A. N., Birinci, G., & Kurt, A. A. (2012). The development, validity and reliability of TPACK-deep: A technological pedagogical content knowledge scale. Computers & Education, 58(3), 964–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, L. (2016). The effectiveness of self-regulated learning scaffolds on academic performance in computer-based learning environments: A meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016-9426-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33(2-3), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1998.9653292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar