An intelligent content provider based on students learning style to increase their engagement level and performance

References

• Ahmed, M. U., Sangi, N. A., & Mahmood, A. (2018). A model of adaptive e-Learning in an ODL environment. Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 37(2), 367–382. https://doi.org/10.22581/muet1982.1802.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbulut, Y., & Cardak, C. S. (2012). Adaptive educational hypermedia accommodating learning styles: A content analysis of publications from 2000 to 2011. Computers & Education, 58(2), 835–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Nakhal, M. A., & Abu-Naser, S. S. (2017). Adaptive intelligent tutoring system for learning computer theory.
   Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian, V., & Anouncia, S. M. (2018). Learning style detection based on cognitive skills to support adaptive learning environment – A reinforcement approach. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 9(4), 895–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2016.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. (2018). Engaging students as partners in developing online learning and feedback activities for first-year fluid mechanics. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(1), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1232372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caro-Alvaro, S., Garcia-Lopez, E., Garcia-Cabot, A., De-Marcos, L., & Martinez-Herriaz, J.-J. (2017). Development of a social gamified platform for e-learning.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, N., Watson, B., Bakerson, M. A., & McGoron, F. X. (2013). Undergraduate students’ perceptions of electronic and handwritten feedback: A follow-up study across an Entire Midwestern University Campus. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 21–42.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Breslow, L., & DeBoer, J. (2018). Analyzing productive learning behaviors for students using immediate corrective feedback in a blended learning environment. Computers & Education, 117, 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Corte, E. (2012). Constructive, self-regulated, situated, and collaborative learning: An approach for the acquisition of adaptive competence. Journal of Education, 192(2–3), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057412192002-307
   Google Scholar
• De Freitas, S. I., Morgan, J., & Gibson, D. (2015). Will MOOCs transform learning and teaching in higher education? Engagement and course retention in online learning provision. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Errico, F., Paciello, M., & Cerniglia, L. (2016). When emotions enhance students’ engagement in e-learning processes. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1144
   Google Scholar
• Dichev, C., Dicheva, D., Angelova, G., & Agre, G. (2014). From gamification to gameful design and gameful experience in learning. Cybernetics and Information Technologies, 14(4), 80–100. https://doi.org/10.1515/cait-2014-0007
   Google Scholar
• Dorça, F. A., Araújo, R. D., De Carvalho, V. C., Resende, D. T., & Cattelan, R. G. (2016). An automatic and dynamic approach for personalized recommendation of learning objects considering students learning styles: An experimental analysis. Informatics in Education, 15(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2016.03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorça, F. A., Araújo, R. D., De Carvalho, V. C., Resende, D. T., Cattelan, R. G., Jagušt, T., Botički, I., So, H.-J., Özyurt, Ö, Özyurt, H., Brown, A., Kakish, K., Pollacia, L., Ahmed, M. U., Sangi, N. A., Mahmood, A., Hassan, M. A., Habiba, U., Majeed, F., … Abu-Naser, S. S. (2018). Adaptive learning to improve student success and instructor efficiency in introductory computing course. Computers & Education, 58(4), 21–42.
   Google Scholar
• El Guabassi, I., Bousalem, Z., Al Achhab, M., Jellouli, I., & Mohajir, B. E. E. L. (2018). Personalized adaptive content system for context-aware ubiquitous learning. Procedia Computer Science, 127, 444–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.01.142
   Google Scholar
• Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felder, R. M., & Spurlin, J. (2005). Applications, reliability and validity of the index of learning styles. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 103–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froschl, C. (2005). User modeling and user profiling in adaptive e-learning systems. Graz, Austria: Master Thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Graf, S., & Liu, T.-C. (2010). Analysis of learners’ navigational behaviour and their learning styles in an online course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(2), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00336.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, M. A., Habiba, U., Majeed, F., & Shoaib, M. (2019). Adaptive gamification in e-learning based on students’ learning styles. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1588745
   Google Scholar
• Jagušt, T., Botički, I., & So, H.-J. (2018). Examining competitive, collaborative and adaptive gamification in young learners’ math learning. Computers & Education, 125, 444–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakish, K., & Pollacia, L. (2018). Adaptive Learning to Improve Student Success and Instructor Efficiency in Introductory Computing Course.
   Google Scholar
• Karagiannis, I., & Satratzemi, M. (2018). An adaptive mechanism for Moodle based on automatic detection of learning styles. Education and Information Technologies, 23(3), 1331–1357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9663-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. T., & Lee, W.-H. (2015). Dynamical model for gamification of learning (DMGL). Multimedia Tools and Applications, 74(19), 8483–8493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-013-1612-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. T., Lee, W.-H., Chen, X., Breslow, L., DeBoer, J., Karagiannis, I., Satratzemi, M., Özyurt, Ö, Özyurt, H., Felder, R. M., Spurlin, J., Ahmed, M. U., Sangi, N. A., Mahmood, A., Koohang, A., Harman, K., Seaborn, K., Fels, D. I., Chen, K.-C., … Porras, J. (2018). Content or platform: Why do students complete MOOCs. Computers & Education, 52(2), 3275–3284. https://elearningindustry.com/dropout-rates-of-online-courses-cut-high
   Google Scholar
• Knutas, A., Ikonen, J., Maggiorini, D., Ripamonti, L., & Porras, J. (2014). Creating software engineering student interaction profiles for discovering gamification approaches to improve collaboration. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies, 378–385. https://doi.org/10.1145/2659532.2659612
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (2007). The Kolb learning style inventory. Hay Resources Direct.
   Google Scholar
• Koohang, A., & Harman, K. (2007). Learning objects and instructional design (Vol. 3). Informing Science.
   Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krouska, A., Troussas, C., & Virvou, M. (2018). Computerized adaptive assessment using accumulative learning activities based on revised bloom’s taxonomy. Joint Conference on Knowledge-Based Software Engineering, 252–258. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97679-2_26
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE: Benchmarks for effective educational practices. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 35(2), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380309604090
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, M.-S., & Chuang, T.-Y. (2016). How gamification motivates visits and engagement for online academic dissemination – an empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzilek, J., Hlosta, M., Herrmannova, D., Zdrahal, Z., & Wolff, A. (2015). OU analyse: Analysing at-risk students at The Open University. Learning Analytics Review, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Park, O. (2008). Adaptive instructional systems. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 469–484.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, A. D., Huebner, E. S., Malone, P. S., & Valois, R. F. (2011). Life satisfaction and student engagement in adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(3), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9517-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malatesh Akkur, D., & Rao, D. H. (2019). A Novel Evaluation Method For e-Learning Tool: Bloom’s Taxonomy and Fuzzy Logic Approach. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Applied Science (IJSEAS), 5(1).
   Google Scholar
• Masapanta-Carrión, S., & Velázquez-Iturbide, Á. (2017). A systematic review of the use of Bloom’s taxonomy in computer science education.
   Google Scholar
• Mödritscher, F., Garcia-Barrios, V. M., & Gütl, C. (2004). The past, the present and the future of adaptive e-learning. Proceedings of ICL 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, J. (2018). Student-led action for sustainability in higher education: A literature review. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19(6), 1095–1110. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-09-2017-0164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, I. B., McCaulley, M. H., Quenk, N. L., & Hammer, A. L. (1998). MBTI manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (Vol. 3). Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Onah, D. F. O., Sinclair, J., & Boyatt, R. (2014). Dropout rates of massive open online courses: Behavioural patterns. EDULEARN14 Proceedings, 1, 5825–5834. http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2402.0009
   Google Scholar
• Othman, N., & Amiruddin, M. H. (2010). Different perspectives of learning styles from VARK model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 652–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.088
   Google Scholar
• Özyurt, Ö, & Özyurt, H. (2015). Learning style based individualized adaptive e-learning environments: Content analysis of the articles published from 2005 to 2014. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 349–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özyurt, Ö, Özyurt, H., Güven, B., & Baki, A. (2014). The effects of UZWEBMAT on the probability unit achievement of Turkish eleventh grade students and the reasons for such effects. Computers & Education, 75, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, C. C., & Hullinger, H. (2008). New benchmarks in higher education: Student engagement in online learning. Journal of Education for Business, 84(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.84.2.101-109
   Google Scholar
• Sami, J. C. A., & Arumugam, U. (2020). A descriptive analysis of students learning skills using bloom’s revised taxonomy. Journal of Computer Science, 16(2), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2020.183.193
   Google Scholar
• Sfenrianto, S., Hartarto, Y. B., Akbar, H., Mukhtar, M., Efriadi, E., & Wahyudi, M. (2018). An adaptive learning system based on knowledge level for English learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 13(12), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i12.8004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, D. (2019). By the numbers: MOOCS in 2017, class central, 2018URL: https://www.classcentral.com/report/mooc-stats-2017/ Visited On, 4, 17.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, R.-S. (2012). A study of the relationships among learning styles, participation types, and performance in programming language learning supported by online forums. Computers & Education, 58(1), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. S., Rook, J. E., & Smith, T. W. (2007). Increasing student engagement using effective and metacognitive writing strategies in content areas. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 51(3), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.51.3.43-48
   Google Scholar
• Sweta, S., & Lal, K. (2017). Personalized adaptive learner model in e-learning system using FCM and fuzzy inference system. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 19(4), 1249–1260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0309-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vélez, J., Fabregat, R., Nassiff, S., Petro, J., & Fernandez, A. (2008). User integral model in adaptive virtual learning environment. E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, 3275–3284.
   Google Scholar
• Zorluoğlu, S. L., & Güven, Ç. (2020). Analysis of 5th grade science learning outcomes and Exam questions according to revised Bloom Taxonomy. Journal of Educational Issues, 6(1). doi:10.5296/jei.v6i1.16197
   Google Scholar