Design strategies to integrate creative learning in elementary school curricula through computer programming activities

References

• Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929905
   Google Scholar
• Beghetto, R. A. (2010). Creativity in the classroom. In J. C. Kaufman, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 447–463). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, B. (2017). The promise and the promises of making in science education. Studies in Science Education, 53(1), 75–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1275380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, B., Petrich, M., & Wilkinson, K. (2014). Tinkering is serious play. Educational Leadership, 72(4), 28–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blikstein, P., & Krannich, D. (2013). The makers’ movement and fablabs in education: Experiences, technologies, and research. IDC ’13: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children” June 2013, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 613–616. https://doi.org/10.1145/2485760.2485884
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, A. J. (1997). Fostering creativity in the classroom: General principles. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), The ceativity research handbook (pp. 83–114). Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gajda, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Exploring creative learning in the classroom: A multi-method approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 250–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutwill, J. P., Hido, N., & Sindorf, L. (2015). Research to practice: Observing learning in tinkering activities. Curator: The Museum Journal, 58(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1990). Software design as a learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 1(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1049482900010102
   Google Scholar
• Israel, M., & Lash, T. (2020). From classroom lessons to exploratory learning progressions: Mathematics + computational thinking. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(3), 362–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1674879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I., Grover, S., Martin, F., Pillai, S., & Malyn-Smith, J. (2020). Computational thinking from a disciplinary perspective: Integrating computational thinking in K-12 science, technology, engineering, and Mathematics education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09803-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. M. (2011). Is pair programming more effective than other forms of collaboration for young students? Computer Science Education, 21(2), 105–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2011.579805
   Google Scholar
• Maloney, J., Resnick, M., Rusk, N., Silverman, B., & Eastmond, E. (2010). The scratch programming language and environment. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 10(4), 16:1-16:15. https://doi.org/10.1145/1868358.1868363
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology. (2017). The courses of study for elementary schools: Social studies. https://www.mext.go.jp/content/20201203-mxt_kyoiku01-100002608_3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Computers, children, and powerful ideas. Basic Books. 255.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, M. (2017). Lifelong Kindergarten: Cultivating creativity through projects, passion, peers, and play. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, M., & Rusk, N. (2020). Coding at a crossroads. Communications of the ACM, 63(11), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta, P., Kinnebrew, J. S., Basu, S., Biswas, G., & Clark, D. (2013). Integrating computational thinking with K-12 science education using agent-based computation: A theoretical framework. Education and Information Technologies, 18(2), 351–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9240-x
   Google Scholar
• Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K., & Petrich, M. (2013). The Art of tinkering: Meet 150+ makers working at the intersection of art, science & technology. Weldon Owen.
   Google Scholar
• Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar