Social family, parental involvement and intentions: predicting the technology acceptance and interest students learning online

References

• Açıkgül, K., & Sad, S. N. (2021). High school students’ acceptance and use of mobile technology in learning mathematics. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 4181–4201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10466-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665–694. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195
   Google Scholar
• Akey, T. M. (2006). School context, student attitudes and behavior, and academic achievement: An exploratory analysis. MDRC.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Maroof, R. S., Salloum, S. A., Hassanien, A. E., & Shaalan, K. (2020). Fear from COVID-19 and technology adoption: The impact of google meet during coronavirus pandemic. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1830121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Mushasha, N. F. A. (2013). Determinants of e-learning acceptance in higher education environment based on extended technology acceptance model. 2013 Fourth International Conference on e-Learning Best Practices in Management, Design and Development of e-Courses: Standards of Excellence and Creativity, Manama, Bahrain (pp. 261–266). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahaya, N., Alamri, M. M., Alyoussef, I. Y., Al-Rahmi, A. M., & Kamin, Y. B. (2019). Integrating innovation diffusion theory with technology acceptance model: Supporting students’ attitude towards using a massive open online courses (MOOCs) systems. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(8), 1380–1392. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1629599
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T. (2004). Towards a theory of online learning. Theory and Practice of Online Learning, Handbook 2nd Edition, 109–119.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, M., & Hauser, R. M. (2011). Adoption? Adaptation? Evaluating the formation of educational expectations. Social Forces, 90(2), 497–520. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sor005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A. F. M., Phon, D. N. A. E., Abdullah, A., & Ming, G. L. (2020). Blended learning adoption and implementation in higher education: A theoretical and systematic review. Technology Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09477-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., Fien, J., & Packer, J. (2001). School environmental education programme impacts upon student and family learning: A case study analysis. Environmental Education Research, 7(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620124123
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1983). Self-efficacy determinants of anticipated fears and calamities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 464. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansak, C., & Starr, M. (2021). Covid-19 shocks to education supply: How 200,000 US households dealt with the sudden shift to distance learning. Review of Economics of the Household, 19(1), 63–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-020-09540-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beh, J., Mascitelli, B., & Pedell, S. (2019). Encouraging social inclusion for older adults through “interest”-led technology use. In Mental health policy, practice, and service accessibility in contemporary society (pp. 226–243). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Bikner-Ahsbahs, A. (2003, July 13–18). Angelika international group for the psychology of mathematics education. Paper presented at the 27th International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education Conference Held Jointly with the 25th PME-NA Conference, Honolulu, HI (Vol. 2, pp. 97–104).
   Google Scholar
• Björklund, A., & Salvanes, K. G. (2011). Education and family background: Mechanisms and policies. In Handbook of the Economics of Education (Vol. 3, pp. 201–247). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53429-3.00003-X
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 17(3), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124189017003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, G. (1981). Social economic status and educational achievement: A review article. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 12(4), 227–257. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.1981.12.4.05x1811q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, T., Sainter, P., & Saunders, G. (2013). Factors affecting faculty use of learning technologies: Implications for models of technology adoption. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 25(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9066-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabero-Almenara, J., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., & Barroso-Osuna, J. (2019). Adoption of augmented reality technology by university students. Heliyon, 5(5), article number e01597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189–217. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, C. H., Wang, Y. S., & Tang, T. I. (2015). Exploring the determinants of knowledge adoption in virtual communities: A social influence perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 35(3), 364–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopher, J. D. (1990). The evolution of distance learning. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 22(3), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1990.10781919
   Google Scholar
• Chu, A., Biancarelli, D., Drainoni, M. L., Liu, J. H., Schneider, J. I., Sullivan, R., & Sheng, A. Y. (2020). Usability of learning moment: Features of an E-learning tool that maximize adoption by students. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 21(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.6.42657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic press.
   Google Scholar
• Costley, J., & Lange, C. H. (2017). Video lectures in e-learning: Effects of viewership and media diversity on learning, satisfaction, engagement, interest, and future behavioral intention. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14(1), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-08-2016-0025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotterman, W. W., & Senn, J. A. (Eds.). (1992). Challenges and strategies for research in systems development. Handbook. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of Use, and user acceptance of Information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhume, S. M., Pattanshetti, M. Y., Kamble, S. S., & Prasad, T. (2012). Adoption of social media by business education students: Application of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). 2012 IEEE International Conference on Technology Enhanced Education (ICTEE), Amritapuri, India (pp. 1–10). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos, A., Riefler, P., & Roth, K. P. (2008). Advancing formative measurement models. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1203–1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• do Amaral, J. A. A., & Brito, S. C. (2018). Using the arts to foster students’ interest engagement, and learning in a distance-learning environment. Anatolian Journal of Education, 3(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2018.321a
   Google Scholar
• Elkaseh, A. M., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2016). Perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of social media for e-learning in Libyan higher education: A structural equation modeling analysis. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(3), 192. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.683
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, J. (1995). School-family-community partnerships: Caring for the childrenwe share. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(3), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009200326.
   Google Scholar
• Eutsler, L. (2018). Parents’ mobile technology adoption influences on elementary children’s use. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-05-2017-0035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyal, T., Sagristano, M. D., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Chaiken, S. (2009). When values matter: Expressing values in behavioral intentions for the near vs. distant future. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. AddisonWesley.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, N., Keane, E., Davitt, E., McCauley, V., Heinz, M., & Mac Ruairc, G. (2021). ‘Schooling at Home’ in Ireland during COVID-19’: Parents’ and students’ perspectives on overall impact. Continuity of interest, and impact on learning. Irish Educational Studies, 40(2), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.1916558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378201900406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. C., & Tremblay, P. F. (1994). On motivation: Measurement and conceptual considerations 1. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 524–527. https://doi.org/10.2307/328591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garthwaite, P. H. (1994). An interpretation of partial least squares. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89(425), 122–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1994.10476452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00407
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou, S. N. (1996). Parental involvement: Definition and outcomes. Social Psychology of Education, 1(3), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02339890
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, A. R. (2002). Parental involvement: Its contribution to high school students’ motivation. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 75(3), 132–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650209599252
   Google Scholar
• Gorard, S., & See, B. H. (2009). The impact of socio-economic status on participation and attainment in science. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 93–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260802681821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halim, L., Abd Rahman, N., Zamri, R., & Mohtar, L. (2018). The roles of parents in cultivating children’s interest towards science learning and careers. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(2), 190–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Hartas, D. (2011). Families’ social backgrounds matter: Socio-economic factors, home learning and young children’s language, literacy and social outcomes. British Educational Research Journal, 37(6), 893–914. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.506945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashim, K. F., Tan, F. B., & Rashid, A. (2015). Adult learners’ intention to adopt mobile learning: A motivational perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heflin, H., Shewmaker, J., & Nguyen, J. (2017). Impact of mobile technology on student attitudes, engagement, and learning. Computers & Education, 107, 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høgheim, S., & Federici, R. A. (2020). Interest in teacher education: Exploring the relation between student teacher interest and ambitions in teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1860006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Liu, M. C., Ho, H. Y., & Chen, Y. L. (2014). Using a “prediction–observation–explanation” inquiry model to enhance student interest and intention to continue science learning predicted by their Internet cognitive failure. Computers & Education, 72, 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Battiato, A. C., Walker, J. M., Reed, R. P., DeJong, J. M., & Jones, K. P. (2001). Parental involvement in homework. Educational Psychologist, 36(3), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3603_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornby, G., & Lafaele, R. (2011). Barriers to parental involvement in education: An explanatory model. Educational Review, 63(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2010.488049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, H.-M. (2002). Toward constructivism for adult learners in online learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48–59. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26458506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, A., Masrek, M. N., Mahmood, K., & Qutab, S. (2017). Factors influencing the adoption of digital reference services among the university librarians in Pakistan. The Electronic Library, 35(6), 1225–1246. https://doi.org/10.1108/el-05-2016-0112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khechine, H., Raymond, B., & Augier, M. (2020). The adoption of a social learning system: Intrinsic value in the UTAUT model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2306–2325. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock, N., & Lynn, G. S. (2012, September 26). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2152644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krapp, A. (1999). Interest, motivation and learning: An educational-psychological perspective. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Baert, H. (2013). The learning intentions of low-qualified employees: A multilevel approach. Adult Education Quarterly, 63(2), 165–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713612454324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, E. Y. H., & Lee, K. (2021). Parents’ views on young children’s distance learning and screen time during COVID-19 class suspension in Hong Kong. Early Education and Development, 32(6), 863–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2020.1843925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q., & Luximon, Y. (2016). Older adults and digital technology: A study of user perception and usage behavior. In Advances in physical ergonomics and human factors (pp. 155–163). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, A. C., Fernandez, W. D., & Gregor, S. (2012). Understanding web enjoyment experiences and informal learning: A study in a museum context. Decision Support Systems, 53(4), 846–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y., Wang, S., Wu, Q., & Chen, L. (2019). Key technologies and solutions of remote distributed virtual laboratory for E-learning and E-education. Mobile Networks and Applications, 24(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-018-1130-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D., & Blackie, R. A. (2012). Action control, motivated strategies, and integrative motivation as predictors of language learning affect and the intention to continue learning French. System, 40(4), 533–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marjoribanks, K. (1996). Family learning environments and students’ outcomes: A review. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 27(2), 373–394. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.27.2.373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazer, J. P. (2012). Development and validation of the student interest and engagement scales. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(2), 99–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2012.679244
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, A., Morris, N. P., Swinnerton, B., & Homer, M. (2019). The influence of values on E-learning adoption. Computers & Education, 141, article number 103617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melesk, K. (2020). Combining learning with family responsibilities: European women in comparative perspective. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 41(7/8), 826–841. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-05-2020-0194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, article number 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mohammadi, H. (2015). Investigating users’ perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). E-learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, T. A. (2010). Anytime/anywhere online learning: Does it remove barriers for adult learners? In T. Kidd (Ed.), Online education and adult learning: New frontiers for teaching practices (pp. 115–123). Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Muali, C., Islam, S., Bali, M. E. I., Baharun, H., Mundiri, A., Jasri, M., & Fauzi, A. (2018). Free online learning based on rich internet applications; The experimentation of critical thinking about student learning style. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1114(1), 012024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1114/1/012024
   Google Scholar
• Müller, F. H., & Louw, J. (2004). Learning environment, motivation and interest: Perspectives on self-determination theory. South African Journal of Psychology, 34(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/008124630403400201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musgrove, F., & Taylor, P. H. (2011). Society and the teacher's role (Vol. 228). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2017). Mobile-based assessment: Investigating the factors that influence behavioral intention to use. Computers & Education, 109, 56–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Offir, B., Barth, I., Lev, Y., & Shteinbok, A. (2003). Teacher–student interactions and learning outcomes in a distance learning environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00162-8
   Google Scholar
• Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., & Sharma, D. (2018). Online learning: Adoption, continuance, and learning outcome—A review of literature. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J. H., & Choi, H. J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 207–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrova, K., & Li, C. (2009). Focus and setting in mobile learning research: a review of the literature. Paper presented at the meeting of the IBIMA 2009, Kuala Lumpur.
   Google Scholar
• Petter, S., Straub, D, & Rai, A. (2007). Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS quarterly, 31(4), 623–656. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plug, E., & Vijverberg, W. (2003). Schooling, family background, and adoption: Is it nature or is it nurture? Journal of Political Economy, 111(3), 611–641. https://doi.org/10.1086/374185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieto, J. C. S., Migueláñez, S. O., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2014). Mobile learning adoption from informal into formal: An extended TAM model to measure mobile acceptance among teachers. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, Salamanca, Spain (pp. 595–602). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Rahmi, B. A. K. I., Birgoren, B., & Aktepe, A. (2018). A meta analysis of factors affecting perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in the adoption of e-learning systems. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 19(4), 4–42. http://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.471649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renninger, K. A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation (pp. 373–404). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012619070-0/50035-0
   Google Scholar
• Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., Krapp, A., & Renninger, A. (2014). The role of interest in learning and development. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, M., Menezes, I., & Ferreira, P. D. (2018). Validating the formative nature of psychological empowerment construct: Testing cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and relational empowerment components. Journal of Community Psychology, 46(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saadé, R., & Bahli, B. (2005). The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 42(2), 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleem, M., Kamarudin, S., Shoaib, H. M., & Nasar, A. (2021). Influence of augmented reality app on intention towards e-learning amidst COVID-19 pandemic. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1919147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salta, K., Paschalidou, K., Tsetseri, M., & Koulougliotis, D. (2021). Shift from a traditional to a distance learning environment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Science and Education, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00234-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U. (2009). Situational and individual interest. In K. R. Wenzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 197–222). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Seginer, R., & Vermulst, A. D. (2002). Family environment, educational aspirations, and academic achievement in two cultural settings. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(6), 540–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220022102238268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sha, L., Schunn, C., Bathgate, M., & Ben-Eliyahu, A. (2016). Families support their children’s success in science learning by influencing interest and self-efficacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(3), 450–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenoy, V., Mahendra, S., & Vijay, N. (2020). COVID 19 lockdown technology adaption, teaching, learning, students engagement and faculty experience. Mukt Shabd Journal, 9(4), 698–702.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, K. L., & Cappel, J. J. (2006). Students’ perceptions of online learning: A comparative study. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 5(1), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.28945/243
   Google Scholar
• Straub, E. T. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625–649. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., & Gao, F. (2020). An investigation of the influence of intrinsic motivation on students’ intention to use mobile devices in language learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1181–1198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09733-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobias, S. (1994). Interest, prior knowledge, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064001037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toli, G., & Kallery, M. (2021). Enhancing student interest to promote learning in science: The case of the concept of energy. Education Sciences, 11(5), 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, Y. H., Lin, C. H., Hong, J. C., & Tai, K. H. (2018). The effects of metacognition on online learning interest and continuance to learn with MOOCs. Computers and Education, 121, 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker-Drob, E. M., & Briley, D. A. (2012). Socioeconomic status modifies interest-knowledge associations among adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., & Ackerman, P. L. (2000). A longitudinal field investigation of gender differences in individual technology adoption decision-making processes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83(1), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2896
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watjatrakul, B. (2020). Intention to adopt online learning: The effects of perceived value and moderating roles of personality traits. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 37(1-2), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-03-2019-0040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, K., Martin, M., & Patterson, B. (2001). Teacher behavior, student interest and affective learning: Putting theory to practice. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880128101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widyasari, Y. D. L., Nugroho, L. E. & Permanasari, A. E. (2019). Persuasive technology for enhanced learning behavior in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0142-5
   Google Scholar
• Wyant, J., & Baek, J. H. (2019). Re-thinking technology adoption in physical education. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education, 10(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/25742981.2018.1514983
   Google Scholar
• Yadav, S. K., & Joseph, D. (2020). Prioritising critical failure factors for the adoption of ERP system using TOPSIS method. International Journal of Operational Research, 39(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJOR.2020.109753
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Wen, H., Li, D., Fu, Z., & Cui, S. (2010). E-learning adoption intention and its key influence factors based on innovation adoption theory. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 51(11-12), 1428–1432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2009.11.013
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, J., & Li, S. (2020). What drives students’ intention to use tablet computers: An extended technology acceptance model. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, article number 101612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar