Examining Taiwanese university students’ multimodal multiple text comprehension: individual differences and epistemic prompting

References

• Anmarkrud, Ø, Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2014). Multiple-documents literacy: Strategic processing, source awareness, and argumentation when reading multiple conflicting documents. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barak, M., Ashkar, T., & Dori, Y. J. (2011). Learning science via animated movies: Its effect on students’ thinking and motivation. Computers & Education, 56(3), 839–846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, D. S., Marzouk, F., Chulak-Oglu, K., Bennett, D., Tierney, P., & O’Keeffe, G. W. (2016). Anatomy education for the YouTube generation. Anatomical Sciences Education, 9(1), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., & Ka’adan, I. (2017). Learning to integrate divergent information sources: The interplay of epistemic cognition and epistemic metacognition. Metacognition and Learning, 12(2), 193–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-016-9165-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., Zohar, A. R., & Mor-Hagani, S. (2018). Promoting integration of multiple texts: A review of instructional approaches and practices. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 973–999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9436-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braasch, J. L., & Bråten, I. (2017). The discrepancy-induced source comprehension (D-ISC) model: Basic assumptions and preliminary evidence. Educational Psychologist, 52(3), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1323219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Anmarkrud, Ø, Brandmo, C., & Strømsø, H. I. (2014). Developing and testing a model of direct and indirect relationships between individual differences, processing, and multiple-text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 30, 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293–332. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, I.-J. (2016). Hypertext glosses for foreign language reading comprehension and vocabulary acquisition: Effects of assessment methods. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.983935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, J. (2019). Most common languages used on the internet as of April 2019, by share of internet users. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/262946/share-of-the-most-common-languages-on-the-internet/.
   Google Scholar
• Cromley, J. G. (2018). Introduction to the special issue: Desiderata for a theory of multi-source multi-modal comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 57, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, S. M., Martin-Beltrán, M., Peercy, M. M., & Silverman, R. (2016). Moving beyondYes or No: Shifting from over-scaffolding to contingent scaffolding in literacy instruction With emergent bilingual students. TESOL Journal, 7(2), 393–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M., & Paas, F. (2010). Attention guidance in learning from a complex animation: Seeing is understanding? Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeStefano, D., & LeFevre, J. A. (2007). Cognitive load in hypertext reading: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1616–1641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erçetin, G. (2010). Effects of topic interest and prior knowledge on text recall and annotation use in reading a hypermedia text in the L2. ReCALL, 22(2), 228–246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344010000091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glogger-Frey, I., Gaus, K., & Renkl, A. (2017). Learning from direct instruction: Best prepared by several self-regulated or guided invention activities? Learning and Instruction, 51, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen, Å.M., Braasch, J.L. and Bråten, I. (2014). Relationships between spontaneous note-taking, self-reported strategies and comprehension when reading multiple texts in different task conditions. Journal of Research in Reading, 37, S. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01533.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hailikari, T., Katajavuori, N., & Lindblom-Ylanne, S. (2008). The relevance of prior knowledge in learning and instructional design. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72(5), 113. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj7205113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A., & Donoghue, G. M. (2016). Learning strategies: A synthesis and conceptual model. Npj Science of Learning, 1(1), 16013. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S. (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 509–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9054-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kammerer, Y., Meier, N., & Stahl, E. (2016). Fostering secondary-school students’ intertext model formation when reading a set of websites: The effectiveness of source prompts. Computers & Education, 102, 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. M., & Hannafin, M. J. (2016). Synergies: Effects of source representation and goal instructions on evidence quality, reasoning, and conceptual integration during argumentation-driven inquiry. Instructional Science, 44(5), 441–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9381-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchner, K. S. (1983). Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition. Human Development, 26(4), 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1159/000272885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, S., Rienties, B., Littleton, K., Mitsui, M., Tempelaar, D., & Shah, C. (2017). The relationship of (perceived) epistemic cognition to interaction with resources on the internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 507–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, K. (2009). Comprehension of relations among controversial texts: Effects of external strategy use. Instructional Science, 37(4), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9041-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kombartzky, U., Ploetzner, R., Schlag, S., & Metz, B. (2010). Developing and evaluating a strategy for learning from animations. Learning and Instruction, 20(5), 424–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühl, T., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., & Edelmann, J. (2011). The influence of text modality on learning with static and dynamic visualizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-H. (2018a). Scripting to enhance university students’ critical thinking in flipped learning: Implications of the delayed effect on science reading literacy. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(5), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1372483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-H. (2018b). Internet-based epistemic beliefs, engagement in online activities, and intention for constructivist ICT integration among pre-service teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(5), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. Y., & List, A. (2019). Processing of texts and videos: A strategy-focused analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(2), 268–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-H. (2021). Scaffolding university students’ epistemic cognition during multimodal multiple-document reading: The effects of the epistemic prompting and the automated reflection report. The Internet and Higher Education, 49, 100777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J. J. H., Lee, Y.-H., Wang, D.-Y., & Lin, S. S. J. (2016). Reading subtitles and taking enotes while learning scientific materials in a multimedia environment: Cognitive load perspectives on EFL students. Educational Technology & Society, 19(4), 47–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, L., & Atkinson, R. K. (2011). Using animations and visual cueing to support learning of scientific concepts and processes. Computers & Education, 56(3), 650–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, A. (2018). Strategies for comprehending and integrating texts and videos. Learning and Instruction, 57, 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, A., & Alexander, P. A. (2019). Toward an integrated framework of multiple text use. Educational Psychologist, 54(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1505514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, A., Stephens, L. A., & Alexander, P. A. (2019). Examining interest throughout multiple text use. Reading and Writing, 32(2), 307–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9863-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madrid, R. I., Van Oostendorp, H., & Melguizo, M. C. P. (2009). The effects of the number of links and navigation support on cognitive load and learning with hypertext: The mediating role of reading order. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L. (2018). Multiplicity in the digital era: Processing and learning from multiple sources and modalities of instructional presentations. Learning and Instruction, 57, 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L., Boldrin, A., & Ariasi, N. (2010). Searching the Web to learn about a controversial topic: Are students epistemically active? Instructional Science, 38(6), 607–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9089-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L., Junyent, A. A., & Tornatora, M. C. (2014). Epistemic evaluation and comprehension of web-source information on controversial science-related topics: Effects of a short-term instructional intervention. Computers & Education, 76, 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., Mathias, A., & Wetzell, K. (2002). Fostering understanding of multimedia messages through pre-training: Evidence for a two-stage theory of mental model construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8(3), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-898x.8.3.147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghavvemi, S., Sulaiman, A., Jaafar, N. I., & Kasem, N. (2018). Social media as a complementary learning tool for teaching and learning: The case of YouTube. The International Journal of Management Education, 16(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, R., & Nielsen, W. (2017). Development and validation of a social media and science learning survey. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(1), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2016.1161255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (Ed.). (2016). Pisa 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematic and financial literacy. Organization For Economic Co-Operation & Development.
   Google Scholar
• Q-Success. (2019). Usage of content languages for websites. Web Technology Surveys. https://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/content_language.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (3.5) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Roever, C., & Pan, Y.-C. (2008). Test review: GEPT: General English proficiency test. Language Testing, 25(3), 403–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532208090159
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, Y. (2009). The effects of an animation-based on-line learning environment on transfer of knowledge and on motivation for science and technology learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(4), 451–467. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.40.4.d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, S. (2018). Motivations to seek science videos on YouTube: Free-choice learning in a connected society. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 8(1), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2017.1371357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouet, J.-F., & Britt, M. A. (2011). Relevance processes in multiple document comprehension. In M. T. McCrudden, J. P. Magliano, & G. Schraw (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 19–52). IAP Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rupley, W. H., & Slough, S. (2010). Building prior knowledge and vocabulary in science in the intermediate grades: Creating hooks for learning. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49(2), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070902780472
   Google Scholar
• Salmerón, L., & Kammerer, Y. (2012). Selecting pages from google to learn about a controversial topic: The role of epistemic beliefs. Staging Knowledge and Experience: How to Take Advantage of Representational Technologies in Education and Training? 181–183.
   Google Scholar
• Schleinschok, K., Eitel, A., & Scheiter, K. (2017). Do drawing tasks improve monitoring and control during learning from text? Learning and Instruction, 51, 10–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W. (2014). Integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of multimedia learning: Vol (pp. 72–103). Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Shams, L., & Seitz, A. R. (2008). Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2007). Dealing with multiple documents on the WWW: The role of metacognition in the formation of documents models. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9015-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2008). Effects of the metacognitive computer-tool met.a.ware on the web search of laypersons. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 716–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., & Ferguson, L. E. (2013). Spontaneous sourcing among students reading multiple documents. Cognition and Instruction, 31(2), 176–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2013.769994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, S. A., & Puntambekar, S. (2015). Learning with digital texts: Exploring the impact of prior domain knowledge and reading comprehension ability on navigation and learning outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4.
   Google Scholar
• van Riesen, S. A., Gijlers, H., Anjewierden, A., & de Jong, T. (2018). The influence of prior knowledge on experiment design guidance in a science inquiry context. International Journal of Science Education, 40(11), 1327–1344. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1477263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J. R. (2012). GEPT and English language teaching and testing in Taiwan. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(1), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.553251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J.-Y., & Xie, C. (2018). Using time pressure and note-taking to prevent digital distraction behavior and enhance online search performance: Perspectives from the load theory of attention and cognitive control. Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 244–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar